Strategic Planning Outcome Status Report
Date:
May 17, 2004
Sponsor:
Marilyn Vasquez
Committee Co-Chairs:
Outcome No.
Mike Certa
9
Provide a brief description of your outcome:
Activities completed to
date
Members of the AQIP
Technology
Subcommittee devised
three (3) distinct
surveys that were
distributed to faculty,
staff/administrators and
students. The purpose of
the surveys was to
determine baseline data
for current technology
usage and areas in
which people would
like to learn more about
the use of technology.
Discussed validity of
the preliminary statistics
that were provided to
the AQIP Technology
Subcommittee from the
survey responses on
technology usage
received from faculty,
staff, and students.
Action plans based on the AQIP technology
project will have been developed by 12/31/04;
increase the capabilities of students, faculty,
staff, and administrators in the use of
technology by 12/31/05.
Method of
Results (for both activity
Engagement/Feedback
and engagement process)
Surveys were mailed to all
The response rate for each
faculty, staff and students in group was
randomly selected classes.
Students 10%
Staff
22%
Faculty 15%
Faculty volunteers analyzed
the data and shared the
results with the AQIP
Technology Subcommittee.
Determined that results
from the survey did not
provide statistically
significant data on the use
of technology or
identification if
instructional/training gaps.
Decision to redesign and
distribute surveys in 2004.
Find alternate method to
establish baseline data for
the number of training
Dates
5/15/2003
9/30/2003
2
Strategic Planning Outcome Status Report
Activities completed to
date
Method of
Engagement/Feedback
Collected information
from IT, Oncourse and
CETL to establish
baseline data for
number and types of
tech training sessions
provided during the last
year.
AQIP Technology
Subcommittee, Jay Fern,
Oncourse, Director of
CETL, IT Training
Coordinator.
Redesigned surveys and
revised method for
collection of data
AQIP Technology
Committee
Results (for both activity
and engagement process)
sessions offered on
campus.
Data from providers of
tech and educational
training used to establish
baseline.
Short questionaires are
developed to increase
student response rate.
Another method of
engagement is identified to
insure larger response rate
from faculty, staff, and
administrators.
Dates
2/01/2004
3/01/2004
3
Strategic Planning Outcome Status Report
Note: In filling out the next chart, any activities identified as well as engagement approaches
should only be listed if the sponsor is at least 95% confident of achieving their success by the dates
identified.
Activities remaining to be
completed
Collected and collated data from
revised surveys that were
distributed to randomly selected
classes.
Proposed Engagement
AQIP Technology
Subcommittee, surveys
distributed to over 100 sections
of undergraduate and graduate
classes.
Expected completion dates
/31/2004
Collected and collated data from AQIP Technology
questionnaires that were emailed Subcommittee
or sent to all full-time faculty,
staff, and administrators.
7/31/2004
Staff, faculty/administrators and
student responses to the
questionnaires have been
analyzed.
9/01/2004
AQIP Technology
Subcommittee, Director of
Institutional Research.
Skills that people have identified AQIP Technology
that they would like to develop
Subcommittee
are identified for faculty,
staff/administrators and
students.
10/01/2004
Devised process to measure
progress in use of technology.
Developed plans to offer
instruction to meet the needs
identified in the
questionnaires/surveys.
12/31/2004
AQIP Technology
Subcommittee
CETL, IT, HR, VCs
4
Strategic Planning Outcome Status Report
What do you need in terms of support or other resources (including any identified personnel
listed above) to ensure achievement of your outcome by December 31, 2004?
Assistance from the Director of Institutional Research
AQIP
Describe whatever challenges you anticipate or have encountered in applying the AQIP process
to your outcome?

What data have you collected that address the AQIP questions that were assigned to your
committee’s outcome?
None

What are your specific action steps to ensure that the data needed to complete the systems
portfolio related to your Outcome have been completed by November 30?
1. Provide subcommittee with information and overview of AQIP and an understanding of
their role in the collection of information for the Systems Portfolio.
VCFA and AQIP Technology subcommittee
July 1,2004
2. Divide the duty of collecting data among the members of the subcommittee
and begin data collection.
AQIP Technology Subcommittee and relevant campus constituencies.
July 31, 2004
3. Check-in meeting to discuss status of data collection.
AQIP Technology Subcommittee
September 15, 2004
4. Review collection of data to date. Insure plan and timeline are in place to insure
that all data will be collected and collated by November 30,2004.
AQIP Technology Subcommittee
October 15, 2004
5. All data is collected and collated for AQIP questions assigned to the
AQIP Technology Subcommittee.
AQIP Technology Subcommittee, Sponsor, and Director of Institutional Research
November 30,2004