EMOTIONAL HEALTH AND PARASOCIAL RELATIONSHIPS WITH CELEBRITIES A Project Presented to the faculty of the Division of Social Work California State University, Sacramento Submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SOCIAL WORK by Megan Marie Daniel SPRING 2012 © 2012 Megan Marie Daniel ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii EMOTIONAL HEALTH AND PARASOCIAL RELATIONSHIPS WITH CELEBRITIES A Project by Megan Marie Daniel Approved by: __________________________________, Committee Chair Maria Dinis Ph.D., MSW ____________________________ Date iii Student: Megan Marie Daniel I certify that this student has met the requirements for format contained in the University format manual, and that this project is suitable for shelving in the Library and credit is to be awarded for the Project. __________________________, Graduate Coordinator Dale Russell, Ed.D., LCSW Division of Social Work iv ________________ Date Abstract of EMOTIONAL HEALTH AND PARASOCIAL RELATIONSHIPS WITH CELEBRITIES by Megan Marie Daniel Many people who struggle with emotional health utilize media as a coping method. This study explored emotional health (loneliness) and parasocial relationships with celebrities and other media figures. An exploratory quantitative survey research design was used to gather information from 46 college students. The sampling method was a non-probability convenience sample. Statistically significant relationships were found in chi-square analyses between gender and frequency of celebrity encounters. Most respondents reported increased parasocial activity in presence of unmet relational needs. Respondents who identified as not white also reported increased parasocial interaction. Findings suggest that the presence of unmet relational needs may play a role in the propensity to engage in parasocial behavior. Future research is important to understanding parasocial interaction with respect to age, race and emotional health. Implications for multi-level social work practice are discussed. _______________________, Committee Chair Maria Dinis Ph.D., MSW _______________________ Date v DEDICATION I would like to dedicate this project to my Grandmother, Martha J. Morgan who has inspired me to push myself even when I was ready to give up. Without you I would never have made it this far. Because you were, I am. Thank you for making me better every single day. I love you. vi TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Dedication .......................................................................................................................... vi List of Tables ...................................................................................................................... x Chapter 1. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................... 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 1 Background of the Problem ................................................................................... 4 Statement of the Research Problem....................................................................... 7 Purpose of the Study.............................................................................................. 8 Research Question ................................................................................................. 9 Theoretical Framework ......................................................................................... 9 Definition of Terms ............................................................................................. 13 Assumptions ........................................................................................................ 13 Justification ......................................................................................................... 14 Delimitations ....................................................................................................... 15 Summary ............................................................................................................. 16 2. REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE .............................................................................. 17 Introduction ......................................................................................................... 17 Historical Background ......................................................................................... 18 Loneliness and the Need to Belong: An Overview ............................................. 21 vii Parasocial Relationships and Imaginary Social Worlds ...................................... 23 Characteristics of People Involved in Parasocial Relationships ......................... 27 Identification ....................................................................................................... 28 Attachment Theory Explained: A Theoretical Connection ................................ 31 Attachment, Parasocial Relationships and Loneliness ........................................ 35 Gaps in the Literature .......................................................................................... 39 Conclusion ........................................................................................................... 41 3. METHODOLOGY ....................................................................................................... 42 Introduction ......................................................................................................... 42 Research Question ............................................................................................... 42 Research Design .................................................................................................. 42 Variables .............................................................................................................. 45 Study Population ................................................................................................. 45 Sample Population ............................................................................................... 46 Instrumentation .................................................................................................... 46 Data Gathering Procedures .................................................................................. 48 Data Analysis ...................................................................................................... 49 Protection of Human Subjects ............................................................................. 49 Summary ............................................................................................................. 50 viii 4. DATA ANALYSIS ....................................................................................................... 52 Introduction ......................................................................................................... 52 Research Question ............................................................................................... 52 Survey Respondents ............................................................................................ 52 Dependent Variable ............................................................................................. 53 Independent Variables ......................................................................................... 53 Summary ............................................................................................................. 63 5. DISCUSSION ............................................................................................................... 65 Introduction ......................................................................................................... 65 Summary ............................................................................................................. 65 Discussion ........................................................................................................... 66 Limitations........................................................................................................... 70 Implications for Social Work Practice and Policy .............................................. 71 Recommendations ............................................................................................... 73 Conclusion ........................................................................................................... 75 Appendix A. Consent to Participate in Research .............................................................. 77 Appendix B. Survey Instrument ....................................................................................... 80 References ......................................................................................................................... 84 ix LIST OF TABLES Page 1. Table 4.1 Age and comfort with celebrities .................................................................. 54 2. Table 4.2 Gender and frequency of celebrity encounters ............................................. 55 3. Table 4.3 Race and making remarks to celebrities on television .................................. 57 4. Table 4.4 Feeling “in tune” and feeling a part of a celebrities world ........................... 58 5. Table 4.5 Feeling alone and feeling a part of a celebrity’s world ................................. 59 6. Table 4.6 Feeling close to people and celebrity emotionality ...................................... 61 7. Table 4.7 Having people in one’s life and frequency of celebrity encounters ............. 63 8. Table 4.8 Companionship and making remarks to celebrities on television ................ 64 x 1 Chapter 1 INTRODUCTION Introduction When Kim Kardashian got married the world stopped to watch. Millions of people (including the researcher) tuned in to watch Kim’s Fairytale Wedding on E Entertainment Television. For weeks leading up to the event, TV media shows, magazines, message boards, blogs, Tweets and Facebook status updates writhed with anticipation. It was as though the entire country was personally invited to the wedding as guests. The wedding was to be bigger than the royal wedding between Will and Kate, Diana and Charles, and Grace and Rainier combined. Over eight million people tuned in to watch Kim walk down the aisle in what would be a two day television event. Kim Kardashian was the American version of the Dutchess of Cambridge (USA Today, 2011). It was during this time the researcher began to develop what would become the main questions surrounding this study. Why did society feel so passionately for Kim Kardashian without having ever met her? More importantly, what causes this one sided affection and where does it come from? It is virtually possible to be a person living in American society without encountering media culture in some way, but upon closer examination, it seemed that some people were much more submerged into celebrity culture than others. It stands to reason that there must be some key differences between individuals who are not enveloped in this celebrity social world, and those who are. 2 The tendency to have an affinity towards or affection for a celebrity is not uncommon, especially amongst younger people. As long as there have been celebrities, there has of course been fandom. In a general sense, we may be compelled to encourage fandom as a relatively normal and healthy activity in relation to one’s stage of development. Popular media is interwoven both throughout the life course and throughout life transitions. It provides normatively appropriate aged based activities which define in large part, the intergenerational divide. In short, being a fan can be good for you because it can foster a sense of identification with one’s generation, can facilitate feelings of belongingness and self-esteem, and can help transition into more mature stages of life (Harrington & Bielby, 2010). However, celebrity identification may serve a deeper purpose on the individual level. The writer became interested in parasocial relationships through observing the climate of popular culture in the summer of 2011. At the fevered pitch of America’s fascination with the Royal Wedding and the anticipation of the Kardashian Wedding, the author observed that the preoccupation with the lives of Kim Kardashian and Kate Middleton seemed to extend beyond general interest. People wanted to look, talk, speak and be just like them. When Kate Middleton wore a dress, it immediately sold out in stores. When the writer logged onto Facebook, status messages reflected a longing to have a fairytale romance just like Kim and Chris expressing how Kim would make an ideal best friend. The writer began to notice that what would ordinarily be a fascination with the glitz and glamour of celebrity nuptials for some was an almost vicarious 3 experience for others. Some people seemed to care very little about the goings on in the lives of the famous, while others seemed to thrive on learning intricate details about their favorite celebrity, and in fact seemed to identify with them. The author began to wonder what factors constituted this difference in affect towards celebrities, and became curious about how these one-sided relationships come about as well as what purpose they might serve in helping people frame themselves. Further study is needed into the ways in which people engage with celebrities, as these public figures are representations of the larger context of popular culture in which we live. The clients we serve as social workers live (as we do) in this cultural world, and are therefore forced to make their own meanings out of the images and stories of popular culture. These meanings no doubt have implications for the attitudes and behaviors of the people we serve. They may also affect the subsequent self-concept and self-esteem of clients as they compare their own lives with those of the celebrities they encounter. The writer’s findings may contribute to the field of social work because it honors the social work ethical principle of competence which encourages increased proficiency in professional skills and knowledge, which can then be applied to practice. This study will hopefully increase the competence of social worker as they learn more about the social world in which their client’s live. The hope is that this study will also help social workers gain insight into a largely unstudied mechanism through which people cope with loneliness: media consumption. Because the greatest prevalence of one of the most important by-products of loneliness (depression) tends to be amongst poor and minority 4 populations, social workers can therefore gain a richer understanding of the ecological world of clients, specifically with respect to the most vulnerable populations. Background of the Problem Mental and Physical Health. American’s spend a great deal of time consuming media. The average American spends 140 hours per month watching television—about a fifth of their lives (Nielsen, 2011). As technology improves, Americans are better able to access television away from home and at their convenience. For example, the availability of DVR (digital video recorders) and mobile phones that can access the internet or television programs has made media literally at one’s fingertips. In the first quarter of 2009 alone, thirteen million American got their media through mobile viewing and watched over eight hours of DVR recorded shows (The Nielsen Company, 2009). According to the World Bank World Development Indicators report in 2009, 78.1 % of the American population uses the internet, as opposed to 36.6% ten years prior. Furthermore, 32% of people who use social media follow a celebrity (Nielsen, 2011). Loneliness in the United States is viewed largely as a growing epidemic because of the debilitating effects it has on the physical and psychological health of individuals. Perceived social connectedness decreases the level of autonomic activities such as lower resting blood pressure, increases immunoservailance (cells that monitor and fight disease), and lowers levels of stress hormones. Conversely, low perceived social support is associated with increased heart disease, body mass index, smoking, drinking and 5 metabolic rate. Social isolation is also a good predictor of morbidity and mortality from cancer and cardiovascular disease (Hawkley & Cacioppo, 2003). However the implications loneliness has for mental health are also staggering. To admit that one is lonely in itself is a taboo in modern society (Killeen, 1998). Loneliness can be devastating; it can make one feel hopeless, useless, and without purpose. Furthermore, it can result in desperate attempts to fill the void of closeness, sometimes in non-constructive ways. Research of characteristics of the lonely indicate that the loneliest people often believe they are self-absorbed and self-centered. Lonely people were also found to have a general negative view of the world (Kileen, 1998). Thus, loneliness can in many cases lead to depression, even after controlling for a wide range of demographic and psychosocial variables. Working in tandem with depressive symptoms, loneliness can lead to many of the aforementioned health risks which can diminish the welfare of an individual over the lifespan (Cacioppo et al., 2006). The populations most affected by loneliness are young adults and the recently divorced (Rubenstein, Shaver & Peplau, 1979). This is because young adults tend to be unattached, longing for that “one special person,” and are generally more likely to feel alienated. They also tend to feel as if they are not understood or not needed. (Rubenstein, Shaver & Peplau, 1979). Media consumption is a popular means of coping with the hopelessness of loneliness. Media consumption (watching television, using computers etc.) is identified as “sad passivity” and is associated with the loneliest and most depressed