Culture and/versus Society Emic and Etic; American and British Anthropological Traditions 7/17/2016 1 Emic, Etic, Etc. Anthropologists tend to differ depending on whether they view human behaviour and organization as being primary or human language and meaning as being primary. Whether socialization and social groups influence individual thinking or cultural values propel individuals decisions and behaviour. The first is the more etic approach, associated with British social anthropology, the second is the more emic approach and is associated with American cultural anthropology. Canada: a bit of both. Most anthropologists today examine both values and behaviour, both meaning and social groups. The two approaches can be viewed as two sides of the same coin. 7/17/2016 2 The Concept(s) of Culture At least 300 definitions of culture. One of the most influential comes from Tylor (1871): “Culture is that complex whole which includes knowledge, belief, art, morals, law, custom and any other capabilities and habits acquired by man as a member of society.” Depends upon our ability to symbolize through language; this differentiates human beings from other species. But, example of linguistic ability amongst chimpanzees and dolphins. Yet, human beings have a greater capacity to symbolize than other species. Each language is composed of only a small percentage of sounds that the human being is capable of making. 7/17/2016 3 Cultures and Classification Franz Boas, father of American cultural anthropology, saw culture as a like a pair of glasses that gave us the ability to determine the meaning of our social lives. Bee larvae are a delicacy for the Mixtec, for the American anthropologist they produced nausea. The same was true for his Mixtec guests eating onion soup. Shows that both groups define food and non-food items. Even though insects may be nutritious, they are not ‘food’ in American culture. The ways that cultures classify different categories of food may differ, but the practise of classifying is universal in human cultures. Common ways in which cultures classify are in terms of food/non-food, nature/culture, male/female. Society is not simply a model which classificatory thought followed; it was its own divisions which served as divisions for the system of classification (Mauss and Durkheim, 1906). 7/17/2016 4 Levi-Strauss and Binary Thought Human classification is universal But this is due to the inherent property of human thought. Human thought occurs through binary oppositions and analogies, e.g. between night/day; hot/cold; male/female; nature/culture. 7/17/2016 5 Issues in the Contemporary Study of Culture Whether cultures are integrated: The question of power: enculturation produces a set of values that depend upon notions of what is normal and what is abnormal. Very often what is ‘normal’ or ‘ideal’ reflects the norms of ‘elite’ groups within a society; whether these be defined by gender, ethnicity or class. What about ‘marginal’ groups? What about ‘sub-cultures’? For example, the value of individualism in the film Skin Deep. The question of boundaries: Especially with recent globalization, the flows of people across ‘cultures’ have become very visible and significant. No longer possible to associate a particular culture with a particular territory. 7/17/2016 Ethnoscapes (Appadurai): refers to the cultural repertoire that people carry around in their minds as an imagined community. Increasingly, people are required, like anthropologists to be bi- or multicultural, able to function in two or more cultures and languages. 6 Societies and Social Organization Focuses on social roles, social groups, and social networks. Pays attention not to the transitory groups that form and dissolve, but on more general and permanent organizations of individuals. Often, this organization extends beyond the lives of the individuals who make up the group. E.g. of this classroom and the university as an institution. 7/17/2016 Social roles: instructors and students, each having certain norms and expectations that exist beyond the lives of me and you. 7 Institutions Patterns of behaviour and ideology that become relatively permanent, discrete and autonomous. Total institutions: prisons, the military, boarding schools, monasteries, communes, cults, psychiatric hospitals, etc. Institutions that govern almost every facet of an individual’s life. 7/17/2016 8 Structure and Function Each society has a structure consisting of roles, groups, institutions. Each of these structures has a function, e.g. to provide social cohesion, to resolve conflict, to ensure the reproduction of the group, to provide nutrition, to provide meaning, etc. Malinowski: British social anthropologist who stressed the universal and often basic needs that diverse institutions met. E.g. explained magic among Trobriand Islands’ fishermen as fulfilling the psychological need of alleviating anxiety. Radcliffe-Brown: stressed the function of all institutions in maintaining social cohesion, e.g. joking relationships commonly found at points of tension in a specific society. Cohesion versus Conflict: Marx argued that societies are shaped as much by conflict between different groups than by cohesion. 7/17/2016 9 ‘Tradition’, ‘Modernity’ Maine: status to contract. Tonnies: gemeinschaft/gesellschaft Durkheim: mechanical solidarity/organic solidarity. Weber: bureaucratic rationality versus traditional authority systems. Yet most anthropologists today find these dichotomies to be too simplistic and even ethnocentric. Doing fieldwork alerts us to the complexity of social life, difficult to categorize in terms of traditionalism and modernization. Especially difficult to categorize societies today in a globalized world. 7/17/2016 10