Periodicities in variable stars: a few issues Chris Koen Dept. Statistics University of the Western Cape Summary • • • • Variable stars The periodogram Quasi-periodic variations Periodic period changes Some Example Lightcurves • Lightcurve: brightness plotted against time (or sometimes phase) An eclipsing double star (P=7.6 h) A pulsating star (P=1.4 h) Residual sums of squares after fitting sinusoids with different frequencies Phased lightcurve, adjusted for changing mean values The Periodogram 2 2 N N 1 I ( ) yk cos 2 tk yk sin 2 tk N k 1 k 1 1 yk cos tk yk sin tk N k 1 k 1 N 2 N 2 Regular time spacing • Frequency range • Frequency spacing 0 0.5 / t j j / N ; j 1, 2, ..., N2 Periodogram of sinusoid (f=0.3) with superimposed noise: regularly spaced data Periodogram of sinusoid (f=0.3) with superimposed noise: irregularly spaced data 2 2 N N 1 I ( ) yk cos tk yk sin tk N k 1 k 1 I (* ) I (* ) sin * (t k t j ) 0 for all k , j N 1 S ( ) sin (t j 1 k j 1 2 N k tj) 0 Solutions for Nyquist frequency Time spacing between exposures (IRSF) Top: IRSF exposures Bottom: Hipparcos Frequency spacing • Frequency resolution is ~ 1/ T (Loumos & Deeming 1978, Kovacs 1981) Significance testing of the largest peak • For regularly spaced data: - statistical distribution of ordinates known - ordinates independent in Fourier frequencies • For irregularly spaced data: - ordinates can be transformed to known distribution – ordinates not independent Correlation between periodogram ordinates for increasing separation between frequencies (irregularly spaced data) Horne & Baliunas (1986): “independent frequencies” Quasi-periodicities (QPOs) • Sinusoidal variations with changing amplitude, period and/or phase A 32 minute segment of fast photometry of VV Puppis Periodogram of the differenced data Periodograms of first and second quarters of the data Wavelet plot of the first quarter of the data Complex Demodulation • Transform data so that frequency of interest is near zero • Apply a low pass filter to the transformed data Complex demodulation of the first quarter of the data Time Domain Modelling Y (t ) C (t ) cos (0 t (t )) e(t ) cos 0 t A(t ) sin 0 t e(t ) B(t ) A(t ) A(t 1) (t ) B (t ) B (t 1) (t ) , Gaussian Amplitude and phase variations from Kalman filtering The results of filtering the second quarter of the data Periodic period changes • Apsidal motion • Light-time effect • Stochastic trends? O-C (Observed – Calculated) • Equivalent to CUSUMS • Sparsely observed process: n j number of cycles elapsed between T j and T j 1 j N j ni cumulative cycle count i 1 (O C ) j T j (T* N j P0 ) SZ Lyn (Delta Scuti pulsator in a binary orbit) The Light-time Effect 1 e2 T (t ) A sin [ (t ) ] e sin 1 e cos (t ) 1 e E (t ) (t ) 2 arctan tan 2 1 e 2 E (t ) e sin E (t ) (t t0 ) Pb TX Her (P = 1.03 d) SV Cam (P = 0.59 d) A stochastic period-change model Pj j j j Nj i 1 k 1 T j T* ni i k ek (O C ) j ni i N j P0 k ek i 1 k 1 2 j j 1 j j ~ (0, ) j Nj State Space Formulation: Tj 1 nj U 1 0 j U T* e j j n j 1 1 U j 1 , Gaussian j 1 Nj j 1 j i 1 k 1 i 1 k 1 U j ni i k ni i k TX Her (units of 10 5 d) SV Cam (units of 10 6 d) General form of Information Criteria: IC = -2 log(likelihood)+penalty(K) • Akaike : penalty=2K • Bayes: penalty=K log(N) • Model with minimum IC preferred Models: • Polynomial + noise • Random walk + noise • Integrated random walk + noise Order Sigma_error BIC 3 1.1921 153.57 4 1.1036 142.74 #5 0.51673 -4.4166* 6 0.51335 -1.1247 7 0.51519 4.1961 RW 0.43166 41.661 IRW 0.51412 55.247 Order sigma_error BIC 1 0.24656 -170.82 4 0.23132 -169.76 5 0.21551 -179.32 6 0.21558 -174.65 7 0.21589 -169.76 # RW 0.19477 -185.97* IRW 0.21756 -171.33 Order sigma_error BIC 4 0.29048 -124.22 5 0.27773 -128.59 6 0.24941 -145.5 7 0.24809 -141.95 8 0.24678 -138.41 RW 0.17886 -119.37 #IRW 0.2194 -149.06* A brief mention… Transient deterministic oscillation or purely stochastic variability?