Linac Coherent Light Source Project Update
Incident
Budget
Schedule
Project activities- Highlights
Charge
7 April 2005
LCLS Facility Advisory Committee
John N. Galayda
galayda@slac.stanford.edu
11 October 2004-Worker Severely Injured
Sector 20 Equipment Alcove
Electrician employed by “Bay Span”
Working “hot” on a breaker panel – 480V
Short-to-ground, arc/explosion
Worker’s shirt caught fire
Burned over ~50% - upper body, hands
Discharged from hospital 16 December 2004
7 April 2005
LCLS Facility Advisory Committee
John N. Galayda
galayda@slac.stanford.edu
Safety Management
Mike Scharfenstein, LCLS ES&H
Coordinator
SLAC corrective actions defining path
forward for LCLS
Policies/procedures for management of
contractor safety are important to LCLS
7 April 2005
LCLS Facility Advisory Committee
John N. Galayda
galayda@slac.stanford.edu
Conventional Construction Safety
Richard Hislop ( ANL Advanced Photon
Source) working with LCLS through 9/2005
APS Project Construction ES&H
Line Construction Management
APS Lab Office Modules
APS Utilities expansion
Center for Nanoscale Materials
7 April 2005
LCLS Facility Advisory Committee
John N. Galayda
galayda@slac.stanford.edu
LCLS - Estimated Cost, Schedule (My Standard LowResolution Slide
$315M Total Estimated Cost
$379M Total Project Cost
FY2005 Long-lead purchases for injector, undulator
FY2006 Construction begins
FY2008 FEL Commissioning begins
March 2009 Construction complete – operations begins
CD-0
CD-1 CD-2a
Title I
Design CD-2b
Complete
XFEL
Commissioning
CD-3b
CD-3a
FY2001
FY2002
FY2003
2002
2003
FY2004
Project Engineering Design
2004
FY2005
Long-Lead
Procurement
2005
FY2006
2006
FY2007
FY2008
Operation
Construction
CD-3a
7 April 2005
LCLS Facility Advisory Committee
FY2009
CD-4
John N. Galayda
galayda@slac.stanford.edu
FY2005 – Start Long-Lead Procurements
Linac Coherent Light Source BCWS Profile (AYM$)
WBS
System
FY02
FY03
September 2004
FY04
FY05
FY06
1.1 Project Mgmt., Admin. & Integration
0.00
1.43
2.50
6.61
1.2 Injector System
0.00
0.64
1.60
1.3 Linac System
0.00
0.18
1.17
1.4 Undulator System
0.00
0.57
1.5 X-Ray Transport & Diagnostics
0.00
0.70
1.6 X-Ray Endstations
0.00
1.9 Conventional Facilities
0.00
Estimated Base Cost
Contingency
% Contingency
FY07
FY08
FY09
Total
5.82
4.70
4.03
1.92
27.02
9.34
4.86
0.93
0.26
0.05
17.67
3.37
11.25
8.43
2.16
0.43
27.01
1.90
6.88
23.61
13.78
1.45
0.09
48.28
0.75
2.81
6.59
6.87
7.59
0.62
25.93
0.00
0.46
0.39
1.61
6.59
6.45
0.50
15.99
0.11
1.44
6.17
23.54
34.19
8.74
0.40
74.59
0.00
3.64
9.82
35.57
77.27
75.50
30.68
4.01
236.49
0.00
0.00
0.01
14.51
8.27
30.00
19.82
6.00
78.52
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
40.8%
10.7%
39.7%
64.6%
149.7%
35.2%
Total Estimated Cost (Base + Contingency)
0.00
3.64
9.83
50.08
85.54
105.50
50.50
10.00
315.00
2.1 Project Mgmt., Admin. & Integration
1.50
0.00
0.67
1.86
1.35
4.71
9.46
19.33
38.88
2.2 Injector System
0.00
0.00
0.44
0.70
0.24
3.63
0.65
0.34
5.99
2.3 Linac System
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.10
1.11
0.34
2.54
2.4 Undulator System
0.00
0.29
