Peer Evaluation Guide and Form
Evaluate your team members’ contribution to each of the following areas. Also, record how much that person was
assigned. This two step process will be used to identify groups that need more help with organization versus student who
are not pulling their own weight.
Be sure that for each design area, the total ‘Assigned work’ is 100% spread among all team members. Also the amount of
‘Completed work’ needs to be 100% spread among all members.
You have the possibility of getting full points by turning in an evaluation form. Your actual score is dictated by the
feedback your other group members have about your performance.
Design Area Descriptions:
Technical Design: Development of schematics, drawings, and designs. Can include system level decisions and
local (block) level decisions
Component Research: Investigation of what components to use, Example systems that could be utilized,
Locating sources for components
Customer Relations: Contacting mentor or instructor
Webpage/Documentation: Authoring or reviewing of written materials, Webpage design or maintenance
Project Management: Task assignment, scheduling, encouragement, etc
In the notes section, please try to identify what specifically were the person’s responsibilities. Also include any short
comments. For longer comments, please feel free to write in the Comments area at the end. Please print out your
evaluation and comments, and turn them into Don Heer’s mailbox in KEC1148 by the due date. Please do not include
the examples in your submission.
Sunday, July 24, 2016
Examples of Completed Forms
Example One:
Your project has four people and five easily discernable circuits to be designed. Additionally you need a couple people to
track down parts, one person to stay in contact with the mentor, a webmaster, a recording secretary to keep meeting notes,
and a project manager to monitor progress and possibly reassign tasks.
Student 1) Me
Design Area
Total
Assigned
40%
Technical Design
10%
Component Research
0%
Customer Relations
Webpage/Documentation 10%
10%
Project Management
Total
Completed
40%
10%
0%
10%
10%
Notes
Total
Completed
20%
10%
100%
40%
0%
Notes
Total
Completed
20%
40%
0%
10%
90%
Notes
Total
Completed
20%
40%
0%
40%
0%
Notes
Power Supply, Communications
Student 2) Bob
Design Area
Total
Assigned
20%
Technical Design
10%
Component Research
100%
Customer Relations
Webpage/Documentation 40%
0%
Project Management
Microcontroller
Student 2) Chelsea
Design Area
Total
Assigned
20%
Technical Design
40%
Component Research
0%
Customer Relations
Webpage/Documentation 10%
90%
Project Management
Sensors
Digital Parts
Student 2) Sarah
Design Area
Total
Assigned
20%
Technical Design
40%
Component Research
0%
Customer Relations
Webpage/Documentation 40%
0%
Project Management
User Interface
Analog Parts
A student should only loose points if it’s the general consensus of the group that one person is not completing what they
were assigned.
Sunday, July 24, 2016
Example Two:
In this group, the project manager isn’t doing their job, no one is talking to the mentor, and one person isn’t completing
their technical design requirements. It is also troubling that one student hasn’t been assigned enough work. This wouldn’t
result in a grade reduction, but the instructor and TA would want to discuss this with you’re team.
Student 1) Me
Design Area
Total
Assigned
40%
Technical Design
30%
Component Research
0%
Customer Relations
Webpage/Documentation 0%
10%
Project Management
Total
Completed
5%
30%
0%
0%
30%
Notes
Struggling with design work
Student 2) Bob
Design Area
Total
Assigned
20%
Technical Design
30%
Component Research
100%
Customer Relations
Webpage/Documentation 50%
0%
Project Management
Total
Completed
55%
30%
0%
95%
60%
Notes
Making up for first students slacking
Not Talking to Mentor
Making up for leadership void
Student 2) Chelsea
Design Area
Total
Assigned
20%
Technical Design
40%
Component Research
0%
Customer Relations
Webpage/Documentation 50%
90%
Project Management
Total
Completed
20%
40%
100%
5%
10%
Notes
Only one talking to mentor
Not helping with webpage
Poor Leadership
Student 2) Sarah
Design Area
Total
Assigned
20%
Technical Design
0%
Component Research
0%
Customer Relations
Webpage/Documentation 0%
0%
Project Management
Sunday, July 24, 2016
Total
Completed
20%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Notes
Not assigned Enough Work
Peer Evaluation Form:
Student 1) Me
Design Area
Total
Assigned
Total
Completed
Notes
Total
Assigned
Total
Completed
Notes
Total
Assigned
Total
Completed
Notes
Total
Assigned
Total
Completed
Notes
Total
Assigned
Total
Completed
Notes
Technical Design
Component Research
Customer Relations
Webpage/Documentation
Project Management
Student 2) Bob Jones
Design Area
Technical Design
Component Research
Customer Relations
Webpage/Documentation
Project Management
Student 3) Chelsea Font
Design Area
Technical Design
Component Research
Customer Relations
Webpage/Documentation
Project Management
Student 4) Sarah Dent
Design Area
Technical Design
Component Research
Customer Relations
Webpage/Documentation
Project Management
Student 5) Fred Flinstone
Design Area
Technical Design
Component Research
Customer Relations
Webpage/Documentation
Project Management
Sunday, July 24, 2016
Comments:
Your comments and actual percentages will only be seen by the instructor and TAs, contact us for a private meeting if you
need to talk.
Sunday, July 24, 2016