IFCS/FSC/02.25
IFCS Simple Indicators of Progress
Prepared by:
Ibrahima Sow, Senegal
Consultant to the IFCS Secretariat
Revisions by IFCS Secretariat
This report was prepared as an information paper for the Forum Standing
Committee to assist in the preparation for Forum IV. It represents a work in
progress and will be updated as necessary when additional information is
received. The report provides information for the President’s Progress Report.
The information should also prove useful for planning regional efforts.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------IFCS Simple Indicators of Progress - Forum IV,….– Ver 001.
1
IFCS/FSC/02.25
INRODUCTION
Forum III revised and updated the Priorities for Action that had been adopted by the Forum in
1994. The revised Priorities for Action beyond 2000 were designed to be fewer in number, more
focussed and measurable.
The Forum Standing Committee agreed to a number of simple indicators as a tool to
monitor progress. The simple indicators were selected to provide basic information,
focusing on key items for which information was relatively easy to collect, and with
target dates before or near Forum IV. The limitations of all numeric data of this
simplified form and type should be kept in mind when interpreting the information.
Questionnaires were sent to national governments and the Participating
Organizations of the Inter-Organization Programme for the Sound Management of
Chemicals (IOMC). The information received by February 2003 in response to the
questionnaires is presented with explanatory notes. Obtaining information from
national governments has remained a challenge - a relatively low number of
countries have responded (56). The following table gives the number of countries
and IOMC members having completed the questionnaire. Also note the number of
eligible countries.
Groups
Africa
Asia&Pacific
C&EE
LA&C
Number of Countries
13
11
11
10
having completed the
questionnaire
Number of eligible
53
56
27
39
countries
IOMC members having completed the questionnaire: OECD, UNEP, UNITAR, WHO
WEOG
11
Total
56
31
206
The responses to the questionnaire received from governments may not have matched the
information provided by the IOMC organizations. Comments/explanatory notes are included to
provide additional analytical observations. Detailed summary check lists of the information
provided by countries can be found in the Annex.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------IFCS Simple Indicators of Progress - Forum IV,….– Ver 001.
2
IFCS/FSC/02.25
INDICATORS
1.
National Capabilities and Capacities for Chemicals Management
1.1 Countries having prepared a comprehensive Chemicals Management Profile;
1.2 Countries in the process of developing or planning on developing a Comprehensive
National Chemicals Management Profile;
1.3 Countries having developed National Policies on the sound management of
chemicals (SMC);
1.4 Countries having developed National Profiles on the SMC;
1.5 Countries having developed National Strategies on the SMC;
1.6 Countries having developed National Action Plans on the SMC;
1.7 Countries having established an interministerial/intersectorial coordinating
mechanism.
2.
Classification and Labelling of Chemicals
2.1 Countries having initiated work to adopt and implement the GHS for classification
and Labelling
2.2 Countries having ratified the ILO Convention 170 on Safety in the use of chemicals
at work.
3.
National arrangements for exchange of information on hazardous chemicals
3.1 Existing operational arrangements for the exchange of information on hazardous
chemicals;
3.2 Website where national partners can gain access to chemical information sources;
3.3 Institutional directory listing sources of information.
4.
National Procedures on Safety Information for hazardous materials in
circulation
4.1 Procedures in place to ensure that any hazardous material put into circulation is
accompanied by appropriate and reliable safety information;
4.2 Consistency with the safety data sheet of the International Labour Organization
Chemicals Convention (No.170)?
4.3 Conformity to the globally harmonized system for classification and labelling of
chemicals.
5.
Ecologically sound and integrated strategies for pest management
5.1 Countries having prepared pest management strategies
5.2 Countries having prepared national studies to develop the strategies.
6.
Obsolete stocks of pesticides and other chemicals
6.1 Countries having prepared an action plan for disposal of obsolete stocks of
pesticides and other chemicals;
6.2 Countries implementing the plan,
6.3 Countries preparing a plan of actions for disposal of obsolete pesticides and other
chemicals.
7.
National systems for prevention of major industrial accidents and emergency
preparedness and response
7.1 Countries implementing a national system for emergency preparedness and
response:
7.2 Countries having a national law requiring the system
7.3 Countries having ratified and implemented ILO Convention 174 on Prevention of
Major Industrial Accidents;
7.4 Countries putting efforts under way to ratify and implement the above convention.
8.