0.45
5.40
0.38
0.34
6.87
0.97
5.97
0.12
3.52
0.00
0.00
Authorized
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.78
FY2005
2.6 X-Ray Endstations
0.00
0.00
0.00
President’s
0.95
0.40
0.75
2.12
FY2006
0.00 Budget
1.09
0.51
1.81
2.9 Conventional Facilities
2.5 X-Ray Transport & Diagnostics
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.21
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.21
Other Project Costs
1.50
0.00
1.91
4.00
3.53
16.09
15.52
21.41
63.97
Total Project Costs (Base + Cont. + OPC)
1.50
3.64
11.74
54.08
89.08
121.59
66.02
31.41
378.97
Linac Coherent Light Source Funding Profile (AYM$)
FY02
TEC Funding
OPC Funding
Total Funding
7 April 2005
LCLS Facility Advisory Committee
FY03
0.00
1.50
1.50
FY04
5.93
0.00
5.93
7.46
2.00
9.46
FY05
FY06
FY07
FY08
FY09
Total
50.08
85.54
105.50
50.50
10.00
315.00
4.00
3.50
16.00
15.50
21.50
64.00
54.08
89.04
121.50
66.00
31.50
379.00
John N. Galayda
galayda@slac.stanford.edu
EIR
Thanks to Mark Reichanadter for his tireless efforts
to close out the 5/10/2004-3/31/2005 External
Independent Review
It is possible that it will be over soon (famous last
words)
ESAAB for CD-2B (approval of the baseline for the
entire project) Scheduled for 8 April 2005
7 April 2005
LCLS Facility Advisory Committee
John N. Galayda
galayda@slac.stanford.edu
Ultrafast Science and LCLS Experiments – 120 Attendees, all prospective users
Organizers: Jerry Hastings and Keith Hodgson
Monday-Tuesday, October 25-26 For program information see: http://www-conf.slac.stanford.edu/ssrl/2004/lcls_workshop.htm
A Workshop in Ultrafast Science and LCLS Experiments at SSRL will be organized on October 25-26, 2004.
There will also be a pre-registration reception on Sunday evening, October 24th from 5-7 pm. The tentative
schedule for the workshop is a joint session on Monday morning, October 25th. On Monday afternoon and
Tuesday morning, there will be breakout sessions for each of the five thrust areas of the LCLS:
(1) Atomic, molecular and optical physics
(2) High energy density states of matter
(3) Optical pump-x-ray probe studies in chemistry, biology and materials science
(4) Diffraction imaging of single objects approaching atomic scale resolution and
(5) Coherent x-ray scattering for the study of dynamics (X-ray photon correlation spectroscopy)
The workshop will end with a joint session on Tuesday afternoon, October 26th. The workshop and breakout
sessions will focus on the scientific goals and technical needs of the LCLS experimental end-stations, as
well as experimental specifications. This workshop provides an opportunity to all users, including potential
future users to participate in building ultrafast science at LCLS by providing input and sharing their scientific
ideas.
For atomic, molecular and optical physics breakout session at the meeting please contact
Lou DiMauro (dimauro@bnl.gov)
Phil Bucksbaum (phb@umich.edu)
Nora Berrah (berrah@wmich.edu)
Jerry Hastings (jbh@slac.stanford.edu)
For the other breakout thrust areas please contact
John Arthur (jarthur@SLAC.Stanford.EDU).
