Second WHO consultation: Development of a WHO reference panel for the control of Chagas diagnostic tests Geneva, 27 – 28 January 2009 Chagas disease in Spain: Experience from a reference laboratory Teresa Gárate Servicio de Parasitología Centro Nacional de Microbiología Experience from a Parasitology Reference Laboratory General Role of the Parasitology Lab Parasitology Lab and Chagas’ disease in Spain Parasitic diseases AUTOCTHONOUS IMPORTED Leishmaniasis Malaria Toxoplasmosis Other Leishmaniasis Cryptosporidiasis Chagas disease Giardiasis Sleeping sickness Amebiasis Cysticercosis Fasciolosis Schistosomiasis Hydatidosis Filariasis/Oncho Anisakiasis Intestinal parasites Toxocariosis Trichinellosis National Microbiology Centre The Parasitology Lab works with Spanish hospitals and blood donor centers on Chagas disease diagnosis Other Activities related with T. cruzi diagnosis Chagas Test evaluation - In house tests - Commercial tests Control sample preparation - Serum of characterized patients - DNA from parasite strains - Blood spiked with parasites Training microbiologists in - Microhaemotocrit - PCR - Serological result interpretation Implementation of T. cruzi Diagnostic Tools in Parasitology Lab Commercial assays (rapid tests) PCR ELISA Microscopic examination Culture Xenodiagnosis IFAT 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Real time PCR Evaluation of serological tests: In house ELISA and 3 serum panels Positive IFAT Negative IFAT 3.0 2.5 DO 405 nm 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 Panel 1 ELISA in house Panel 2 Panel 3 Panel 1 Panel 2 Panel 3 Chagasic Healthy (n = 13) (n = 15) Chagasic Healthy (n =31) (n = 115) Chagasic Healthy (n = 38) (n = 30) Positive 11 0 30 2 38 0 Negative 2 15 1 113 0 30 Evaluation of serological tests: In house ELISA and 3 serum panels Diagnostic index Panel 1 Panel 2 Panel 3 % CI 95% % CI 95% % CI 95% Sensitivity 85 65 to 100 97 91 to 100 100 100 to 100 Specificity 100 100 to 100 98 96 to 100 100 100 to 100 PPV 100 100 to 100 94 85 to 100 100 100 to 100 NPV 88 73 to 100 99 97 to 100 100 100 to 100 Characteristics of serum samples of the 3 panels used in the evaluation of the In house ELISA Panel 1: Sera from Bolivian individuals with positive or negative xenodiagnosis Panel 2: Sera from population with positive or negative T. cruzi IFAT. Healthy individuals from endemic and non-endemic areas Panel 3: Sera of anti-T. cruzi Specific Panel and healthy individuals from endemic and non-endemic areas Anti-T. cruzi Specific Sera Panel (QPanel, Sao Paulo-Brazil, http://www.panel.com.br) was kindly provided by Dra. Elena Franco Evaluation of serological tests: Commercial ELISAs CHAGAS HEALTHY VISCERAL LEISHMANIASIS BLK Chagas test 25/25 (100%) 1/10 (10%) 5/9 (56%) Biokit ELISA 25/25 (100%) 1/10 (10%) 3/9 (33%) 30/31 (97%) 1D/23 (4%) 4D/52 (8%) ID-PaGIA BLK Chagas test Biokit ELISA ID-Pagia Sensitivity 100 100 97 Specificity 90 90 96 PPV 96 96 97 NPV 100 100 96 Characteristics of serum samples used in the evaluation of commercial tests Characteristics of Sera Chagasic Panel 1 (QPanel, Brasil) Non Chagasic Panel 2 (Parasitology, CNM, ISCIII) Nº of sera 38 2 Chagasic patients diagnosed in Spain 28 Spain 22 Bolivia 19 Healthy Brazil individuals 20 Argentina 14 Ecuador 20 Panel 3 Visceral leishmaniasis (Parasitology, CNM, ISCIII) Malaria 30 30 Evaluation of Commercial ELISAs: Sensitivity Chagasic Nº of positive (total sera) Sensitivity (CI 95%) IFAT-CNM 65 (66) 98.5 (95.5 - 100) ELISA-CNM 66 (66) 100 (100 - 100) Certest 66 (66) 100 (100 - 100) Ortho 66 (66) 100 (100 - 100) BLK 41 (42) 97.6 (93.0 - 100) Biokit 66 (66) 100 (100 - 100) ID-PaGIA2 61 (66) 92.4 (86 - 98.8) ID-PaGIA3 65 (66) 98.5 (95.5 - 100) ICT Operon 61 (66) 92.4 (86.0 - 98.8) Evaluation of Commercial ELISAs: Specificity Non Chagasic Nº of positive (total sera) Specificity 2b (CI 95%) Other pathologies Nº of positive (total sera) Specificity 1a (CI 95%) IFAT-CNM 0 (97) 100 (100 - 100) 23 (60) 85.4 (79.8 - 90.9) ELISA-CNM 0 (97) 100 (100 - 100) 18 (60) 88.6 (83.6 - 93.5) Certest 0 (97) 100 (100 - 100) 25 (60) 84.2 (78.4 - 89.8) Ortho 0 (97) 100 (100 - 100) 18 (60) 88.6 (83.6 - 93.5) BLK 0 (74) 100 (100 - 100) 13 (60) 90.3 (85.3 - 95.3) Biokit 1 (97) 99 (97 - 100) 7 (60) 94.9 (91.5 - 98.3) ID-PaGIA2 1 (97) 99 (97 - 100) 1 (60) 98.7 (97.0 - 100) ID-PaGIA3 2 (97) 98 (95 - 100) 2 (60) 97.5 (95.0 - 99.9) ICT Operon 2 (97) 98 (95 - 100) 10 (60) 92.4 (88.2 - 96.5) a The specificity was calculated into account results of healthy control b The specificity was calculated into account results of healthy control and other pathologies. Molecular diagnosis of T. cruzi Control assay of limit detection Samples of population at-risk kDNA-PCR modified (121-122 / HUF-REV) Britto et al 1993; Cruz et al 2002; Walsh et al 1991; Dorn et al 1997; Gomes et al 1998; Wincker et al 1994; Rubio et al 2002 Molecular diagnosis of T. cruzi Diagnostic sensitivity and specificity PCR Positive Negative Total Acute patients 11 0 11 Chronic patients 471 295 766 0 1227 1227 482 1522 2004 Seronegative subjects Total Diagnostic index in chronic phase CI (95%) Sensitivity 61.5 58 65 Specificity 100 99.96 100 Positive predictive value 100 99.89 100 80.62 78.6 82.64 Negative predictive value Chagas disease cases in Spain AUTOCTHONOUS Blood transfusion Congenital transmission Organ transplant Laboratory accidents IMPORTED Immigration from endemic area Long stays in endemic area Latin American population in Spain On December 2008: > 1.8 million Ecuador Colombia Bolivia Argentina Peru Brazil Paraguay Uruguay Venezuela Chile Rest of SA 415535 284043 236048 196946 123173 119209 66950 61407 61069 48939 268 Reports of Transfusional Chagas cases in Spain Year of detection Year of Donation N º of recipients Nº of infected 1992 ? 1? 1 Villalba et al., 1992 Ref. 2005 2004 1 1 Fores et al., 2007; Flores-Chavez et al., 2008 2006 1994-2003 10 1 Abalo et al., 2007, CNM 2007 2005-2007 9 2 Perez et al., 2008; CNM 2008 2004 1 1 Ibarra et al., 2008, CNM National Haemovigilance System Transfusional Chagas Cases Origin Age Madrid recipient Coruña recipient Málaga recipient 1 Málaga recipient 2 País Vasco recipient Spanish Spanish Spanish Moroccan Spanish 27 55 33 57 4 Bone marrow aplasia Choroid plexus papilloma Cardiac surgery Clinical status before transfusion Hepatic Leukemia transplant Phase of Chagas disease and symptoms Acute FUO Multiorga nic failure Chronic Asympto matic Acute FUO Chronic Right bundle branch block Chronic Asympto matic Treatment Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Follow up After treatment Fatal dead person S (+) PCR (-) S (-) PCR (-) S (+) PCR (-) S (+) PCR (-) País Vasco A Coruña Madrid Characteristics of Infected donors: Malaga A Coruña Madrid Malaga País Vasco Bolivia Brazil Bolivia Bolivia Sex Male Female Male Male Age 62 58 53 ELISA 2.3 2.2 2.3 IFAT > 1/160 > 1/160 > 1/160 PCR P N/P P Treatment No Yes Yes Permanenc e in Spain 42 years 1 year 3 years Origin Congenital Chagas disease Newborns examined during 