Workshop 1 – How shall we live? – 14th April, Gt North Museum, Newcastle Background and Context SUSTAINE, the independent champion for sustainable development in North East England, in association with the Centre for Urban and Regional Development Studies (CURDS) and sustainability strategists Beyond Green, delivered two technical workshops exploring how we can work towards achieving a sustainable future for our region. Our first workshop explored the question: “How shall we live?” as part of a sustainable regional future. This workshop considered: How the need to lead more sustainable lives could shape the region’s future? What kind of lives might we lead? What might need to change to make sustainable living attractive? What new economic and work opportunities might emerge? How can the region as a whole, and communities within it, effect change? The workshop was structured into two halves; the first half drew on keynote presentations and regional respondents, whilst in the second half the workshop delegates explored the issues raised within themed workgroups. The workshop concluded with plenary feedback and reflections. Session 1: Setting the Agenda Welcome and Introductions: Professor John Tomaney (CURDS); Professor Paul Younger (Pro-Vice Chancellor, Newcastle University) Keynote Presentations and Regional Respondents: Joanna Yarrow, Beyond Green; John Adams, SUSTAINE; Bob Hull, Tynedale Transition Towns Session 2: Themed Workgroups Sustainable living and economic opportunity Social implications of sustainable living Environment, ‘place’ and sustainable lifestyles Leadership and agency for sustainable behaviour change Introduction Professor Paul Younger opened the workshop with some words of welcome and echoed one of the key challenges of the sustainability agenda: ‘It’s easier to talk about sustainability than get an idea of what this means in practice’. In terms of defining sustainability, Professor Younger suggested: ‘Enough, for all, forever’. Professor John Tomaney introduced the workshop and situated the event as part of a longer and wider set of discussions around sustainability in the North East. In particular, today’s workshop was designed to complement and broaden discussions raised at a previous CURDS/One NorthEast Regional Insights seminar on the Green New Deal that focused on the job opportunities for the region associated with new industries like wind turbines or electric cars (http://www.ncl.ac.uk/curds/news/item/green-new-deal-policy). Today’s workshop seeks to think more broadly about ‘how we will live in the future’. Session 1: Setting the Agenda Keynote Presentation – Joanna Yarrow (Beyond Green) See weblink: http://www.ncl.ac.uk/curds/research/projects/project/3506 Regional Respondents John Adams (SUSTAINE) – A key issue emerging is the extent to which either GVA or quality of life measures are prioritised in sustainability strategy and practice. In the North East, particularly, there is a tendency to frame things in terms of the GVA gap, and how they can be used for economic growth. In contrast to this there is an opportunity for the region to develop a brand as a leading low-carbon and sustainable region. Referring to the ‘Prosperity without Growth’ (Sustainable Development Commission: http://www.sdcommission.org.uk/publications.php?id=914 ) – there is an inherent need in our economic system to produce new goods and services fuelled by consumer demand. We have to continually grow to support this and replace the jobs lost through productivity increases. This is unsustainable. We need to ‘get off this train’ and start a discussion about quality of life measures against GVA. We need to embed sustainable development in the region. The Single Integrated Strategy is potentially a move in this direction but we need to go beyond this. However, a key problem is that we don’t know where the accountability for this is held in the region. Key message: There is a need to rethink what we mean by growth, and how we measure it. We need to explore a range of indicators to measure quality of life and what we really value in society. Bob Hull (Tynedale Transition Towns) – Bob’s response drew upon his experiences of Transition Towns in the North East. These are local community-based responses aimed at mitigating the effect of larger issues such as peak oil and climate change which could potentially affect all aspects of life in these localities. They form groups in the community to look at key issues, with some links to local government. The premise is that society has used huge levels of creativity and ingenuity in moving up the energy use curve, so we should also be able to use this to find ways of moving downwards. ‘If they rely on governments its too late, if they rely on individuals its too little, there’s a need for community action’. The challenge is getting the community to put ideas into practice. Bob then drew on Tynedale as an example. Tynedale started by looking at energy use, focusing on e.g. renewable energy projects, transport, allotment / school gardens. Whilst recognising they are not a campaign group, they aimed to get into schools and raise awareness. It is a bottom-up approach aiming to make links with other local groups and empower people. Key message: Transition movement is about taking collective action led by a core group of people to make it work. It needs experts and expertise. If ‘we work with communities, we might just deliver and in time’. We need