7 April 2005
LCLS Facility Advisory Committee
John N. Galayda
galayda@slac.stanford.edu
Scientific Advisory Committee Meeting
27-28 October
Start of CD-1 activity
Presentations by each Team Leader
Near- and Long-term goals
Performance requirements, near- and long-term
Intensity, repetition rate
Wavelength
Commissioning likely to progress from 1.5 to 0.15 nm
Time scale for production of conceptual design (CD-1)
7 April 2005
LCLS Facility Advisory Committee
John N. Galayda
galayda@slac.stanford.edu
PIXEL Initiative to build out LCLS Experiments
Thrust areas:
SSRL/LCLS Contact
(1) Coherent scattering at
the nanoscale
G.B. Stephenson*
K. Ludwig
S. Brennan
(2) Pump/probe diffraction
dynamics
K. Gaffney*
D. Reis
J. Larsson
A. Lindenberg
(3) High energy density
(HED) physics
R. Lee*
P. Heimann
J. B. Hastings
(4) Nano-particle/single
molecule(non-periodic)
imaging
J. Hajdu*
J. Miao
H. Chapman
J. Arthur
(5) Atomic, molecular,
L. DiMauro*
J. B. Hastings
and optical science
N. Berrah
* Team leader
7 April 2005
LCLS Facility Advisory Committee
John N. Galayda
galayda@slac.stanford.edu
Detector Review 28 February 2005
Detector Subcommittee formed,
recommendations received
Y. Amemiya, U. of Tokyo
Gareth Derbyshire, RAL (Chair)
Eric Eikenberry, SLS
Lothar Strueder, Max Planck Inst.
Albert Walenta,
Univ. Siegen
7 April 2005
LCLS Facility Advisory Committee
John N. Galayda
galayda@slac.stanford.edu
LCLS Injector
10/2005 Shutdown
LINAC HOUSING SIDEWALL
RF Gun
TR
UM
EN
T CH
A MB
VA
CU
EA
TM
PU
MP
S
1
F
YA C 1,
G
SP
SE O OL
AL S
FR
1
1
Transverse RF Cavity
2
EO
SC 2
QU 7
AD
QU
AD
Pb 2
10' HIGH
CONCRETE
A , B , C ARE THE DETECTOR LOCATIONS INSIDE THE LCLS INJECTOR VAULT
VA
LV
E
Fe 2
Fe 3
BEAM
LINAC HOUSING SIDEW ALL
7 April 2005
LCLS Facility Advisory Committee
QUAD
QUAD
CM4
EO3
BPM 19
SC11
B02
AD
QU
04
SC10
D
04
WS
OTR
6
Q UA
SC9
B01
AD
03
BPM 16
B PM 15
9.4
ACCELERATOR
SECTION 21-1B
DUMP
02
3" TUBE
6
B PM 18
Q S01
BP M 20
SC13
LE
01
3
5
17
PEP-2 HE/LE BYPASS
QU
VALVE
HE
4
Pb 1
BP
M
SECTION 20-8C
2
B0
SECTION 20-8B
2" TUBE
BPM
VA
14
LV
E
4
SC
12
YA
G
4
SECTION 20-8A
1
10' ACCEL
QE-901
10' ACCEL
ACCEL
BEAM
STOPPER
10'
LINAC HOUSING SIDEW ALL
P E N . 21 -1
PIC
PIC
PEN. 20-17
OT
R5
Fe 1
PEN. 20-16
PEN. 20-15
SC
8
LINAC HOUSING SIDEW ALL
3
BP
M
OT
R4
BP
M
12
Pb 3
13
0 1 , 0 2 ... ETC. ARE POINT-SOURCE LOCATIONS ALONG THE HE BYPASS LINE
BP
M
11
B
DL1 Bend
OP
PE
R
C
ST
SC
6
KE
R
RF
BSOIC
A
RA
D
LI
NA
C
OT
VA R3
LV
E
2
... ETC. ARE SIX SOURCE AREAS ALONG THE DRIFT REGION
KIC
UN
DU
LA
TO
R
TO
9
N
10
D
IF
IC
AT
IO
OT
R
M
O
OT
R
6
U
RC
E
BP
M
1 , 2
SO
Laser Heater
OR
BP
M
KEY:
10
'A
CC
EL
ER
AT
BP YA
G
M
7
3
QU
AD
1/22/2004
LI
G
HT
SI
D
EW
AL
L
QU
BP
M
AD
8
H
ER
EN
T
SC
5
C
O
HO
US
IN
G
L0-1 & L0-2
3-m SLAC Sections
3
Gun Diagnostics
YA
BP G 2
M
5
LI
NA
C
RF
Cav
.