young individuals. More vigorous coping strategies such as exercise, 6 hobbies and writing are associated with more minimal degrees of loneliness (Rubenstein, Shaver & Peplau, 1979). People in this population are also the most likely to consume media. Simultaneously, television households are at an all-time high, with young adults (18-49) continuing to be the highest media consumers with respect to television (Neilsen, 2011). Racial and Ethnic Considerations. Being a minority and being poor are the strongest indicators for the prevalence of depressed symptoms (Riolo et al., 2005). African Americans and Mexican Americans are more likely to be chronically dysphoric over the course of the lifespan (Riolo et al., 2005). Furthermore, low socio-economic status is associated with higher levels of depression. This is because low socio-economic status, paired with the stressors of poverty and financial strain work in tandem to result in increased risk of depressive symptoms (Lorant et al 2007). Persons living in poverty are 1.5 times more likely to have Major Depressive Disorder; largely the same cohort of persons with lower socio-economic status (households making $20,000) who have been reported to consume media at a rate almost double that of those in the middle class (households making $60,000) (Nielsen, 2011). Minority and socio-economic status are also predictors of the likelihood of media consumption (Nielsen, 2011). With respect to diversity, racial and ethnic minorities, specifically African-Americans and Hispanics, are more likely to consume media compared to the general population. According to the Neilsen Television Audience Report (2011), Blacks and Hispanics have higher tuning levels than the composite of the 7 entire population, with 79 and 60 hours per year respectively, as opposed to 59 hours compositely. Statement of the Research Problem This study will investigate which aspects of loneliness are most associated with increased parasocial interaction with celebrities and other media figures. Loneliness is a condition that can affect both the social and psychological wellbeing of the individual. Because loneliness is a multi-faceted phenomenon, it can be argued that specific characteristics of feeling lonely (for example, feelings of depression and social disconnection) are the facets that can have the deepest impact. People develop methods of coping to alleviate the pain of loneliness, including consuming popular media. Though media provides a degree of escapism for the consumer; a way to forget life problems, at least for a short time, the relationship between viewers and the media characters they encounter has been largely unstudied. Also unstudied are the benefits of such relationships. Are parasocial relationships with celebrities providing lonely people with the intimacy of friendship, love or companionship they are unable to obtain in the real world? Are lonely individuals more likely to find meaningful identity in parasocial relationships? These questions must first be answered before a judgment on the value of these relationships can be made. 8 Purpose of the Study An exploratory study by design, this study’s purpose will serve to identify the degree to which emotional health (loneliness) and parasocial relationships are associated. The aim of this study is to increase the social work understanding of human behavior and the social environment, as it will highlight a phenomenon that is largely ignored in the field; the degree to which the behaviors, attitudes, and psychological wellbeing of clients is connected to the world of media and media figures. From a micro social work perspective, the findings from this study may benefit direct social work practice with individuals and families. By helping to identify how the emotional vulnerabilities of clients are often resolved through the emotional feedback and personal identification they acquire from media and media figures, this study may aid the practitioner in recognizing how media influences client’s perceptions of the world. We are all in some way oriented to the world of popular culture. For some, popular culture is the only world we know, for others it is a fun pastime, but at some point everyone encounters it. Social workers must be aware of the level of importance to which clients hold popular culture, because popular culture serves a variety of functions in the lives of clients. Pop culture helps to define behavioral norms, establishes the boundaries of society, and can influence revolution and social change (Kidd, 2007). In this sense, clients who are consumers of popular culture may choose to subscribe to the same values with figures they encounter on television or film, feel validated as their feelings are reflected in a popular song, or develop their own moral compass largely by 9 identifying with the principles and actions of a popular media figure. Thus the lives of clients are enveloped in the influence of popular culture (Rubin, 2008). This influence no doubt affects the thoughts, feelings, and attitudes of clients. Therefore it is the responsibility of social workers not to underestimate the degree to which popular culture can influence client decision making. These perceptions are not necessarily negative. Many therapeutic strategies like Narrative Therapy utilize identification with media figures to help clients build solutions by using media figures as examples. There is a need to find relationships between emotional health and components of loneliness, and parasocial relationships with celebrities or media figures in order to inform social workers of the important role popular culture plays in the everyday lives of clients. Research Question This study addresses the following research question: What is the relationship between emotional health as it relates to components of loneliness, and parasocial relationships with celebrities or media figures? Theoretical Framework The theoretical perspective used for the purpose of this study is based in Psychodynamic theory. The facets of Psychodynamic theory and its relevance to emotional health and parasocial relationships with celebrities or media figures will be explained as it applies to social work practice. The basic assumption of Psychodynamic Theory is that conflict, both interpersonal and intrapsychic is inevitable (Zeldow, 2010). Humans are complex beings 10 attempting to make sense of incompatible goals and paradoxes of life. We attempt to rationalize these conflicts through hypothetical psychological structure: the Id, the Ego and the Superego which all exist in our unconscious mind. The Id is governed primarily by the pleasure principle: the desire to avoid pain and seek pleasure without delay of gratification. Thus it seeks to satisfy our most basic urges. The Ego, which operates under the reality principle, exists to postpone gratification until an appropriate object is found to satisfy one’s urges through realistic thinking and problem solving. The Superego is said to give balance to the two and represents the values and norms of society. It is essentially one’s conscience. When these three forces are at odds, one is said to be in conflict (Zeldow, 2010). Psychodynamic perspectives of the past have held that behavior seeks to serve some aggressive or sexual urge, but the idea that has been more widely adopted into modern theory is the concept of Object Relations (Greenberg & Mitchell, 1983). Because Psychodynamic Theory assumes that the events of childhood significantly affect the behaviors one exhibits in adulthood, one of the most important developments derived from this idea is the assertion that objects are significant others. People can act as objects. Therefore parent child interaction in early life is critical to development. Movement from dependence on a parental figure towards independence as an adult is central to autonomy (Zeldow, 2010). This allows the individual to be open to meaningful attachments with others. If this process is disrupted it can result in the constant effort on the part of the individual to attempt to reestablish this connection in 11 maladaptive ways. If a firm sense of self is not developed, attempts to form attachments with others may be nothing more than a way of compensating for the inability to do so at an early stage. In such cases, the object of affection is not seen in an accurate way, but as the main source of nurturance (Zeldow, 2010). In short, Object Relations is the mechanism through which the individual gains a basic sense of connection with the social world around them. It is through this sense of connection that the individual feels calm and secure (Greenberg & Mitchell, 1983). These connections, according to Psychoanalytic theorist Heinz Kohut, are not limited to connections at childhood, and therefore should not be looked at pathologically in adulthood. Rather the need for nurturance and human affection from a significant object is looked upon as a basic human need that is sought after throughout the lifetime, but may intensify if not met in the early stages of development (Greenberg & Mitchel, 1983). In keeping with the psychoanalytic tradition, Greenberg and Mitchell (1983) assert that the earliest motivation in life is the desire to avoid pain and enhance the pleasurable experience of attachment with others. As the individual grows, they learn to associate with pleasurable relationships, while dissociating with relationships that are either harmful or do not meet the aforementioned need for closeness. Thus people may tend to enhance or intensify relationships that best fit their need for interaction, while attempting to make those that do not fit their purposes disappear. In adulthood, we seek relational experiences that are most similar to the most pleasurable we have ever experienced, and this attempt to re-experience pleasurable relationships is constant 12 phenomenon. We essentially never stop pleasure seeking. In adulthood, we expect for significant people in our lives to exhibit “role responsiveness,” the testing out of whether or not a person will respond in sought after ways that will reconstruct the original interaction (Greenberg & Mitchell, 1983). Viewed in terms of psychodynamic theory, the research question would be explained in terms of a lack of meaningful attachments with objects; in this case, significant others, friends or any other relationship that would serve to enable an individual to feel connectivity to others. From a psychodynamic perspective, people are constantly seeking to re-establish the best pleasurable experience of connectivity they have ever experienced. This experience occurring most usually at childhood is the catalyst through which people endeavor to find comparable affection. In adulthood, people tend to seek affection not in parental figures, but in friends and romantic partners. When there is inconsistency in one’s ability to create meaningful attachment with others, the result is loneliness. Therefore the person does not feel adequately nurtured. As a result the person may seek meaningful attachments to alternate objects to compensate for this void (seeking to satisfy the urge for attachment). Celebrities and media figures are exemplary figures through which lonely individuals can form safe attachments. Though not mutually satisfying in the classical sense, parasocial relationships may be preferential for many lonely people because these such relationships offer minimal risk. Celebrities do not argue, they have no opinions of their admirers, and they almost never leave. Essentially, the research question in terms of psychodynamic theory 13 may be posed in the following way: In what ways do celebrities and other media figures serve as alternate forms of connectivity when people do not feel that they are adequately connected to others? Definition of Terms The following terms are used throughout this project and are common used in both the study of parasocial interaction and of loneliness. Parasocial Interaction Describes one-sided relationships in which one party knows a great deal about the other but the relationship is not mutual (Mccutcheon & Ashe, 2001) Loneliness The unpleasant experience that arises when a person’s system of social relations is lacking in some important way; either quantitatively or qualitatively (Rubin, Perse & Powell, 1985) Celebrity A famous or celebrated person (Merriam-Webster Dictionary, Online). Identity The sense of self that develops as the child differentiates from parents and takes a place in society (Jary & Jary, 1991) Solitude The absence of social interaction (McCutcheon, Aruguete & Scott & Von Waldner 2004). 14 Need to Belong The need to form and maintain at least a minimum quantity of lasting, positive, and significant interpersonal relationships (Mellor et al., 2008) Assumptions The following assumptions have been made in this study: 1) most people have knowledge of (even if in some minimal way) at least one celebrity or media figure; 2) people tend to act emotionally towards media figures in a general sense; 3) loneliness is a characteristic common to human experience; 4) meaningful attachment to another person is a fundamental human need; and 5) people utilize media as a means of coping with adversity. Justification Social work has of course been concerned with the effect of media on society and the individual, but little research has been done into the ways in which the individual interprets and uses media for his or her own social or psychological needs. Principal to social work values in the National Association of Social Workers Code of Ethics (2008) is the “importance of human relationships.” Social workers should therefore be concerned with parasocial relationships, and the factors contributing to the creation of parasocial relationships. They should also be concerned with the emotional vulnerabilities, specifically the lack of human relationships that may lead to the use of parasocial relationships as a coping mechanism used to reconcile the lack meaningful human contact amongst lonely individuals. The results of this study may assist social workers towards a greater understanding of the ways in which the emotional response of 15 clients can be greatly influenced by stimuli outside of the classic, ecological sense (family, institutions etc.) and can help to expand the understanding of cultural systems to include the effects of media on client behavior. As described in the National Association of Social Workers Code of Ethics (2008), social workers should aim to be competent to remain in keeping with ethical practice. Therefore they should keep current with knowledge relevant to social work. It is the researchers belief that media culture is relevant to social work practice as “who we are or aren’t—alienated or not—is, for many of us, largely defined by our relationship to popular culture” ( Rubin, 2008, p.xxi). Clients are constantly living in a world saturated by media influence, to ignore the degree to which that influence plays a role in the lives of our clients would be to ignore a field of knowledge that could be utilized in groundbreaking ways. Delimitations This study will examine one facet of emotional health as it relates to parasocial behavior. While it is impossible not to discuss the interconnectivity between loneliness and other facets of emotional health (for example, depression), it is not the focus of this study to expand these in great detail. Furthermore, this study does not aim to describe parasocial relationships resulting from loneliness as beneficial or detrimental, but to explore the extent to which the two are related. Further research would be needed to explain the implications of the findings of this study. The research is not generalizable in the sense that it is limited to the responses of Sacramento State students, not the population as a whole. Furthermore, this study is quantitative by design. The study is descriptive and does not provide an in depth analysis into the motivations nor a rationale 16 behind the phenomenon being explored. This purpose of this study is therefore to explore the degree of relationship between aspects of loneliness and parasocial relationships with celebrities. Summary In this section, the researcher outlined the background of the problem, the statement of the research problem, the purpose of the study, and the theoretical framework used to guide the research. Important terms utilized for the purposes of the research, as well as assumptions, justifications and limitations of this study were also discussed. Chapter 2 will consist of a review of the literature on the following themes: loneliness and the need to belong; parasocial relationships; characteristics of people involved in parasocial relationships; identification; the existence of imaginary social worlds; the role of attachment theory in parasocial relationships; and attachment and loneliness. Chapter 3 will include a description of the research methodology enlisted for the study. The data analysis will be described in Chapter 4. Lastly, in Chapter 5, conclusions, implications, and suggestions for further study will be discussed. 