CF Overview & Status
Design Status
CMGC Status
Latest VE Decisions
CF Total Estimated Cost
Beneficial Occupancy Dates
CF Organization
Summary
Oct 27, 2005
FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturity
David Saenz
saenzd@slac.stanford.edu
Design Status
√ Title I - completed May 04
√ Interim services by JE between Title I/Title
II – completed at the start of Title II
√ Final Tunneling Memorandum and
Geotechnical Investigation Report completed
Jan 05
√ Geotechnical Baseline Report (GBR)
awarded April 05 to HatchMott MacDonald
Oct 27, 2005
FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturity
David Saenz
saenzd@slac.stanford.edu
Design Status – cont’d
√ Title II AE Design Kickoff March 29-30
√ 30% design review was performed in Aug-Sept
05
Meeting was held at JE Cypress facility to review sum
total of <1,000 comments from the various disciplines
100% civil design delivered Oct 26, 05
Road-work for North Access Road/Survey Tower
Road
Open excavation at EBD/FEE/NEH
Oct 27, 2005
FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturity
David Saenz
saenzd@slac.stanford.edu
Design Status – cont’d
60% design review scheduled for Oct 28 (will likely be
delayed ~ 3 weeks as a result of recent VE decisions)
100% design review Jan 18, 05
Progress drawings for design reviews are available at
http://www-ssrl.slac.stanford.edu/lcls/cf/
When performing design reviews…
A commitment for a timely review and response back to JE is
necessary
system mgrs
citizen committees
various groups and departments, i.e. CEF, ES&H, SU
Oct 27, 2005
FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturity
David Saenz
saenzd@slac.stanford.edu
Design Status – cont’d
30% construction cost estimate delivered by JE
Oct 4, 05 ($74.3M)
Title I Estimate $50.2M
DCN process was followed for all design changes to include
estimated hard cost
Valued at ~$3.5M
30% independent cost estimate delivered by
WDWC Oct 7, 05 ($66.4M)
Title I Estimate $72M
Reconciliation report needs to be completed
Oct 27, 2005
FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturity
David Saenz
saenzd@slac.stanford.edu
CMGC Status
Approved!
SO DOE
Chicago DOE
Washington DOE
Awarded to Turner
Construction (TC) Oct 17, 05
Phase I - $.6M
Phase II - $12M
Incentive Fee - $.55M
Safety
Schedule
Oct 27, 2005
FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturity
David Saenz
saenzd@slac.stanford.edu
CM/GC Phase 1 Effort
Phase 1 – preconstruction activities to
include:
Provide effective overlap period and oversight of
effort during Title II
Estimates during Title II
CPM Schedule
Identify lead-time for critical items
Design coordination
Constructability reviews
Value Engineering reviews
Site investigation
Oct 27, 2005
FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturity
David Saenz
saenzd@slac.stanford.edu
CM/GC Phase 1 Effort – cont’d
Develop construction bid packages
Develop list and contact potential bidders
Develop prequalification criteria
Solicit bids
Recommend award to SLAC for approval
of subcontractor
Award contract to subcontractors
Oct 27, 2005
FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturity
David Saenz
saenzd@slac.stanford.edu
CM/GC Phase 1 Effort – cont’d
Develop Project Management Plan (PMP)
Construction Management Plan – outlines project
scope, organization, and specific approach to
accomplish project
Project Safety Plan – project specific identifying job
hazards, safety performance and individuals
responsible for project safety
Procurement Plan – identifies systems, methods and
procedures for solicitation to subcontractors
Quality Control and Assurance Plan – method of
controlling time, cost and quality of various
management tasks specific to the project
Oct 27, 2005
FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturity
David Saenz
saenzd@slac.stanford.edu
CM/GC Phase 2 Effort
Phase 2 – CM/GC shall provide all materials,
labor, and services required to construct the
Project
All general conditions including field personnel,
office staff, temporary offices, temporary
construction, safety implementation,
construction equipment, coordination of all subs,
project administration, construction waste
management, commissioning
Oct 27, 2005
FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturity
David Saenz
saenzd@slac.stanford.edu
CMGC Status – cont’d
Held Kick-off meeting Oct 19, 05
Delivered cost estimates from both JE and WDWC
AE Design schedule
Other data was relayed i.e. weekly Owner/Architect/Contractor
(OAC) meetings, etc
Critical message
Safety First!
