You have more than two groups and a mean (average) for each ◦ e.g., young = 4.0, ◦ middle aged = 5.0, ◦ older = 4.5 How do you determine the strength of the covariation? Marketing Research 7/17/2016 1 Hypothesis Tests Related to Differences Black Box H0: µ1 = µ2 = µ3 sig. tests p. value = .001 Hypothesis Tests Related to Differences .001 Disagree H0: µ1 = µ2 = µ3 1.0 Agree Conditional probability P (Sample Data | Null is True) Level of agreement between Null and sample data sig. tests p. value = .001 Hypothesis Tests Related to Differences Looking atanything the(or averages for each box size (u1, u2, u3), Hmmm, isisthere else that westores), might like to know about each Consider the potential sales volume of three different of the Okay, With sothe What the variance same about in the sales lack variance? of) (across difference Let’s occurring look are and the three see. insizes the different next set What about Lets get this rid third of the set “Black of comparisons? Box” do we believe that these 3 types sell the same? group of sales cereal. data?or why not? same Cheerios comparisons ofthe comparison? same? Why u1 u2 u3 sig. tests p. value = .001 H0: µ1 = µ2 = µ3 u1 u2 u3 u1 u2 u3 ◦ Decomposes “variance” into: treatment effects other factors unexplained factors ◦ Compares data to group means Subtracts each data point from group mean Squares it Keeps a running total of “Sum of Squares” Marketing Research 7/17/2016 5 ◦ The Sums of Squares are then: Divided by the number of groups (To get an estimate “per group”) “Mean Squares” MSSr = SSr / df (variance per group) MSSr / MSSu = F Total variance “explainable” ◦ F compared to F crit [dfn, dfd] ◦ if F > F crit, difference in population Marketing Research 7/17/2016 6 ◦ One way ANOVA investigates: ◦ Main effects factor has an across-the-board effect e.g., age or involvement Marketing Research 7/17/2016 7 Study of movie profits ◦ Dependent variable: Gross revenue in dollars [continuous] ◦ Independent variables: Sex [categorical] Violence ◦ Examine predictors of profitability: Sex, violence, interaction (sex * violence) Marketing Research 7/17/2016 8 No Sex Sex No Violence 3 4 Violence 3 4 Marketing Research 7/17/2016 9 5 4 No sex Sex 3 2 Low High VIOLENCE LEVEL Marketing Research 7/17/2016 10 No Sex Sex No Violence 3 3 Violence 4 4 Marketing Research 7/17/2016 11 5 4 No sex Sex 3 2 Low VIOLENCE LEVEL High Marketing Research 7/17/2016 12 ◦ A TWO-WAY ANOVA investigates: ◦ INTERACTIONS effect of one factor depends on another factor e.g., larger advertising effects for those with no experience importance of price depends on income level and involvement with the product Marketing Research 7/17/2016 13 No Sex Sex No Violence 3 4 Violence 4 3 Marketing Research 7/17/2016 14 5 4 No sex Sex 3 2 Low High VIOLENCE LEVEL Marketing Research 7/17/2016 15 Study of movie profits ◦ Dependent variable: Gross revenue in dollars [continuous] ◦ Independent variables: Sex [categorical] Violence ◦ Examine predictors of profitability: Sex, violence, interaction (sex * violence) Marketing Research 7/17/2016 16 ◦ Interpret the results Tests of Between-Subjects Effects Dependent Variable: Total Gross Type III Sum Source of Squares Corrected Model 43744.364 a Intercept 952785.362 SEX 35467.649 VIOLENCE 10228.369 SEX * VIOLENCE 21.589 Error 995088.361 Total 1991539.265 Corrected Total 1038832.725 df 3 1 1 1 1 381 385 384 Mean Square 14581.455 952785.362 35467.649 10228.369 21.589 2611.780 F 5.583 364.803 13.580 3.916 .008 Sig. .001 .000 .000 .049 .928 a. R Squared = .042 (Adjusted R Squared = .035) Marketing Research 7/17/2016 17 Marketing Research 7/17/2016 18