to look at the small things people/communities can do to make a change, and build momentum around this to create a change. Discussion In response to the presentation, a number of points were raised and discussed by the workshop delegates. The following key messages emerged: An important consideration is the issue of growing populations (in developed and developing world) that obviously acts against reducing overall carbon use levels, so we could reduce per capita levels and still end up standing still or even moving backwards. Demographic change needs to be factored into our sustainability planning. We need to first look at reducing the need for travel (e.g. through more homeworking) and then at the development of alternative modes of travel through more viable public transport links and options. We need to enhance our evidence base in planning for sustainable transport systems and improve the ways in which we communicate these systems to the public. There is a danger in ignoring the role of the central government in structuring our options. Politicians need a stronger mandate to make changes. We also need to think in longer terms than 5 year political cycles – more towards 25-30 year inter-generational timeframes. Long-term visions are required to shape and coordinate shorter terms objectives Session 2: Themed Workgroups Group 1 – Sustainable Living and Economic Opportunity (reported by Anja McCarthy, ONE) Many of the themes developed in this group resonated with earlier discussions about the implications of environmental sustainability for economic growth. These included: Sustainable production : ‘making more with less’ Socially useful jobs: ‘the nature and type of work and how it impacts on society (e.g. caring jobs)’ How housing is organised: ‘local mechanisms for renting; community-based cooperatives’ How do we affect behavioural change: - ‘Not just incentives for individual consumers but also in business’. - Not just through regulation but also by presenting / phrasing opportunities in new ways to increase their appeal. Need for private sector leadership as well. It was roundly agreed that green jobs and renewable energy offers great potential for the North East. We need to look at the advantages the region has nationally to lead both technological and community solutions: the production of renewable energy through wind and off shore wind is the first and underway, the second is food production. The region has an opportunity to design, develop and export technologies in these fields. It is also well placed in terms of sustainable food production (a point also raised by Group 2). Given the region’s natural resources, can we develop opportunities around the concept of ‘Food sovereignty’? Finally, the group discussed the challenge of developing the skills base to achieve a more sustainable society and economy. Group 2 – Social Implications of Sustainable Living (reported by Shruti Jain, SUSTAINE) An overriding theme emerging from this group was the extent to which activities should be focused on working with communities - to see how they live and work. We need to work with our communities to raise awareness of sustainable development relating it to the individuals and how they live, work and socialise. Issues need to be addressed through active working practices/sessions. Poorer communities consume less, use public transport more, and are seen as a problem/drain on society. There is a huge part of the population not taking action but the state is helping them through initiatives like Warm Zone. We need to think further about how we ‘help’ these hard to shift communities. The challenge is to build community based projects for larger solutions e.g. SRB, Leader schemes Previous initiatives such as SRB worked well and brought communities together on one issue. A climate challenge fund based on a SRB style basis where communities come together with ideas for cutting carbon footprint – adding positive externalities such as social capital. IPPR North is doing some local work at street level on travel behaviours that has been incentivised and is hugely successful. In so doing, as a region, we need to decide what we value in forming a sustainability agenda. There was a consensus in the group that there is a need to create other measures and parameters. Sustainable living needs to be achievable and ‘friendly’. We do not want to frighten people. There needs to be a further debate on what kind of society we aspire to, and which groups there must be a focus on. This will help the region better recognise and promote its particular qualities, for example quality of life (e.g. open spaces etc.). There is a sense that good things are already going on at the local level, but this needs to be joined-up more through collaboration at the regional level, whilst still avoiding a top-down approach. Darlington Travel Town Initiative is a good example of activity. It should be rolled out across the region. However there is an issue of scaling up activity. The activity needs to stay local, and join up and work at this level. It cannot work as a big infrastructure project. Is there scope for a particular place to become a leading exemplar of sustainable development for the rest of the region? Group 3 – Environment, ‘Place’ and Sustainable Lifestyles – (reported by Neil Murphy, Beyond Green) How are different parts of the region set up for sustainability? Sustainable lifestyles vary between urban, suburban, and