ME 475/675 Introduction to Combustion Lecture 43 Review for Final

advertisement
ME 475/675 Introduction to
Combustion
Lecture 43
Review for Final
Announcements
• HW17 Ch. 10 (5, 6, 8)
• Due now, return by Wednesday
• Final:
• Friday, December 11, 2015, 2:45-4:45 PM
• Trying to see if we can postpone to 3-5 PM
• Hasib will have a tutorial review on Thursday (he will email time)
• Course Evaluations:
• Log in with your NetID to www.unr.edu/evaluate
• Please complete before 11:59 PM on Wed (dead day)
• If a student completes ALL teaching evaluations, they can see grades in real-time as
they have done in the past.
• If they leave even one evaluation incomplete, they will be unable to view grades through MyNevada
Grade Viewing until the Tuesday after grades are due (December 22 this year).
• I am curious how you feel about these components of the course:
• Lecture slides, Worked examples, Extra-credit example problems, Long tests, Project
Final
• Friday, December 11, 2015, 2:45-4:45 PM (2 hours)
• Chapters 8, 9, 10 and 16
• Even though Chapter 8 was partially covered on Midterm II
• Use skills from earlier chapters as needed
• 3-4 problems with parts
• Open book with bookmarks + 1 page of notes
• Study all:
• HW problems
• Lectures and extra-credit problems
• Text reading assignments
Ch. 8 Laminar Premixed Flames
𝛼
𝑣𝑒
•
•
•
•
𝑆𝐿
𝛼
Bunsen Burner Inner Cone angle, 𝛼
𝑆𝐿 is the laminar flame speed relative to the premixed reactants
𝑣𝑒 is the unburned reactant speed
If 𝑣𝑒 > 𝑆𝐿 , then a cone will form whose angel 𝛼 adjusts so that 𝑆𝐿 = 𝑣𝑒 sin 𝛼
• The angel 𝛼 and its sine sin 𝛼 =
𝑆𝐿
𝑣𝑒
decrease as 𝑣𝑒 increases (inner cone length increases)
• If 𝑣𝑒 < 𝑆𝐿 , then flame will flash back to air holes (unless quenched in tube).
Tube filled with stationary premixed Oxidizer/Fuel
Products shoot
out as flame
burns in
𝑆𝐿 Laminar Flame Speed
Burned
Products
𝛿
Unburned Fuel + Oxidizer
• Flame reference frame:
𝑣𝑏 , πœŒπ‘
𝑣𝑒 = 𝑆𝐿 , πœŒπ‘’ ,
𝛿~1 π‘šπ‘š
• 1 π‘˜π‘” 𝐹𝑒 + 𝜈 π‘˜π‘” 𝑂π‘₯ → 1 + 𝜈 π‘˜π‘” π‘ƒπ‘Ÿ
• Conservation of mass: π‘š" = πœŒπ‘’ 𝑣𝑒 = πœŒπ‘ 𝑣𝑏 ; so
𝑣𝑏
𝑣𝑒
=
𝑇𝑏
𝑇𝑒
• Diffusion of heat and species cause flame to propagate
• Estimate the laminar flame speed 𝑆𝐿 and thickness 𝛿.
≈
2100𝐾
300𝐾
= 7, 𝑣𝑒 = 𝑆𝐿 =?