17 Chapter 2 REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE Introduction This chapter reviews pertinent literature with regards to loneliness and parasocial relationships with celebrities, especially as it relates to the history of fandom and celebrity worship. These two concepts are key to understanding many facets of the research question. The first section explains the historical background of parasocial relationships from its roots in fandom to the rise of the Hollywood star. The second section is an overview of the concepts of both loneliness and the need to belong, delineating the difference between the two. The researcher will describe the phenomenon of loneliness itself as it relates to the basic human need for meaningful social interaction with others. Strict distinctions will be made between loneliness and isolation. The third section will explain parasocial relationships and imaginary social worlds in greater detail. The fourth section will highlight the characteristics most descriptive of people who tend to enter into parasocial relationships and the rationale of individuals who are likely to participate in parasocial relationships. In the fifth section, the role of identity will be explored as it relates to the power of celebrity influence in the lives of individuals. The sixth section will address the importance of Attachment Theory in the study of both parasocial relationships and loneliness. Finally, the gaps in the literature will be discussed. 18 Historical Background Parasocial relationships have been a field of interest for researchers for some time, especially since the advent of television into popular culture. However the examination of the forces through which parasocial relationships are fostered has been studied through many different lenses from psychology and sociology to studies communication studies. Only recently has the connection between emotional health and parasocial relationships been a concern for study, and the rationale for the connection between the two is as vast as the study of imaginary social worlds in general. A Historical Background of Celebrity and Parasocial Relationships If looked at solely in terms of historical context, celebrity is a relatively new phenomenon (Inlgis, 2010). Concepts of fame amongst the masses date back to Roman times, but the real roots of celebrity begin later in time, where in mid-eighteenth century London, capital quickly replaced the court as the epicenter of social relations. With this movement came the rise of the individual and the demise of the monarch (Turner, 2004). This change in social fabric opened the doors for people to be admired not by their title, but for their more urban activities. Admiration followed what you did rather than who you were. Suddenly journalistic radicals, scientists, poets, and others outside of the traditional royal societal construct began to rise to fame. At the same time, the theatre rose to prominence, with its leading figures becoming instant celebrities, setting the groundwork for what would later be the equivalent to what film did for Hollywood (Inglis, 2010). 19 Still, prior to the Twentieth Century, there was no real concept of celebrity as we know it today. The concept of a true celebrity rose to fame just as mass media began to expand to include not just newspapers, but radio and film (Turner, 2004). Not only were newspapers attaining levels of mass circulation, but the invention of the camera allowed people to not just read about important figures, but to see them. This laid the groundwork for the publicizing of people, as media figures faces could now be disseminated across the country with rapid speed (Gamson, 1994). Later, with the subsequent invention of public relations and publicity promotion, the celebrity became elevated as a glamorous commodity in need of protection. Indeed prior to the twentieth century, there were of course people who were successful and therefore famous. But in 1920, when Adolf Zukor, founder of Paramount pictures offered the first one million dollar contract to actress Mary Pickford everything changed. Suddenly what a person had accomplished had little to do with the amount of fame one could acquire (Schnickel, 1985). Following this event, newspaper tycoons like Walter Wenchell began to highlight the private lives of celebrities even as the rather conservative news media was scarcely brave enough to report on even a pregnancy for fear of offending people with bad tastes (Gabler, 1995). Suddenly, fans could read about the private details of celebrity lives, including the most taboo of activities. By 1922, over half of biographical interest stories reported in magazines were related to celebrity lives, as opposed to ten years prior, when political interests dominated popular reading. At the 20 same time, magazines celebrating nothing but the lives of actors of stage and screen began to hit newsstands (Turner, 2004). No stronger influence to the rise of celebrity can be identified than of the motion picture industry (Turner, 2004). As the American film industry began to develop newer and better means of bringing films to mass audiences, the strength of celebrity developed. Initially the names of actors in films were not disclosed as many working actors saw working in moving pictures as a move that could taint their reputation, seeing it as “below the stage” (Turner, 2004). But as the years went on, actors faces became more and more recognizable, and personalities seen on the screen became in much higher demand. Acting on the silver screen became increasingly more acceptable. By the 1950s, people were becoming acquainted with an altogether different way of encountering celebrity through television. With television came a new experience of celebrity, marked by a more intimate, immediate, and spontaneous experience in which people could identify more closely with the personalities of the celebrities they encountered (Bennett & Holmes, 2010). The pull of attraction to movie stars was the mystery behind the concealment then revelation of their personalities. Television was much more concerned with convincing the audience that TV stars were relatable, ordinary and authentic. This is because networks need viewers to form closer bonds with the stars of television shows in order to convince them to tune in week after week (Bennett & Holmes, 2010). Although television programming now focuses on the lives 21 of the rich and famous in recent years, the need for television personalities to be relatable continues be a goal of producers. Today, with the advent of the internet, handheld cameras, cellular phones, and reality television, celebrities on both stage and screen can be encountered at any time. People no longer need to be sitting in front of the television or in a crowded theatre to see their favorite celebrity (Leslie, 2011). This had no doubt changed the climate of celebrity interactions with the public in recent years. Yet the same basic connections that were established years ago seem to hold true; celebrities still want to be relatable, and people still want to relate to them. The very intimacy people feel when encountering celebrities sets the stage for the phenomenon of parasocial relationships to occur. Loneliness and the Need to Belong: An Overview A thorough understanding of the relationship between parasocial relationships and aspects of loneliness first requires an understanding of the study of loneliness and the need to belong in general. This researcher will attempt to describe the ways in which the study of loneliness has converged with the study of parasocial relationships, mainly as a means of coping or resolving feelings of other-oriented loneliness by individuals. It is important to note that loneliness and solitude are altogether different experiences. For example, (Rokach 2011) asserts that contrary to popular thought being lonely is not necessarily and consequently being alone. Being alone is simply the reality of being without others, while being lonely is the subjective experience that is very much connected with situational aspects of one’s life. It consists of disagreeable feelings that 22 arise when an individual experiences an inconsistency between the relationships they desire, and the relationships they currently have (Mellor et al., 2008). Furthermore, being alone can have positive and in fact therapeutic implications. For some, being in solitude allows for self-reflection, creativity and relaxation. Greenwood and Long (2009) found that a strong predictor of coping with loneliness or loss was other-oriented solitude. Thus it is the lack of connection with others that results in the subjective experience of loneliness this researcher is studying. Loneliness, then, must be dismantled into its smaller components (aspects) to gain an understanding of how it affects the psychosocial world of the individual. For this reason, the construct of Russell’s UCLA Loneliness Scale (1996) used for the purposes of this study assumes that loneliness is a single state that can be reached through many different relational deficits. Researchers have been concerned with the physiological and psychological effects of loneliness for quite some time. One of the most widely studied aspects of loneliness, and perhaps the most important facet for the purpose of this study is the need to belong. Researchers have theorized that the need to belong is a fundamental human motivation; an essential human need like food, water and shelter. Failure to satisfy this fundamental need can result in adverse consequences for general health (Baumeister & Leary, 1995). Mellor (2008) found that when belongingness needs go unmet, the result is loneliness which then in turn affects wellbeing. According to Hagerty and Petusky (1995), the need to belong is a significant predictor of mental health difficulties ranging from depression to anxiety and 23 suicidality. Better connectivity with others can also foster more healthful behaviors. In an investigation of stress and social support, House (1981), found that social support was connected with better personal hygiene, nutritional choices, restful activities, and exercise, all of which contribute to the lifespan. Because we require satisfaction of our need for social connectivity, Beaumiester and Leary (1995) assert that we may attempt to supplement those missing interactions with a surrogate. The bonds that we create with others cannot be partially satisfying. They must feel to the individual that there is some semblance of mutual positive caring. When these needs are not met, the individual may attempt to replace inadequate social relationships with another relationship that provides similar benefits. This action is known as substitution. Parasocial Relationships and Imaginary Social Worlds American society is saturated with media culture. Caughey (1978) theorizes that most Americans only know about two to three hundred people with whom they actually interact, but are also oriented with another world of beings entirely. Celebrities belong to a world of people whom we know and find significant, but with whom we never actually engage. Through books, movies, television, and internet, it is nearly impossible not to come into contact with celebrities and media figures (both fictional and real) in everyday life. Caughey (1978) believes that these beings in our “artificial world” are several times more numerous than those with whom we actually interact. 24 But to say that we never engage with these figures is not a complete truth. While we do not have face-to-face interactions with media figures, we may have artificial interactions with them in which we go “away” to what Goffman (1963) called a “playlike world” in which [we] alone participate[s]” (p.69). Thus we enter into parasocial relationships with these figures. These relationships allow us to generate our own imaginary constructions of our relationships with media figures. These relationships may closely resemble those of our actual lives. A certain guise of intimacy is created as the production of media is manipulated such that the viewer feels that the figures on the screen are somehow interacting with them (Caughey, 1978). The extent to which the viewer identifies, sympathizes or likes a character has considerable influence over the degree to which the individual transports into the narrative of the parasocial relationship (Green, 2004). These imaginary social worlds in which viewers find themselves participating can serve a variety of purposes. McQuail et al. (1972) identified two essential functions of parasocial interaction: companionship and personal identity. Similarly, Rosengren and Windahl (1972) concluded that the most important function of parasocial relationships was as a source of alternate companionship resulting from insufficiencies in social life. Thus parasocial interactions may provide the viewer with attributes that create frameworks for improvement of the self, but more importantly, may compensate for what the viewer may be lacking in real relationships. When viewers find their own relationships dissatisfying, they may use parasocial relationships with media figures in a 25 compensatory way. Katz and Lazarsfeld (1955) suggest a “substitute for socializing activity” is therefore created. Essentially, we may substitute what is lacking in our real relationships by supplementing or substituting them with parasocial ones. However, these relationships do not occur in a vacuum. There are many factors at play that create imaginary social worlds, making it easier to participate in these narratives. Parasocial relationships with media figures are bred through the interplay of several important factors. Caughey (1984) identified several facets of social relations with media figures that contribute to the creation of these imaginary social worlds. First, there are cultural considerations—specifically those of mainstream American society. There is a particular expectation of knowledge of prevalent media figures in American society. “True Americans” can identify these media figures at will. Failure to recall these figures or their importance can be seen as problematic, even anti-social. Often the individual who does not exhibit knowledge of these figures is seen as outside the norm. A prominent example is American sports teams and young males. Young males are expected not only to know various sports teams, but also the individual players on the teams, their team numbers, statistics and personal information. Thus it is in the individuals’ interest to be well acquainted with media figures to avoid situations of social exclusion in a media driven culture. Another explanation as to why these relationships exist is the amount of time we spend in narrative worlds (Caughey, 1984). It is said that by one’s teenage years, the average person spends more time watching TV than attending school, and the average 26 adult watches more than three hours of television per day. It is virtually impossible not to have at least minimal encounters with the entertainment world, especially when media consumption occupies about half of our leisure time. Because we are so often enveloped in these imaginary social worlds, we naturally develop strong feelings about the figures we encounter (Caughey, 1984). As we become acquainted with media figures, we assign our own personal evaluations of them as though they are real, even through a lack of face-to-face contact. Just as in real relationships, we tend to like some, and be indifferent to or dislike others. The strong feelings we develop towards media figures are so personal that the terminology we use to describe them may also be intensely emotional and personal. In discussing evaluations of celebrities, we may use words such as “talented,” or “entertaining,” but more commonly we describe them as if we are intimately involved with them For example, characters or figures we dislike become “shallow,” “phony” or “pompous.” It is difficult not to make real associations with media figures when the ways in which we encounter them seems incredibly real. Editing techniques, dialogue, and storylines help to create a pseudo-involvement between the consumer and the figure (Caughey, 1984). Through various camera angles, we are put into the perspective of the media figure, take on the role of the voyeur (we can see what the figure cannot), or become the object of the figures attention as they speak directly to us by breaking the fourth wall. All of these techniques serve one purpose: to pull the viewer out of the objective social world and into the imaginary world. 