PLANNING COUNCIL
March 19, 2014
Bergengren Hall, Room 112
2:00 – 4:00 pm
PRESENT
Members and Co-Chairs
Susan Antillon, Jameal Adkins, Paul Capps, Linda Cupick, Shana Deyo, Ron Eaglin, Meghan Griffin, Margie
Hensler, Diane Holmes-Curtice, Andrea Horney, Reed Markham, Jennifer Maxwell, Karla Moore, Nancy
Morgan, Aileen Morrissey, Todd Richardson, Amy Ringue, Evan Rivers, Harry Russo, Diana Tata, Laurie Van
Dusen, Richard Vollaro, Dustin Weeks
I.
Welcome
Dustin Weeks welcomed everyone and reviewed the agenda. He announced the first half of the
meeting will be recorded as well as broadcast on Adobe Connect. He presented the minutes
from the last meeting, and hearing no corrections, the minutes were approved by all.
II.
Updates on Issues of Significance
a. Performance-based Funding – Susan Antillon
The latest model of performance-based funding ranks the college last in the state. Funding
of $80 million is proposed for 14-15 and will be distributed to state colleges according to
points earned based on seven metrics. Half the points are performance points and half are
improvement points. The goal is to graduate more students in less time with less expense.
b. Budget Planning Assumptions – Veronica Black / Isalene Montgomery
With the governor requesting no increase in college tuition, and a 5% decrease in enrollment
projected for the college, cost center managers are asked to look at their actual expenses
and to decrease their budgets accordingly, if possible. The budget entry module will be open
until March 31.
c. Student Satisfaction Survey Results – Ken Matthews
Institutional Research recently distributed two student surveys, the Student Satisfactory
Inventory (SSI) and the Priorities Survey for Online Learners (PSOL). Both surveys measured
importance, satisfaction, strengths and challenges. SSI, the paper survey, had a 73%
response rate and the PSOL online survey had a 15% response rate. Results of the surveys
will be posted on the Portal under Institutional Research.
III.
Committee Reports
a. Academic Success Committee – Karla Moore / Amy Ringue
The Academic Success Committee finished reviewing 34 programs for 13-14 which
completed the committee’s review process. A summary was provided of the rubric used to
assess the programs, results, and recommendations for 14-15.
Planning Council
March 19, 2014
Page 2
IV.
Strategic Planning Assessment Process
Nancy Morgan reviewed the assessment results of Priorities 3 and 5, and outlined the process
for assessing Priority 6 of the strategic plan: Enhance Teaching and Learning.
V.
Circle of Voices
All attendees engaged in a group activity to review information regarding Strategic Priority 6,
answer two questions to analyze impact, and come to consensus on the most notable
accomplishments. See attached summary of the discussion.
VI.
Conclusion
Dustin Weeks announced the next Planning Council meeting will be April 16, 2014, and asked
members to please review Priority 7 to be included in the information packet e-mailed prior to
the next meeting.
VII.
Adjournment
The meeting adjourned at 4:00 p.m.
Planning Council
March 19, 2014
Page 3
Strategic Plan 2010-14 Analysis
Planning Council 3/19/14
Priority 6: Enhance Teaching and Learning
6.1 Enhance the quality of academic instruction through a continued focus on student learning outcomes
assessment.
Of the outcomes listed, what was the most notable accomplishment (or most significant
impact)?
It was agreed that all items were notable accomplishments.
Instructional Resources
11-12 Outcome: Developed and implemented a way to store and share student artifacts in D2L to measure
Student Learning Outcomes.
College of Arts and Sciences
11-12 Outcome: Assessment coordinators were assigned for each academic department, faculty attended
workshops and conferences about assessment, and rubrics were developed for measuring AA program
outcomes.
College of Business Administration
11-12 Outcome: Institutional and program assessment reports were completed for critical thinking
outcomes.
12-13 Outcome: Faculty met and reviewed assessment results then determined their “use of results”. All
program and institutional assessments were submitted to Institutional Effectiveness.
College of Education
11-12 Outcome: All Student Learning Outcomes for Education were reviewed, communicated and updated.
College of Health and Public Services
11-12 Outcome: Preparations were begun for upcoming accreditation self-study and site visits for Nursing
and Physical Therapist Assistant programs.
Are there other things that have been done to address this priority that are not on the list?
Academic Success Committee
SACS praise of SLO’s and processes
External accreditation reports
Additional faculty training
State Assessment Meeting
Planning Council
March 19, 2014
Page 4
Strategic Plan 2010-14 Analysis
Planning Council 3/19/14
Priority 6: Enhance Teaching and Learning
6.2 Identify baccalaureate level educational needs of the region and offer programs to address those
needs.
Of the outcomes listed, what was the most notable accomplishment (or most significant
impact)?
It was agreed that all items were notable accomplishments.
College of Technology
11-12 Outcome: A consultant recommended splitting BSET into two programs (BSET and BSIT) to facilitate
ABET accreditation.
11-12 Outcome: Students in the BSET program provided feedback to faculty on how to improve online
course content.
12-13 Outcome: Interviewed employers and identified need for more students with software and database
skills. Met with employers of graduates to get info on needs and determine how well students are meeting
needs.
College of Education
12-13 Outcome: Results of a survey showed that graduate satisfaction exceeded targeted outcomes. 93%
responded that FEAP preparation was effective or highly effective; 96.5% indicated that the program
overall was effective or highly effective.
Are there other things that have been done to address this priority that are not on the list?
BSN
BSIT
Nationally ranked BAS
Increased marketing
NSF Cybersecurity grant
Planning Council
March 19, 2014
Page 5
Strategic Plan 2010-14 Analysis
Planning Council 3/19/14
Priority 6: Enhance Teaching and Learning
6.3 Maximize the utility and function of land, facilities, information technology, and instructional
systems to provide a positive and safe environment for effective learning at all College campuses.
Of the outcomes listed, what was the most notable accomplishment (or most significant
impact)?
Facilities Planning
11-12 Outcome: Projects completed included Veteran’s Center, The Landing, Writing Center expansion,
Cosmetology remodel, News Journal Center remodel, Building 1200 remodel; ATC Solar Array project, and
more.
12-13 Outcome: Completed 12 small projects. Completed design of Flagler Building 3 and NJC Scene Shop.
Facilities Services
12-13 Outcome: Replaced or upgraded exterior lighting for Buildings 100, 140 and 150 and News Journal
Center.
Academic Support Center
11-12 Outcome: Developed and implemented virtual tutoring for distance learning students in MAT1033
and MAC1105
Information Services
12-13 Outcome: 100% of academic buildings and areas have wifi.
Software and Systems Administration
12-13 Outcome: MyDaytonaState portal was up and available 99.98% of time during FY12-13.
12-13 Outcome: Email had an uptime of 98.1% in FY12-13 with an average resolution time of 3.0 hours.
Are there other things that have been done to address this priority that are not on the list?
Student activities
Campus Safety shuttle service
Critical incident management team training
Emergency response teams
Disability services
Student accounts