Poison Centres
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------IFCS Simple Indicators of Progress - Forum IV,….– Ver 001.
3
IFCS/FSC/02.25
8.1 Countries having established new (since 2000) poison centres;
8.2 Countries strengthening the capabilities and capacities of existing poison centres
(since 2000) – ref. WHO Status of Development Classification;
8.3 Countries initiating work to establish a poison center;
9.
Pollutant release and Transfer Register/Emission Inventories
9.1 Countries having established an air emission inventory;
9.2 Countries having established a water inventory;
9.3 Countries having established a waste inventory;
9.4 Countries having established a pollutant release and transfer register (PRTR);
9.5 Countries initiating work to design a PRTR or emission inventory.
10. Prevention of illegal traffic in toxic and dangerous products
Countries having developed a national strategy for the prevention of illegal traffic in toxic
and dangerous products,
11. Common principles for harmonized approaches for risk management
Common approaches agreed and published (Terminology, Cancer, Reproductive,
Development).
12. Hazard evaluation
12.1 Number of substances for which final documentation has been completed;
12.2 Number of substances for which it is anticipated that the final documentation will be
completed by 2004;
12.3 Number of substances that have passed final discussions (e.g. SIAM) and are
considered complete, but final documentation is not available;
12.4 Number of substances for which it is anticipated and will have passed final
discussions (e.g. SIAM) and will be considered complete, but final documentation is
not yet available in 2004.
13. Severely hazardous pesticide formulation under conditions of
use/applications of mechanisms under Rotterdam Convention
13.1 Numbers of times mechanisms used;
13.2 Countries using mechanism.
14. FAO code of conduct on the distribution and use of pesticides
14.1 Status of work leading to the adoption of the revised code,
14.2 Countries taking steps to implement (agreed sections?) revised code?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------IFCS Simple Indicators of Progress - Forum IV,….– Ver 001.
4
IFCS/FSC/02.25
ANNEXES
INDICATORS
1. National Capabilities and Capacities for Chemicals Management
Indicators
Africa Asia
C&EE LA&C
1.1 Countries having prepared a comprehensive
8
8
4
4
Chemicals Management Profile
1.2 Countries in the process of developing or planning
on developing a Comprehensive National Chemicals
Management Profile;
1.3
Countries having developed National Policies for
the sound management of chemicals (SMC)*;
Work in progress (Target - 2005)
1.4
Countries having developed National Priorities
for the
SMC
Work in progress (Target - 2005)
1.5
Countries having developed National Strategies
for
the SMC;
Work in progress (Target - 2005)
1.6
Countries having developed National Action
Plans
for the SMC;
Work in progress (Target - 2005)
WEOG
7
Total
31
4
3
7
6
1
21
7
6
6
2
10
31
0
7
1
9
4
5
3
4
0
8
8
33
1
5
0
5
5
3
2
4
0
9
8
26
2
5
1
7
6
4
2
2
2
7
13
25
2
1
6
4
3
16
32
1.7 Countries having established an
8
8
5
4
7
interministerial/intersectorial
coordinating
mechanism
 SMC= Sound management of chemicals
 Shaded figures represent the work in progress for 1.3, 1.4, 1.5, 1.6 issues for the 2005 target period.
Information from UNEP
As of 1 July 2002, 45 developing countries and countries with economies in transition had approved GEF financial
support to develop their implementation plans required by Article 7 of the Stockholm Convention.
Information from UNITAR
The number of countries that have prepared a National profile is 69. Some 22 additional are in the process of
developing a National Profile.