27 Aiding in this process is the preexisting knowledge of social behavior that consumers bring with them into the process. Consumers already have engrained in them concepts of good and bad, and these concepts guide their interpretation of media figures (Caughey, 1984). Thus when media figures do something the consumer deems favorable or unfavorable, their subsequent emotional response or attitude towards the media figure will be filtered through this preexisting system of learned knowledge. Characteristics of People Involved in Parasocial Relationships The characteristics of people who participate in parasocial relationships with celebrities differ from that of the general population in several ways. Mccutcheon, Ashe, Houran & Maltby (2003) found that there are levels of absorption into parasocial relationships with celebrities. In their study of individuals who tend to worship celebrities, it was discovered that celebrity worshippers, or those who self-reported to be at the highest level of celebrity absorption, exhibited number of psychological risk factors, one being lower psychological wellbeing. Furthermore they found that cognitive deficits only help facilitate susceptibility towards celebrity worship, but they assert that celebrity worship cannot simply be explained away by some cognitive deficiency found in worshipers that we cannot find in nonworshipers (Mccutcheon, Ashe Houran & Maltby, 2003). Research by Goswick and Jones (1981) suggests that the missing variable between people who seek parasocial relationships and people who do not is the need to avoid feelings of loneliness and the subsequent negative feelings associated with it. 28 Lonely individuals (specifically those lonely individuals who are dissatisfied with their friendship, dating and family relationships) tend to have more problematic emotions such as negative self-concept, self-derogation and negative attitudes toward others (Goswick & Jones, 1981). Mccutcheon, Aruguete, Scott & Von Waldner (2004) found that a person’s tendency to relate to celebrities as measured by the Celebrity Attitude Scale positively correlated with shyness and loneliness. They propose the idea that people involved in parasocial relationships with media figures are attempting to cope with shyness and loneliness by creating a benign non-threatening relationship with a celebrity. People high in need to belong were also found to be more likely to engage parasocially. Moreover, the relationships between other-oriented solitude and media use were found to be the main reason for this relationship (Greenwood & Long, 2009). This suggests that an important characteristic of people who participate in parasocial relationships is loneliness facilitated by the absence of meaningful relationships with others. The need to belong therefore can influence the individual to employ a celebrity or media figure to serve as a type of symbolic surrogate for what is lacking relationally. Identification One explanation of how this can occur is the degree to which the individual identifies with the media figure of choice. Basil (1996) proposes that this process can best be explained by Burkes Dramatism theory, and Kelman’s theory of opinion change. As proposed by Burke, the viewer consumes media; they do not just watch it blindly. They are in fact assigning meaning to what they see. As the individual process this 29 information, they begin to find ways in which they share values or perceptions with the figure. Through this experience, a bond is formed. Once this bond of identification is formed it satisfies some innate need in the viewer (Kelman, 1961). Perhaps the needs that are satisfied by identification with celebrities are simply aspects of a model for the idealized self. Celebrities have talents or mannerisms that admirers would like to develop in themselves, whether they be physical attributes, abilities or ethics (Boone & Lomore, 2001) Kelman (1961) further asserted that there are three processes that contribute to the condition of opinion change: compliance, identification, and internalization. Compliance occurs when the individual takes on influence from another with the hope of achieving some sort of favorable reaction from the other such as entry into a social group. Essentially, the individual complies because the agent wants him to do so. Identification refers to the process by which an individual adopts the behaviors of another person because the behavior is somehow associated with a positive relationship that shapes a person’s self-image. The individual is attempting to maintain an established relationship that meets his needs. Finally, internalization occurs when an individual is influenced by another because the views of the other are congruent with their own. The person adopts the values of another because the other’s values are conducive to the intensification of his own values. Parasocial relationships with celebrities can then be assumed to be influenced by any one of the aforementioned processes, or it may be a combination of two or three 30 (Kelman, 1961) It is possible that there are in fact tangible rewards one could derive from an investment in a parasocial relationship (for example, membership in a club or group of friends that appreciate the same musical artist), that these relationships serve to supplement some innate need in the individual (feelings of loneliness or a need to belong), or that people may be drawn to a given set of values that the celebrity exhibits (political, social affiliations or attitudes of love and life choices). When the individual adopts an attitude or behavior of the object of parasocial relationship, the stronger the level of identification with a given figure, the more likely the individual is to adopt their opinions, feelings and actions advocated by the celebrity (Brown & Basil, 1995). An example of this trend was exemplified by Brown & Basil’s 1996 study of attitudes of HIV/AIDS in connection with basketball player Magic Johnson. The study found that those who identified with Johnson to the greatest degree were more likely to adopt his message of safe sex, condom use, and reduced risky behaviors (Basil, 1996). A similar study performed on people’s perceptions following the death of Princess Diana found that the more people feel connected to a celebrity, the more likely they are to pay attention to media coverage and stories about that celebrity, perform actions they advocate, and take on similar belief systems (Brown, Basil & Bocarnea, 2003). An important distinction found, however, was that people tend to process information through media involvement. The greater the exposure to media, the more information will be processed through a media lens. Thus, if a person already identifies with a particular celebrity, and then encounters them repeatedly through media 31 access, the attitudes they hold will be more likely to have been shaped by that given celebrity. Gender and age were found to be key variables in identification because people who are in the same age or gender category as the celebrity tend to have greater degrees of identification (Brown , Basil & Bonarea, 2003). The most prevalent theoretical perspective researchers have used as a guide for research of identification in parasocial relationships is Kelman’s theory of Identification, though Kelman’s theory is not primarily concerned with parasocial relationships, it is also concerned with self-defined relationships, or those in which one person may be completely unaware that others are role modeling his behavior. Additionally, it provides an explanation of how bonds can be formed between a person and another whom they have never met. The assertion is that individuals seek to preserve or augment selfdefined relationships by adopting the value systems and behaviors of the other (Brown & Basil, 2010). Attachment Theory Explained: A Theoretical Connection Attachment theory has been given a great deal of attention with respect to the study of parasocial relationships in recent years. The roots of attachment theory are based in the work of Mary Ainsworth and John Bowlby. Having worked separately in the beginning, Bowlby’s understanding of developmental psychology and psychoanalysis paired with Ainsworth’s methodology of the concepts created what we know today as modern attachment theory. Early study was mainly focused on the role of attachments 32 between mother and child. Today all meaningful developmental attachments are deemed important (Bretherton, 1992). Attachment theory has two central components: a normative component, and an individual difference component. The normative component aims to describe human attachment in its most basic terms. It outlines typical patterns of behavior and stages of development that all humans generally pass through. The individual difference component examines deviations from this normative model. Most research performed today is done from an individual difference standpoint, but it is important to have an understanding of what is considered basic human attachment processes to evaluate differences (Simpson & Rholes, 1998). The basic premise of attachment theory originated by the work of Bowlby, stresses that attachment is a behavioral system in which children form connections to caregivers. Attachment theory asserts that infants develop strong emotional ties to caregivers in the earliest years of life. Through these attachments the child accrues vital social-emotional development and an increased overall sense of wellbeing (Roth-Hanania & Davidov, 2004). The main function of the system is to increase the likelihood that the need for safety and nurturance of the infant will be met. A child’s separation from the caregiver results in behaviors meant to re-establish contact. These differing behaviors in establishing contact in turn reflect different attachment styles (Cole & Leets, 1999). For Bowlby, the child’s feelings of exploratory safety (the exploratory behavioral system) are directly linked to their feelings of secure attachment to the caregiver; in this case the 33 adult. The more secure the child feels in their attachment to the adult, the more likely they are to venture out away from them, knowing that should the situation become threatening, they can come back to the caregiver for safety. Bowlby therefore made two assertions; first, that differences in quality of caregiver child interactions are largely a product of the history of contact with the caregiver, and second, that these differences in quality of attachment have implications for later life (Sroufe, 2005). Ainsworth furthered this concept through her Strange Situation Procedure. During the procedure, a child is placed in an environment with their caregiver— an adult stranger is introduced to the child. The caregiver is then removed in an effort to trigger the child’s need for caregiver support. The child’s exploratory behaviors and attachment behaviors are examined throughout the process and especially at the reunion between caregiver and child. The different reactions to detachment stress have been assessed as what we know today as attachment styles (Zeanah, Berlin & Boris, 2011). The primary caregiver is considered the child’s “secure base.” This means that to the child they are a strong, safe person on which the child can rely on when his attachment system is aroused (von der Lippe et al., 2010). The mechanism through which the adult transmits attachment safety to the child is generally thought to be through sensitivity and the degree of responsiveness to the child’s signs of anxiety (von der Lippe et al., 2010). Historically, there have been thought to be three main attachment styles in children: secure, avoidant and ambivalent/resistant. Secure attachment is characterized 34 by the direct expression of distress at the separation from the caregiver and active comfort seeking. When comfort is given, the child resumes separation and exploration. Avoidant attachment elicits minimal response to separation, and ignoring or actively avoiding the caregiver when reunited. Ambivalent/Resistant attachment is usually characterized by intense distress at separation. Attempts to seek comfort are usually minimal, awkward and resistant when the caregiver attempts to sooth. A fourth category, disorganized attachment refers to atypical patterns of attachment not covered by previous three main categories. These categories are expanded into more detailed and numerous categories with age. (Zeanah, Berlin & Boris, 2011). Studies of adult attachment assert that similar styles are exhibited in adulthood (Simpson & Rholes, 1998). In studying attachments between parents and children, the prevalent paradigm has been the Adult Attachment Interview AAI. True to its name, the procedure of the AAI is by means of interview. This technique was mainly developed as a means of predicting infant attachment styles by examining those of their parents. However it is not a significant predictor of attachments between adults (Simpson & Rholes, 1998). The prevalent means of studying adult attachment relationships outside of the nuclear family is known as the Peer/Romantic Partner Tradition (Simpson & Rholes, 1998). Similarly to the attachment styles found in children, adults in peer and romantic relationships can be categorized into three distinct categories: secure, avoidant, and anxious ambivalent. Though researchers recognize that adult attachment differs from 35 child attachment in very important ways, they nonetheless have concluded that bonds of affection in adult hood are formed through an attachment process (Shaver, Hazan & Bradshaw, 1987). An important development in the study of adult attachment has been the work of Bartholomew and Horowitz (1991) who found that there are four as opposed to three attachment categories. This is because avoidance can be broken down into two types: fearful-avoidance, and dismissing-avoidance. These attachment styles are now believed to be a reflection of different ways of coping with or controlling interpersonal relationships (Simpson, Rholes & Phillips, 1996). Attachment, Parasocial Relationships and Loneliness A developing field of study involves the role of attachment styles in the absorption of media. Specifically, researchers are interested in the formation of insecure relationships in a parasocial way (Cole & Leets, 1999). Because parasocial relationships function for the individual in much the same way as a normal relationship, “there is reason to believe that parasocial relationships function similarly to ‘real life’ relationships in terms of attachment behaviors” (Cole & Leets, 1999, p. 497). This is because parasocial relationships display central properties of adult attachment (Weiss, 1992). First, individuals will attempt to reduce the distance between themselves and their attachment figure. An example of this behavior is proximity seeking amongst fans of media figures, but perhaps a more solid, everyday example is the collection of information about media figures such as memorabilia and trivia (Ferguson, 1992), or the arrangement of one’s schedule such that one can encounter the media figure on 36 television. All of these behaviors are a means of gaining a sense of closeness. Furthermore it shows how bonds can be formed with the parasocial other even if it is onesided. Second, the object of attachment elicits a sense of security for the individual. Companionship is a significant motive for many viewers (Caughey, 1984). The warmth they feel while making a connection with a given media figure creates sense of safety in the relationship formed, especially when the relationship is a continued one and continues from week to week. Finally, the individual may have a tendency to protest when separation from the attachment figure is looming (Cohen, 2004). For example, campaigns that are often started when a television show is due to be cancelled early. Petitions, message boards, and letters flood studio inboxes protesting the decision, and demanding that the show be reinstated. In a 1999 study, Cole and Leets found that attachment style does have a significant bearing on the degree to which people will tend to engage in parasocial interaction. Specifically, they found those who are Anxious-ambivalent (people who experience the most distress at separation from an attached figure) are the most likely to engage in parasocial relationships. A perhaps more curious finding reported that though more securely attached individuals reported only moderate parasocial interaction, they were more likely they were to form parasocial relationships as their level of distrust increased. They concluded that their findings suggest the possibility that those who are 37 anxious-ambivalent turn to TV characters because they are stable as a mechanism of satisfying idealistic and unsatisfied relational needs. Thus, individuals who experience loneliness related to unmet relational needs (not necessarily the absence of others around them) may seek to buffer these unmet attachment needs through imagined intimacy. Greenwood and Long conducted a 2011 study, in which they examined which types of attachment styles and life circumstances are most vulnerable to parasocial relationships. They found that attachment needs may be exacerbated by the attachment needs of the individual. Consequently, a person who may be more vulnerable to feelings of abandonment or distrust of others in intimate relationships romantic or otherwise, may seek out others who will be available and responsive to their needs. Because media figures are consistent, romanticized, and do not present any serious threat, they make exemplary attachment figures for those with activated attachment needs or difficulties forming attachments with others (Derrick, Gabriel & Tippin, 2008). Moreover, individuals with high attachment needs tend to idealize the behavior and appearance of their favorite character. This suggests that parasocial relationships have a bearing on identity formation when facilitated through attachment styles (Green, Pietromonaco & Lockwood, 2008). The findings remain consistent with respect to parasocial responses to media figures when examined solely by attachment style (Cole & Leets, 1999). Individuals with more anxious attachment styles—that is, those who are more likely to have intense 38 preoccupation with real-life relationships, are the most likely to also have intense preoccupation with imagined ones as well. These imagined relationships may provide dependable feelings of intimacy craved from real life. Furthermore, anxious individuals are more likely to express anxiety over a hypothetical loss or “breakup” with a parasocial other, for example, a character being taken off the air (Cole & Leets, 1999). These characters can be romanticized comforting figures for those who are insecurely attached (Greenwood, Pietromonaco & Long, 2008). The longer a person has been involved in a parasocial relationship with a character, the more that person believes in the qualities of the character, and the more important the individual finds the relationship. Thus people who are already prone to suffer from breakups due to high attachment anxiety may also find themselves with high emotionality when it comes to the breakup of a parasocial relationship (Cohen, 2004). Cole and Leets (1999) also found that same gender parasocial relationships appear to complement same gender real relationships, whereas opposite gender parasocial relationships acted as a compensator for those not involved in a romantic partnership. More importantly, those with high attachment anxiety, high in need to belong, and not involved in a romantic relationship (the loneliest individuals), showed the highast parasocial engagement, especially with opposite gender celebrities (Greenwood & Long, 2011). Attachment styles have a great deal of influence both over the psychological wellbeing