CM/GC Overview
CM/GC Plan & Status
Systems Description
Cost Estimate
Construction Schedule
Risks and Challenges
Summary
April 8, 2005
CM/GC Overview
David Saenz
saenzd@slac.stanford.edu
CM/GC Plan
Why do we need a CMGC (Construction
Manager & General Contractor)
SLAC does not have the in-house expertise to
independently manage a project of this
magnitude
April 8, 2005
CM/GC Overview
David Saenz
saenzd@slac.stanford.edu
CM/GC Plan
SOW for CM/GC has been
developed and continues to have
the highest priority in the CF group
as largest stand-alone
procurement in the LCLS project
Currently being reviewed by SLAC SO
DOE
Comments being updated as we
speak
Once approved by SLAC SO DOE,
the plan is to submit to DOE
Headquarters for approval (Chicago
→ DC)
Once plan is approved, there will not
be a need to go back for multiple
review and approval of bid packages
April 8, 2005
CM/GC Overview
David Saenz
saenzd@slac.stanford.edu
CM/GC Plan – cont’d
Advanced
Procurement
Plan (APP)
has been
written and
continues to
be updated
as necessary
(signed copy
on LCLS
website)
Advertisement placed in construction
periodical – ENR Magazine Jan/Feb
Meeting planned Milestones are
crucial!
April 8, 2005
CM/GC Overview
David Saenz
saenzd@slac.stanford.edu
CM/GC Plan – cont’d
CM/GC services will be solicited as firm-fixed price
contracts
Phase 1 – preconstruction services
Phase 2 – construction services of underground and
major excavation effort, and construction services of
above ground buildings
CM/GC Award 6/30/05
CM/GC qualifications – partial list
Technical competence
Similar previous experience
Successful history using second and third tier subcontractors
Financial strength
April 8, 2005
CM/GC Overview
David Saenz
saenzd@slac.stanford.edu
CM/GC Plan – cont’d
Outstanding safety record
LCLS has
decided to
place all
contractors
working on
projects to
have an
EMR of
<.81, go
no-go
Experience Modification Rate (EMR) <.81
EMR 1.0 indicates that a company submits injury claims that are
considered average among their industry group
EMR > 1.0 indicated that the company files more claims than other
similar companies
EMR<0.81 indicates that the company had filed fewer claims than
those compared against similar companies
Injury frequency and severity rates
Safety Program evaluation and evaluations of the key personnel
OSHA citation history
References from previous projects
Evaluation of the contractors’ integration of safety into their work
practices
April 8, 2005
CM/GC Overview
David Saenz
saenzd@slac.stanford.edu
CMGC P3 Schedule
April 8, 2005
CM/GC Overview
David Saenz
saenzd@slac.stanford.edu
CM/GC Phase 1 Effort
Phase 1 – preconstruction activities to
include:
Provide effective overlap period and oversight of
effort during Title II
Estimates during Title II
CPM Schedule
Identify lead-time for critical items
Design coordination
Constructability reviews
Value Engineering reviews
Site investigation
April 8, 2005
CM/GC Overview
David Saenz
saenzd@slac.stanford.edu
CM/GC Phase 1 Effort – cont’d
Develop Project Management Plan (PMP)
Construction Management Plan – outlines project
scope, organization, and specific approach to
accomplish project
Project Safety Plan – project specific identifying job
hazards, safety performance and individuals
responsible for project safety
Procurement Plan – identifies systems, methods and
procedures for solicitation to subcontractors
Quality Control and Assurance Plan – method of
controlling time, cost and quality of various
management tasks specific to the project
April 8, 2005
CM/GC Overview
David Saenz
saenzd@slac.stanford.edu
CM/GC Phase 1 Effort – cont’d
Develop construction bid packages
Develop list and contact potential bidders
Develop prequalification criteria
Solicit bids
Recommend award to SLAC for approval
of subcontractor
Award contract to subcontractors
April 8, 2005
CM/GC Overview
David Saenz
saenzd@slac.stanford.edu