* Countries having
Africa
1. Angola
2. Benin
3. Burkina Faso
4. Cameroon
5. Chad
6. Egypt
7. Ethiopia
8. Gambia
9. Ghana
10. Guinea
11. Ivory Cost
12. Lesotho
13. Madagascar
14. Malawi
15. Mali
16. Niger
17. Nigeria
18. Senegal
19. Tanzania
20. Zambia
prepared National Profiles
Asia and Pacific
CE&E
1. Bahrain
1. Bulgaria
2. Bangladesh
2. Croatia
3. China
3. Czech republic
4. Indonesia
4. Georgia
5. India Iran
5. Hungary
6. Iran Jordan
6. Latvia
7. Jordan
7. Lithuania
8. Korea
8. Russia
9. Mongolia
9. Slovak Republic
10. Pakistan
10. Slovenia
11. Papua New Guinea
12. Sri Lanka
13. Thailand
14. Vanuatu
15. Vietnam
LA&C
1. Argentina
2. Bolivia
3. Chile
4. Colombia
5. Dominican Republic
6. Ecuador
7. Mexico Nicaragua
8. Nicaragua
9. Paraguay
10. Peru
11. Trinidad and Tobago
12. Uruguay
13. Venezuela
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------IFCS Simple Indicators of Progress - Forum IV,….– Ver 001.
WEOG
1. Australia
2. Austria
3. Canada
4. Cyprus
5. Denmark
6. France
7. Germany
8. Israel
9. Sweden
10. Switzerland
11. USA
5
IFCS/FSC/02.25
Comment:
About 50% of countries having completed the questionnaire have put in place the necessary
mechanisms to ensure a sound management of chemicals (National profiles, policies,
priorities, strategies and action plans and an interministerial/intersectorial coordinating
mechanism.
UNITAR : 33,5% have prepared their national profiles
With respect to the interministerial/intersectorial coordinating mechanism, it should be
recommended that committees include all stakeholders (in some countries, committees are
only composed of governmental institutions).
2.
Classification and Labelling of Chemicals
Indicators
2.1 Countries having initiated work to adopt and
implement the GHS for classification and Labelling
2.2 Countries having ratified the ILO Convention 170
on Safety in the use of chemicals at work.
Africa
2
Asia
8
C&EE
3
LA&C
6
WEOG
8
Total
27
3
4
2
3
3
15
Information from UNITAR
UNITAR and ILO have developed, with multistakeholder input, training and guidance materials on Chemical Hazard
Communication/GHS implementation. The primary audience for the guidance materials is developing countries and
countries with economies in transition. The documents, which are in draft form and being field-tested in a number of
pilot countries, are entitled:
Preparing a National Chemical Hazard Communication Situation Analysis (Working Draft);
Developing and Implementing a National Chemical hazard Communication and GHS Action Plan (Working
Draft Guidance Document), 2001;
Developing and Implementing a National Chemical hazard Communication and GHS Action Plan –
Implementation manual for Pilot Countries (Working Draft) 2001;
The guidance and training materials will be finalised as part of the Pilot Programme. A training package on
comprehensibility is also under development, and will be available for country use in 2003.
Information from OECD
 OECD Harmonised Integrated Hazard Classification system for chemical Substances and mixtures;
 OECD-EHS series of Monographs on testing and Assessment – Monograph no.33 (July 2001).
Comment:
About 50 % of countries have initiated work to adopt and implement the GHS for
classification and Labelling. Very few (27%) have ratified the ILO Convention 170
on Safety in the use of chemicals at work.
Many WEOG countries have developed their own systems but are working to reach
consensus on the development of the harmonized system on classification criteria
and hazard communication elements.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------IFCS Simple Indicators of Progress - Forum IV,….– Ver 001.
6
IFCS/FSC/02.25
3.
National arrangements for exchange of information on hazardous chemicals
Indicators
3.1 Existing operational arrangements for the
exchange of information on hazardous chemicals;
Africa
+
Asia
+
C&EE
+
LA&C
+
WEOG
+
Total
+
4
7
6
4
10
31
7
4
5
3
9
28
3.2 Websites where national partners can gain access
to chemical information sources;
3.3 Institutional directory listing sources of
information.
Comment:
+ Many countries have established procedures for the exchange of information on
hazardous chemicals;
A lot of efforts are being made on the dissemination of information on hazardous
chemicals; More than 50% have established websites and institutional directory
listing sources of information and an information centre is being developed in
some countries.
4.
National Procedures on Safety Information for hazardous materials in
circulation
Indicators
Africa
7
Asia
11
C&EE
7
LA&C
6
WEOG
11
Total
42
4.2 Consistency with the safety data sheet of the
International Labour Organization Chemicals
Convention (No.170)?