of individuals, and their degree of emotional health (Wei et al, 2005). The 39 satisfaction of relational needs (the degree to which people feel autonomous, competent, and related to others serves), as a mediator between ones attachment style and aspects of emotional health (loneliness, shame, and depression). Essentially, attachment anxiety is related to loneliness, but the more one’s psychological needs are meet, the less of an effect that anxiety will have on one’s everyday life. Because people with high attachment anxiety tend to have a more negative sense of self, they have a decreased sense of self-efficacy. This is the degree to which they believe in their own social competence. A lack of self-efficacy is the mediator through which attachment anxiety fosters feelings of loneliness (Wei, Russell & Zakalik, 2005). Gaps in the Literature In reviewing past research related to the question to be studied, the researcher identified several gaps in in the literature. Current and past literature is largely concerned with connecting parasocial relationships with media figures with some theoretical framework, yet the most basic aspects of the phenomenon have yet to be studied. \Attachment theory has been the main framework through which parasocial relationships have been explored with some success; however it has been difficult to provide a description of what factors contribute to the likelihood that an individual will begin to engage in parasocial relationships. Essentially, research has made a leap from behavior to theory without a description of the mechanism through which the phenomenon manifests itself. Furthermore, while a small portion have attempted to focus on loneliness as a mediator, they have not considered that loneliness is multi-faceted. Therefore the 40 loneliness experience may vary from person to person. This study attempts to bridge this gap by identifying which aspects of loneliness are the most applicable to the phenomenon of parasocial interaction itself. Literature has also focused on adolescent television media consumption, largely because adolescents are assumed to be the largest consumers of media, and are also assumed to be more susceptible to celebrity influence. Little research has been done into early adult (18 to 30 year old) parasocial behavior. Because young adults are amongst the loneliest of the U.S. population, the degree to which they engage in parasocial behavior is no doubt valuable to the study of parasocial relationships in general. This study focuses specifically on young adults and utilized a convenience sample of university students. Much of the research conducted on parasocial behavior has largely ignored issues of diversity. While many studies have addressed specific cohorts based on age alone, there has been little examination of the differences of media consumption with respect to categories of diversity like race, class and gender. For example, even though minorities consume media at an increased rate compared to whites, and are more likely to be lonely, there are few research comparisons made across racial lines between loneliness and parasocial behavior. Some comparisons have been made between gender and the object of parasocial activity, but these comparisons have not been extended to include differences in likelihood to engage parasocially between men and women. This study will broaden the scope of the study of parasocial interaction to include comparisons between parasocial interaction and demographic characteristics such as race, age and 41 gender. It will also treat loneliness as a multi-faceted experience by breaking it down into its smaller components. Conclusion The researcher has outlined the vast array of literature aimed at the connection between parasocial relationships and emotional health. An analysis of the literature was written on both the connection between the variables examined for the purpose of this study, and the literature necessary to describe the phenomenon through the lens of the author’s chosen theoretical perspective. In the next chapter, the researcher will describe her research methodology including the study performed, specifics of the research tool and target population. 42 Chapter 3 METHODOLOGY Introduction This chapter examines the research methodology used for the purposes of this study. A description of participants and the selection criteria used to recruit them will be explained, as well as a description of the sample population and the sampling method used. The data collection, instrumentation, and data analysis will be discussed. Also included in this chapter is an explanation of the steps taken to ensure the protection of human subjects. Research Question The purpose of the study was to identify the ways in which emotional health can have an effect on the way we experience and make meaning of popular culture. Specific consideration was given to personal attachment to celebrities as well as how celebrity influence can affect decision making and emotionality. These factors were explored to address the question: What is the relationship between aspects of loneliness and parasocial relationships with celebrities and other media figures? Research Design This study used an exploratory quantitative cross-sectional survey design research method consisting of twenty questions (Likert scale) and four multiple choice questions. Because statistical findings of the data collected will be analyzed, as opposed to observation or personal interview, this study is by definition quantitative in nature. 43 This study utilizes an exploratory research design as there is little previous data available for this topic of research. Though past research studies on parasocial relationships have been performed, few have focused on possible contributory or underlying factors affecting this phenomenon. Thus, the researcher’s use of an exploratory survey study design is to bring to focus the previously unstudied factors of the topic. The data gathering process used for this study is survey research. Surveys are designed to create statistics about a desired population by deducing characteristics of the target population from the answers of the people who take the survey (Fowler, 2009). According to Rea and Parker (2005), survey research requires “solicitation of selfreported verbal information from people about themselves” (Rea and Parker, 2005, p. 4). In order to perform this type of research, a sample of the population to be studied must be identified under the assumption that the responses of the people who take the survey can be representative of the larger target population, and that the answers that they give will adequately correctly describe the characteristics of the target population (Fowler, 2009). Survey research according to Rubin and Babbie (2010) is beneficial because it allows the researcher to examine many facets of the research topic in one questionnaire. Furthermore it allows the researcher to reach larger numbers of people, which increases external validity, (or the ability to standardize information gained), and generalizability to the larger population. Finally, survey research allows for cross-comparisons between the multiple characteristic variables of the population, and the research question itself. 44 When examining these benefits within the context of this study, the benefits of survey research are numerous. Because the researcher cannot feasibly survey every college student in the United States, measuring the responses of a statistically sound sample of students more readily available to the researcher is much more practical with respect to the time and resources the researcher can commit towards the completion of this study. The sample collected can therefore be used for descriptive statistical analysis that can be generalized to a larger population. Because responses are designed such that each participant must respond to the same questions operationalized the same way, ambiguity as to the meanings and reasoning behind questioning is decreased (Rubin & Babbie, 2010). However, survey research is also limiting in several ways. First, survey questionnaires do not explore the deeper meanings behind any given phenomenon and they do not give weight to individual circumstance and variability between persons. Thus, consideration of the context of social life is often not adequately accounted for, and the conditions through which people think and behave are not thoroughly examined (Rubin & Babbie, 2010). Likewise, it is difficult for a researcher to change the nature of the study design in the event that a new variable important to the research is introduced. Surveys also leave open the possibility of biased responses on the part of participants, which may not accurately measure their actual beliefs. However, data from this research can be used as a catalyst for future in-depth study, and it is the hope of the researcher that 45 this research will aid the social work community gain insight into the ways in which popular cultural affects the attitudes and behaviors of the clients it serves. Variables The independent variable in this study is loneliness, more specifically, the aspects of loneliness as defined by the UCLA Loneliness Scale. The dependent variable is the degree to which people engage parasocial relationships with celebrities and media figures. Participant’s aspects of loneliness will be measured in a five point Likert Scale format with respect to level of agreement (strongly agree, agree, disagree, strongly disagree). The aspects of parasocial behavior will also be measured using the same five point Likert format, comprised of questions developed by the researcher originally derived from the Parasocial Interaction Scale. The level of measurement for both the independent and dependent variable is ordinal scale. Control variables include age, race/ ethnicity, gender, and marital status, which are nominal measures. Study Population The study population included students currently attending California State University, Sacramento. The researcher surveyed 46 students, 13 of which were male, and 33 of which were female. This population included various racial and ethnic backgrounds, which included African American (9), Caucasian (10), Asian (18), Hispanic (7) and other (2). All but one participant in the survey (who identified as “married”) identified as “single,” and 42 of 46 participants identified as less than 30 years of age. Four identified as 30 or older. 46 Sample Population The researcher is using a non-probability, convenience sample of 46 students recruited in the Student Union of California State University, Sacramento. The strength of this sample is that respondents are easily available and it is economical to conduct the research. The weakness is that the sample is limited only to those who visited the Student Union on the specific days in which the study was performed and is not representative of the population. Instrumentation Surveys were administered to all participants who first agreed to participate in the study and subsequently signed an informed consent form (see appendix A). A standardized survey, which consisted mainly of twenty Likert-type questions and four demographic questions, was completed by each participant. The survey also contained one fill in question, and two multiple choice questions. To measure the independent variable (emotional health), participants were instructed to rank their level of agreement to the following statements: I feel “in tune” with the people around me, I feel as if there are people I can turn to, I feel alone most of the time, I feel outgoing and friendly, I feel close to people, I feel I have meaningful relationships with others, I feel isolated from others, I feel there are people in my life that really understand me, I have people in my life that I can talk to, I feel I can find companionship when I want it. To measure the dependent variable (parasocial relationships with celebrities), participants were instructed to rank their level of agreement to the following statements: 47 When I see my favorite celebrity becoming emotional, I become emotional too, when my favorite celebrity gives their opinion about something, it helps me make up my own mind about the topic, I feel sorry for my favorite celebrity when he/she makes a mistake, my favorite celebrity makes me feel comfortable as if we are friends, my favorite celebrity keeps me company when he/she is on television, sometimes I make remarks to my favorite celebrity when I see them on TV, I miss seeing my favorite celebrity when they are not on television, I find my favorite celebrity to be attractive, I emulate the fashion/style of my favorite celebrity, when I watch my favorite celebrity on television, and I feel as if I am a part of their world. The reliability and validity of questions for both the independent and dependent variable are substantiated by the research performed by the originators of the scales from which they were derived (Russell, 1996). The UCLA Loneliness Scale-version 3 (the scale from which the questions for the independent variable are derived), has been used to assess loneliness in a variety of populations ranging from college students to the elderly, all yielding similar results. These findings provide strong support for the reliability of the scale. Furthermore, it yielded comparable findings to the values reported in the two earlier versions of the UCLA Loneliness Scale. The validity of the scale was also found to be strong, given that results from Version 3 (primarily of the college population) have significant correlation to other measures of loneliness (Russell, 1996). The Parasocial Interaction (the scale from which the questions for the dependent variable are derived), was also found to have good reliability, as it has been tested and 48 revised against previous versions, all yielding high significance and correlation to one another (Rubin, Perse & Powell, 1985). Data Gathering Procedures The survey was conducted in the Student Union of California State University, Sacramento. The researcher approached potential subjects throughout a month-long data gathering process in the University Union of Sacramento State. The researcher oriented herself at a table central to most participants in the union, where each participant could turn in their survey and enter a drawing as an inducement. The researcher obtained consent by requiring that participants sign an informed consent form prior to completing the survey. The researcher introduced herself and the survey to participants. The researcher then said the following: “My name is Megan Daniel and I am a graduate student in Social Work here at C.S.U.S. I am currently performing a research survey for my thesis on the relationship between emotional health and parasocial relationships with celebrities. Would you consider taking a few minutes to complete a survey? It is completely voluntary and anonymous, so if you don’t want to complete the survey you can hand it back to me with the survey and consent form blank at any time. If you do wish to participate, please read and fill out the consent form. It should only take ten to fifteen minutes to complete the survey. If you have any questions you may ask me immediately, or if you have questions later, you may e-mail me at the address provided on the consent form.” 49 Participants who agreed to participate in the study completed a consent form and then the survey. Data Analysis All data analysis including statistics, frequency distributions, and cross-sectional analysis was performed using the PASW (Predictive Analysis Software) program (version 18). Chi-square analysis was used to examine the relationship between the aspects of the independent variable (emotional health), with those of the dependent variable (parasocial relationships with celebrities and media figures), and were also completed using the PASW program. Chi-square analysis was also used to examine the relationships between participant responses and demographic criteria such as age, race/ethnicity, gender and marital status. Protection of Human Subjects Before data collection began, this study was approved by the California State University, Sacramento Division of Social Work Human Committee for the Protection of Human Subjects as a minimal risk study. Potential subjects were informed of the voluntary nature of the study through the informed consent document provided. Once this document was read, participants were asked to sign this consent form prior to participating in the study which outlined the risks and benefits of participation. The informed consent form stressed that participants could cease participation in the study at any time without consequence. Furthermore, they could choose to skip or decline to answer any question. 50 The researcher made herself available to clarify any questions participants may have had. All responses to the survey were kept confidential. Consent forms and data gathered were stored in a locked cabinet in the researcher’s home. The researcher’s thesis advisor had access to completed surveys throughout the extent of the project up to its conclusion. The researcher’s findings as reported in its finality did not include any information that can be used to identify subjects. All data collected over the duration of the study will be destroyed one month after researcher’s project is filed by Graduate Studies or by June of 2012. Because of the personal nature of many of the questions posed in the survey, information for accessing mental health support services was provided should subjects feel they need it. Finally, the researcher’s contact information was included should participants need additional information about the study. Risk of discomfort or harm was minimized in several ways. First, survey responses were kept confidential. Additionally, survey participants were given the option to cease participation or decline to answer any given question at any time. Finally, in the event that participants should become distressed or experience discomfort from having completed the survey, resources were given for additional support, namely Counseling and Psychological Services at California State University, Sacramento which provides counseling services at no cost to students. Summary This chapter discussed the purpose, design and research methodology in the study. Descriptions of the study population and the study sample were provided, as well 51 as a description of the survey instrument used and the means by which the data acquired was analyzed by the researcher. A detailed explanation of the means by which ethical practice was ensured for the protection of human subjects was outlined. In the next chapter, the data will be analyzed. 