• Depends on the pressure, fuel, equivalence ratio, heat and mass diffusion,…
Heat Flux with diffusion
• Heat: Energy transfer at a boundary due to temperature difference
• When there is a large species gradient, diffusion contributes to heat flux
•
𝑄π‘₯′′
=
𝑑𝑇
−π‘˜
𝑑π‘₯
• For 𝐿𝑒 =
𝛼
π’Ÿ
=
′′
π‘šπ‘–,π‘‘π‘–π‘“π‘“π‘’π‘ π‘–π‘œπ‘›
β„Žπ‘–
+
π‘˜
π’ŸπœŒπ‘π‘ƒ
≈ 𝑂(1), true for most combustion mixtures
• Shvab-Zeldovich form: 𝑄π‘₯′′ = −πœŒπ’Ÿ
π‘‘β„Ž
𝑑π‘₯
=−
π‘˜ π‘‘β„Ž
𝑐𝑃 𝑑π‘₯
• Approximate Solution (Midterm II)
• 𝑆𝐿 =
2𝛼 1+𝜈
πœŒπ‘’
• 𝛿=
2π›ΌπœŒπ‘’
′′′ 1+𝜈
−π‘šπΉ
−π‘šπΉ′′′ ; 𝜈 is air/fuel mass ratio
=
2𝛼
𝑆𝐿
(Fast flames are thin)
• π‘šπΉ′′′ = πœ”πΉ π‘€π‘ŠπΉ
• πœ”πΉ at average 𝑇 that is closer to 𝑇𝑏 than 𝑇𝑒 , and average values of 𝐹𝑒𝑒𝑙 and 𝑂π‘₯
Pressure and temperature dependence of SL and 𝛿
𝑆𝐿
𝑆𝐿
𝑆𝐿
2𝛼 1 + 𝜈
• For methane:
Φ
𝑇𝑒
𝑃
• 𝑆𝐿 =
′′′
−π‘šπΉ
πœŒπ‘’
~𝑃0 𝑇𝑒 𝑇 0.375 𝑇𝑏−1 𝑒π‘₯𝑝
• Actually decreases as P increases: 𝑆𝐿
cm
𝑆𝐿 s
•π›Ώ=
𝛿
cm
s
=
43
𝑃 [π‘Žπ‘‘π‘š]
Φ
πΈπ‘Ž 𝑅𝑒
−
2𝑇𝑏
≠ 𝑓𝑛 𝑃 (for HC fuels, N=2)
Not reliable
Better
• Increases with temperature:
= 10 + 3.71 × 10−4 𝑇𝑒2 𝐾
• Decreases for Φ above or below 1.05 (because that decreases temperature)
2𝛼
𝐸 𝑅
~𝑃−1 𝑇 0.375 𝑇𝑏1 𝑒π‘₯𝑝 π‘Ž 𝑒
𝑆𝐿
2𝑇𝑏
• Fast (high temperature) flame are thin
Dependence on Fuel
𝑆𝐿
𝑆𝐿,𝐢3 𝐻8
𝑇𝑓
• Table 8.2, P = 1 atm, Φ = 1, Tu = Room temperature
• Figure 8.17 presents ratio of maximum flame speed (at Φπ‘š ≈ 1.05) of some
hydrocarbons to propane speed (C3H8) versus 𝑇𝑓 at maximum 𝑆𝐿 (at Φπ‘š ≈ 1.05).
• C3-C6 follow same trend
• hydrogen H2 and acetylene C2H2 are much faster
Flame Speed Correlations for Selected Fuels
• Hint: Be aware of what fuels are in this and other tables so you’ll know
the easiest way to find the results you need
• 𝑆𝐿 = 𝑆𝐿,π‘Ÿπ‘’π‘“
𝑇𝑒
𝑇𝑒,π‘Ÿπ‘’π‘“
𝛾
𝑃
π‘ƒπ‘Ÿπ‘’π‘“
𝛽
1 − 2.1π‘Œπ‘‘π‘–π‘™
• 𝑇𝑒 > ~350𝐾, π‘‡π‘Ÿπ‘’π‘“ = 298 𝐾, π‘ƒπ‘Ÿπ‘’π‘“ = 1 π‘Žπ‘‘π‘š
• 𝑆𝐿,π‘Ÿπ‘’π‘“ = 𝐡𝑀 + 𝐡2 Φ − Φπ‘š 2
• 𝛾 = 2.18 − 0.8 Φ − 1
• 𝛽 = −0.16 + 0.22 Φ − 1
• RMFD-303 is a research fuel that simulates gasoline
Flame Mixture Flammability, Ignition, Quenching
• What does it take to ignite a mixture?
• What does it take to extinguish a flame?
• “Williams Criteria” (rule of thumb)
• Ignition will occur if enough energy is added to a slab of thickness 𝛿 (laminar
flame thickness) to raise it to the adiabatic flame temperature, Tad.
