The Center for
Human Resources
San Diego State University
5500 Campanile Drive
San Diego, CA 92182-1625
Tel: 619·594·6404
Fax: 619·594·1147
San Diego
State University
Name:
Management Personnel Plan
Performance Evaluation
Evaluation Period:
College/Department:
Position:
NARRATIVE: PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT
Provide narrative remarks on the administrator's performance in the areas identified in the MPP Merit Evaluation
Guidelines.
Evaluator's Signature/Date
Employee's Signature/Date
COMMENTS:
Dean/Director Signature/Date
VP/Cabinet Officer Signature/Date
SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY
MPP Merit Evaluation Form
Page 1 of 2
April, 2009
MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL PLAN
MERIT EVALUATION PROCEDURES
LEVEL I, II AND III ADMINISTRATORS
GUIDELINES
These guidelines have been developed for evaluation of level I, II and III administrators. Evaluation of
employees at these levels must also cover managerial responsibilities and requirements common to such
positions, as well as unique items the manager identifies as specific to the organizational unit involved
and campus priorities and programs. Specifically the evaluations should discuss how the administrator
has advanced academic excellence, learning-centered university, community, social justice, wise use of
resources, and global university. The evaluating administrator should give consideration to opinions of
those affected by the performance of the administrator. Additional criteria are:








managing or supervising human resources
contributions to diversity
managing financial and material resources
collaboration
communication
quality and quantity of work
problem solving
contributions and service to the university community
Specific goals or tasks pertinent to the department but not adequately covered in the general criteria
should be identified separately at the beginning of each rating period and communicated to the employee.
The manager’s evaluation should involve both the level of the employee’s performance in each area as
well as the relative importance of each factor to the position. The evaluation is a narrative statement of
merit rather than a numerical rating scale, and may include examples illustrative of the evaluation.
EVALUATION DOCUMENT
The approved document is attached on which to record the evaluations for all MPP Administrators. The
evaluation should be discussed with the Administrator and a copy provided to he/she at the conclusion of
the discussion. One copy of the document shall be retained by the recommending administrator, and one
copy shall be provided to The Center for Human Resources.
Copies: Human Resources, Cabinet Officer, Employee
MPP Merit Evaluation Form
Page 2 of 2
April, 2009