52 Chapter 4 DATA ANALYSIS Introduction The following chapter examines the results of the survey performed. The demographic makeup of the respondents will be explored, and participant responses will be discussed as they relate to the research question: the relationship between emotional health (loneliness) and parasocial interaction with celebrities and other media figures. Chi-square tests will be utilized to exemplify relationships between variables. This chapter will conclude with a summary of the findings. Research Question The research question is what is the relationship between emotional health and parasocial relationships with celebrities and other media figures? The factors being explored in relationship to various parasocial behaviors for which findings will be reported are: (1) demographic relationships with the dependent variable; (2) feeling in tune with others; (3) feeling alone; (4) feeling close to others; (5) having someone to talk to; (6) being able to find companionship when needed. Survey Respondents A total of 49 participants completed the survey. After eliminating results from those respondents that did not answer at least half of the questions posed in the survey, the data from a total of 46 surveys were coded and analyzed. 53 Dependent Variable Parasocial Interaction. The dependent variable for the purpose of this study were the various aspects of parasocial interaction derived from the Parasocial Interaction Scale. The questions in Likert scale format were collapsed into two categories in order to create more meaningful statistical analysis. Respondents selected between the following levels of agreement on a four point scale: Strongly Agree, Agree, Disagree, and Strongly Disagree. Two multiple choice questions designed to measure frequency and type of celebrity were also posed. Independent Variables Aspects of loneliness. With the exception of the gender, age and marital status variables, all other variables were recoded following data collection to allow for a richer statistical analysis. The independent variable in this study was the level of agreement various aspects of loneliness derived from the UCLA Loneliness Scale. Respondents chose between the following levels of agreement on a four point Likert scale: Strongly Agree, Agree, Disagree and Strongly Disagree. To allow for meaningful statistical analysis, these variables were collapsed into two categories: Strongly Agree/Agree and Disagree/Strongly Disagree. The process of coding each variable will be discussed under the heading of each category. Age. Because the survey population was comprised of a convenience sample of mainly young adults, age was coded into two distinct categories in order to be more easily utilized for statistical analysis: under 30 years of age, and 30 years of age and 54 older. The age category of under 30 year of age had a total of 42 responses (91.3 percent), while the age category of 30 year of age and older had a total of 4 responses (8.1 percent). All 46 participants responded to this question. Age and Comfort with Celebrities. The relationship between age and the dependent variable “my favorite celebrity makes me feel comfortable as if we are friends” was recoded into two response categories corresponding to the two highest and the two lowest levels of agreement with this statement. Over three quarters (78.6 percent) of the respondents under 30 years of age disagreed that celebrities make them feel comfortable (Table 4.1) This association was approaching significance however two cells that had an expected count less than five (X=5.436; df=1; p=.020). Table 4.1 Age and comfort with celebrities Age Under 30 years of age 30 years of age or older Total Count % within Age % within comfortable % of Total Count % within Age % within comfortable % of Total Count % within Age % within comfortable % of Total My favorite celebrity makes me feel comfortable as if we are friends Agree/strongly Disagree/strongly agree disagree 9 33 21.4% 78.6% 75.0% 97.1% Total 42 100.0% 91.3% 19.6% 3 75.0% 25.0% 71.7% 1 25.0% 2.9% 91.3% 4 100.0% 8.7% 6.5% 12 26.1% 100.0% 2.2% 34 73.9% 100.0% 8.7% 46 100.0% 100.0% 26.1% 73.9% 100.0% 55 Gender. Of the total 46 respondents, 13 respondents (28.3 percent) indicated they were male, and 33 respondents (71.7 percent) indicated they were female. Gender was not found to have any significant relationships to the dependent variable (parasocial interaction) when a chi square test was performed. Gender and Frequency of Celebrity Encounters. The relationship between age and the dependent variable (the frequency with which I see my favorite celebrity) was recoded into two response categories (every day to 4-6 times a week, and 2-4 times a week or less). Equal proportions of men and women saw their favorite celebrity every day to 4-6 times a week. (Table 4.2) (X=5.719; df=1, p=.017). Chi square testing was conducted between the two variables and the association was shown to be statistically significant Table 4.2 Gender and frequency of celebrity encounters Gender Male Female Total Count % within Gender % within frequency % of Total Count % within Gender % within frequency % of Total Count % within Gender % within frequency % of Total The frequency with which I see my favorite celebrity Every day to 4- 2-4 times a week 6 times a week to once a week or less 8 5 61.5% 28.5% 50.0% 16.7% 17.4% 10.9% 8 25 24.2% 75.8% 50.0% 83.3% 17.4% 54.3% 16 30 34.8% 65.2% 100.0% 100.0% 34.8% 65.2% Total 13 100.0% 28.3% 28.3% 33 100.0% 71.7% 71.7% 46 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 56 Race. Of the total 46 respondents, 9 respondents (19.6 percent) indicated they were Black/African American, 10 respondents (21.7 percent) indicated they were Caucasian, 18 respondents (39.1 percent) indicated Asian/Pacific Islander, 7 respondents (15.2 percent) indicated they were Hispanic, and 2 respondents (4.3 percent) responded as “other” but did not specify an identified race. This variable was recoded into two response categories (Caucasian and not Caucasian) in order to be more easily used for statistical analysis. Race and making remarks to celebrities on television. The relationship between race and the dependent variable was recoded into two response categories. Nearly twothirds of the respondents who were not Caucasian agreed that they made remarks to their favorite celebrity when they see them on television as compared to 30% of Caucasians (Table 4.3) (X=3.401; df=1; p=.065). A chi square test was performed between the two variables and though this association was approaching significance, it did not render any statistically significant findings. 57 Table 4.3 Race and making remarks to celebrities on television Race Caucasian Not Caucasian Total Count % within Race % within Remarks % of Total Count % within Race % within Remarks % of Total Count % within Race % within Remarks % of Total Sometimes I make remarks to my favorite celebrity when I see them on TV Agree/strongly Disagree/strongly agree disagree 3 7 30.0% 70.0% 12.0% 35.0% 6.7% 15.6% 22 13 62.9% 37.1% 88.0% 65.0% 48.9% 28.9% 25 20 55.6% 44.4% 100.0% 100.0% 55.6% 44.4% Total 10 100.0% 22.2% 22.2% 35 100.0% 77.8% 77.8% 45 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Feeling “in tune” with others. There were 46 participants who responded to the question “I feel in tune with the people around me.” Among these respondents 6 respondents (13 percent) indicated that they strongly agreed to this statement, 36 respondents (78.3 percent) indicated that they agreed, 3 respondents (6.5 percent) indicated they disagreed, and 1 respondent (2.2 percent) indicated that they strongly disagreed. The “in tune” variable was also recoded into two new response categories: Strongly Agree to Agree representing 91.3 percent of respondents, and Disagree to Strongly disagree representing 8.7 percent of respondents. These recoded variables were compared against the dependent variable “When I watch my favorite celebrity on television, I feel as if I am a part of their world,” which was collapsed into two recoded variables as aforementioned. Nearly three-quarters of respondents who agreed with being 58 in tune with others disagreed that when they watch their favorite celebrity on television and feel as if they are a part that celebrity’s world Table 4.4). This association was approaching significance (X=3.94; df=1; p=.047); however there were two cells that have an expected count less than five. Table 4.4 Feeling “in tune” and feeling a part of a celebrities world I feel “in tune” with people around me Agree/ strongly agree Disagree/ strongly disagree Total Count % within Tune % within World % of Total Count % within Tune % within World % of Total Count % within Tune % within World % of Total When I watch my favorite celebrity on television I feel as if I am a part of their world Agree/strongly Disagree/strongly agree disagree 11 30 26.8% 73.2% 78.6% 96.8% 24.4% 66.7% 3 1 75.0% 25.0% 21.4% 3.2% 6.7% 2.2% 14 31 31.1% 68.9% 100.0% 100.0% 31.1% 68.9% Total 41 100.0% 91.1% 91.1% 4 100.0% 8.9% 8.9% 45 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Feeling Alone. Similarly, 46 participants responded to the question “I feel alone most of the time.” Among these respondents 3 respondents (6.5 percent) indicated that they strongly agreed to this statement, 3 respondents (6.5 percent) indicated that they agreed, 33 respondents (71.7 percent) indicate that they disagreed, and 7 respondents (15.2 percent) indicated that they strongly disagreed. The “feeling alone” variable, as previously mentioned was also recoded into two new response categories: Strongly Agree to Agree representing 13 percent of respondents, and Disagree to Strongly disagree representing 87 percent of respondents. 59 These recoded variables were compared against the dependent variable “When I watch my favorite celebrity on television, I feel as if I am a part of their world,” which was collapsed into two recoded variables as aforementioned. About three-quarters of respondents reported disagreement to feeling alone most of the time and feeling part of a celebrity’s world. Very few respondents actually agreed to both feeling alone and also feeling part of a celebrity’s world Table 4.5). This association was approaching significance (X=4.084; df=1; p=.043), however there were two cells that have a count less than five. Table 4.5 Feeling alone and feeling a part of a celebrity’s world I feel alone most of the time Agree/ strongly agree Disagree/ strongly disagree Total Count % within Alone % within World % of Total Count % within Alone % within World % of Total Count % within Alone % within World % of Total When I watch my favorite celebrity on television I feel as if I am a part of their world Agree/strongly Disagree/strongly agree disagree 4 2 66.7% 33.3% 28.6% 6.5% 8.9% 4.4% 10 29 25.6% 75.4% 71.4% 93.5% 22.2% 64.4% 14 31 31.1% 68.9% 100.0% 100.0% 31.1% 68.9% Total 6 100.0% 13.3% 13.3% 39 100.0% 86.7% 86.7% 45 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Feeling close to people. All 46 participants responded to the question “I feel close to people.” Of those respondents, 13 (28.3 percent) reported that they strongly agreed with this statement, 26 (56.5 percent) reported that they agreed, 6 (13 percent) reported that they disagreed, and 1 (2.2 percent) reported that they strongly disagreed. 60 The “feeling close” variable was recoded into two new response categories. Strongly Agree to Agree representing 84.8 percent of respondents, and Disagree to Strongly Disagree representing 15.2 percent of respondents. These recoded variables were compared against the dependent variable “When I see my favorite celebrity becoming emotional, I become emotional too,’ which was collapsed into two recoded variables according to the two highest, and two lowest levels of agreement. In comparing the two variables, 85.7 percent of respondents reported disagreement to feeling close to others, while at the same time in agreement that when they see their favorite celebrity becoming emotional, they become emotional themselves (Table 4.6) (X=6.717; df=1; p=.010). Two cells had a count less than five. Table 4.6 Feeling close to people and celebrity emotionality I feel close to people Agree/ strongly agree Disagree/ strongly disagree Total Count % within close % within celebemotional % of Total Count % within close % within celebemotional % of Total Count % within close % within celebemotional % of Total When I see my favorite celebrity become emotional, I become emotional too Agree/strongly Disagree/strongly agree disagree 13 26 33.3% 66.7% 68.4% 96.3% Total 39 100.0% 84.8% 28.3% 6 85.7% 31.6% 56.5% 1 14.3% 3.7% 84.8% 7 100.0% 15.2% 13.0% 19 41.3% 100.0% 2.2% 27 58.7% 100.0% 15.2% 46 100.0% 100.0% 41.3% 58.7% 100.0% 61 Having people to talk to. Of the total 46 respondents that answered the question, “I have people in my life I can talk to,” 19 respondents (41.3 percent) reported that they strongly agreed to the statement, 26 people (56.5 percent) reported that they agreed, 1 respondent (2.2 percent) reported that they disagreed, and no participants indicated that they strongly disagreed. The “having people to talk to” variable was recoded into two new response categories with strongly agree to agree representing 97.8 percent of responses, and disagree to strongly disagree representing 2.2 percent of responses. The recoded variables were compared against the dependent variable “the frequency with which I see my favorite celebrity is” which was collapsed into two recoded variables according to the two highest and two lowest levels of frequency (every day to 4-6 times a week, and 2-4 times a week to once a week or less). In comparing the two variables, 88.9 percent of respondents were in agreement that they have people in their lives that they can talk to while reporting the lowest frequency with which they see their celebrity (Table 4.7) (X=6.814; df=1; p= .009). However, two cells had a count less than five. 62 Table 4.7 Having people in one’s life and frequency of celebrity encounters I have people in my life that I can talk to Agree/ strongly agree Disagree/ strongly disagree Total Count % within Talk % within Frequency % of Total Count % within Talk % within Frequency % of Total Count % within Talk % within Frequency % of Total Frequency 2-4 times a week Everyday to 4- to once a week or 6 times a week less 5 40 11.1% 88.9% 83.3% 100.0% 10.9% 87.0% 1 0 100.0% 0.0% 16.7% 0.0% 2.2% 0.0% 6 40 13.0% 87.0% 100.0% 100.0% 13.0% 87.0% Total 45 100.0% 97.8% 97.8% 1 100.0% 2.2% 2.2% 46 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Companionship. All 46 respondents answered the question, “I feel I can find companionship when I want it.” Of these respondents 13 people (28.3 percent) indicated that they strongly agreed to this statement, 25 respondents (54.3 percent) indicated that they agreed, 7 respondents (15.2 percent) indicated that they disagreed, and 1 respondent (2.2%) indicated that they strongly disagreed. The companionship variable was recoded into two new response categories with Strongly Agree to agree representing 82.6 percent of responses, and Disagree to Strongly Disagree representing 17.4 percent of responses. Recoded variables were compared against the dependent variable “Sometimes I make remarks to my favorite celebrity when I see them on TV,” which was collapsed into the two highest and two lowest levels of agreement. In comparing the two variables, 100 percent of respondents who disagreed that they can find companionship when they want it also agreed that they make remarks 63 to their favorite celebrity when they see them on television. About half of the respondents who agree that they find companionship also agreed that they make remarks to their favorite celebrity (table 4.8) (X= 6.632; df=1; p=.010). Two cells had a count less than five. Table 4.8 Companionship and making remarks to celebrities on television I feel I can find companionship when I need it Agree/ strongly agree Disagree/ strongly disagree Total Count % within Companionship % within Remarks % of Total Count % within Companionship % within Remarks % of Total Count % within Companionship % within Remarks % of Total Sometimes I make remarks to my favorite celebrity when I see them on tv Agree/strongly Disagree/strongly agree disagree 18 20 47.4% 52.6% Total 38 100.0% 72.0% 40.0% 7 100.0% 100.0% 44.4% 0 0.0% 84.4% 84.4% 7 100.0% 28.0% 15.6% 25 55.6% 0.0% 0.0% 20 44.4% 15.6% 15.6% 45 100.0% 100.0% 55.6% 100.0% 44.4% 100.0% 100.0% Summary This chapter described the results of the survey performed. The demographic characteristics and the responses of respondents were analyzed in an effort to examine the relationship between aspects of loneliness and parasocial interaction with celebrities and other media figures. Chi-square tests were utilized to find the statistical relationships between variables. In the next chapter, the data gathered will be analyzed. The 64 conclusions, limitations and implications for social work practice and policy will also be discussed. 