4
8
6
4
11
33
4.3 Conformity to the globally harmonized system for
classification and labelling of chemicals.
4
6
4
4
6
24
4.1 Procedures in place to ensure that any hazardous
material put into circulation is accompanied by
appropriate and reliable safety information;
Comment:
Ensuring a reliable safety information with respect to hazardous chemicals into
circulation appears to be a priority in many countries. In addition, the information
are consistent with the safety data sheet of the International Labour Organization
Chemicals Convention.
Efforts are necessary for the conformity to the globally harmonized system for
classification and labelling of chemicals.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------IFCS Simple Indicators of Progress - Forum IV,….– Ver 001.
7
IFCS/FSC/02.25
5.
Ecologically sound and integrated strategies for pest management
Indicators
5.1 Countries having prepared pest management
strategies
5.2 Countries having prepared national studies to
develop the strategies.
Africa
9
Asia
8
C&EE
5
LA&C
8
WEOG
8
Total
38
7
6
4
8
8
33
Comment:
68 and 59 % of countries have respectively prepared pest management strategies
and national studies to develop those strategies. This indicator seems to be a high
priority in many countries.
6.
Obsolete stocks of pesticides and other chemicals
Indicators
Africa
9
Asia
8
C&EE
6
LA&C
3
WEOG
6
Total
32
6.2 Countries implementing the plan,
6
5
4
1
6
22
6.3 Countries preparing a plan of actions for disposal
of obsolete pesticides and other chemicals.
2
3
3
5
0
12
6.1 Countries having prepared an action plan for
disposal of obsolete stocks of pesticides and other
chemicals;
Target date: (2003 – 2005)
Comment:
Implementing plans for disposal of obsolete pesticides remain uncertain (only
39%) while 57 % have already prepared their action plan.
The ASP (African Stockpile project) would remedy this situation, at least in the
African region where the issue of obsolete stocks is very crucial.
7.
National systems for prevention of major industrial accidents and emergency
preparedness and response
Indicators
7.1
Countries implementing a national system for
Emergency preparedness and response:
Work in progress (2002 -2006)*
7.2
Countries having a national law requiring the
System
7.3 Countries having ratified and implemented ILO
Convention 174 on Prevention of Major Industrial
accidents;
7.4
*
Countries putting efforts under way to ratify and
implement the above convention
Africa
6
Asia
6
C&EE
8
LA&C
5
WEOG
10
Total
35
5
6
3
8
0
8
3
8
1
10
12
40
2
3
1
1
2
9
5
7
5
4
2
23
Shaded figures represent the work in progress for the 7.1 issue for the 2002 - 2005 period
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------IFCS Simple Indicators of Progress - Forum IV,….– Ver 001.
8
IFCS/FSC/02.25
Information from OECD

All 30 OECD countries implement systems in accordance with international principal;

All 30 OECD countries have a national law requiring system
Comment:
Only 16 % countries have ratified the Convention 174 on Prevention of Major
Industrial accidents. Yet, 63 and 71 % have respectively a national system for
emergency preparedness and response (work in progress is also perceptible :
63%) and have a national law requiring the system. Here again, implementation
of existing plans remain uncertain.
8.
Poison Centres
Indicators
Africa
1
Asia
2
C&EE
3
LA&C
2
WEOG
2
Total
10
8.2 Countries strengthening the capabilities and
capacities of existing poison centres (since 2000)
ref. WHO Status of Development Classification;
3
5
3
2
4
17
8.3 Countries initiating work to establish a poison
centre;
(Target period: 2002 – 2003)
5
1
2
1
0
9
8.1 Countries having established new (since 2000)
poison centres;
Information from WHO :
Number of countries having newly established a poison centre
1.
Ghana
2.
Dominican Republic
3.
Peru
4.
Trinidad
5.
Uzbekistan
6.
Kuwait
7.
Oman
8.
Vietnam
Countries with existing centres that have opened new poisons centres
1.
Ecuador
2.
India
3.
Kazakhstan
Number of countries strengthening existing poisons centres (since October 2000)? (Proposed criteria: At
least one centre in the country should have been upgraded to higher level in WHO classification)
1.
Cambodia
2.
China
3.
Malaysia
4.
Thailand
5.
Lithuania
6.