2002 2008 Newborns 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Total Positive PCR 1 3 2 4 12 78 91 191 1* 3 5 9 Transmission index: ~ 4,5% * Post mortem diagnosis In Spain ≈ 990 000 women of childbearing age Bolivia: 132 421 women Argentina: 94 794 women Laboratory Accidents and Chagas disease Alvar J. 1983 Laboratorio 76(456): 645-648 Chagas disease cases in Spain AUTOCTHONOUS Blood transfusion Congenital transmission Organ transplant Laboratory accidents IMPORTED Immigration from endemic area Long stays in endemic area Chagas disease in blood donors Asturias at- risk 2890 2750 2750 2000 2000 Madrid 1250 1250 779 500 500 200 200 100 100 36 36 4 1 00 2002-2006 2002-2006 2003-2006 200 C. T. Cruz Roja C.C. de Sangre y de Madrid Tejidos de Asturias Prevalence % 1,23 0,13 Profile of immigrant population Asturias 0 Ecuador Colombia Argentina Brazil Venezuela Paraguay Uruguay Peru Chile Bolivia Asturias Madrid 0 Ecuador Colombia Peru Bolivia Argentina Brazil Venezuela Paraguay Chile Uruguay 30000 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 4358 2721 1903 1886 915 549 435 373 370 310 2006: ≈ 17 000 immigrant 2008: ≈ 20 000 immigrant Madrid 60000 90000 120000 150000 145811 64906 43068 32975 25169 13474 10840 8997 8476 3958 2006: ≈ 400 000 immigrant 2008: ≈ 500 000 immigrant Prevalence in blood donors at-risk (2002-2006) ? Nicaragua Colombia Venezuela Ecuador Peru Bolivia Brazil End. Zone Non End. Zone ND Spain P N Prevalence % 1 1 1 1 2 37 2 3 1 3 1 16 776 249 908 258 203 221 207 307 245 277 6.25 0.13 0.40 0.11 0.78 18.23 0.90 1.45 0.33 1.22 0.36 P = Seropositive N = Seronegative Seroprevalence in population at-risk: 24% 1200 1137 ≈ 1144 Chagasic patients 1000 815 800 600 400 200 0 6 1 5 0 27 1997 1998 1999 2 40 7 2000 75 3 6 26 46 2001 2002 2003 2004 464 361 285 219 131 SERONEGATIVE Prevalence % 476 398 90 2005 138 2006 2007 2008 SEROPOSITIVE 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 14 0 7 15 4 4 11 14 18 22 31 29 Distribution of cases in Spain Alicante 800 Madrid 2500 2000 2289 Prevalence 19 % 400 200 1500 1000 500 598 600 Prevalence 12 % 79 0 528 Seronegative Seropositive 0 Seronegative Seropositive Almeria 200 150 173 Prevalence 8% 100 50 15 0 Seronegative Seropositive ARGENTINA BOLIVIA BRAZIL CHILE PARAGUAY URUGUAY COLOMBIA ECUADOR PERU VENEZUELA GUATEMALA HONDURAS NICARAGUA SALVADOR MEXICO SPAIN Origin of seropositive population 100% 80% 60% 5% 4% 3% 2% 1% 0% Conclusions Panel of Reference - Positive samples by different serological tests, and - Positive samples from chagasic individuals with parasitological, epidemiological and clinical evaluation. Number of positive sera/panel - 3 serum samples for kit manufacturers - 100 serum samples for evaluation of tests - 3 serum samples for quality control. Chagas in Spain - Imported and autochonous types. - Bolivian group, mainly from Santa Cruz region, shows the highest seropositivity rates and represents the highest risk for T. cruzi infection transmission. Thank you UNIDAD LEISHMANIA Y CHAGAS Carmen Cañavate Javier Nieto Mercedes Rodriguez Israel Cruz Elena Bodas Marta Hernández Rubén González Emilia García Carmen Chicharro María Flores Chagas disease in Spain AUTOCTHONOUS Transfusional and congenital Chagas Organ transplant and lab incident IMPORTED Immigration and long stays in endemic area ? Months Acute Years Chronic phase Level of anti-T. cruzi IgG in samples of patients with positive PCR 6 5 4 DO/CO 3 2 1 0 Acute case 1 (Madrid recipient) Acute case 2 (Málaga recipient)