Monitoring CBR: Collaborative development of a menu and guidelines
Monitoring CBR:
Collaborative development of a menu and guidelines
Ros Madden, Sue Lukersmith, Tinashe Dune, Sally Hartley, Alexandra
Gargett
The University of Sydney
Bounlanh Phayboun
Cooperative Orthotic and Prosthetic Enterprise, Laos
Nguyen Viet Nhan
Office of Genetic Counseling and Disabled Children, Vietnam
›
Why monitoring?
›
Why a menu and guidelines?
›
Methods being used
›
Progress and next steps
›
Potential use
Outline
2
Why monitoring?
Monitoring differs from ‘evaluation’ in that it:
› Has an internal focus
› Provides ongoing information
About inputs and outputs as well as outcomes
› Is a local information system designed, managed and used by CBR managers and stakeholders
› Enables managers and staff to identify and check for progress, changes or problems (person or program)
Leading to possible program adjustments
3
Why a menu and guidelines?
Monitoring should be:
› In the hands of program managers and stakeholders
› Able to be adapted to local conditions
› Based on best practice and established knowledge
Promoting standards but allowing choice from a ‘menu’ of items
› Empowering
› Tools with guidelines, not a formulaic recipe book
Similar to the CBR guidelines!
4
CBR monitoring menu: methods being used
Literature reviews : CBR monitoring and evaluation literature
Collaborative information design : agencies’ basic needs for and uses of information
Ideas and items
(a menu or toolkit, with guidelines) for testing
Testing in country
Communication, further research, new partners +
International
Advisory Group
Testing in country
Refined monitoring menu and guidelines
5
Literature review (1)
› What tools and methods have been used for monitoring and evaluating
CBR?
Who used them?
In what country or setting?
Who was involved in providing information ?
What is the goal of the program and how does it relate to CBR matrix?
How do tools relate to CBR matrix?
Does the monitoring and evaluation link to the CBR principles?
Purpose of monitoring and evaluation?
How were people with disabilities involved in the research?
6
Review of literature (2)
Can evaluations of CBR programmes be mapped onto the CBR Matrix and ICF framework?
7
What
Why
Who
Collaborative information design
How
We:
› Discussed information needs in terms of 4 basic questions
› Developed unstructured lists of items
› Grouped and related the items to standard frameworks where possible
8
Much more work to do
Information needs
Information items for monitoring
Refining and structuring the monitoring menu together – mapping to standards
Photos from Google images
Plans for testing and more collaboration
9
Possible uses of the monitoring menu in near future
Lao PDR
› Designing information collection at village level, or database (central)
› Progress in the village/community – evaluating program
› CBR worker performance and development
› Monitoring service use and progress for people with disabilities
› Identifying and monitoring the influence of the environment on participation
› Empowering
Community role in creating empowering environment - Monitoring: Awareness – acceptance, and then involvement
› Enhance knowledge and skills of the personnel in early intervention area with available resources (e.g. as a planning and awareness raising checklist)
10
NETWORK
LOCATION
INCOME
Possible uses of the monitoring menu in near future
VIETNAM
NATIONAL POLICIES
LOCAL GOVERNMENT
LIVELIHOOD
EDUCATION
SOCIAL
HEALTH CARE
DISABLED PEOPLE
EMPOWERMENT
LOCAL HEALTH WORKERS
TRAINING PROGRAMS
EXPERT TEAMS
TRAINING PROGRAMS
FAMILIES’ MEMBERS
11
Khop Chai
Cám ơn
Thank you
If you are interested in discussing this project and perhaps participating in the future please attend our workshop on
Wednesday 7 December, 9.30 am
Room 022 Law School Annex (next door)
12