BP
M
LINAC HOUSING SIDEW ALL
ER
AT
OR
SC
4
SC
X-Y 2
4
LI
N
AC
SC
3
BP
M
QU
AD
FC
Y A 3,
G
C
M2
QU
AD
3
10
'A
CC
EL
BP
M
FC
YA 2,
G
CM
2
10' HIGH
S2
M1
BP
M
DE
QU
A
QU D
AD
C
HO
BP
M
AT
U HV
GA AL
TE L
VA ME
LV TA
ES L
PO
HO RC
LD UPIN
ER
EC
VA
LV
E
MA
SC
G
Sp N E
QU 1 X
ec TIC
A D -Y,
tro
.
YA
G
OM
CA
T
RF H OD
GU E
N
E0
1
1
ER
LO
AS NG
SE BE
MB LL
L OW
Y
S
Load Lock
VA
LV
E
S1
Q S02
DRIFT SECTION
LINAC HOUSING SIDEW ALL
Straight Ahead Spectrometer
John N. Galayda
galayda@slac.stanford.edu
QS0 3
O TR
FC 4
Injector
Building out for bid
Laser bids, ranked
Gun in fabrication
at SLAC
Preparations for
October shutdown
Elev -35’-0”
Elev 0’-0”
Sector 20 Laser Facility
vacuum connection
to linac
7 April 2005
LCLS Facility Advisory Committee
John N. Galayda
galayda@slac.stanford.edu
Long-Lead Procurements, FY2005 - Linac
Selected Linac Systems
X-band RF system – underway
Klystron construction >50%
Chicane Magnets vendor survey
7 April 2005
LCLS Facility Advisory Committee
John N. Galayda
galayda@slac.stanford.edu
Long-Lead Procurements, FY2005 Undulator Systems
Undulator Hardware
Magnet Blocks
Magnet Poles Awarded
Strongback Awardees chosen
final negotiations near complete
Undulator Measurement Lab design complete, bid
package in preparation for room
On track for complete delivery of undulators by
June 2007
7 April 2005
LCLS Facility Advisory Committee
John N. Galayda
galayda@slac.stanford.edu
Undulator Magnet Measurement – Bldg 81
CMM
Out to
Bid
See LCLS-TN-05-04
Test stand lay-out is driven by requirement to match Earth Magnetic Field (to
~0.1G) conditions in lab to Undulator Hall, i.e. azimuth and gap orientation need
to be identical
7 April 2005
LCLS Facility Advisory Committee
John N. Galayda
galayda@slac.stanford.edu
1.5 X-ray Transport, Optics, and Diagnostics
Finally we can give
some funds
TTF damage tests
Gas cell design
Help with gun laser
pulse shaping
7 April 2005
LCLS Facility Advisory Committee
John N. Galayda
galayda@slac.stanford.edu
Undulator
Hall
(175m)
Linac-to-Undulator (227m)
Beam Dump
(40M)
Front End
(29m)
X-ray
Near Transport
Expt. (250m)
Far
Expt.
Hall
Hall
1.9 Conventional Facilities Title-II Kickoff 29-30 March 2005
We must finalize (!) Title – II specifications by 8 April
Award of CM/GC is slipping later than ideal
Complete Title-II by 30 November 2005
7 April 2005
LCLS Facility Advisory Committee
John N. Galayda
galayda@slac.stanford.edu
Alternate Far Hall Layout
14.6m
10-meter hutch length
7 April 2005
LCLS Facility Advisory Committee
John N. Galayda
galayda@slac.stanford.edu
Charge to Committee
Breakouts:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Accelerator systems design and construction
Undulator systems design and construction
X-ray transport, optics and diagnostics design and construction
Experiment station systems design and construction
Conventional facilities design and construction
Controls
Planning and execution of commissioning and early operations
Title II Conventional Facilities Design begins Monday – Consequence of building
design change goes up rapidly
•Mirrors upstream of Near Hall
•Far Hall layout
Changed PEP schedule has forced change to shut-down schedule
SLAC Radiation Physics has done some outstanding work on collimation and dose
to undulators – Committee may wish to hear about this Friday Morning
Diagnostics talk- may be repeated to Electron Beam Group
Thank you for giving your time to this review process. We value your advice
7 April 2005
LCLS Facility Advisory Committee
John N. Galayda
galayda@slac.stanford.edu
End of Presentation
7 April 2005
LCLS Facility Advisory Committee
John N. Galayda
galayda@slac.stanford.edu
7 April 2005
LCLS Facility Advisory Committee
John N. Galayda
galayda@slac.stanford.edu
X-Ray Subgroup- Paul Fuoss presenting
Issues:
Details of designs are sparse, User workshops should be aimed at
collecting more detail.
