(EDI 633) Teaching Social Studies and Diversity Common Course Assessment: Social Studies Unit Plan (EDI 633) Teaching Social Studies and Diversity Common Course Assessment: Social Studies Unit Plan Common Course Standards: NBPTS Proposition 2: Teachers Know Their Subjects and How to Teach Them Demonstrate Knowledge of Content and Pedagogy Demonstrate Knowledge of Students Select Instructional Goals Demonstrate Knowledge of Resources Design Coherent Instruction Assess Student Learning NCATE Standard 1 Appreciate how knowledge is created, organized and linked. (NCATE 1.1, 1.3) Have specialized knowledge in how to convey the subject. (NCATE 1.1, 1.3) Generate multiple paths to knowledge. (NCATE 1.1, 1.3) INTASC Standard 7: Instruction and Curriculum Planning Knowledge: Teacher understands learning theory, subject matter, curriculum development, and student development and knows how to use this knowledge in planning instruction to meet curriculum goals. Dispositions: Teacher values long term and short term planning as an individual and as a member of a team. Performance: As an individual and as a member of a tem, teacher selects/creates learning experiences appropriate for curriculum goals, relevant to learners, and based upon principles of effective instruction. Teacher plans learning opportunities, lessons, and activities that address various learning styles and meet the developmental/individual needs of diverse learners. Common Course Assessment: Social Studies Unit Plan Directions to the Student: For the Social Studies Unit Plan, you will develop a 5-7 lesson unit plan based on the Michigan Curriculum Framework Social Studies Benchmarks and new Grade Level Content Expectations. Choose 1-2 content area benchmarks or grade level content expectations. Include an introduction to the unit giving rationale, benchmarks, grade level content expectations, grade level, time span, and scope and sequence of the unit. In the body of the unit, give complete directions for 5-7 lessons, including learning objectives, materials, procedures, social studies content background information, and assessment (pre, during, and post instruction) strategies. If you are in the GTC Program, you must follow the Madeline Hunter ITIP lesson plan format for this unit. If you are in the Elementary Master Program, you may use one of the following lesson plan formats: I.T.I.P., Five E, or the Parker Model. Include a bibliography that cites all resources used. Elements Unit Overview Distinguished Proficient Progressing Unsatisfactory (3) (2) (1) (0) All elements listed in unit All elements listed in unit plan syllabus One or more missing Few or no elements and Introduction plan syllabus guidelines included. Clear, well-organized; provides easyto-follow introduction to the unit for the reader. Very few or little editing/grammar mistakes/typos. guidelines included. Introduction may be short or lack the details needed to give a complete overview of the unit. Organization, clarity, editing/grammar may have some minor problems. elements, as listed in the unit plan syllabus guidelines. Problems with organization, clarity, missing components, and/or editing/grammar are significant enough to interfere with reader’s ability to easily interpret the introduction. included from the unit plan syllabus guidelines. Body of the Unit Unit includes all required components, as listed in the unit plan syllabus guidelines. Thorough lesson plans with enough detail given that another teacher could use them. Clear organization/eas y-to-follow. Lessons lead toward understanding of the selected benchmarks. Lessons demonstrate accurate knowledge of social studies content and benchmarks/GL CEs, with no content errors. Lessons are designed to address commonly held student misconceptions as well as misconceptions identified during Unit may have minor omissions in required components, as listed in the unit plan syllabus guidelines. Lessons may lack some necessary detail, making it difficult for another teacher to follow them without guidance. Possible minor organization problems that make the unit less “userfriendly”. Possible issues with scope and sequence, or with lesson focus, that may interfere with students learning the chosen benchmarks. Lessons demonstrate accurate knowledge of social studies content and benchmarks/GLCEs, with no content errors. Overuse of one or two types of learning activities, resulting in students with alternative learning styles Unit may have significant omissions in required components, as listed in the unit plan syllabus guidelines. Lessons are difficult to follow and lack detail. Lack of organization throughout unit. Hodge-podge of activities that do not contribute to students learning the chosen benchmarks/GL CEs. Social studies content errors or misconceptions may be apparent in the lessons. Lack of variety in lesson design. Over reliance on didactic instruction with little or no opportunity for student inquiry. Unit includes few or no required components listed in the unit plan syllabus guidelines. Bibliography pre-assessment. Focus on inquiry learning, with enough variety of instruction to accommodate various learning styles and levels. being disadvantaged. Didactic teaching outweighs inquirybased instruction. Variety of resources (books, websites, multimedia, area resource people, etc.) listed using APA format (see knowledge base) list in syllabus or consult the current APA Style Guide). At least 10 resources cited. All sources used are cited. Lack of variety or quantity (5-9) in resource list. Some minor mistakes with APA format and/or minor publication information missing, but all resources used are cited. Skimpy and unvaried resource list. APA format not used and/or significant citation information missing. Some missing citations for resources used. Few or no resources listed. APA format not used.