• A flame will be sustained if its rate of chemical heat release insides a slab is
roughly equal to heat loss by conduction out of the slab
Flammability Limits
• Flames only propagate within certain equivalence ratio ranges
• Φπ‘šπ‘–π‘› < Φ < Φπ‘šπ‘Žπ‘₯ ,
• Φπ‘šπ‘–π‘› = Φπ‘™π‘œπ‘€π‘’π‘Ÿ = Φπ‘™π‘’π‘Žπ‘›
• Φπ‘šπ‘Žπ‘₯ = Φπ‘’π‘π‘π‘’π‘Ÿ = Φπ‘Ÿπ‘–π‘β„Ž
• See page 291, Table 8.4 for limits
• Φ=
𝐴
𝐹 π‘ π‘‘π‘œπ‘–π‘
𝐴
𝐹
• πœ’πΆπ»4 ,πΏπ‘’π‘Žπ‘› =
=
π‘šπΉ π‘šπ΄,𝑆𝑑
π‘šπΉ,𝑆𝑑 π‘šπ΄
𝑁𝐢𝐻4
𝑁𝐢𝐻4 +π‘π΄π‘–π‘Ÿ
πΏπ‘’π‘Žπ‘›
=
1
𝐴
𝐹 π‘ π‘‘π‘œπ‘–π‘
4
1+ π‘€π‘Š
π΄π‘–π‘Ÿ ΦπΏπ‘’π‘Žπ‘›
π‘€π‘ŠπΆπ»
; πœ’πΆπ»4 ,π‘…π‘–π‘β„Ž =
1
π‘€π‘ŠπΆπ»
1+ π‘€π‘Š 4
π΄π‘–π‘Ÿ
𝐴
𝐹 π‘ π‘‘π‘œπ‘–π‘
Φπ‘…π‘–π‘β„Ž
Ignition
𝑑𝑇
𝑑π‘₯
π‘…πΆπ‘Ÿπ‘–π‘‘
• The minimum electrical spark energy capable of igniting a
flammable mixture.
• It is dependent on the temperature, pressure and equivalence
ratio of the mixture
• Critical (minimum) radius of a spark that will propagate
• Order of Magnitude: π‘…π‘π‘Ÿπ‘–π‘‘ ≥ 6
𝛼
𝑆𝐿
=
6
𝛿
2
= 1.22 𝛿
• Energy to bring critical volume to Tb
• 𝐸𝑖𝑔𝑛 = 61.56𝑃
𝛼 3 𝑐𝑝 𝑇𝑏 −𝑇𝑒
𝑆𝐿
𝑅𝑏
𝑇𝑏
~𝑃−2
• Need lots of energy at low pressure
• Agrees with measurements at low pressure
• 𝐸𝑖𝑔𝑛 decreases as Tu increases
• Table 8.5 page 298 Different fuels
Data
• Very low for Hydrogen, Acetylene, and Ethylene
• Depends on fuel, equivalence ratio, initial (unburned) temperature,
and pressure (next slide)
•
Cold Wall Quenching
d
d
• Quenching distance d
• Smallest dimension d that allows flame to pass
• Experimentally determined
• By shutting off flow of a premixed stabilized flame
• dtube = (1.2 to 1.5) dslot
• Order of magnitude analysis: 𝑑 <
𝛼
2
𝑆𝐿
𝑏=𝛿 𝑏
• where 𝛿 = π‘™π‘Žπ‘šπ‘–π‘›π‘Žπ‘Ÿ π‘“π‘™π‘Žπ‘šπ‘’ π‘‘β„Žπ‘–π‘π‘˜π‘›π‘’π‘ π‘ ; b ≥ 2
Quenching Distance Data, Table 8.4 page 291
•
Chapter 16 Detonations
• Flames (deflagrations) are subsonic
• Detonations are supersonic
• 𝑣π‘₯ > 𝑐 =
𝛾𝑅𝑇 =
• Mach Number: π‘€π‘Ž
𝑅𝑒
𝛾
𝑇,
π‘€π‘Šπ‘šπ‘–π‘₯
𝑣π‘₯
= >1
𝑐
Increases with temperature T and 𝛾 =
𝑐𝑃
𝑐𝑣
>1
• Sound speed in room temperature air