There is not enough effort going into the shot-by-shot beam diagnostics (?)
There is not enough effort going into optics stability
Consider making the center hutch in the far hall longer
Recommendations
Concentrate on LCLS-specific problems such as shot-by-shot diagnostics,
data flow, feedback control, preservation and measurement of coherence
The detector advisory committee should coordinate the effort of LCLS and
MIE
Identification and communication of critical issues to LCLS experimenters
should be a priority
Do not fund detector efforts unless resources are sufficient to produce a
useful end result
7 April 2005
LCLS Facility Advisory Committee
John N. Galayda
galayda@slac.stanford.edu
Controls
Global standards are required - push for this (vacuum? where is the interface?)
You desperately need a central database for all project data (not just controls)
SLC-aware IOC good progress prototyping, still lack functional requirements and top level
design decisions on Applications and which should be EPICs vs SLC.
X-ray beam line controls requirements must be defined
BPMs - are electrons and positrons on a single pulse still needed? Is it OK to simply keep
the "old" original electronics in place and disconnected, so the new electronics are limited
to LCLS requirements?
BPM location and anchoring must be decided
Undulator BPM performance requirements should be articulated including max working
range
The engineering process seems to be proceeding without explicit requirements and
reviews. An example of this is the PNET module
Where is global controls on the org chart?
Can we get x-band klystrons and waveguides from the NLCTA?
Injector laser controls interface needs close communication between vendor, controls
group and laser experts/operators
Follow new code requirements for low-smoke fireproof cables
It is unclear how to design feedback to control X-band phase- explore "dithering".
7 April 2005
LCLS Facility Advisory Committee
John N. Galayda
galayda@slac.stanford.edu
Electron Systems
Do gun tests as early as possible, at vendor maybe consider creation of a gun test facility
Order 2 guns
They recommend continued testing of laser pulse shaping at DUVFEL
Consider doing electron beam tests at DUVFEL
Consider collaboration with LLNL on gun laser development
Recommend a hot spare laser
Recommend the formation of a laser group
Consider doing tests of "lock-in" detection of low gain at DUVFEL
Consider x-band waveform modulation as the input modulation for lock-in detection
Show analysis and simulations of collimator performance at the next review, including shower
computations
Continue work on ESASE
Recommend x-y scanners for wire monitor, rather than diagonal
Consider the design of a feedback loop that adjusts the laser based on electron beam measurements
Consider options for the ULTIMATE LCLS Master Oscillator
Continue tests of THz measurement techniques at SPPS (WHEN?)
Consider schemes to modulate X-band phase for optimal set-up
Place appropriate emphasis on challenging phase/amplitude control of X-band system
By 1/2005, force a decision on undulator design changes for AC wake field
7 April 2005
LCLS Facility Advisory Committee
John N. Galayda
galayda@slac.stanford.edu
Undulator Systems
Cradle system needs attention
Trade-offs must be considered to decide whether longer
girders can improve tolerance to ground motion
They recommend that, if the gap/period is changed, a new
prototype is not necessary
Consider feed-forward from temperature measurement to
undulator horizontal position to control K
Decision has been made to NOT to hire a general
contractor responsible for delivering complete undulators.
