Cost Recovery for CD Extension Programs Fundamental of Economic Development o

advertisement

Cost Recovery for CD Extension Programs

Fundamental of Economic Development o Has base fee already set (part of partnership with MEDC) which is under review o Fee generation worksheet should be completed by ExCEED at state level.

Community Development Academy o Has set fee based on market and competition. We do need to review this periodically. o We also need to review current policies for reimbursement—potentially recouping some small portion from income to offset salaries paid on GO dollars for state and regional faculty presenters. o Fee generation worksheet should be completed by state faculty coordinating.

EXCEL/Youth EXCEL/Other CLD except Step-Up:

 Non-Extension sponsored/non-Extension coordinated:

To recoup salary costs of specialist and remit to campus—If you are a speaker and spending 4 or more hours in teaching for all of EXCEL, then charge $20/hour (not per session)

 EXCEL sponsored or co-sponsored by Extension: o Cost recovery to remit to campus: Amount per participant: $25 per participant state to assist with program support materials at state level AND o To recoup salary costs of specialist and remit to campus—10% of face and participant time that regional faculty spend

 Notes: o May be covered by sponsorship or grants o We have looked at the average time that regional specialists spend on this.

Step-Up has a set curriculum

 Extension sponsored or delivered:

To remit to state: $125 to hold the course flat fee to state

Typically 12 sessions @ 3 hrs each face time (36 hours) for faculty

@$35/hr for regional specialist = $1,260:

Already pay $10 per participant (state fee) or materials may be printed locally (local or sponsor cost)

 Non-Extension sponsored/non-Extension coordinated:

To recoup salary costs of specialist and remit to campus—If you are a speaker and spending 4 or more hours in teaching for all of STEP-Up, then charge $20/hour (not per session)

 Note: Assuming a low-income audience, may be covered by sponsorship or grants

OTHER PROGRAMS:

One-shot offerings:

 Half day to full-day workshop/offering that is single engagement:

To recoup faculty time remit $20/hour/faculty member (if teaming)

Organizing/managing workshop or course:

 When offering a workshop that exceeds the 2 hour prep for each hour of workshop/course time, recoup and remit to campus 10% of faculty time per offering that includes the planning because these are planning intensive o Example: 3 hour workshop that required 40 hours planning/prep/organizing: 0.1 x (43x$35)=$150.50 fee to remit for faculty time

 Exception: Fundamentals of ED or other program that has designated specific fee from state level (Strategic Doing is still in progress).

In-depth planning/facilitation of process:

Web-based offerings:

 Requires same deliberation re: time and commitment, etc.

We anticipate we will have more guidelines as we engage in several of these.

OVERALL NOTES:

4 hours seems to be break point on when to start considering charging

Considerations of Public vs private good:

 Private entity: recoup our time plus E&E

 Otherwise, after determining how much time is involved and time exceeds the four hours, then determine: o Is this mostly private good? o What is the ratio of public good in comparison to private good? o Do individual participants have the ability to pay? o What are there alternative funding sources? o Can local sponsorships and/or partnerships be garnered? o Can a grant cover the state and local costs to be recouped? o Does this offering sufficiently open opportunities for other programs for which fee would be charged, ie. we MIGHT have a case for reduction in recovery, especially if this is a short program. o Is a pilot program with potential to charge the next time around?

However participants and constituents need to understand this is a pilot and one-time pricing structure.

Issues

 Apprehension re: remittance from field, CPDs, councils

 State/federal investment locally (need to convey the whole investment of

Extension in a county)

Critical Communications

 Frame as cost-recovery to support county operation, faculty and campus support.

 Also opportunity to frame this as part of “One MU Extension”

Approved Fall 2012 after Work Group August 27, 2012 (Celeste Vanderbrugen, Dean

Larkin, Johanna Reed Adams, and Mary Leuci) based on CD Adobe in March and May,

Workshop in April 2012)

For more information, please contact:

Mary Simon Leuci, Ed.D.

Assistant Dean, College of Agriculture Food and Natural Resources

Program Director, Community Development Extension

University of Missouri

232 Gentry Hall

Columbia, MO 65211

573-882-2937 e-mail: leucim@missouri.edu

Back to: http://extension.missouri.edu/staff/feegeneration.aspx

Related documents
Download