Philadelphia University
Nursing Faculty
Criteria for Evaluation of Nursing Care
Critical Care Procedure
Criteria of Evaluation
Rarely
0
Sometimes
0.25
Usually
0.5
Sometimes
0.25
Usually
0.5
Critical care procedure
- Assessment (for patient, chart, invasive devices,
machines
- Preparation( for patient self, equipment ,environment)
- Implementation
- Sequence
- Safe
- Speed
- Complete
- Post care ( for patient self, equipment ,environment)
- Documentation (reporting and recording)
Health Teaching
Criteria of Evaluation
Health teaching :- Relevant to patient 's problems (actual & high risk)
, needs, invasive devices and machines.
- Clear and understandable \ simple language
- Correct evidence based scientific knowledge
- Complete & concise content
Rarely
0
Philadelphia University
Nursing Faculty
Criteria for Evaluation of Self Learning Activities
● Written Assignment
Student name:-……………………… Academic Year:-………………….
Registration number:-………………. Academic term:-………………….
Assignment topic :-…………………… Hospital name :- ………………..
Items of Evaluation
● Introduction (1 Grade)
- Title page
- Objectives & Outline
● Body (8 Grades)
- Complete\Comprehensive
- Organized in logical sequence
- Specific and relevant to topic
- Clear & Concise
- Computerized and printed
- Correct scientific evidence based
knowledge
- Appropriate vocabulary and
Terminology
- Relevant, clear, attractive, effective
audiovisuals
● End ( 1 Grade)
- Summarize the presentation
- List of different recent references
Total Score
Grade
Grade
allotted Acquired
0.5
0.5
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0.5
0.5
10
Comments
Philadelphia University
Nursing Faculty
● Oral Presentation of the Written Assignment
Student name :-……………………… Academic Year:-………………….
Registration number:-………………. Academic term:-………………….
Assignment topic :- …………………. Hospital name :- ………………..
Items of Evaluation
● Introduction (1 Grade)
- Objectives
- Outline
● Process ( 5 Grades)
- Cover all items of topic
- Command the subject
- Use audiovisual material
effectively
- Focus on major points adequately
- Present material in appropriate
time
- Able to control audience
- Transit from idea to another in
organized and smooth way
● Communication ( 3.5 Grades)
- Present data clearly & competently
- Encourage discussion and
participation
- Be ready to respond to questions
- Present topic with enthusiasm
- Use appropriate tone of voice
\pace of speech
- Present in a confident and
Professional manner
● End (0,5 Grade)
- Summarize the presentation
Total Score
Grade
allotted
0.5
0.5
1
1
1
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
1
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
10
Grade
acquired
Comments
Philadelphia University
Nursing Faculty
Oral Presentation of Patient Case Study
Student name :-……………………… Academic Year:-………………….
Registration number:-………………. Academic term:-………………….
Assignment topic :- …………………. Hospital name :- ………………..
Items of Evaluation
Grade
allotted
● Assessment (2.5 Grades)
- Demographic data
0.25
- Subjective data
0.75
- Objective data
1.5
● Knowledge (5 Grades)
- Disease
1
- Laboratory investigations
0.75
- Diagnostic test
0.75
- Invasive devices
0.75
- Machines
0.75
- Medication & therapy
1
● Planning (2.5 Grades)
- Nursing diagnosis
0.75
- Goal & objective
0.5
- Interventions
0.75
- Evaluation
0.5
Grade
acquired
Comments
Philadelphia University
Nursing Faculty
Criteria for Evaluation of Clinical Document
● Assessment
- Assessment of subjective data
- Actually done
- Organized in logical sequence
- From all available resources
- Complete\ comprehensive
- Assessment of objective data (Physical examination)
- Relevant to patient's condition
- Organized in logical sequence
- Correct technique
- Complete\Thorough
● Nursing diagnosis
- Accepted nursing diagnosis from NANDA list
- Including defining characteristics based on assessment of patient's
condition
- Prioritized based on patient's actual and high risk problems, needs and
condition
- Including correct related and risk factors
● Documentation \ record
- Actual\ accurate
- Specific \ concise
- Complete
- Organized in logical sequence (according to priority and time)
Philadelphia University
Nursing Faculty
● Nursing Care Plan
- Nursing diagnosis
- Selected from NANDA list/terminology
- Including defining characteristics based on assessment of all dimensions of
patient's condition
- Prioritized based on patient's actual and high risk problems, needs and
condition
- Including correct related and risk factors
- Patient outcomes
- Relevant to nursing diagnosis and patient problems
- Patient and family centered and realistic
- Formulated through collaboration with patient, family, and health care
Providers
- Complete (include measurable action, content ,condition and criteria)
- Nursing interventions
- Relevant to patient expected outcome, nursing diagnosis and patient
condition as a whole
- Organized in logical sequence (from assessment to reassessment – simple
to complex –noninvasive to invasive - nursing to medical)
- Ideal , concise and realistic
- Developed through review of literature and communication with health
care providers
- Evaluation
- Actually done
- Relevant to patient expected outcome
- Including criteria for meeting of patient expected outcome
- Including causes for not meeting patient expected outcome
Philadelphia University
Nursing Faculty
Criteria for Evaluation of Professional Behavior
Criteria of Evaluation
● Attendance (2 Grades)
- Attend all days
2
- Absent one day without excuse
1.5
- Absent two days without excuse
1
- Absent three days without excuse
0.5
- Absent four days without excuse
0
N.B:- for each one day absence with excuse subtract 0.25 grade from the attendance
Usually
Sometimes
Rarely
● Punctuality (2 Grades)
0.5
0.25
0
- Attend on expected time
- Submit all clinical documents on time
- Submit & present self learning activities
( seminar & patient case study) on time
- Perform all scheduled nursing assessment ,
monitoring and intervention on time
● Uniform (2 Grades)
- Follow the prescribed uniform
- Has clean tidy & complete uniform
(pencil, notes ,file, clinical document…)
- Has Neat appearance (Hair, fingernail,
makeup jewelry,)
- Hung ID university & name badge.
● Relationship\ Communication(2 Grades)
- Use verbal and nonverbal communication
skills effectively with:
- Patient and family
- Hospital staff
- Other students(peers)
- Faculty staff
● Leadership abilities (2 Grades)
- Be self motivated & self directed
- Evaluate self and peers effectively
- Lead the group effectively
- Follow faculty and hospital policies
Philadelphia University
Nursing Faculty
Critical Care Nursing ( Clinical)
Daily Evaluation for Lab Sessions
Group: - ………..
Student' name
Date:- …\ …\ ……….
Attendance
&
Punctuality
Lab coat
&
Badge
Behavior
&
Attitude
(1)
(1)
(1)
Relation
Participation
&
&
Cooperation Demonstration
(1)
(1)
Total
Philadelphia University
Signature
Nursing Faculty