ARO 2003 353 Minimum Audible Angle Measured in Young and Old CBA Mice Using Prepulse Inhibition of Startle Paul D. Allen, Jordan Bell, Navin Dargani, Catherine A. Moore, Carolyn M. Tyler, James R. Ison Department of Brain & Cognitive Sciences, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY • 180° speaker swap was compared with simple noise offset and onset (i.e. S1 or S2 alone) Single Off Single On 180 Swap 80 60 40 • 3 month old mice 1 2 5 10 20 30 ISI (ms) 60 100 300 •Can we estimate a minimum audible angle for the mouse in this way? 80 40 20 • Spectrally-matched high-frequency speakers (TDT ES1) located 45cm from the mouse head 2 5 10 20 30 ISI (ms) 60 100 300 90 45 15 C • Speaker angle is fixed in each session (counterbalanced design) with 11 presentations of each condition, block randomized • Inhibition calculated relative to no-prepulse controls 300 Angular Shift : 90 • Compared with 3 month old data, ISI functions shift progressively later with age • Size of inhibitory effect is reduced with age even when it is reliably generated by large angular separations C 1 2 60 5 10 20 30 ISI (ms) 60 100 300 • Duration of optimum inhibition is reduced as longer ISI is required in old mice for inhibition, but inhibition does not persist longer Angular Shift : 45 180 40 1 2 5 10 20 30 ISI (ms) 60 100 300 • Smaller angles have longer ISI to peak inhibition and maximal inhibition is reduced -20 10 ms 50 ms 50 • 5ms only 180° provides significant inhibition 25 • At 10ms, 22.5 ° is marginally significant C 1 2 5 10 20 30 ISI (ms) 60 100 15 22.5 45 90 Angular Separation (degrees) 180 • Minimum Audible Angle depends on ISI: optimum duration suggests MAA <15° 45 1 2 5 10 20 30 ISI (ms) 60 100 300 20 0 3 mo 6 mo 12 mo 24 mo 100 40 20 10 5 -20 C 1 2 60 5 10 20 30 ISI (ms) 60 100 300 15 Angular Shift : 7 75 6 mo 12 mo 24 mo 40 20 22.5 0 45 Angle () ISI = 50 ms 90 180 C 1 2 5 10 20 30 ISI (ms) 60 100 300 20 10 0 -10 7 22.5 45 90 Angular Separation (degrees) • Swap of lower octaves (2-4 and 4-8 kHz) does not provide inhibition • 8-16 kHz does provide inhibition, but only at large angles • 16-32 has inhibition at this ISI that accounts for most of the response seen to swap of broadband noise, but the effect of frequency band on ISI is 180 unclear • Masker noise and shaping of stimuli might also reduce inhibition, and account for the difference between broadband and 16-32 kHz Discussion Here we demonstrate that swapping the source of continuous noise between two speakers causes prepulse inhibition of startle in CBA mice, and since inhibition scales with angular separation, the technique can provide behavioral measures of minimum audible angle (MAA). These results agree with previous behavioral estimates of MAA in the mouse, and the importance of sufficient ISI for inhibition to develop maximum sensitivity is analogous to the minimum integration time required for optimal MAA in human psychoacoustics. The 3rd experiment using octave bands of noise shows that low frequency carriers are ineffective in producing inhibition, suggesting that ILDs provide the cues for spatial discrimination. This result is in accord with the mouse having a well developed LSO and atrophied MSO. There is a systematic increase with age in the ISI needed to obtain a particular level of auditory spatial resolution, and the magnitude of the inhibition produced at a given ISI and angle decline with age, particularly from 12 to 24 months of age. 25 0 -20 30 Alternatively, over this same frequency range the mouse pinna produces spectral notches, which might serve as a separate cue for change in spatial location, mediated by DCN processing. This could be tested using narrow band or pure tone stimuli. 3 mo 6 mo 12 mo 24 mo 50 40 • 70dB octave band carriers with 2ms on/offset shaping and 50dB broadband floor to mask transients The rapid onset of inhibition when angular separation is large, but not when it is small, indicates that monaural cues at each ear are sufficient to alert the auditory system to a change in the acoustic environment, while the longer ISI required for inhibition when angular separation and hence monaural difference cues are reduced, suggests that binaural processing of inputs to the two ears is needed to detect the change in sound source location. Angular Shift : 22.5 40 ISI = 50 ms Broadband (Expt 2) 2-4 kHz 4-8 kHz 8-16 kHz 16-32 kHz These data indicate that in the 3 month old CBA mouse MAA at 0 degree azimuth is between 7 and 15°, but