Location Strategy and Layout Strategy 19 July 2001 Introduction What – Location and Layout Decisions Where – Important to company Why – Costly to change Why is Location Important? Affects costs Costs of inputs depend on region Characteristics of labour force depend on region Difficult to change once decision made Objective: maximize benefits of location to the firm Choosing a Country Government Culture and economics Market locations Labour Availability of Inputs Exchange rate Choosing a Community Corporate desires Attractiveness Labour Utilities Environmental Regulations Government Incentives Proximity Land and Construction Costs Choosing a Site Size and Cost Air, rail, highway, waterway systems Zoning restrictions Nearness of services and suppliers Environmental impact Evaluating Location Alternatives How do we choose between locations? Factor Rating Develop list of factors Weight each factor Develop scale for each factor Score each location for each factor Multiply score by weights Sum points Break-Even Analysis Determine fixed and variable costs for each location Plot costs vs volume Select location with lowest total cost for expected production volume Break-Even Analysis Annual Cost 200000 150000 100000 50000 Akron lowest cost 0 0 Bowling Green lowest cost Chicago lowest cost 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 Volume Center of Gravity Method Service Location Strategy Maximize volume of business and revenue Purchasing Power Compatibility with demographics Competition Quality of Competition Uniqueness of location Physical qualities of facilities Operating Policies Quality of Management What is Layout? Placement of machines Offices Service centers Efficient flow of materials, people, information Layout Achieves Higher utilization of space, equipment, people Improved flow of information, materials, people Improved morale and safe working conditions Improved customer / client interaction Flexibility Good Layout Requires Material handling equipment Capacity and space requirements Environment and aesthetics Flows of Information Cost of moving between work areas Fixed Position Layout Project remains in one place Workers and equipment come to the work area Limited space At different stages, different materials needed Volume of materials needed is dynamic New Innovations Move some construction off-site Modular construction – ie shipbuilding Group technology – group components Process-Oriented Layout Low volume High variety Similar machines grouped together Product moves from one department to another Advantage: flexibility Disadvantage: set-up and movement Material Handling Costs Arrange departments to minimize material handling Work cells Temporary Product-oriented arrangement Reduced work-in-process inventory Less floor space Reduced raw material and finished goods inventory Reduced labour More employee participation Increased use of equipment Reduced investment in machinery Work cells require Identified families of products Highly trained and flexible employees Support to get up and running Focused Work Centre Product oriented arrangement Office Layout Moving information instead of materials Work cell concept still valid Technology allows increasing layout flexibility Virtual companies – hoteling Retail Layout Profitability related to customer exposure to products High-draw items around periphery Prominent locations for high-impulse and high-margin Disperse “power items” around store End-aisle locations have high exposure Convey mission by position lead-off department Warehouse and Storage Layout Find optimum cost between material handling and storage space Variety of items stored and number of items picked per order Shipping and receiving areas Cross-Docking Avoid placing in storage Ship what is received Reduce distribution costs Speed restocking Requires tight scheduling Requires accurate product information Random Stocking Locate stock wherever there is space Customizing Warehouse adds value to product by customizing it for customer Modification Repair Labeling Packaging Repetitive Product-Oriented Layout High volume Low variety Expensive! Volume adequate for high equipment utilization Product demand stable Product standardized Adequate supplies of raw materials Product Layouts Fabrication line Assembly line Time spent at each stage in the line must be balanced Advantages Low variable cost per unit Low material handling cost Reduced work-in-process inventory Easier training and supervision Rapid throughput Disadvantages High investment – requires high volume Work stoppage stops entire operation Low flexibility Assembly-Line Balancing Cycle time = Production time available per day / units per day Minimum Workstations = Sum of task times / Cycle time Efficiency = Sum of task times / (actual workstations x assigned cycle time)