CM/GC Phase 2 Effort
Phase 2 – CM/GC shall provide all materials,
labor, and services required to construct the
Project
All general conditions including field personnel,
office staff, temporary offices, temporary
construction, safety implementation,
construction equipment, coordination of all subs,
project administration, construction waste
management, commissioning
April 8, 2005
CM/GC Overview
David Saenz
saenzd@slac.stanford.edu
Below Grade Plan
Beam
Transport Hall
Undulator
Hall
April 8, 2005
CM/GC Overview
Near Hall
XRTDT
Far Hall
David Saenz
saenzd@slac.stanford.edu
New Facilities (below grade)
Beam Transport Hall –
227m long above grade
facility to transport the
electron beam through the
existing RSY
Electron Beam Dump –
40m long underground
facility used to separate the
electron and x-ray beams
Undulator Hall – 175m long
underground tunnel housing
undulators and ancillary
equipment
Central Lab Office
Complex – office facility to
house ~ 300 LCLS
researchers, engineers,
technicians, administrative
staff and visiting
experimentalists
Far Experimental Hall –
underground
cavern/tunnels to house 3
experimental hutches, prep
and shop space
Front End Enclosure – 30m
long underground facility to
house various diagnostic
equipment in support of the
photon beam
Near Experimental Hall –
underground facility whose
primary function is to house 3
experimental hutches, prep
and shops
X-Ray Transport &
Diagnostics Tunnel – 250m
long underground tunnel
used to transport photon
beams from NEH to FEH
April 8, 2005
CM/GC Overview
David Saenz
saenzd@slac.stanford.edu
LCLS Site Plan
Spear
Future
Office
Space
Undulator Hall
Research Yard
Pep Ring Road
SLC
Office Complex
Survey Tower
NEH
Beam
Transport
Hall
SLC Tunnel
Future
Beam Lines
Beam Dump
Front End
Enclosure
X-Ray Transport
Pep Tunnel
April 8, 2005
CM/GC Overview
David Saenz
saenzd@slac.stanford.edu
BEAM TRANSPORT HALL
• IN RESEARCH YARD
• 227 M LONG
• 15’ x 14’-9” (W x H)
• 63 M HEADHOUSE
• 72” THICK WALLS
• 48” THICK CEILING
• 3 SERVICE AREAS
• ENDS IN HEADWALL
• HEADWALL LABYRINTH
April 8, 2005
CM/GC Overview
David Saenz
saenzd@slac.stanford.edu
BEAM TRANSPORT HALL
UNDULATOR HALL
• UNDER HILL
• 175 M LONG
• 21’-11” x 14’-6” (W x H)
• 33 UNDULATORS
• HEAVY GRANITE SLABS
• MONOLITHIC FLOOR
• THERMAL BARRIERS
April 8, 2005
CM/GC Overview
David Saenz
saenzd@slac.stanford.edu
BEAM TRANSPORT HALL
UNDULATOR HALL
ELECTRON BEAM DUMP
• UNDER PEP RING RD.
• 40 M LONG
• 15’ x 12’-6” (W x H)
• CAST-IN-PLACE
• GROOVED FLOORS
• E-BEAM DIPS DOWN
• HEAVY METAL SHEILD
April 8, 2005
CM/GC Overview
David Saenz
saenzd@slac.stanford.edu
BEAM TRANSPORT HALL
UNDULATOR HALL
ELECTRON BEAM DUMP
FRONT END ENCLOSURE
• EAST OF BEAM DUMP
• 29 M LONG
• BETWEEN SHEILDS
• 15’ x 12’-6” (W x H)
• CAST-IN-PLACE
• NUMEROUS EQUIP.
April 8, 2005
CM/GC Overview
David Saenz
saenzd@slac.stanford.edu
BEAM TRANSPORT HALL
UNDULATOR HALL
ELECTRON BEAM DUMP
FRONT END ENCLOSURE
NEAR EXPERIMENTAL HALL
• EAST OF FEE
• 39 M LONG
• 2 FLOORS
• 3 HUTCHES
• LASER BAY (ABOVE)
• CLOC FACILITY ABOVE
• PREP & CONTROL AREA
• FREIGHT ELEVATOR
• CUT & FILL TECHNIQUE
April 8, 2005
CM/GC Overview
David Saenz
saenzd@slac.stanford.edu
BEAM TRANSPORT HALL
UNDULATOR HALL
ELECTRON BEAM DUMP
FRONT END ENCLOSURE
NEAR EXPERIMENTAL HALL
NEH HUTCHES
• WITHIN NEH
• TOTAL 3 (CURRENT)
• ANOTHER 3 (FUTURE)
• 10 M x 10 M
• SHEILDING NEEDED
• HEAVY SLIDING DOOR
April 8, 2005
CM/GC Overview
David Saenz
saenzd@slac.stanford.edu
BEAM TRANSPORT HALL
UNDULATOR HALL
ELECTRON BEAM DUMP
FRONT END ENCLOSURE
NEAR EXPERIMENTAL HALL
X-RAY TRANSPORT TUNNEL
• EAST OF NEH
• 250 M LONG
• 18’ WIDE CONSTANT
• BEAM SPLITS IN THREE
• LABYRINTH TO FEH
• WALKWAY ALONG BEAM
April 8, 2005
CM/GC Overview
David Saenz
saenzd@slac.stanford.edu
BEAM TRANSPORT HALL
UNDULATOR HALL
ELECTRON BEAM DUMP
FRONT END ENCLOSURE
NEAR EXPERIMENTAL HALL
X-RAY TRANSPORT TUNNEL
FAR EXPERIMENTAL HALL