The consequences of this decision (plans for control of final
assembly) should be presented
7 April 2005
LCLS Facility Advisory Committee
John N. Galayda
galayda@slac.stanford.edu
Conventional Facilities
Prepare a prediction of floor performance in terms of settlement and vibration, based on SLAC
experience, calculation, etc. that covers "DC-to_daylight" bandwidth
Give serious consideration to "active" alignment techniques to compensate for performance limitations
of floor and supports
Give further consideration to where cut/cover is better than tunneling
Consider heating the tunnel walls
Report the earthquake design criteria for LCLS construction
CLO- 300 people in 90,000 square feet seems tight- revisit space allocation
Committee is skeptical of 27 month construction schedule
We need a construction procurement expert
We need a construction safety expert
W need a construction QA function/program
We need a review by a fire safety engineer
Confirm that the standards chosen (UBC1997 was an example quoted at the review) are the latest,
and that no changes in requirements and standards are imminent. (?)
Consider an excavated tunnel cross-section that is not circular
Go through a cost-optimization exercise. it may be possible to save money on construction cost
Consider having your procurement group set up bulk purchasing agreements for commodities.
7 April 2005
LCLS Facility Advisory Committee
John N. Galayda
galayda@slac.stanford.edu
Robinson Summation
Risk registry should show AC conductivity
Prepare a tunnel/undulator stability/error
budget!!
The Project mgmt has not yet demonstrated
global systems integration
Go through a value engineering cycle
Improve integration between conventional
facilities and laser systems
7 April 2005
LCLS Facility Advisory Committee
John N. Galayda
galayda@slac.stanford.edu
I am happy to announce that Paul Emma has agreed to take over leadership of
the LCLS accelerator system physicists' group. Paul's ability, cooperative spirit
and dedication have earned him the respect of his peers and the LCLS WBS
managers alike. I should add my expression of gratitude to the system physicist
team for their advice to me and their efforts to make the LCLS a success.
I ask that you all give your support to Paul and the Accelerator Systems Physicist
team as we turn the LCLS from a dream, nearly 14 years in the making, into a
groundbreaking scientific facility and a running facility.
The photon systems physicists,
John Arthur for X-Ray Transport/Optics/Diagnostics and
Jerry Hastings for X-Ray End Station Systems, will continue
to report to me in this capacity at present, in addition to their
responsibilities to SSRL and the PIXEL initiative (which will
complete the suite of experiment stations for the LCLS).
--- John Galayda
7 April 2005
LCLS Facility Advisory Committee
John N. Galayda
galayda@slac.stanford.edu
by 2012
Near Experimental
Hall
Soft X-ray Station
AMO Physics
Magnetic imaging
Hard X-ray Imaging Station
Coherent imaging
Hard X-ray Diffraction Station
Pump-probe dynamics
Hard X-ray Diffraction Station
XPCS
Hard X-ray Station
Extreme states of matter
(assumes funding found)
Far Experimental
Hall
7 April 2005
LCLS Facility Advisory Committee
John N. Galayda
galayda@slac.stanford.edu
2008-9
Near Experimental
Hall
Soft X-ray Station
AMO Physics (funded by LCLS)
Hard X-ray Imaging Station
Coherent imaging (funded by PIXEL)
Extreme states of matter (funding?)
Hard X-ray Diffraction Station
Pump-probe dynamics (funded by PIXEL)
XPCS (funded by PIXEL)
Green applications do not
have full capability, but can
do preliminary experiments
Far Experimental
Hall
7 April 2005
LCLS Facility Advisory Committee
John N. Galayda
galayda@slac.stanford.edu
7 April 2005
LCLS Facility Advisory Committee
John N. Galayda
galayda@slac.stanford.edu
7 April 2005
LCLS Facility Advisory Committee
John N. Galayda
galayda@slac.stanford.edu
Where Are We Now
About to transit from administrative/design
activities to construction activities
Training profiles must change accordingly
About to heavily exercise LCLS-SLAC
synapses
Citizens’ committees
Matrix support from Technical Division, CEF
SLAC oversight
Oversight of LCLS activities at ANL, LLNL
7 April 2005
LCLS Facility Advisory Committee
John N. Galayda
galayda@slac.stanford.edu
How Will We Get There
Write Safety Assessment Document
Identify certain generic design features to control
hazards
Busbar covers? “Power ON” warning lights?