Mexico
Move from Grade E to Grade D (i.e. from having no plans to open center, to having started work on
poisons centre development)
1.
Djibouti
2.
Mauritania
3.
Bahamas
4.
Barbados
5.
Grenada
6.
Jamaica
7.
St Lucia
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------IFCS Simple Indicators of Progress - Forum IV,….– Ver 001.
9
IFCS/FSC/02.25
8.
Malta
Comment:
A lot of efforts is necessary with respect to the establishment and
functioning of poison centres. Only 18% of countries have established new
(since 2000) poison centres. And very few countries (16%) are initiating
work to establish a poison centre for the target period 2002 – 2003.
9.
Pollutant release and Transfer Register/Emission Inventories
Indicators
Africa
2
Asia
6
C&EE
8
LA&C
3
WEOG
11
Total
30
9.2 Countries having established a water inventory;
3
7
7
3
11
31
9.3 Countries having established a waste inventory;
4
4
8
3
8
27
9.4 Countries having established a pollutant release
and transfer register (PRTR);
1
2
2
0
8
13
9.5 Countries initiating work to design a PRTR or
emission inventory.
3
7
6
5
1
22
9.1 Countries having established an air emission
inventory;
Information from OECD
PRTR
1. Australia
2. Canada
3. Ireland
4. Japan
5. Korea
6. Mexico
7. Netherlands
8. Norway
9. Slovak Republic
10. United Kingdom
11. Unites States
Emission inventory
1. Belgium
2. Czech republic
3. Denmark
4. Finland
5. Hungary
6. Italy
7. Sweden
8. Switzerland
Comment :
Most of the WEOG countries have established the above inventories while the
percentage of developing countries having established the inventories is very weak.
10.
Prevention of illegal traffic in toxic and dangerous products
Indicators
Countries having developed a national strategy for the
prevention of illegal traffic in toxic and dangerous
products,
Africa
6
Asia
8
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------IFCS Simple Indicators of Progress - Forum IV,….– Ver 001.
C&EE
4
LA&C
2
WEOG
7
Total
25
10
IFCS/FSC/02.25
Comment:
Approximately 45% % of the countries have developed a national strategy for the
prevention of illegal traffic in toxic and dangerous products.
11.
Common principles for harmonized approaches for risk management
OECD
Yes –date?
Terminology
Cancer
Reproductive and
Developmental
Agreed
No – when anticipated?
June 2003
2004
Published
No – when anticipated?
June 2003
2004
2002
July/August
2002
2000
December
2000
(Sub) Chronic Toxicity
Humane end points
Yes-date?
OECD-EHS Series of
Monographs on Testing and
Assessment
Monograph no’s 32 and 35
OECD-EHS Series of
Monographs on Testing and
Assessment
Monograph no 19
WHO
Yes –date?
Agreed
No – when anticipated?
June 2003
Terminology
Cancer
Yes*
Reproductive and
No
2004
Developmental
* + additional work proposed on this end-point
Yes-date?
Yes, 2001
No
Published
No – when anticipated?
June 2003
2004
12. Hazard evaluation
OECD
Indicators
12.1 Number of substances for which final documentation has been
completed;
Nb
152
12.2 Number of substances for which it is anticipated that the final
documentation will be completed by 2004;
140
12.3 Number of substances that have passed final discussions (e.g. SIAM)
and are considered complete, but final documentation is not available;
142
12.4 Number of substances for which it is anticipated and will have
passed final discussions (e.g. SIAM) and will be considered complete, but
final documentation is not yet available in 2004.
140
13. Severely hazardous pesticide formulation under conditions of
use/applications of mechanisms under Rotterdam Convention
No information received
Indicators
16.1 Numbers of times mechanisms used;
16.2 Countries using mechanism.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------IFCS Simple Indicators of Progress - Forum IV,….– Ver 001.
11
IFCS/FSC/02.25
14. FAO code of conduct on the distribution and use of pesticides
No information received
Indicators
17.1 Status of work leading to the adoption of the
revised code, adopted November 2002.
17.2 Countries taking steps to implement (agreed
sections?) revised code?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------IFCS Simple Indicators of Progress - Forum IV,….– Ver 001.