65 Chapter 5 DISCUSSION Introduction This chapter will begin with a brief summary of the most important findings discovered from the study. Findings presented will be those that were statistically significant, those that were approaching significance, and others that while not significant, were interesting or surprising. Thus a more in-depth discussion of the findings of the study will be analyzed. Next, limitations of the study will be discussed, followed by the implications of the findings at the micro, mezzo, and macro levels of social work practice and policy. The chapter will conclude with recommendations for future research and a final conclusion. Summary There remains little research into the affect that loneliness may have on media consumption on a parasocial level. Past studies have looked only at one facet of loneliness, not the many intricacies of the experience itself. The purpose of this study was to clarify these studies through the exploration of what aspects of loneliness have the strongest relationship with parasocial interaction with celebrities and other media figures. Of the 13 items used to compare against behaviors of parasocial interaction, only one was found to be statistically significant. Seven others approached significance. The variable with the strongest significance, which was also the only demographic variable, was gender and the frequency with which one sees their favorite 66 celebrity. This is consistent with research conducted by Cole and Leets (1999) which found that no differences in sex [gender] are associated with parasocial interaction. Other findings for which chi square tests were conducted did not render statistically significant evidence, but were approaching significance. A chi square test was approaching significance when comparing age with degree of celebrity comfort. This revealed that a greater percentage of respondents under 30 years of age as compared to 30 years of age or older disagreed that celebrities make them feel comfortable, as if they are friends. The chi square was approaching significance for people who were more likely to agree that they made remarks to their favorite celebrity when they see them on television and also disagreeing that they feel “in tune” with others. Chi square tests were approaching significance for reporting disagreement to feeling close to others while at the same time feeling emotional when seeing one’s favorite celebrity becoming emotional. Those who had the lowest frequency of seeing their favorite celebrity also agreed to have someone to talk to about issues. This relationship had a chi square that was also approaching significance. Finally about half of the respondents agreed that they can find companionship when needed and also that they make remarks to their favorite celebrity; a relationship that again was approaching significance. Discussion This study was created to explore aspects of loneliness and parasocial interaction with celebrities and other media figures. The researcher first compared parasocial interactions with the demographic characteristics of race, age and gender. Then, these 67 interactions were compared with aspects of the phenomenon of loneliness. When examining the findings from a psychoanalytical lens, it is important to consider which aspects of loneliness could be most closely associated with the basic human need for connection and the ways in which people form meaningful connections with the world around them through their relationships with others. Age and Parasocial Behavior. Age could play an important role in the degree to which people behave parasocially due to differences in the frequency with which people of different age groups encounter media, and the through differences in the ages at which people are the most likely to experience loneliness. It was therefore surprising that younger adults (under 30 years of age) had higher levels of disagreement to parasocial behavior. Rather, this study found that adults 30 years of age and older were more likely to agree that they behaved parasocially. The researcher believed that the opposite would be true given that the literature suggests that young adults are more likely to experience loneliness (Perlman,1990), and are also the largest group of television media consumers in the United States (Neilsen, 2011). However, more research needs to be conducted to explore the connection between adults and loneliness, as well as adults and parasocial behavior. Gender and Parasocial Behavior. The fact that gender did not play a role in the propensity towards parasocial behavior was not surprising. As aforementioned, a great majority of studies on parasocial behavior have found that sex differences do not play a large role in parasocial interaction. However differences have been identified in the type 68 of celebrity men and women interact with parasocially. Men tend to form stronger parasocial bonds with male celebrities, whereas women form bonds with celebrities of both sexes (Boone & Lomore, 2001). No analysis of the type of celebrity chosen by respondents as a “favorite celebrity” was conducted for the purposes of this study. Race and Parasocial Behavior. Though no significant statistical findings were derived from this study with respect to race and parasocial behavior, the findings were nonetheless interesting. The researcher believed that because they are less likely to be emotionally healthy (Riolo et al., 2005), paired with the fact that they also consume a great deal more media than the general population, minorities would report a higher degree of parasocial activity (Nielsen, 2011). The findings from this study support this assertion as minorities were found to report parasocial behavior at over twice the rate of non-whites. At present little study has been done to investigate the relationship between race and parasocial behavior—information that could help further the knowledge base within the study of media engagement in general. Connectivity with Others. Feeling “in tune” with others, having someone to talk to about issues, and finding companionship when it is needed are important factors that may play a role in the likelihood of parasocial interaction with celebrities. This study may support prior research which found that people whose loneliness experience is due to unmet relational needs may seek to buffer their attachment needs through parasocial relationships (Greenwood & Long, 2011). The aspects of loneliness approaching the 69 greatest significance were those aspects of loneliness that are characterized primarily by a need for attachment to others. In applying findings to the literature, these findings may be consistent with both the psychoanalytic tradition and attachment theory, which consider strength in relationship to others as the key to emotional health. One of the most important aspects of psychodynamic theory is the concept of object relations which asserts that significant others are objects to which we must form meaningful attachments (beginning in early childhood) (Zeldow, 2010). If we are unable to form these attachments, we struggle to do so in adulthood. Sometimes we form attachments but in unhealthy ways. The story is similar according to the study of adult attachment theory. Most people carry their childhood attachment style into adulthood, and these styles determine to a great degree the ways in which people experience intimacy in friendships and relationships (Cole & Leets, 1999). Those who are the most insecurely attached tend resort to more extreme relational behaviors. More research is of course necessary, but the findings of this study suggest that it is the aspects of loneliness that have the most to do with interaction with others that have the most bearing on one’s propensity towards parasocial interaction. That is, the more people feel detached from others, the more they may utilize relationships with celebrities and other media figures to supplement their relational needs and reflect a desire for intimacy, even it is imagined (Cole & Leets, 1999). 70 The findings are also consistent with studies of the need to belong. Because need to belong is not necessarily connected with any one attachment figure, it cannot be described in the same way as attachment theory. Therefore, it is much broader than attachment theory, which focuses on one figure as being the object of connection. Therefore need to belong can be defined to include the desire to be included in groups or the larger society. According to Greenwood and Long (2011), the key elements that encourage parasocial interaction with celebrities is the absence of shared empathy paired with heightened relational needs. Finally, the findings of the research may support the idea that loneliness is a complicated and multi-facted experience. It is for Russell (1996) a multidimensional experience that is characterized by different relational deficits that come together to create what we call loneliness. It was not simply being alone that influenced parasocial behavior; rather it was a feeling of detachment from others which could presumably still take place even in a crowded room full of people. Limitations The limitations of this study include the number of participants (n=46), the way in which participants were obtained for the study, the collection methods, the research tool, the study participants, and the researcher herself. The findings of this study cannot be generalized to the larger population because of the limited number of participants utilized for data collection. Furthermore, the sample procedures used in this study were not representative because a convenience sample of available students was used. The 71 participant’s degree of awareness of the purpose of the study may have influenced the answers reported. The researcher’s bias may have influenced the ways in which the survey was designed, the data collected, and the subsequent analysis of the data itself. In order for further research into this topic to be performed, the study should be duplicated; changes made to the survey, and representative probability sampling methods should be utilized. To gain a richer perspective on the studied phenomenon, qualitative analysis would also be useful. Implications for Social Work Practice and Policy There are several implications for social work practice resulting from this study. First, little research has been done with respect to media engagement in the field of social work, and even less with respect to this research question. The research performed in this study will therefore help to increase the knowledge base. It is the researcher’s hope that the information collected by this study will inspire others to do additional research on this topic. On the micro level, it would be beneficial for social workers to be aware of media as an environmental factor in the lives of clients. Social workers could therefore begin to see media and celebrity as influences that can affect client’s thoughts, beliefs and perceptions. It could also help social workers to be more cognizant of media events as they apply to the individual lives of clients. Furthermore, social workers could reference media in their own practice strategies, not only to build a rapport with clients, but to provide objective examples through which phenomena happen in the lives of others and 72 in the larger culture. Social workers could also gain a richer understanding of how media can be used as a coping strategy. At the mezzo level, the findings of this study can assist social work educators to expand curriculum to include media influences. Client reactions to celebrity and media influence could be used an example of human behavior in the social environment. Through the exploration of how this research topic and topics like it may intersect with theories commonly used in social work, educators can provide students with a deeper understanding of media as more than just an outside influence in the lives of clients. The findings of this study may also provide increased social work knowledge of the differences in media experiences across different populations of people, especially with respect to race, class and gender. On the macro level, social workers can use the research performed in this study to work with media entities such as the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA), as well as entertainment content companies like Viacom to both educate and advocate for media consumers. Social workers can highlight the ways in which the relationships consumers form with media figures do have implications for their lives and behaviors. Social workers could therefore advocate for more conscientious programming, and a greater awareness of human behavior and popular culture amongst media providers. This research could have implications on the policy level as well. Social workers could utilize this research to increase awareness about topics that are consistent with 73 social work principles. For example, information about the degree to which people identify with media can help entities such as the Ad Council which seeks to provide the American public with education on a variety of topics such as teen pregnancy prevention, drunk driving, and foster care. Such campaigns often enlist the help of celebrities who have considerable media influence, and could therefore further awareness about topics that are hot button societal issues. An example of this has been the “It Gets Better campaign,” and the “No H8” campaign, which have utilized celebrity influence to increase awareness about bullying, and homophobia, and the current policies surrounding them. Recommendations The purpose of this study was to explore the relationship between emotional health (loneliness) and parasocial relationships with celebrities and other media figures. The following section is a list of recommendations developed for future and present social workers: Social work education shall recognize the influence of media, particularly the celebrity influence of human behavior and the social environment. This can be done through examining media through the lens of various social work theories and practice strategies. Social work shall be concerned with the ways in which the influence of media and celebrity effects the most vulnerable of society, especially with respect to race, class and gender. 74 Social work shall be concerned with increasing the knowledge base with respect to the use of media and relationships with celebrities and other media figures as a coping strategy for life stressors like loneliness. This can be done by expanding the scope of social work research to strive for a greater understanding of how individuals view media influences (including celebrity) in comparison to their own lives. Social work shall expand its advocacy lens to include institutions that regulate media engagement including the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA), the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), and various other media companies to shed light on the implications media and celebrity influences have on vulnerable groups. Social work shall be concerned with working with media entities to further awareness of issues key to the profession through the use of media and media figures who have considerable influence. Further research shall be done on the topic in order to better understand how emotional health may affect parasocial interaction with celebrities and other media figures. This will in turn better prepare future social workers in understanding this relationship. Areas of focus for future study shall include areas that were either approaching significance, or were significant in the chi square tests. Other studies shall aim for a deeper understanding, and may enlist qualitative research, larger populations and representative sampling populations. 75 Conclusion The primary purpose of this study was to explore the relationship between emotional health as it relates to components of loneliness and parasocial interaction with celebrities and other media figures. The secondary purpose of this study was to increase the amount of research that has been performed on the topic as there is currently little research done, especially within the field of social work. The findings from this study suggest that additional research should be performed on the topic in order for it to be better understood for application to social work practice. Future research ought to include more demographic variables including socioeconomic status and level of education on the likelihood to engage in parasocial behavior with celebrities, an expansion upon the number of aspects of loneliness used in the study, and an expansion of the types of parasocial behaviors performed. The study might also include additional forms of emotional health aside from loneliness. The study needs to be duplicated in order to validate the findings. Supplementary in-depth analysis could be used to further explore this topic and add to the body of knowledge that currently exists. 