rural areas, but we must move away from looking at things in terms of an urban-rural split. There is hidden rural deprivation as well as urban deprivation, and an ageing population in rural areas. Can we make the environment an economic asset for the region? It was recognised that there currently exists a ‘cognitive dissonance’ with people not seeing the benefits of, for instance, having wind turbines in the region – they see this as a something more akin to an inward investment or something imposed from outside. Challenge is how to get them to see the benefits. Need to recognise the importance of ‘movement / mobility’ as a theme. For instance, how does the effort being put into becoming a mass producer of electric cars sit with things like increasing walking and building cycle lanes etc. (when things like building infrastructure for electric cars, disposing of batteries and levels of energy actually saved are considered). Is this a genuinely low-carbon alternative or just distracting from other changes that are needed? Car use is the biggest affecter socially and environmentally. Reductions in use of the private motor car will promote social as well as environmental sustainability. We need to get people used to public transport early in life – free transport for under 18 year olds as well as the over 60s! The public transport system needs to be de-privatised to deliver a true public transport system. There remains an overriding need for more participation and buy-in. For example, today’s event is still just a group of professionals talking, and not community participation. Group 4 – Leadership and agency for sustainable behaviour change – (reported by John Edwards, CURDS) In terms of leadership, the group questioned the extent to which Central Government are leading on new forms of measurement for sustainable development. Sustainability is still a box-ticking exercise. Could the North East develop its own alternative set of measures and strategy? However, it was also recognised that local and regional activity takes place as part of a multi-level system. Local initiatives are important but some issues need national state interventions (e.g. North Sea Oil). In terms of leadership: - Accountability was not considered particularly strong at the regional level. It is the job of regional policymakers to empower people. Leadership is influence – outlining the changes that are needed. Need for distributed leadership across different institutions (e.g. including education, private sector as well) with each area doing what they are good at. The group also suggested that strategies can be usefully informed by ideas and evidence drawn from outside the region. Plenary Reflections and Discussions Drawing on the feedback from the themed workgroup, our invited speakers offered the following points: Joanna Yarrow: The eternal problem is a lack of engagement. There is a difference between talking fervently in our policy and stakeholder communities and actually engaging. There is a level of disenfranchisement in the region which needs to be addressed as a major challenge moving forward. Ownership of the problems and ownership of the solutions will be important. Co-ordination and celebration of the good work already happening in the region. John Adams: Should we be focusing on smaller things that can help sustainability than some of the big renewable energy schemes and issues like local food production that we have talked about? A lack of leadership? Politicians ‘don’t run too far ahead of the population’, so a need for wider engagement to influence them. In events like this there tends to be too much optimism about the short-term and too much pessimism about long-term, so we need to be more balanced about these. Bob Hull: More thinking is required as to what sustainability on the ground actually means. There are clear opportunities for technological solutions, but this will require coordination between local authorities, the private sector, and universities. Need community participation and a can-do attitude – we know what needs to be done, so should do it. Appendix 1: Pen Portraits of Invited Speakers Joanna Yarrow Joanna is a founder of sustainability company Beyond Green (www.beyondgreen.co.uk), which provides strategic advice to clients ranging from the Olympics to Audi and the Premier League. She presented BBC3’s Outrageous Wasters and is GMTV’s green expert. She regularly appears on lifestyles and current affairs programmes including Five News and ITV Tonight, and is a presenter on ITV’s 60 Minute Makeover, bringing a sustainable touch to interior design. Joanna is the author of 1,001 Ways You Can Save the Planet, How to Reduce Your Carbon Footprint and Eco-logical! She fronts consumer behaviour-change campaigns including the Ariel/Energy Saving Trust energy- and water-saving campaigns and the Future Friendly Awards, and is often featured in the print media. She regularly hosts or speaks at conferences, events and award ceremonies. Joanna sits on the Commission for Architecture and the Built Environment Eco Towns Design Review Panel. John Adams John Adams is an experienced freelance researcher based in North East England. He has an extensive knowledge of public policy, nationally, regionally and locally. He has written solely and jointly a number of keynote research publications in a diverse range of policy areas. He is also a non-executive Board member of Sustaine, the sustainability