Cost estimate for CLOC
Construction sequencing, particularly the demolition of FFTB
Civil work
North Access Road
Open cut
Schedule of preparation of procurement packages for construction
Remaining Phase II work
Oct 27, 2005
FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturity
David Saenz
saenzd@slac.stanford.edu
Cost Estimates
Largest
variance!
JE Est
WDWC Est
Oct 27, 2005
FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturity
David Saenz
saenzd@slac.stanford.edu
Title II JE Cost Summary by CSI
Title II Est
$74.4M
Title I Est
$50M
Oct 27, 2005
FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturity
Variance
$24.1M↑
David Saenz
saenzd@slac.stanford.edu
Title II JE Cost Summary by CSI
Site-work
$4.2M (TI) vs
$7.4 (TII) delta
of $3.2M↑
Mechanical
$8M (TI) vs
$13.4M (TII)
delta of $5.4M↑
Electrical
$5.8M (TI) vs
$12.8 (TII)
delta of $7M↑
Oct 27, 2005
FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturity
David Saenz
saenzd@slac.stanford.edu
Title II JE Cost Summary by Area
Areas with most
significant increase:
•UH $4.3M
→$10.9M
•NEH $6.4M
→$9.6M
•CUP $395K
→$2.8M
•XRT $3.8M
→$5.7M
•FEH $6M
→$10.7M
•CLOC $12.9M
→$21.3M
Oct 27, 2005
FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturity
David Saenz
saenzd@slac.stanford.edu
Title II Breakdown by Structure (with Area)
Oct 27, 2005
FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturity
David Saenz
saenzd@slac.stanford.edu
Cost Estimate
Delta results in reduction in scope of various
items
To date $11M worth of scope has been reduced
Total value of items continue to fall short of
remaining in the box by ~$3.6M
Oct 27, 2005
FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturity
David Saenz
saenzd@slac.stanford.edu
VE Scope Reductions - Tunneling
Oct 27, 2005
FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturity
David Saenz
saenzd@slac.stanford.edu
•T2 – shorten
xrt 60’ and
access tunnel
40’
•T3a – enlarge
access tunnel to
19’
•T5a/b – square
off transition
tunnel, shift
FEH 60’ to the
west (T2)
•T6 – cut/cover
FEH (not
approved)
XRT/FEH Tunnel Floor Plan
Oct 27, 2005
FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturity
David Saenz
saenzd@slac.stanford.edu
Architectural, Site, Finishes
Oct 27, 2005
FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturity
David Saenz
saenzd@slac.stanford.edu
Architectural, Site, Finishes – cont’d
Oct 27, 2005
FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturity
David Saenz
saenzd@slac.stanford.edu
A01 – Delete masonry
veneer
NEH – Service Yard Entrance
Oct 27, 2005
FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturity
David Saenz
saenzd@slac.stanford.edu
A15 – Reduce glazing
Oct 27, 2005
FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturity
David Saenz
saenzd@slac.stanford.edu
A07 – 3rd floor shell only,
no interior build out
CLOC Floor Plan 3rd Floor
Oct 27, 2005
FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturity
David Saenz
saenzd@slac.stanford.edu
A12 – Eliminate Conf
Ctr
Conf Center Floor Plan
Conf Center Elevation
Oct 27, 2005
FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturity
David Saenz
saenzd@slac.stanford.edu
Architectural, Site, Finishes – cont’d
Oct 27, 2005
FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturity
David Saenz
saenzd@slac.stanford.edu
G08 – use pan form
concrete
NEH Cross Section
Oct 27, 2005
FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturity
David Saenz
saenzd@slac.stanford.edu
G10 – reduce size of
basement level shaft
NEH Floor Plan – Basement Level
Oct 27, 2005
FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturity
David Saenz
saenzd@slac.stanford.edu
Architectural, Site, Finishes – cont’d
Oct 27, 2005
FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturity
David Saenz
saenzd@slac.stanford.edu
S06 – replace screen
wall at CUP service
yard w/ 8’ mesh fence
Site Plan
Oct 27, 2005
FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturity
David Saenz
saenzd@slac.stanford.edu
S04 – reduce
retaining walls
S03 – reduce
excavated bowl
Site Plan - CLOC
Oct 27, 2005
FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturity
David Saenz
saenzd@slac.stanford.edu
Mechanical Scope Reductions
Oct 27, 2005
FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturity
David Saenz
saenzd@slac.stanford.edu
Mechanical Scope Reductions – cont’d
Oct 27, 2005
FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturity
David Saenz
saenzd@slac.stanford.edu
Mechanical Scope Reductions – cont’d
Oct 27, 2005
FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturity
David Saenz
saenzd@slac.stanford.edu
M13 – place baseline UH
design with alt plan
Oct 27, 2005
FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturity
David Saenz
saenzd@slac.stanford.edu
Mechanical Scope Reductions – cont’d
Oct 27, 2005
FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturity
David Saenz
saenzd@slac.stanford.edu
Electrical Scope Reductions
Oct 27, 2005
FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturity
David Saenz
saenzd@slac.stanford.edu
Electrical Scope Reductions – cont’d
Oct 27, 2005
FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturity
David Saenz
saenzd@slac.stanford.edu
Summary of Scope Reductions
Tunneling - $.847M
Architectural, Structural, General - $4.484M
Mechanical - $3.782M
Electrical - $1.762M
Running Total = ~$11M
All cost reductions have been approved by
Systems Managers and Project Office.
Oct 27, 2005
FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturity
David Saenz
saenzd@slac.stanford.edu
At grade in RSY
LCLS CF Rendering
Cut & Cover
Location of
Pep Ring Rd
BTH
UNDULATOR HALL
ELECTRON BEAM DUMP & FEE
NEAR EXPERIMENTAL HALL AND CENTRAL LABS & OFFICE
X-RAY TRANSPORT & DIAGNOSTICS TUNNEL
FAR EXPERIMENTAL HALL (redesign)
Oct 27, 2005
FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturity
David Saenz
saenzd@slac.stanford.edu
CF Cost Estimate – Aug 05
19%
4%
1.9.1 System Management & Integration
77%
1.9.2 Title 1 & Title 2 Conventional Facilities
1.9.3 Construction-T3 Conventional Facilities
Total CF Cost = $80.6M
Oct 27, 2005
FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturity
David Saenz
saenzd@slac.stanford.edu
Beneficial Occupancy Dates (L3 and L4)
Sector 20
3/31/06
MMF
4/3/06
Oct 27, 2005
FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturity
David Saenz
saenzd@slac.stanford.edu
CF Staff FY 06-08
Oct 27, 2005
FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturity
David Saenz
saenzd@slac.stanford.edu
Summary
Open Issues…
Prepare for upcoming Lehman visit on Nov 17, 05
Demonstrate readiness for CD-3 Review (7-9 February
2006)
Title II 60% design review coming shortly (?)
Geotechnical Baseline Report (GBR) in process, due in
parallel with design by outside separate consultant
Independent Seismic Peer Reviewer on-board and
working with JE (Forell/Elsesser Engineers, Inc.)
S20 and MMF to complete construction in the next 120
calendar days by XL Construction
Changes will delay BO date
Oct 27, 2005
FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturity
David Saenz
saenzd@slac.stanford.edu
Summary – cont’d
Turner Construction (TC) to begin full steam ahead
Conduct cost estimate and major planning, conduct VE and
constructability reviews, project schedule and develop bid
packages
Possible advancement Phase II effort
RSY North Access Road [1]
Memo was sent SSO requesting approval to commence this
activity
Open-cut of NEH area [1] ?
Utility investigation?
Title III Construction for RSY – CLOC by TC (03/06)
MEP Technical Review will be required within the next 4
weeks
Resolution to additional near future de-scope items
Oct 27, 2005
FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturity
David Saenz
saenzd@slac.stanford.edu
End of presentation
Oct 27, 2005
FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturity
David Saenz
saenzd@slac.stanford.edu