Pinch hazard covers?
Local crash buttons for motors?
Enclosed laser paths? laser interlocks?
Confirm it is all there in the Readiness Review
7 April 2005
LCLS Facility Advisory Committee
John N. Galayda
galayda@slac.stanford.edu
LCLS Project Management
PMD
LCLS Sector 20
Document #
1.9-001
Conventional Facility
Construction Project Approval Form
Revision
0
PART B – CITIZEN COMMITTEE REVIEW/APPROVAL PROCESS
INSTRUCTIONS
Jo Beth Folger
(Author)
Signature
Date
David Saenz
(System Manager)
Signature
Date
Michael Scharfenstein
(Project ES&H)
Signature
Date
Richard Hislop
(Construction ES&H)
Signature
Date
Part B shall be completed by the LCLS Conventional Facilities Manager or the Facilities Cost Account
Manager for the particular project/activity. Check the first column if review by a particular committee,
based on professional judgment, and/or direction from the SOC Chairperson, is required. At a
minimum, the SOC Chairperson signature is required.

Eric Bong
(Injector-Linac System Mgr)
Signature
Date
James Welch
(Physics Liaison)
Signature
Date
Darren Marsh
(LCLS Quality Assurance Mgr)
Signature
Date
Richard M. Boyce
(LCLS Integration Mgr)
Signature
Date
Mark Reichanadter
(Chief Engineer)
Signature
Date
John Galayda
(Division Director)
Signature
Date
Committee
Chairperson
Safety
Overview
Committee
(SOC)
Earthquake
Safety
Electrical
Safety
Environment
al Safety
Fire
Protection
Hazardous
Exp. Equip.
Hoisting and
Rigging
Safety
Non-Ionizing
Radiation
Safety
Radiation
Safety
Operating
Safety
Architectural
Review
Ken Moffeit
Phone
Notification Approval Signature
Date
Scott DeBarger
Marjorie
Widmeyer
William Kroutil
Frank O’Neill
John Weisend
Dave Ernst
Roland Koontz
Bill Wisniewski
Janice Dabney
Steve Williams
The LCLS Construction Project Approval Form provides timely notification of a proposed construction
project or work activity at SLAC, and serves as a checklist to identify hazards or other aspects of the work
activity which are controlled by practices specific to SLAC. The Construction Project Approval Form also
documents the authorization to commence work. It lists applicable permits, site specific training
requirements, and organizations to be notified prior to the commencement of on-site work activities. (Note
that this form will document an authorization to commence construction, not an approval to operate a
particular facility or piece of experimental equipment.)
7 April 2005
LCLS Facility Advisory Committee
John N. Galayda
galayda@slac.stanford.edu
Date
How We Will Get There
Schedule our safety design reviews like other project
activities – by subsystem
Flowcharts for Safety Approval processes with branches to
address, e.g.
Design
Review
Authorization
Work planning/execution
JHAM
AHA
Electrical Work
Hoisting
Excavation
Work Authorization
7 April 2005
LCLS Facility Advisory Committee
John N. Galayda
galayda@slac.stanford.edu
A Concern- Can We Live With This?
Proposed Schedule for Accelerator Operations 2005 - 2008 Seeman/Erickson/Dungan 3/9/05
2006 December Run
Run
Run
Year
2007
2007
2007
2007
2007
2007
2007
2007
2007
2007
2007
2007
January
Run
February Run
March
Run
April
Run
May
Run
June
Run
July
Run
August
Run
SeptemberDown
October Down
November Down
December Run
Run
Run
Run
Run
Run
Run
Run
Run
Down
Down
Down
Run
Run
Run
Run
Run
Run
Run
Run
Down
Down
Run/Startup
Run
Run
2008
2008
2008
2008
2008
2008
2008
2008
2008
2008
2008
January
Run
February Run
March
Run
April
Run
May
Run
June
Run
July
Run
August
Run
September Run
October Down
November Down
Run
Run
Run
Run
Run
Run
Run
Run
Run
Down
Down
Run
Run
Run
Run
Run
Run
Run
Down
Down
Run/Startup
Run
Month
Linac
PEP-II
FFTB
SPEAR 3
2005
2005
2005
2005
2005
2005
2005
2005
2005
2005
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
Run
Run
Run
Run
Run
Run
Run
Down
Run
Run
Run
Run
Run
Run
Run
Run
Run
Down
Run
Run
Down
Tune up
E166?
