1 Chapter 1 INTRODUCTION In their earliest years, stadiums in the United States were not as grandiose as they are today, but were temporary wooden structures built and deconstructed as needed. Permanent structures became more common by the end of the nineteenth century, though they were made out of wood and liability was extremely high. After fires damaged and sometimes destroyed numerous ballparks, the tradition of wooden construction was abandoned for concrete and steel. (Trumpbour, 2006). In their early years, stadiums and arenas were often privately funded by businessmen and developers, and college campuses funded their own facilities through donations. Public subsidies were not viewed as an effective means of construction until the 1950s with the construction of Milwaukee County Stadium. The Braves’ move from Boston to Milwaukee in 1953 demonstrated public funding of baseball facilities was feasible and could improve profitability, creating a momentum for a construction boom. The Braves’ move was followed by the Brooklyn Dodgers’ and New York Giants’ westward move to Los Angeles, CA and San Francisco, CA, respectively (Trumpbour, 2006). The 1960s and 1970s saw the construction of notable facilities such as Shea Stadium, the Houston Astrodome, Qualcomm Stadium, the Louisiana Superdome, Busch Stadium, and Three Rivers Stadium. Such facilities were circular in design and not ideal for football or baseball spectatorship. Many individuals regarded the facilities as futuristic, reflecting the emerging space program and arms race; New York’s Shea 2 Stadium was designed to emulate the architectural grandeur of the Roman Coliseum in a setting offering modern amenities. Construction slowed in the late 1970s and early 1980s. Renovations occurred at several existing facilities, while construction of Minneapolis’ Metrodome in 1982 and Indianapolis’ Hoosierdome in 1984 were considered anomalies (Trumpbour, 2006). Luxury seating became more popular by the 1990s as teams were charging more than $100,000 a year for private seats, and this money did not have to be shared either the teams’ municipal landlords or with their fellow owners. This could translate into millions of dollars a year in team profits considering there are upwards of two hundred boxes in some of the newest stadiums. This idea is reflected in the construction of Baltimore’s Camden Yards, Cincinnati’s Paul Brown Stadium and Great American Ball Park (deMause & Cagan, 2008), and Philadelphia’s Wachovia Center (Frank, Lopez, & Santana, Fall 1998). Visiting a stadium was not always a matter of spectatorship as many facilities provided programs for the public. Qualcomm Stadium in San Diego, CA hosted a variety of programs such as OMBAC Rugby and RaceLegal, a legal street racing program designed to curb illegal street racing ("Qualcomm Stadium," 2008). The Hubert H. Humphrey Metrodome in Minneapolis, MN hosts a variety of civic events such as the Minnesota State High School League Prep Bowl ("Minnesota State High School League," 2008), the Youth in Music Marching Band Competition ("Youth in Music," 2008), the Hmong American New Year Celebration ("Hmong American New Year Inc.," 2008), Dome Running ("MDRA Dome Running," 2008), and Rollerdome 3 ("RollerDome," 2008). Stadiums have come a long way from their humble beginnings, but this has not come without controversy. Need for the study The use of public subsidies continued in to the 1990s, but slowed toward the end of the century. With bonds for many civic stadium projects of the 1960s were due to expire in the 1990s, team owners were left with the knowledge that competing owners were pushing their host cities to construct new stadiums to exploit new economic opportunities (Trumpbour, 2006). This led to the boom in stadium construction, including the Wachovia Center in Philadelphia, PA. At the time, the Wachovia Center was projected to last over fifty years (Frank, et al., Fall 1998); however, history has shown not all facilities last as long as projected. The Miami Arena was completed in 1988 and became the home of the NBA’s Miami Heat and the University of Miami’s NCAA Basketball Team; the NHL Florida Panthers became an occupant five years later. Built for a low price of $52 million, the facility had a capacity of 14,696; however, the Heat and Panthers soon complained it did not offer revenue-generating suites. The Panthers moved to another facility in 1998, followed by the Heat in 2000 ("Investor pays $28-million for fading Miami Arena," August 12, 2004). The facility sat vacant, garnering the nickname of ‘pink elephant’, until its demolition in 2008 ("Drivers - Beware demolition of Miami Arena," 2008). Ballparks once seen as holy grounds of leisure and places of father-son bonding are now perceived as irreverent places of taxpayer waste providing little or nothing to the public. San Franciscans consistently denied providing money to improve Candlestick 4 Park, while the tenants of the Metrodome in Minneapolis, MN found numerous obstacles in attempting to fund new facilities (Trumpbour, 2006). A coalition in Oceanside, CA