• 𝑐=
1.4
π‘ƒπ‘Ž π‘š3
π‘˜π‘šπ‘œπ‘™ 𝐾
π‘˜π‘”
28.85
π‘˜π‘šπ‘œπ‘™
8315
298𝐾 =
π‘š
347
𝑠
=
π‘šπ‘–π‘™π‘’
776
β„Žπ‘Ÿ
• A detonation is a shockwave sustained by energy released by combustion
• πΆπ‘œπ‘šπ‘π‘Ÿπ‘’π‘ π‘ π‘ π‘–π‘œπ‘› π‘ β„Žπ‘œπ‘π‘˜ → β„Žπ‘–π‘”β„Ž π‘‘π‘’π‘šπ‘π‘’π‘Ÿπ‘Žπ‘‘π‘’π‘Ÿπ‘’ → π‘π‘œπ‘šπ‘π‘’π‘ π‘‘π‘–π‘œπ‘› → π‘π‘œπ‘šπ‘π‘Ÿπ‘’π‘ π‘ π‘–π‘œπ‘› π‘ β„Žπ‘œπ‘π‘˜
• Mass flux rates
′′
• π‘šπ·π‘’π‘“
~ 1
•
′′
π‘šπ·π‘’π‘‘
π‘˜π‘”
π‘š2 𝑠
π‘˜π‘”
~ 2000 2
π‘š 𝑠
Confined planar and spherical systems
Hot Compression Shock
Combustible Mixture
𝑣π‘₯1
Combustion Zone
Products of Combustion
High Temperature T, Pressure P and
density, r
Combustible Mixture
𝑣π‘₯2
• Closed tube or expanding spark (both have confined hot products)
• Expansion of hot gases behind shock may be much faster than laminar or
turbulent flame speed
• Flame Frame
2
1
Shock
Detonation
• Unknown: 𝑃2 , 𝑇2 , 𝜌2 , 𝑐2 =
𝛾𝑅𝑇2 , π‘€π‘Ž2 (𝑣π‘₯,2 ), and 𝑣π‘₯,1 = 𝑣𝐷 detonation velocity
Typical Properties
•
Rankine-Hugoniot Curve
• Conservation of momentum and mass
• 𝑃2 = 𝑃1 − π‘š′′
2
𝑣2 − 𝑣1
• Conservation of energy
•
𝛾
𝛾−1
𝑃2 𝑣2 − 𝑃1 𝑣1 −
𝑃2 −𝑃1
2
𝑣2 + 𝑣1
− π‘ž=0
• 𝑃2 versus 𝑣2 is a hyperbola (for given 𝑃1 , 𝑣1 , 𝛾 and π‘ž)
• Need to be given π‘š′′ to find state 2
One-dimensional detonation analysis
𝑃1 , 𝑣1 , 𝑣π‘₯,1
𝑃2 , 𝑣2 , 𝑣π‘₯,2 = 𝑐2 =
𝑃2 >>𝑃1
2
1
𝛾𝑅𝑇2
Detonation
• Real 1-D solutions must satisfy
• mass, momentum and energy conservation
• If we also know π‘š′′ = 𝜌1 𝑣π‘₯,1 = 𝜌2 𝑣π‘₯,2
• Then we can find state 2
• Need to find the Detonation velocity 𝑣𝐷 = 𝑣1,π‘₯
• Book says 𝑣π‘₯,2 = 𝑐2 =
𝛾𝑅𝑇2
• π‘š′′ = 𝜌1 𝑣π‘₯,1 = 𝜌1 𝑣𝐷 = 𝜌2 𝑣π‘₯,2 = 𝜌2 𝛾𝑅𝑇2 , need 𝜌2 π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ 𝑇2
• We found: 𝑣𝐷 =
2 1 + 𝛾2 𝛾2 𝑅2
𝑐𝑝1
𝑐𝑝2
𝑇1 +
π‘ž
𝑐𝑝2
• Mostly use state 2
• Need 𝑐𝑝1 , 𝑐𝑝2 , 𝛾2 , 𝑅2 , π‘ž
•
•
π‘€π‘Š =
𝛾2 =
𝐢𝑝
𝑅
𝑒
πœ’π‘– π‘€π‘Šπ‘– ; 𝑅2 = π‘€π‘Š
; 𝑐𝑃 = π‘€π‘Š =
𝑐𝑃2
;𝑐
𝑐𝑣2 𝑣2
2
= 𝑐𝑃2 − 𝑅2
πœ’π‘– 𝐢𝑝𝑖
π‘€π‘Š
[T1 is known, but T2 and TAvg = (T1 +T2)/2 must be guessed]