SPPS?
E167?
Run
Run
Run
Run
Run
Down
Down
Run/Startup
Run
Run - exc. few days
2006
2006
2006
2006
2006
2006
2006
2006
2006
2006
2006
January
Run
February Run
March
Run
April
Run
May
Run
June
Run
July
Run
August
Down
SeptemberDown
October Down
November Down
Run
Run
Run
Run
Run
Run
Run
Down
Down
Down
Down
E166?
SPPS?
E167?
E166?
SPPS?
E167?
SPPS?
SPPS?
Dismantled
Run
Run
Run
Run
Run
Run
Run
Down
Down
Run/Startup
Run
A lot of people are waiting to “hear” from us on this
7 April 2005
LCLS Facility Advisory Committee
John N. Galayda
galayda@slac.stanford.edu
LCLS Facility Advisory Committee
Membership
Kem Robinson,
Harry Carter,
John Cleary,
John Corlett,
Roger Falcone,
Josef Feldhaus,
Paul Fouss,
Thomas Himel,
Vim Leemans,
Pat O'Shea,
Joachim Pflueger,
Thomas Rabedeau,
Jörg Rossbach,
Keith Schuh,
Peter Siddons,
Thomas Tschentscher,
Karen White,
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), Chair
Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (FNAL)
Stanford University (SU)
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL)
UC Berkeley
Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron (DESY)
Argonne National Laboratory (ANL)
Stanford Linear Accelerator Center (SLAC)
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL)
University of Maryland (UMD)
Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron (DESY)
Stanford Linear Accelerator Center (SLAC)
Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron (DESY)
Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (FNAL)
Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL)
Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron (DESY)
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility (TJNAF)
Meetings
29-30 April
2004
12-13 October 2004
7-8 April
2005
DOE (Lehman) Review 10-12 May will cover PIXEL
7 April 2005
LCLS Facility Advisory Committee
John N. Galayda
galayda@slac.stanford.edu
FFTB/SPPS
Schedule
Must preserve funds for FY boundary BUT
Acceleration of 2006 procurements considered
Conventional construction – SPPS/FFTB
schedule
LCLS schedule shows May 2006 Shutdown
Some evidence that delay past March 2006 will delay
LCLS commissioning start-
Linac Complete by end of 2007 shutdown
Startup planning should exploit this!
7 April 2005
LCLS Facility Advisory Committee
John N. Galayda
galayda@slac.stanford.edu
What’s Next
Review Calendar
FAC 7-8 April 2005
SAC 5-6 May 2005
Lehman 10-12 May 2005
7 April 2005
LCLS Facility Advisory Committee
John N. Galayda
galayda@slac.stanford.edu
PIXEL Initiative
Experiment Stations (instruments?) for LCLS
CD-0 Draft under review
Warm Dense Matter looking for funding
outside BES
7 April 2005
LCLS Facility Advisory Committee
John N. Galayda
galayda@slac.stanford.edu
Start of LCLS Project
7 April 2005
LCLS Facility Advisory Committee
John N. Galayda
galayda@slac.stanford.edu
1.9 Conventional Facilities Construction Manager Out for Bids
Undulator
Hall
(175m)
Beam Dump
(40M)
Front End
(29m)
Linac-to-Undulator (227m)
X-ray
Near Transport
Expt. (250m)
Far
Expt.
Hall
Hall
Central Lab Office Complex (CLOC)
Capacity ~300
72,000 GSF Total
150-Seat Conference Room
7 April 2005
LCLS Facility Advisory Committee
John N. Galayda
galayda@slac.stanford.edu