12
IFCS/FSC/02.25
SUMMARY CHECK LIST OF INFORMATION PROVIDED BY COUNTRIES
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------IFCS Simple Indicators of Progress - Forum IV,….– Ver 001.
13
IFCS/FSC/02.25
Indicators
AFRICA (12)
Egypt
Gambia
Lybia Madagascar Mali Mauritanie Ile Maurice
Nigeria
Senega Seychelle Sudan Tanzani Uganda
l
s
a
1
1
0
1
1
1
TOTAL
1.1
1.2
1
1
1
0
0
0
1
0
1
1
1
0
8
1
4
1.3
1
1
0
0
1
0
0
1
1
1
0
0
1
7
1.4
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
6
1.5
0
1
1
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
5
1.6
1
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
5
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
7
1.7
2
2.1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
2
2.2
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
3
3.2
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
4
3.3
1
0
1
1
1
0
0
1
1
1
0
7
4.1
1
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
3
3.1
0
4
1
1
1
1
7
4.2
1
1
0
1
1
4
4.3
1
1
0
1
1
4
5.1
1
1
1
1
1
1
9
0
1
1
1
1
7
1
1
1
1
0
9
0
1
1
1
5
5.2
0
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
6
6.1
1
6.2
6.3
0
0
0
1
6
0
1
7
7.1
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
6
7.2
1
1
1
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
6
7.3
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
1
1
1
1
1
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
1
0
3
0
5
7.4
0
8
8.1
0
0
8.2
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
8.3
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
9
9.1
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
9.2
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
3
9.3
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
4
9.4
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
9.5
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
3
10.1
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
6
10
1
1
1=yes
0= No
Blank = no given answer
* Questionaire completed by IFCS NFP excepted for Mauritius and Seychelles
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------IFCS Simple Indicators of Progress - Forum IV,….– Ver 001.
15
IFCS/FSC/02.25
Indicators
CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE (7)
Armenia
Belarus
Estonia
Hungary
Latvia
Lithuania
Moldova
Slovakia
Slovenia
Yugoslavia
FS of Micronesia
1
TOTAL
1.1
0
0
1
1.2
1
1
1.3
1
0
1
1.4
1
0
1.5
1
0
1.6
0
1.7
1
2.1
2.2
1
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
0
1
1
0
0
1
1
1
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
0
1
0
0
1
3.2
0
1
3.3
0
4.1
0
1
0
0
4
1
1
6
0
1
0
5
0
1
0
0
4
0
0
0
0
2
1
0
1
0
0
4
0
1
1
1
0
0
6
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
2
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
2
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
6
1
1
1
0
0
1
1
0
5
0
2
3
3.1
0
4
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
4.2
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
7
6
4.3
1
0
1
1
0
1
0
4
0
1
0
1
0
1
1
1
0
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
0
1
0
0
1
1
1
5
5.1
1
5.2
0
6.1
0
0
0
4
4
6
6.2
6.3
0
0
6
4
1
3
7
7.1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
7
7.2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
7
7.3
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
2
7.4
1
1
1
1
0
4
8.1
0
0
3
8.2
0
8.3
0
1
9.1
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
9.2
1
1
1
1
0
1
9.3
1
1
1
1
0
1
9.4
0
0
0
0
0
9.5
1
1
1
1
10.1
1
0
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
0
1
1
0
8
0
0
0
3
0
0
2
1
0
1
7
1
1
0
1
1
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
1
0
1
1
0
9
6
7
1
1
2
5
10
1
0
0
* Questionaire completed by IFCS NFP excepted for Moldova
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------IFCS Simple Indicators of Progress - Forum IV,….– Ver 001.