Ch. 9 Laminar Diffusion Flames (not premixed)
• Non-reacting, constant-density
laminar fuel jet in quiescent air
• Assume
• Temperature and Pressure are
constant
• π‘€π‘ŠπΉ = π‘€π‘Šπ‘‚π‘₯ = π‘€π‘Š
• 𝜌𝐹 = πœŒπ‘‚π‘₯ = 𝜌
πœ‡
• Schmidt number, 𝑆𝑐 = π’Ÿπœˆ = πœŒπ’Ÿ
= 𝑂(1)
Fuel
πœŒπ‘’ , 𝑣𝑒 , πœ‡
𝑄𝐹 = 𝑣𝑒 πœ‹π‘…2
π‘šπΉ = πœŒπ‘’ 𝑣𝑒 πœ‹π‘…2
Centerline:
Dimensionless
𝑣
Speed, π‘₯,0
𝑣𝑒
Fuel Mass
Fraction π‘ŒπΉ
Constant in Core
Then decrease
due to spreading
Axial Speed
Profiles
𝑣π‘₯,0
= π‘ŒπΉ versus r
𝑣𝑒
• before 𝐿𝑒 =
𝛼
π’Ÿ
=1
• Axial diffusion is small compared to
advection outside core π‘₯ > π‘₯𝑐
• Potential core not affected by viscosity
Spreads out as
x increases
• Jet volume flow rate: 𝑄𝐹 = 𝑣𝑒 πœ‹π‘…2
Max magnitude
2 πœ‹π‘… 2
•
Jet
initial
momentum:
𝐽
=
𝜌
𝑣
𝑒
𝑒
𝑒
Decreases
“Similarity” Solution
• 𝑣π‘₯ =
3 𝐽𝑒
8πœ‹ πœ‡π‘₯
1+
πœ‰3
1/2
3𝐽𝑒
1 πœ‰− 4
2
16πœ‹πœŒπ‘’
π‘₯
πœ‰2
1+
−2
πœ‰2
; π‘£π‘Ÿ =
4
4
• πœ‰=
•
𝑣π‘₯
𝑣𝑒
=
3πœŒπ‘’ 𝐽𝑒 1 2 1 π‘Ÿ
16πœ‹
πœ‡π‘₯
𝑅
0.375𝑅𝑒𝑗
π‘₯
Similarity variable (Greek letter Xi)
1
πœ‰2
+
4
−2
πœŒπ‘’ 𝑣𝑒 𝑅
πœ‡
• Jet Reynolds number 𝑅𝑒𝑗 =
• For Schmidt number 𝑆𝑐 =
• π‘ŒπΉ =
𝑅
0.375𝑅𝑒𝑗
π‘₯
1
πœ‰2
+
4
𝜈
π’Ÿ
=
−2
=
𝑣π‘₯
𝑣𝑒
πœ‡
πœŒπ’Ÿ
=𝑂 1
Jet “half” radius
Fast
π‘Ÿ1
• π‘Ÿ1
2
= radius where
𝑣π‘₯
𝑣π‘₯,0
=
• Jet spreading half-angle 𝛼;
•
π‘Ÿ1 2
π‘₯
• 𝛼=
=
2.97
𝑅𝑒𝑗
1
2
π‘Ÿ1
= tan 𝛼
−1 2.97
tan
,
𝑅𝑒𝑗
angle decreases as 𝑣𝑒 and 𝑅𝑒𝑗 increase
2
2
Slow
Burning Fuel Jet
(Diffusion Flame)
• Laminar Diffusion flame structure
• T and Y versus r at different x
• Flame shape
• Assume flame surface is located
where Φ ≈ 1, stoichiometric mixture
• No reaction inside or outside this
• Products form in the flame sheet
and then diffuse inward and
outward
• No oxidizer inside the flame envelop
• Assume over-ventilated: enough
oxidizer to burn all fuel
Fuel
πœŒπ‘’ , 𝑣𝑒 , πœ‡
𝑄𝐹 = 𝑣𝑒 πœ‹π‘…2
π‘šπΉ = πœŒπ‘’ 𝑣𝑒 πœ‹π‘…2
Flame length (a measurable quantity)
• Flame length 𝐿𝑓 :
• Φ π‘Ÿ = 0, π‘₯ = 𝐿𝑓 = 1; π‘ŒπΉ = π‘ŒπΉ,𝑠𝑑
• For un-reacting fuel jet (no buoyancy), with Schmidt number 𝑆𝑐 =
3