champion for North East England. He is a former Special Advisor in Whitehall, and a former Director of Research at ippr north. He advised the government during the passage of the legislation which established the National Assembly for Wales, and moved to the Institute for Public Policy Research (ippr) where he led their research programmes on devolution and regionalism. He then moved to Gateshead where he oversaw the creation of ippr north, and co-ordinated a programme of work and a range of research projects. He personally conducted a number of research projects in the fields of regional economic policy and labour market policy and his work did much to highlight the nature of various socio-economic challenges facing the North East. Robert Hull Until his retirement in 2006 Robert Hull was Policy Director of the European Economic and Social Committee in Brussels. He followed very closely developments on environmental and sustainability questions having previously been, from 1990 to 1999, the Head of the Division in the European Commission’s Directorate General for the Environment responsible for initiating and co-ordinating new policy proposals on the environment and sustainable development. He led the team which produced the first European Strategy for sustainable development in 1992. During this time he was the Secretary of the European Consultative Forum on the Environment and Sustainable Development and a member of the Environment Committee of the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development. Currently Mr Hull is a member of the Council of Newcastle University, a member of the Sustainable Development Steering Group of the Higher Education Funding Council for England, chairman of the Regional Centre of Expertise in Education for Sustainable Development, adviser to a cross party parliamentary group on environment issues and sustainable development and a board member of the Hexham Community Partnership with a particular interest in environment and climate change. He is also involved in a series of theatre projects linking arts and sustainability. Appendix 2: List of Registered Delegates No Surname First Name Organisation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 23 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 Adams Armstrong Balderson Best Bone Boyes Boyne Brown Buchanan Burke Byers Campbell Clark Clear-Hill Cliff Colling Coombes Coverdale Cowie Coyne Crilly Cripps Davies Davison Eastick Edwards Errington Goddard Gough Grant Gray Harrison Haverson Histon Hodson Hurst Hull Jain Jeynes Johnston Jones Lashley Lowther Marston John Jill Ursula Nic Gemma Samantha Nicola Ian Keith Wendy Edward Ian Mike Hugh Thomas Valerie Mike David Paul Clive Michael Jonathan James Amy Alan John Barry John Tina Olivia Martin Nicola Paul Julia Julie Rich Robert Shruti Sara Sheila Phil Sharon John Michael Sustaine Richmondshire District Council Newcastle University CPRE North East UK Youth Climate Coalition Civil Engineering, Newcastle University Association of North East Councils Sustainable Heating Solutions UK Ltd Consultant Public Health NE Newcastle University Northumberland County Council Association of North East Councils Northumberland County Council CPCR Ltd Colling Construction Ltd Newcastle University Northumberland National Park Authority Northumberland National Park Authority Gateshead Council Newcastle City Council Community Energy Solutions Tyne & Wear City Region Bradley O'Mahoney Public Relations North Tyneside Council CURDS Government Office for the North East Newcastle University Spence and Dower Architects Sustaine Gateshead Council English Heritage D3 Associates Ltd North Star Housing Group Sunderland City Council North East Strategic Partnership for Sustainable Schools Association of North East Councils South Tyneside Council Gateshead Council One NorthEast Community Energy Solutions Tees Valley Joint Strategy Unit Soil Association /Federation of Cityfarms and Community Gardens 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 McCarthy McDonald McLaughlin Megginson Moore Mortimer Murphy Murphy Namdeo Nichols Peacock Richards Richardson Robson Sanderson Schmuecker Scott Sellars Singh Stevens Stewart Stirling Straughan Stretton Sturman Thompson Thompson Thomson Tighe Tiwary Tomaney Townsend Vallance Wainwright Ward Wilson Woolf Yarrow Young Younger Anja Stephen Ben Claire Roland Shirley Martin Neil Anil Rob Lynda Pete Kevin Steve Joan Katie John Dermot Saljeet John David John Carol Neil Peter Stuart Peter Kirsteen Becki Abhishek John Alan Paul Andrew Karl Sean Craig Joanna Rosemary Paul One NorthEast Durham County Council One NorthEast Association of North East Councils Dept for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs North Tyneside Council Sustaine Beyond Green Civil Engineering, Transport Newcastle City Council 4 Housing Group Groundwork North East Newcastle City Council Association of North East Councils Northumberland County Council IPPR North South Tyneside Council Homes and Communities Agency BEACON JSA Regeneration Ltd Sustaine North Tyneside Council Stockton on Tees Borough Council Durham County Council TWRI Ribble Consultants Gateshead Council One NorthEast Craven Local Strategic Partnership Newcastle University Newcastle University University of Durham CURDS South Tyneside Council Newcastle University South Tyneside Council Community Renewable Energy (CoRE) Beyond Green Stockton on Tees Borough Council Newcastle University