Proposed Changes Disciplinary, Grievance, & Appeal Policies Sam Connally Vice President for Human Resources Performance Management Effective Performance management consists of communicating job duties, establishing performance standards, coaching, reinforcing positive performance & behavior; correcting unsatisfactory behavior; and period evaluation & feedback. 2 Disciplinary & Grievance Policies A subset of performance management. Promote a culture where staff employees and supervisors may engage in constructive conversations regarding job performance or work-related conduct with a shared objective of improving unsatisfactory job performance or correcting unacceptable work-related behaviors. 3 Disciplinary Policy Changes Distinguish between Job Performance and Personal Conduct . Job Performance = Quality & Quantity of Work Personal Conduct = Job related behaviors Establish commitment to Progressive Discipline. Discipline should be progressive whenever a reasonable person would expect opportunity to 4 improve. Disciplinary Policy Changes Discipline is a Four-Step Process for Supervisors; with Three Opportunities for Employees to Improve: 1) Clarification of Expectations > 1st Opportunity 2) Written Warning > 2nd Opportunity 3) Final Written Warning or Suspension w/o Pay > 3rd Opportunity to Improve 4) Reduction in Salary, Demotion, or Termination 5 Disciplinary Policy Changes Define Disciplinary Standard. Decisions must be reasonable & fact-based. Define Disciplinary Authority. Two levels removed from employee At least at level of department head or director. 6 Disciplinary Policy Changes Create pre-disciplinary conference for Suspensions, Reductions in Salary, Demotions. Supervisor recommending these actions must meet with employee in advance. Employee must have opportunity to respond. Discipline is a structured process; but does not follow any fixed time line. Adopt & publish guidelines for pre-termination conferences. 7 Disciplinary Policy Changes Examples Where Progressive Discipline Is Appropriate for Job Performance I. Job Performance (Progressive) Examples where Immediate Discipline May be Imposed for Job Performance II. Job Performance (Immediate) I.A. Unsatisfactory job performance (related either to quality or quantity of work). I.B. Negligence resulting in incidental loss of productivity or property, but no injury to other persons. II.A. Refusal to perform reasonably assigned work task (insubordination). I.C. Failure to follow university policies & procedures, including college, school, division, or departmental guidelines or work rules. II.C. Willful disregard of university policies & procedures, including college, school, division, or departmental guidelines or work rules. II.B. Gross negligence resulting in material loss of productivity or property or injury to other persons. 8 Disciplinary Policy Changes Examples Where Progressive Discipline Is Appropriate for Personal Conduct III. Personal Conduct (Progressive) III.A. Time and attendance problems; excessive absences or tardiness. III.B. Failure to safeguard university property or funds, including failure to make timely disposition or report of loss, with limited adverse impact to the University. III.C. Inappropriate or unauthorized use of university property or resources. See Additional Examples in Draft Policy @ http://louisville.edu/hr/itemsofinterest Examples Where Immediate Discipline May be Imposed for Personal Conduct IV. Personal Conduct (Immediate) IV.A. Walking off the job during an assigned shift. IV.B. Failure to safeguard university property or funds, including failure to make timely disposition or report of loss, with significant adverse impact to the University. IV.C. Use of university property or resources for personal gain or political advocacy. See Additional Examples in Draft Policy @ http://louisville.edu/hr/itemsofinterest 9 Grievance Policy Changes Provide Examples of Grievable / Non-Grievable Issues – Examples of Grievable Actions: • Working conditions • Written warnings (New) • Suspension without pay (in lieu of appeal) (New) • Unsatisfactory performance evaluation (New) • Incorrect application of University policy 10 Grievance Policy Changes Provide Examples of Grievable / Non-Grievable Issues – Examples of Non-Grievable Actions: • Organization and definition of work, unit assignment, and work hours • Performance expectations (unless alleged to be arbitrary, capricious, or not reasonably attainable) • Oral counseling or non-disciplinary “letters of instruction” to clarify performance or personal conduct expectations • Position classification, salary grade, or salary • Allegations of EEO-related discrimination or harassment 11 Grievance Policy Changes Reduce number of steps in the grievance process. 1st Line Supervisor 2nd Line Supervisor Director/Department Head (or 3rd in Chain of command) Grievance Committee is available between 2nd & 3rd level of review. Publish grievance committee guidelines. Permit Grievance Officer to serve as personal representative. 12 Grievance Policy Changes Provide that HR (instead of employee) will notify managers of Step 2 & 3 grievances. Require supervisors & managers to respond in writing to grievances within specified time frames. Failure of 1st or 2nd line supervisor to respond to a grievance will create a presumption of reasonableness in favor of employee going forward. 13 Appeal Policy Changes Move suspension without pay from Appeal Policy to Grievance Policy . Clarify the role of personal advisors in appeal process. Personal Advisor may be any one to advise employee in private. Legal counsel is required to participate actively. Codify delegation of responsibility from President to VPHR to review hearing officer reports and adopt final appeal decisions for the University. 14