called a proposed Chargers stadium fiscally irresponsible; the Chargers dropped plans to construct in Oceanside ("Go Away Chargers," 2007). In early 2009, hundreds of residents of Fremont, CA protested the proposed construction of a ballpark for the Oakland A’s; the A’s dropped these plans shortly after the protest (Artz, February 6, 2009). Also in early 2009, the City of Industry, CA accepted an environmental plan for a proposed $800 million professional football stadium; however, neighboring Diamond Bar, CA and Walnut, CA oppose the project over concerns of traffic, noise, and pollution (McLain, February 26, 2009). Sacramento, CA is one city that was able to avoid the politics of constructing a stadium with public subsidies. The privately-funded ARCO Arena I was opened in 1985 for the Sacramento Kings arrival from Kansas City, MO, serving as a temporary facility until ARCO Arena II’s opening in 1988 (McCormack, 1989). As other cities continued to build new stadiums and arenas, ARCO Arena continued to provide Sacramento a place to see the Sacramento Kings, the circus, concerts, and other shows. This changed after the turn of the century as city leaders began exploring the possibility of building a new arena in the downtown area with the use of public subsidies. The first serious attempt came with the proposed revitalization of Sacramento’s old railyard into a commercial and residential district; however, voters overwhelming voted down the possible use of public subsidies to fund an arena at that site (Fund, 2006). 5 While it has been shown Sacramento residents don’t want to pay for an arena, it is unclear whether they desire one and how they perceive stadiums and arenas in general. The impact of programs for the public is also unclear. It appears the public enjoys programs such as Rollerdome and RaceLegal, but there is no literature to suggest this is the case or to indicate how the program may potentially influence the perception of stadiums and arena. Purpose of the study The purpose of this study is to examine the perception Sacramento’s elected officials hold regarding a new Sacramento arena, and to evaluate how that perception may change if recreation programs for the public were offered at the facility. Research questions In examining the perception Sacramento’s elected officials hold regarding a new Sacramento arena, and evaluating how that perception may change if recreation programs for the public were offered at the facility, the following questions must be answered: What is the general history of stadiums in America? What recreation and leisure programs, if any, are currently provided at stadiums and arenas in America? What is the history of sports and entertainment complexes in Sacramento? What is the history of urban expansion in Sacramento? What is the history of Sacramento’s move to build a new arena in the last decade? Would offering public programs aid in the push to build a new arena in Sacramento? Definitions of key terms ARCO Arena is the name to identify the major sports complex in Sacramento, CA. It was renamed Power Balance Pavilion in 2011. 6 Arena see Stadia/Stadium Cal Expo is the name for the California Exposition & State Fair site in Sacramento, CA. LULU is an acronym used to define locally unwanted land uses. MLB is a set of initials identifying Major League Baseball, a professional baseball league in the United States. NBA is a set of initials identifying the National Basketball Association, a professional basketball league within the United States. NFL is a set of initials identifying the National Football League, a professional football league within the United States. NHL is a set of initials identifying the National Hockey League, a professional hockey league within the United States. NIMBY is an acronym used to define the not in my backyard philosophy and phenomenon. North Natomas is an area north of downtown Sacramento. Stadia/Stadium refers to a facility generally reflecting the original Greek term stadion, meaning ‘the standing place’. The earliest stadiums contained only enough seats for judges and a few dignitaries, and were built in close proximity to an altar. The stadium evolved in to what would become Panathenaic Stadium in Athens and the Roman Coliseum. In the United States, stadiums began as temporary wooden structures, evolving in to permanent wooden structures, followed by brick and concrete structures, to the steel structures seen today. 7 Delimitations Delimitations of this study were as follows: Only current and previous elected officials, holding office at or prior to January 2010, representing the Sacramento region at a City, County, or State level were eligible to participate in the study. The study was performed between February 2010 and November 2010. The study does not focus on stadiums and arenas outside of the United States. Limitations Limitations of this study were as follows: Availability of prospective participants was limited. Study was performed during an election year. Developments in Sacramento’s arena issue were ongoing and ever-changing by the day.