8
• 𝐿𝐹 = 𝑅𝑒𝑗
𝑅
π‘ŒπΉ,𝑠𝑑
=
3 πœŒπ‘’ 𝑣𝑒 𝑅
π‘…πœ‹
8
πœ‡
π‘ŒπΉ,𝑠𝑑 πœ‹
=
3 πœŒπ‘’ 𝑄𝐹
8πœ‹ πœ‡π‘ŒπΉ,𝑠𝑑
𝜈
π’Ÿ
= 1,
• Increases with flow rate 𝑄𝐹 = 𝑣𝑒 πœ‹π‘…2 (not dependent on 𝑣𝑒 π‘œπ‘Ÿ 𝑅 separately)
• Buoyancy accelerates the flame but increases radial diffusion
• These effects on the flame length “tend” to cancel (within order of magnitude)
Experimentally-Confirmed Numerical Solutions
• Roper Correlations pp. 336-9; Table
9.3, Equations 9.59 to 9.70
• Subscripts:
• thy = Theoretical
• expt = Experimental (use these)
• Experimental results
• round nozzles,
• 𝐿𝑓,𝑒π‘₯𝑝 = 1330
𝑄𝐹 𝑇∞ 𝑇𝐹
ln(1+1 𝑆)
• square nozzles,
• Inverse Gaussian
error function
“inverf” from
Table 9.4
• 𝐿𝑓,𝑒π‘₯𝑝 = 1045
𝑄𝐹 𝑇∞ 𝑇𝐹
π‘–π‘›π‘£π‘’π‘Ÿπ‘“ 1+𝑆 −0.5 2
• Metric units (m, m3/s)
• S = Molar Stoichiometric ratio
• For pure CxHy/air: S = 4.76*(x+y/4)
• Temperatures:
• 𝑇∞ oxidizer, 𝑇𝐹 Fuel, 𝑇𝑓 mean-flame
Slot Burners
• Slot burners are dependent on Froude number
• πΉπ‘Ÿπ‘“ =
𝑣𝑒 πΌπ‘ŒπΉ,π‘ π‘‘π‘–π‘œπ‘
0.6𝑔
1500𝐾
𝑇∞
2
−1 𝐿𝑓
=
π‘–π‘›π‘–π‘‘π‘–π‘Žπ‘™ 𝑗𝑒𝑑 π‘šπ‘œπ‘šπ‘’π‘›π‘‘π‘’π‘š
π‘π‘’π‘œπ‘¦π‘Žπ‘›π‘π‘¦
• πΉπ‘Ÿπ‘“ ≫ 1: Momentum-Controlled, πΉπ‘Ÿπ‘“ ~ 1: Mixed (transitional), πΉπ‘Ÿπ‘“ β‰ͺ 1: Buoyancy-Controlled
• 𝐼 = 1 for plug nozzle velocity profile; 𝐼 = 1.5 for parabolic
• Need to iterate since we are trying to find 𝐿𝑓 (Hint: Initially assume 𝐿𝑓 = 1m)
1
• Slot Nozzle Experimental results (stagnant oxidizer); 𝛽 =
•
•
1
4 π‘–π‘›π‘£π‘’π‘Ÿπ‘“ 1+𝑆
2
𝑇∞ 2
4 𝑏𝛽 𝑄𝐹
Momentum Controlled: 𝐿𝑓,𝑒π‘₯𝑝 = 8.6 βˆ™ 10
~𝑄𝐹
β„ŽπΌπ‘Œπ‘“,π‘†π‘‘π‘œπ‘–π‘ 𝑇𝐹
4 1 3
4
𝛽 4 𝑄𝐹4 𝑇∞
3
3
Buoyancy Controlled: 𝐿𝑓,𝑒π‘₯𝑝 = 2 βˆ™ 10
~𝑄
4
𝐹
π‘Žβ„Ž4 𝑇𝐹
• Transitional: 𝐿𝑓 =
𝐿𝑓,𝐡
4
𝐿𝑓,𝑀
9
𝐿𝑓,𝑀
3
1 + 3.38
𝐿𝑓,𝑀
𝐿𝑓,𝐡
3 2 3
−1
• Note: Surprisingly, these are not dependent on diffusion coefficient π’Ÿ∞ = 𝜈
Geometry and Flow Rate Dependence
• Page 341, Fig. 9.9,
• Methane
• Same areas
• 𝐿𝑓 increases with 𝑄𝐹
• Circular: 𝐿𝑓 ~𝑄𝐹
4
• Slot, πΉπ‘Ÿπ‘“ β‰ͺ 1: Buoyancy-Controlled: 𝐿𝑓 ~𝑄𝐹 3
• 𝐿𝑓 decreases for large aspect ratios
Oxidizer (Surroundings) 𝑂2 Content (πœ’π‘‚2 < or > 21%)