16
3
IFCS/FSC/02.25
Indicators
LATIN AMERICA AND CARIBBEAN (9)
The Bahamas Barbados
Brazil
Colombia
Ecuador
Paraguay Peru St lucia Suriname
Trin&Tobag
1
TOTAL
1.1
0
0
1
1
0
0
1.2
1
1
1.3
0
0
0
0
1.4
0
0
1
1.5
0
0
1.6
0
1.7
1
2.1
2.2
1
0
0
1
4
1
0
0
1
1
1
1
0
5
1
0
0
0
1
0
3
1
1
0
0
1
0
1
4
0
1
1
0
0
4
0
1
0
1
1
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
2
1
0
1
1
0
1
8
0
0
1
0
0
1
1
0
1
1
1
0
1
6
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
3
2
3
3.1
0
3.2
1
0
1
0
0
3.3
1
0
1
0
0
4.1
0
0
1
0
1
0
1
1
0
0
4
0
0
0
1
3
0
4
1
1
1
6
4.2
1
1
1
1
1
0
4
4.3
0
1
1
1
1
4
5
5.1
1
5.2
1
6.1
0
6.3
7.1
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
8
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
8
0
0
0
1
1
1
0
0
3
0
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
5
1
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
5
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
8
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
1
1
1
4
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
2
0
1
0
0
1
2
6
6.2
0
0
1
7
7.2
7.3
0
7.4
1
8
8.1
0
8.2
8.3
0
0
1
0
1
9.1
1
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
3
9.2
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
3
9.3
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
3
9.4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
9.5
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
1
5
10.1
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
2
9
10
* Questionaire completed by IFCS NFP excepted for Ecuador
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------IFCS Simple Indicators of Progress - Forum IV,….– Ver 001.
17
IFCS/FSC/02.25
Indicators
WEOG (9)
Australia
Canada Cyprus Denmark
Finland
Germany Netherlands Norway Sweden
Switzerland USA
1
TOTAL
1.1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
1.2
1.3
1
1.4
1
0
1
1
1
1
7
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
10
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
0
8
1.5
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
0
9
1.6
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
7
1.7
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
10
2.1
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
0
1
0
8
2.2
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
3
3.2
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
10
3.3
1
1
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
9
4.1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
11
4.2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
11
0
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
0
0
6
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
8
1
1
1
1
1
1
8
0
0
1
1
1
0
6
1
1
1
0
6
2
3
3.1 ****
0
4
4.3
5
5.1
1
1
0
1
1
6.1
1
1
1
6.2
1
1
1
5.2
6
6.3
0
0
0
0
0
7
7.1
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
10
7.2
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
10
7.3
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
2
7.4
0
0
1
0
0
1
8.1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
2
8.2
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
1
4
0
2
8
8.3
0
9
9.1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
11
9.2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
11
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
0
8
1
0
1
1
0
1
1
1
0
1
8
9.3
9.4
1
9.5
0
0
1
1
10
10.1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
0
* Questionaire completed by IFCS NFP excepted for Norway and USA
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------IFCS Simple Indicators of Progress - Forum IV,….– Ver 001.
18
7
IFCS/FSC/02.25
Indicators
ASIA PACIFIC (9)
Indonesia Iran
Japan
Kuwait
Mongolia
Oman
P New Guinea
Singapore
Thailand
Vietnam
Yemen
TOTAL
1
1.1
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
1.3
0
1
0
1
1
0
1
1
0
1
1
0
1.4
1
1
1
1
6
1
1
0
1
1
1
1.5
0
1
0
9
0
1
1
0
1
1
0
5
1.6
0
1.7
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
9
2.1
2.2
1
0
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
0
8
1
0
1
0
1
0
0
1
0
4
1.2
0
1
1
0
8
1
3
7
2
3
3.1
1
1
3.2
1
0
1
1
0
1
0
1
1
1
0
7
3.3
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
1
0
4
4.1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
11
4.2
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
8
4.3
0
1
0
1
1
1
1
0
1
0
6
5.1
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
8
5.2
1
1
1
1
0
0
1
1
0
6
6.1
1
0
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
0
6.2
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
0
4
5
6
0
6.3
1
1
8
5
4
7
7.1
1
0
1
0
0
1
1
1
1
0
6
7.2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
9
7.3
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
2
7.4
1
1
1
0
1
0
1
1
1
1
8
8.1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
2
8.2
1
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
1
0
5
0
1
0
1
0
8
8.3
2
9
9.1
1
1
0
1
1
0
1
0
1
9.2
1
1
0
1
1
0
1
0
1
1
7
9.3
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
1
1
4
9.4
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
9.5
1
1
10.1
1
1
6
2
7
10
0
1
* Questionaire completed by IFCS NFP excepted for Kuwait and Papua New Guinea
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------IFCS Simple Indicators of Progress - Forum IV,….– Ver 001.
19
8