76 APPENDICES 77 APPENDIX A Consent to Participate in Research You are invited to participate in a research study that will be performed by Megan Marie Daniel, a Master of Social Work student in the Division of Social Work at California State University, Sacramento. This study will explore the relationship between components of emotional health and parasocial relationships with celebrities and media figures. Procedures: After carefully reading this form and agreeing to participate in this study, you will be given a survey containing multiple choice and fill-in questions. This survey should take about 15 minutes to complete. Your survey responses will be kept private and no names will be recorded. As a participant in this study, you are free to decide not to answer any specific question, skip questions, or stop taking the survey at any time. Risks: The discussion of some topics on the survey may illicit some emotional responses as you reflect upon aspects of your emotional health relative to your relationship with celebrities and media figures. If needed, you can seek mental support through California State University, Sacramento Counseling and Psychological Services. They are located in The Well, Primary Care on the second floor. Counseling and Psychological Services provides free counseling to C.S.U.S. students, and can also provide referrals to resources in the community. They can be reached at (916) 278-6416 or www.csus.edu/psysrv/. Furthermore, you may access their Sacramento Valley Community Resource page at www.csus.edu/psysrv/CommunityRes/MentalHealthAgencies.html for regional list of available resources. Benefits: The research gained by completing this survey may help others to better understand the relationship between emotional health and parasocial relationships. In addition, by participating in this study you may gain insight into that ways in which your own emotional health may relate to your relationships with celebrities and media figures. Confidentiality: All information is confidential and every effort will be made to ensure that your confidentiality is protected. Your responses to the survey will be kept confidential. Information you provide on the consent form will be stored separately from completed surveys and will be kept in a locked cabinet in a secure location in the researcher’s home. Throughout the duration of the project, the researcher’s thesis advisor will have access to the completed surveys. The final research report will not include any identifying information. All data will be destroyed as of June 2012, approximately one month after the project is filed with Graduate Studies at California State University Sacramento. 78 Compensation: Participants will not receive any kind of fiscal compensation. Participants will be entered into a drawing to win a gift card $50 to a local retail store as an inducement for participation. Rights to Withdraw: If you decide not to participate in the survey, you may withdraw at any time. You may elect not to answer any specific question on the survey. Consent to Participate as a Research Subject I have read the description on the Research Participation cover letter. I understand that my participation is completely voluntary. My signature or initials indicate that I have received a copy of the Research Participation cover letter and I agree to participate in the study. Signature or initials___________________________ Date_______________________ If you have any questions you can contact the researcher, Megan Marie Daniel via email at Meganmariedaniel@gmail.com, or by telephone at (xxx) xxx-xxxx. Or, if you need further information, you can contact the researcher’s thesis advisor: Maria Dinis, Ph. D., MSW c/o California State University Sacramento (916) 278-7161 dinis@csus.edu 79 Consent to Participate as a Research Subject I have read the description on the Research Participation cover letter. I understand that my participation is completely voluntary. My signature or initials indicate that I have received a copy of the Research Participation cover letter and I agree to participate in the study. Signature or initials___________________________ Date_______________________ If you have any questions you can contact the researcher, Megan Marie Daniel via email at Meganmariedaniel@gmail.com, or by telephone at (xxx) xxx-xxxx. Or, if you need further information, you can contact the researcher’s thesis advisor: Maria Dinis, Ph. D., MSW c/o California State University Sacramento (916) 278-7161 dinis@csus.edu 80 APPENDIX B Survey Instrument Please answer the following demographic questions. Please only circle one option for each category. Age Under 30 year of age 30 years of age or older Race Black Caucasian Asian/Pacific Islander Native American/Alaskan Native Other_________________ Gender Male Marital Status Single Female Married Divorced Widowed Please answer the following questions as honestly as possible. Indicate whether you strongly agree, agree, disagree, or strongly disagree to each question. Circle your answers completely. I feel “in tune” with the people around me Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Agree Disagree Strongly Agree Disagree Strongly Agree Disagree Strongly Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree I feel as if there are people I can turn to Strongly Agree Disagree I feel alone most of the time Strongly Agree Disagree I feel out going and friendly Strongly Agree Disagree I feel close to people Strongly Agree Disagree 81 I feel I have meaningful relationships with others Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree Strongly Disagree Strongly Disagree Strongly Disagree I feel Isolated from others Strongly Agree Disagree I feel there are people in my life that really understand me Strongly Agree Agree Disagree I have people in my life that I can talk to Strongly Agree Agree Disagree I feel I can find companionship when I want it Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Before answering the following questions, take a moment to think about your favorite celebrity. Keeping your favorite celebrity in mind mark the response that is most applicable to you. Please answer honestly. My Favorite celebrity is (please write):___________________________________________ I see my favorite celebrity mostly: In magazines On television Via the internet Other______________ The frequency with which I see my favorite celebrity is: Every day less 4-6 times a week 2-4 times a week Once a week or 82 When I see my favorite celebrity becoming emotional, I become emotional too Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree When my favorite celebrity gives their opinion about something, it helps me make up my own mind about the topic Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree I feel sorry for my favorite celebrity when he/she makes a mistake Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree My favorite celebrity makes me feel comfortable as if we are friends Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree My favorite celebrity keeps me company when he/she is on television Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree Sometimes I make remarks to my favorite celebrity when I see them on TV Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree I miss seeing my favorite celebrity when they are not on television Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree Strongly Disagree I find my favorite celebrity to be attractive Strongly Agree Disagree Agree 83 I emulate the fashion/style of my favorite celebrity Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree When I watch my favorite celebrity on television, I feel as if I am a part of their world Strongly Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Strongly 84 REFERENCES Kate's crown is jeweled, while kim's is tarnished. (2011, December 28. 2011). USA Today, p. 01d. Celebrity. (2012). The Merriam-Webster Dictionary Online Retrieved December 13, 2011, from http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/celebrity Bartholomew, K., & Horowitz, L. M. (1991). Attachment styles among young adults: a test of a four category model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(2), 226-224. Basil, M. D. (1996). Identification as a mediator of celebrity effects. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 40(4). Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497-523. Bennett, J., & Holmes, S. (2010). The 'place' of television in celebrity studies. Celebrity Studies, 1(1), 65-80. Boone, S., & Lomore, C. (2001). Admirer-celebrity relationships among young adults. Human Communication Research, 27(3), 432-465. Bretherton, I. (1992). The origins of attachment theory: john bowlby and mary ainsworth. Developmental Psychology, 28(5), 759-775. 85 Brown, W. J., & Basil, M. D. (2010). Parasocial interaction and identification: social change processes for effective health interventions. Health Communication, 25, 601-602. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2010.496830 Brown, W. J., Basil, M. D., & Bocarnea, M. C. (2003). Social influence on an international celebrity: responses to the death of princess diana. Journal of Communication, 587-605. Cacioppo, J. T., Hawkley, L. C., Waite, L. J., & Thisted, R. A. (2006). Loneliness as a specific risk factor for depressive symptoms: cross sectional and longitudinal analyses. Psycholgy and Aging, 21, 140-151. Caughey, J. L. (1978). Artificial social relationships. American Quarterly(1), 70-89. Caughey, J. L. (1984). Imaginary social worlds. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press. Cohen, J. (2004). Parasocial break-up from favorite television characters: the role of attachment styles and relationship intensity. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 21(2), 187-202. doi: 10.1177/0265407504041374 Cole, T., & Leets, L. (1999). Attachment styles and intimate television viewing: insecurely forming relationships in a parasocial way. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 16(4), 495-511. Company, T. N. (2009). Television, internet and mobile usage in the U.S.: The Nielsen Company. Company, T. N. (2011). Nielsen television audience report 2010 & 2011. 86 Ferguson, M. (1992). Marshall mcluhan revisited: 1960s zeitgeist victim or pioneer postmodern. Media, Culture and Society, 13, 71-90. Fowler, F. J. (2009). Survey research methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. Gabler, N. (1994). Winchell: gossip, power, and the culture of celebrity. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, Inc. Gamson, J. (1994). Claims to fame: celebrity in contemporary america. London: University of California Press, Ltd. Goffman, E. (1963). Behavior in public places. New York: Free Press. Goswick, R. A., & Jones, W. H. (1981). Loneliness, self-concept, and adjustment. The Journal of Psychology, 107, 237-240. Green, M. C. (2004). Transportation into narrative worlds: the role of prior knowledge and perceived realism. Discourse Processes, 38(2), 247-266. Greenberg, J. R., & Mitchell, S. A. (1983). Object relations in psychoanalytic theory: Harvard University Press. Greenwood, D. N., & Long, C. R. (2009). Psychological predictors of media involvement: solitude experiences and the need to belong. Communication Research, 36(5), 637-654. doi: 10.1177/0093650209338906 Greenwood, D. N., & Long, C. R. (2011). Attachment, belongingness needs, and relationship status predict imagined intimacy with media figures. Communication Research, 38(2), 278-297. doi: 10.1177/0093650210362687 87 Greenwood, D. N., Pietromonaco, P. R., & Long, C. R. (2005). Young women's attachment style and interpersonal engagement with female tv stars. journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 25(3). doi: 10.1177/0265407507087964 Hagerty, B., & Patusky, K. (1995). Developing a measure of sense of belonging. Nursing Research, 44(1), 9-13. Harrington, C., & Bielby, D. (2010). A life course perspective on fandom. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 13(5), 429-450. doi: 10.177/1367877910372702 Hawkley, L., C., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2003). Loneliness and pathways to disease. Brain, Behavior, and Immunity, 17, S98-S105. House, J. S. (1981). Work, stress and social support. Reading: Addison-Wesley Educational Publishers. Inglis, F. (2010). A short history of celebrity. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Jary, D., & Jary, J. (Eds.). (1991) The HarperCollins Dictionary of Sociology. NY: HarperCollins. Katz, E., & Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1955). Personal influence: the part played by people in the flow of mass communication Glencoe: Free Press. Kelman, H. C. (1961). Processes of opinion change. Public Opinion Quarterly, 25, 57-78. Kidd, D. (2007). Harry potter and the functions of popular culture. The Journal of Popular Culture, 40(1), 69-89. Killeen, C. (1998). Loneliness: an epidemic in modern society. J Adv Nurs, 28(4), 762770. 88 Leslie, L. Z. (2011). Celebrity in the 21st century: a reference handbook: ABC-CLIO, LLC. Lorant, V., Croux, C., Weiche, S., Denise, D., Mackenbach, J., & Ansseau, M. (2007). Depression and socio-economic risk factors: 7-year longitudinal population study. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 190, 293-298. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.105.020040 McCutcheon, L. E., Aruguete, M., Scott, V. B., & Von Waldner, K. L. (2004). Preference for solitude and attitude towards one's favorite celebrity. North American Journal of Psychology, 6(3), 499-506. McCutcheon, L. E., Ashe, D. D., Houran, J., & Maltby, J. (2003). A cognitive profile of individual who tend to worship celebrities. The Journal of Psychology, 137(4), 309-322. McCutcheon, L. E., Lange, R., & Houran, J. (2002). Conceptualiztion and measurement of celebrity worship. British Journal of Psychology, 93, 67-87. McQuail, D., Blumler, J. G., & Brown, J. R. (1972). The television audience: a revised perspective. In D. McQuail (Ed.), Sociolgy of Mass Coomunications: Selected Readings. Harmondsworth: Penguin. Mellor, D., Stokes, M., Firth, L., Hayashi, Y., & Cummins, R. (2008). Need for belonging, relationship, satisfaction, loneliness and life satisfaction. Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 213-218. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2008.03.020 89 Perlman, D. (1990). Age differences in lonliness: a meta-analysis. Paper presented at the 98th annual convention of the American Psychological Association. Rea, L. M., & Parker, R. A. (2005). Designing and conducting survey research: a comprehensive guide: Jossey-Bass. Riolo, S. A., Nguyen, T. A., Greden, J. F., & King, C. A. (2005). Prevalence of depression by race/ethnicity: findings from the national health and nutrition examination survey III. American Journal of Public Health, 95(6), 998-1000. Rokach, A. (2011). From loneliness to belonging: a review. Psychology Journal, 8(0), 70-81. Rosengren, K. E., Windahl, S., Hakansson, P.-A., & Johnsson-Smaragdi, U. (1972). Mass media consumption as a functional alternative. In D. McQuail (Ed.), Sociolgy of Mass Communications: Selected Readings (pp. 119-134). Harmondsworth: Penguin. Roth-Hanania, R., & Davidov, M. (2004). Attachment. In C. Spielberger (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Applied Psychology (1 ed., Vol. 1, pp. 191-202): Academic Press. Rubin, A., & Babbie, E. (2010). Research Methods for Social Work (7th ed.): Brooks Cole. Rubin, A. M., Perse, E. M., & Powell, R. A. (1985). Loneliness, parasocial interaction and local television new viewing. Human Communication Research, 12(2), 155180. 90 Rubin, L. C. (Ed.). (2008). Popular culture in counseling, psychotherapy, and play-based interventions: Springer Publishing Company, LLC. Rubinstein, C., Shaver, P., & Peplau, L. A. (1979). Loneliness. Human Nature(February), 58-65. Russell, D. W. (1996). UCLA loneliness scale (version 3): reliability, validity, and factor structure. Journal of Personality Assessment, 66(1), 20-40. Schickel, R. (1985). Intimate strangers: the culture of celebrity: Doubleday. Shaver, P., Hazan, C., & Bradshaw, D. (1987). Love as attachment: the integration of three behavioral systems. In R. Sternberg & M. Barnes (Eds.), The anatomy of love. New Haven: Yale University Press. Simpson, J. A., & Rholes, S. (1998). Attachment theory and close relationships. New York: The Guilford Press. Simpson, J. A., Rholes, S. W., & Phillips, D. (1996). Conflict in close relationships: an attachment perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(5), 899-914. Sroufe, A. L. (2005). Attachment and development; a prosepctive, longitudinal study from birth to adulthood. Attachment & Human Development, 7(4), 349-367. doi: 10.1080/14616730500365928 Turner, G. (2004). Understanding celebrity. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. 91 Von der Lippe, A., Eilertsen, D., & Hartmann, E. (2010). The role of maternal attachment in children's attachment and cognitive executive functioning: a preliminary study. Attachment & Human Development, 12(5), 429-444. Waite, L. J., Hawkley, L., C., & Thisted, R. A. (2006). Loneliness as a specific risk factor for depressive symptoms: cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses. Psycholgy and Aging, 21(1), 140-151. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.21.1.140 Wei, M., Russell, D. W., & Zakalik, R. A. (2005). Adult attachment, social efficacy, selfdisclosure, loneliness, and subsequent depression for freshman college students: a longitudinal study. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(4), 602-614. doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.52.4.602 Wei, M., Shaffer, P. A., Young, S. K., & Zakalik, R. A. (2005). Adult attachment, shame, depression, and loneliness: the mediation role of basic psychological needs satisfaction. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(4), 591-601. doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.52.4.591 Weiss, R. S. (1982). Attachment in adult life. In C. M. Parkes, Stevenson-Hinde, J (Ed.), The place of attachment in human behavior (pp. 1971-1984). New York: Basic Books. Workers, N. A. S. (2008). Code of Ethics Retrieved December 31, 2011, from http://www.socialworkers.org/pubs/code/code.asp 92 Zeanah, C. H., Berlin, L. J., & Boris, N. W. (2011). Practitioner review: clinical applications of attachment theory and research for infants and young children. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 52(8). doi: 10.1111/j.14697610.2011.02399.x Zeldow, P. B. (2010). Psychodynamic approaches to human behavior. In D. Wedding & M. L. Stuber (Eds.), Behavior and Medicine (5th ed.): Hogrefe Publishing.