this resolution requires 60 to 100ms of processing, with shorter ISIs yielding coarser resolution. Solid lines show ISI times producing significant inhibition Dots show ISI times leading to marginally significant inhibition C 300 • At 50ms, 15° is marginally significant 0 3 month old 6 month old 12 month old 24 month old 22.5 60 • At a given ISI the effect size increases with the angular separation 5ms 90 15 • Window of optimal inhibition is reduced at smaller angles: 60-100ms at 15° 75 20 0 • Longer ISI required for significant inhibition % Inhibition • ISI conditions: 1, 2, 5, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 100, 150, 200, 300 ms, two no-prepulse controls, and a no-startle, no-swap activity control •Intervals with non-linear averaging may reflect binaural processing • Bringing speakers together reduces inhibitory effect of swap and delays ISI functions • Cage oriented with head facing mid-line of two speakers • Prepulse is noise-swap between speakers at set inter-stimulus interval (ISI) prior to ES 60 100 20 -20 Given that 180° speaker swap is inhibitory, how does inhibition depend on the angular separation of the speakers? 22.5 • Continuous broadband noise (60 dB SPL, 1-50kHz) presented from one speaker (min 15s) 10 20 30 ISI (ms) Angular Separation 1 180 • Angular separations: 180, 90, 45, 22.5, or 15° (7° in Experiments 2 and 3) 5 0 % Inhibition • Startle response recorded from accelerometer (RMS 100ms window, post-ES) 2 1st ISI with q>2 (ms) C Question 2: Angular Separation • Startle eliciting stimulus (ES) delivered overhead (120dB SPL, 15 ms broadband noise burst) 1 • The sum of monaural cues? • Subjects: CBA/CaJ mice 3, 6, 12, 24 months old • Mice held in acoustically transparent wire cage mounted to a platform and accelerometer C 40 % Inhibition 20 • None of the groups show significant inhibition for the 7° swap 60 • 180° speaker swap has inhibitory effect intermediate to noise offset and onset (dashed grey curve shows simple average of on- and offset data) 0 Methods • Same design as Experiment 1, except minimum angle is 7° 20 -20 % Inhibition % Inhibition • 180° speaker swap is significant from 5 to 300 ms, with a hint of facilitation at 1ms 180 90 45 22.5 15 60 What are the neural bases for age-related changes in spatial acuity in the mouse? • Inhibition starts rapidly after noise Offset: at 1ms it is marginally significant, but highly significant from 2 to 300 ms • Onset shows marginally significant facilitation out to 5 ms, then highly significant inhibition from 10 to 200 ms Previous behavioural measures of spatial acuity in the mouse •19° in the 2 month old C57 mouse (Heffner, Koay, & Heffner, 2001) 24 month old (N=18) 0 % Inhibition C •Does a change in spatial location of a continuous sound source cause prepulse inhibition? How do these parameters change with age? 40 Off (N=7), On (N=6), Swap (N=13) •7-15° in 2 month old house mouse (Ehret & Dreyer, 1984) 6 month old (N=12) Angular Shift : 180 20 -20 • 6 month old mice (N=12) 12 month old (N=12) 0 •Startle response amplitude is modulated by prior perturbation of the acoustic environment (inhibition) How does detection of a change in spatial location depend on stimulus duration? 60 Relative Inihibition (%) % Inhibition In this study we wanted to find out if parallel changes in auditory spatial acuity occur with age in the CBA mouse, using a novel application of prepulse inhibition of acoustic startle Is 180° speaker swap inhibitory? 100 Experiment 3: Frequency Effect on Speaker Swap • 3 age groups: Question 1: % Inhibition Auditory spatial acuity supports sound localization and is used to improve communication in noisy environments via unmasking of spatially separable sound sources The CBA mouse is a successful animal model of presbycusis, displaying changes in auditory temporal processing with age analogous to those observed in humans, which have been linked to deficits in speech perception – especially in noisy backgrounds Experiment 2: Age Effect on Speaker Swap Experiment 1: Broad Band Noise Speaker Swap Relative Inihibition (%) Introduction 15 22.5 45 90 Angular Separation (degrees) 180 This finding suggests an ageing effect which could worsen presbycusis by diminishing binaural unmasking - the aging localization system gradually ceases to provide sufficient spatial resolution in the time available for unmasking to be effective. Supported by NIA Grant #AG09524 and The Schmitt Program on Integrative Brain Research