• Circular tube
•
•
•
•
𝑄𝐹 𝑇∞ 𝑇𝐹
𝐿𝑓,𝑒π‘₯𝑝 = 1330
ln(1+1 𝑆)
1
𝑦
𝑆=
π‘₯+
πœ’π‘‚2
4
2
𝑆𝐢𝐻4 =
πœ’π‘‚2
𝐿𝑓
𝐿𝑓,21%
=
ln(1+1 𝑆21% )
ln 1+1 𝑆
=
ln(1+0.21 2)
ln 1+πœ’π‘‚2 2
• Increasing πœ’π‘‚2 in oxidizer decreases flame
length
• Circular tube
Fuel Dependence
• 𝐿𝑓,𝑒π‘₯𝑝 = 1330
𝐢3 𝐻8
• 𝑆=
𝑁𝑂π‘₯
𝑁𝐹𝑒 𝑆𝑑
𝑦
4
𝑂2 + 3.76𝑁2 → β‹―
𝑁 𝑂2
1
=πœ’
𝑁𝐢π‘₯ 𝐻𝑦
𝑂2
1
𝑆𝑑
=πœ’
𝑂2
𝑦
π‘₯+4
• Alkane Fuels: 𝐢𝐻4 , 𝐢2 𝐻6 , 𝐢3 𝐻8 ,… 𝐢π‘₯ 𝐻2(π‘₯+1)
2(π‘₯+1)
4
= 4.76 1.5π‘₯ + 0.5
• 𝑆𝐢𝐻4 = 9.52
• For a given flow rate 𝑄𝐹 and air oxidizer
𝐢𝐻4
•
𝐻2 π‘œπ‘Ÿ 𝐢𝑂
𝑦
• If air is the oxidizer, then πœ’π‘‚2 = 0.21 and 𝑆 = 4.76 π‘₯ + 4
𝑦
• If the oxidizer is pure 𝑂2 , then πœ’π‘‚2 = 1 and 𝑆 = π‘₯ + 4
• 𝑆 = 4.76 π‘₯ +
𝐢2 𝐻6
(increases with S)
• For stoichiometric reaction of a generic HC fuel
• 𝐢π‘₯ 𝐻𝑦 + π‘₯ +
𝐢4 𝐻10
𝑄𝐹 𝑇∞ 𝑇𝐹
ln(1+1 𝑆)
𝐿𝑓
𝐿𝑓,𝐢𝐻4
=
ln(1+1 𝑆𝐢𝐻4 )
ln(1+1 𝑆)
,
• Heavier fuels require more air, and so more time and
distance (𝐿𝑓 ) to reach the stoichiometric condition
• Light fuels, 𝑆 =
4.76
2
= 2.33 (short flame)
1
• 𝐻2 + 2 𝑂2 + 3.76𝑁2 → 𝐻2 𝑂 + 1.88𝑁2
1
• 𝐢𝑂 + 2 𝑂2 + 3.76𝑁2 → 𝐢𝑂2 + 1.88𝑁2
Stoichiometric Factors
• When nozzle gas is pure 𝐢π‘₯ 𝐻𝑦 fuel and ambient gas is air with 𝑂2 mole fraction πœ’π‘‚2
• 𝑆=
1
πœ’π‘‚2
𝑁𝑂2
𝑁𝐢π‘₯ 𝐻𝑦
=
𝑆𝑑
1
πœ’π‘‚2
π‘₯+
𝑦
4
= π‘†π‘ƒπ‘’π‘Ÿπ‘’ (pure fuel)
• Now, generalize the Roper Correlations to include:
• Air or inter gas added to fuel (fuel is “aerated” or “diluted”)
• Revise the definition of 𝑆 =
π‘π΄π‘šπ‘π‘–π‘’π‘›π‘‘
π‘π‘π‘œπ‘§π‘§π‘’π‘™ 𝑆𝑑
• Number of moles of the ambient gas per mole of nozzle gas when fuel to O2 ratio is stoichiometric.
• Adding air to fuel shortens the fuel length and makes it more premixed
• bluer and less sooty
• Keep A/F ratio low enough so that equivalence ration Φ = A/F
flashback
𝑠𝑑
A/F is above rich limit to avoid
• Adding inert gas such 𝑁2 or products of combustion reduces flame temperature and
oxides of nitrogen and increases flame length
Primary Aeration (of nozzle)
•
π‘π΄π‘šπ‘
Ambient
= 1 − πœ“π‘ƒπ‘Ÿπ‘– π‘†π‘ƒπ‘’π‘Ÿπ‘’
