Strategic Planning Outcome Status Report
Date:
May 17, 2004
Sponsor:
Donald A. Coffin
Committee Co-Chairs:
Outcome No.
Bruce Bergland
6
Provide a brief description of your outcome: By December 31, 2004, develop a shared
understanding of “Sustainable Regional Vitality” and “Cultural Discovery and Learning.”
Activities completed to
Method of
date
Engagement/Feedback
Reviewed Quality of
Committee
Life Council
Dimensions of a
desirable community.
Reviewed definition of
Committee
Cultural Discovery and
Learning developed
between 2001 and 2003
by the Cultural
Discovery Task Force
(which has morphed
into the Curitoriate of
the Center for Cultural
Discovery and
Learning)
Drafts circulated
Email distribution of
definitions to faculty, staff,
administration.
Table in Hawthorn to solicit
student feedback
Results (for both activity
Dates
and engagement process)
Revised and adapted these October 2003
Dimensions into 12
Dimensions of Sustainable
Regional Vitality
Adopted this definition
October 2003
Approximately 10-12
responses.
Approximately 20
feedback forms returned.
Responses all addressed
SRV and involved making
modifications to the
wording of the definition,
not to its content.
March 2004
3
Strategic Planning Outcome Status Report
CCDL completed one
round of solicitation of
proposals. (Evidence of
shared understanding of
CDL.)
Curitoriate of CCDL
Prepared draft for
proposals submissions
to CSRV
CSRV Governing Board
Proposals received from
every academic unit.
January (?) 2004
8 (?) proposals funded
RFP prepared
April 2004
Note: In filling out the next chart, any activities identified as well as engagement approaches
should only be listed if the sponsor is at least 95% confident of achieving their success by the dates
identified.
Activities remaining to be
completed
Final CSRV RFP distributed
Final definition of CSRV
circulated
Accept, review, and approve
proposals. (Evidence of
understanding of SRV.)
Request Deans to identify
information on activities related
to CDL and SRV from
2003/2004 Academic Unit
Annual Report and to
incorporate such information
into subsequent Academic Unit
Annual Reports. (Evidence of
understanding of CDL and
SRV.)
Final definitions presented
1) To Faculty Organization
2) To Dean’s Council
3) To Chancellor’s Cabinet
AQIP draft responses to
questions in AQIP Criteria 2, 5,
6
Proposed Engagement
Expected completion dates
CSRV Governing Board email
to faculty, staff, administration
Email distribution.
sponsor meets with Faculty
Organization Academic Affairs
Committee
June 30, 2004
CSRV Governing Board
October 15 (?), 2004
Sponsor, Deans, VCAA
August 1 - October 31, 2004
October 1, 2004
October 31, 2004
Work with Outcome 5 group.
Solicit feedback from academic
units
November 30, 2004
3
Strategic Planning Outcome Status Report
What do you need in terms of support or other resources (including any identified personnel
listed above) to ensure achievement of your outcome by December 31, 2004?
I can’t think of anything at the moment.
AQIP
Describe whatever challenges you anticipate or have encountered in applying the AQIP process
to your outcome?

What data have you collected that address the AQIP questions that were assigned to
your committee’s outcome?
None. I met 5/11 with VC Vasquez to obtain the relevant information for my group.

What are your specific action steps to ensure that the data needed to complete the systems
portfolio related to your Outcome have been completed by November 30?
1) Meet with Dr. Iztok Hozo ASAP to coordinate activities of Outcome 5 and Outcome 6
working groups.
2) Committee meeting in June. We will determine which questions, we believe, we can find
information on or answers to. We will discuss how these fit into the Overview.
3) Meeting in August to plan data collection.
4) August/September/October: Meet/work with academic units and AA office to obtain
information
5) Meeting in late October to prepare/review draft of answers.