• END OF X-RAY TUNNEL
• 29 M LONG
• 2 CAVERN/TUNNELS
• 31’ x 21’ (W x H)
• CONNECTING TUNNELS
• OFFICES IN EXTENDED
CAVERN
• ACCESS TUNNEL
April 8, 2005
CM/GC Overview
David Saenz
saenzd@slac.stanford.edu
CLOC
Exterior
CLOC
FloorElevations
Plans
• Headcount of
CLOC Personnel
= 284
• Capacity of Conf
Center = 150
• Gross square
footage of CLOC
(offices and labs)
= 68,800sf
April 8, 2005
CM/GC Overview
David Saenz
saenzd@slac.stanford.edu
CLOC Exterior Elevations
April 8, 2005
CM/GC Overview
David Saenz
saenzd@slac.stanford.edu
CF FY Total Estimated Cost
1.09 Conventional Facilities
TEC Total $76.75M
(fully burdened & escalated)
40000
35000
30000
25000
20000
15000
10000
5000
0
CMGC is responsible for ~$500K
for Phase I (Award CMGC thru
March 06) and $59.5M for Phase
II (Mar 06 thru 08)
37.15
20.11
8.98
8.36
1.72
Prior
April 8, 2005
CM/GC Overview
.43
FY05
FY06
FY07
FY08
David Saenz
saenzd@slac.stanford.edu
FY09
LCLS CF Construction Schedule
•Major construction phase FY 06 at 30
months duration
•Beneficial Occupancy dates are key to
technical system interfaces
•Site-work at NEH is key!
April 8, 2005
CM/GC Overview
•Added additional time for CM/GC
procurement phase:
DOE approval and CM/GC subcontractor
bidding phase
David Saenz
saenzd@slac.stanford.edu
Title-II Draft Schedule
This is essentially
JE 100% stage
April 8, 2005
CM/GC Overview
Title II Milestones
Due Dates
Kick-Off Meeting
28 Mar ‘05
Freeze Design (FEH, Und, etc.)
Update Design Basis
Freeze Title II Design Schedule
08 Apr ‘05
30% Design Review (Cypress, CA)
Status Review (catch errors at this time!)
26-27 May ‘05
Value Engineering Session
Construction Cost and Schedule Estimate (revised)
16-17 Jun ‘05
60% Design Review (Stanford, CA)
Design Drawing Review
Construction Schedule Review
Construction Estimate Review
Preliminary Specifications
11-12 Aug ‘05
90% Design Review (Stanford, CA)
Design Drawings
Specifications
Calculations
Construction Estimate Review
18-19 Oct ‘05
SLAC Review & Approval
Safety Committees Review & Approval
Stanford University Review & Approval
Incorporate Comments into Final Design
20 Oct ’05 thru
23 Nov ‘05
100% Title II Complete
30 Nov ‘05
Interactive
Planning
session is
scheduled
for April
13,14
(6/05) CMGC has
real value added
input early during
design phase
David Saenz
saenzd@slac.stanford.edu
Risks and Challenges
Construction Safety
All construction activities to comply with Federal
and State environmental, safety, health and building
codes
Subcontractor activities
In-house activities
SLAC will approve construction safety program
prior to start of construction
Enhanced construction program is a must
Special consideration is being addressed
Tunnel construction
RSY due to the congestion in the area
April 8, 2005
CM/GC Overview
David Saenz
saenzd@slac.stanford.edu
Risks and Challenges – cont’d
Bay area construction market
Materials
Labor
Schedule concerns
Annual lab shut-down periods
Schedule for site characterization & remediation
FFTB decommissioning
On-site support
April 8, 2005
CM/GC Overview
David Saenz
saenzd@slac.stanford.edu
Summary
Confidence is high for the successful
implementation of the model chosen as it has
already been proved at LBNL Molecular
Foundry
CMGC holds the paper
Actual cost will be determined by competitive
bids from subcontractors
Total estimated pricing established by SLAC
April 8, 2005
CM/GC Overview
David Saenz
saenzd@slac.stanford.edu
End of presentation
April 8, 2005
CM/GC Overview
David Saenz
saenzd@slac.stanford.edu
Additional data
All subcontractor bids and award of contracts will be
pre-approved by SLAC
Subcontractor bid award amounts added to CM/GC
contract
Technical Documents:
CM/GC Statement of Work
General Requirements (01010)
Special Requirements (01210)
Schedules (01325)
Construction Waste Management (01570)
Schedule of Performance Milestones
April 8, 2005
CM/GC Overview
David Saenz
saenzd@slac.stanford.edu