•
•
π‘π΄π‘šπ‘π‘–π‘’π‘›π‘‘
1−πœ“π‘ƒπ‘Ÿπ‘– π‘†π‘ƒπ‘’π‘Ÿπ‘’ 1 π‘†π‘ƒπ‘’π‘Ÿπ‘’
𝑆=
=
π‘π‘π‘œπ‘§π‘§π‘’π‘™ 𝑆𝑑
1+πœ“π‘ƒπ‘Ÿπ‘– π‘†π‘ƒπ‘’π‘Ÿπ‘’ 1 π‘†π‘ƒπ‘’π‘Ÿπ‘’
1−πœ“π‘ƒπ‘Ÿπ‘–
𝑆=
1 π‘†π‘ƒπ‘’π‘Ÿπ‘’ +πœ“π‘ƒπ‘Ÿπ‘–
𝐿𝑓
ln(1+1 π‘†π‘ƒπ‘’π‘Ÿπ‘’ )
ln(1+1 π‘†π‘ƒπ‘’π‘Ÿπ‘’ )
=
=
1 𝑆
+πœ“
𝐿𝑓,π‘π‘’π‘Ÿπ‘’
ln 1+1 𝑆
ln 1+ π‘ƒπ‘’π‘Ÿπ‘’ π‘ƒπ‘Ÿπ‘–
1−πœ“π‘ƒπ‘Ÿπ‘–
• For methane π‘†π‘ƒπ‘’π‘Ÿπ‘’ = 9.52
Fuel+Oxidizer
𝑦
𝐢π‘₯ 𝐻𝑦 + πœ“π‘ƒπ‘Ÿπ‘– π‘₯ +
𝑂2 + 3.76𝑁2
4
πœ“π‘ƒπ‘Ÿπ‘–
𝑦
π‘π‘π‘œπ‘§ = 1 +
π‘₯+
= 1 + πœ“π‘ƒπ‘Ÿπ‘– π‘†π‘ƒπ‘’π‘Ÿπ‘’
πœ’π‘‚2
4
𝑦
π‘₯+ 4
Fuel Dilution
•π‘†=
•
Ambient
π‘π΄π‘šπ‘ = π‘†π‘ƒπ‘’π‘Ÿπ‘’
𝑦
π‘₯+4
=
πœ’π‘‚2
•
π‘π΄π‘šπ‘π‘–π‘’π‘›π‘‘
π‘π‘π‘œπ‘§π‘§π‘’π‘™ 𝑆𝑑
𝑦
2
1+𝑁𝐷
𝑁𝐷
1
1
πœ’π· =
=
;
1+𝑁𝐷
1 𝑁𝐷 +1 πœ’π‘‚2
πœ’
𝑁𝐷 = 𝐷
1−πœ’π·
𝑦
π‘₯+ 1−πœ’π·
4
•π‘†=
•
=
πœ’π‘‚
𝐿𝑓
𝐿𝑓,π‘π‘’π‘Ÿπ‘’
=
=
πœ’π‘‚2 1+𝑁𝐷
1
𝑁𝐷
+ 1; 𝑁𝐷 =
1
1 πœ’π· −1
πœ’π‘‚2
=
ln(1+1 π‘†π‘ƒπ‘’π‘Ÿπ‘’ )
ln 1+1 𝑆
=
ln(1+1 π‘†π‘ƒπ‘’π‘Ÿπ‘’ )
ln 1+
• For methane π‘†π‘ƒπ‘’π‘Ÿπ‘’ = 9.52
Fuel+Oxidizer
𝐢π‘₯ 𝐻𝑦 + 𝑁𝐷 𝐷
π‘₯+ 4
1 π‘†π‘ƒπ‘’π‘Ÿπ‘’ +πœ“π‘ƒπ‘Ÿπ‘–
1−πœ“π‘ƒπ‘Ÿπ‘–
Droplet Burning
Fuel
• 3 species:
• 1π‘˜π‘” 𝐹 + 𝜈 𝑂π‘₯ → 1 + 𝜈 π‘˜π‘” π‘ƒπ‘Ÿ
• Found temperature and mass fraction
profiles π‘ŒπΉ π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ 𝑇 = 𝑓𝑛(π‘Ÿ) general solutions
• But there were 5 unknowns
Products
Pr
Droplet
rs
rf
π‘šπΉ
Oxidizer
𝑇𝑓
• π‘šπΉ , 𝑇𝑓 , 𝑇𝑠 (π‘šπ‘Žπ‘¦ 𝑏𝑒 π‘π‘’π‘™π‘œπ‘€ π‘‡π΅π‘œπ‘–π‘™ ), π‘ŒπΉ,𝑠 , π‘Ÿπ‘“
• Five constraints
• At the flame assume the fuel and oxidize mass
fractions are π‘ŒπΉ,𝑓 = π‘Œπ‘‚π‘₯,𝑓 = 0, and incoming
fuel/oxidizer flow rates are stoichiometric.
• Heat generated in flame is conducted to
𝑇𝑠
π‘ŒπΉ,𝑠
• droplet and surroundings
• Fuel vapor mass fraction is governed by
equilibrium at droplet/vapor interface
π‘Ÿπ‘“
r
Find 𝑇𝑓 , π‘šπΉ , π‘Ÿπ‘“ and π‘ŒπΉ,𝑠 assuming 𝑇𝑠 is known (guessed)
• Method
• Guess 𝑇𝑠 (π‘‡π΅π‘œπ‘–π‘™ or below, or sometimes given)
• Calculate π΅π‘œ,π‘ž , π‘ŒπΉ,𝑠 , B and A, new value of
• If necessary, find new value of 𝑇𝑠 , and repeat
• π‘šπΉ =
4πœ‹π‘˜π‘” π‘Ÿπ‘ 
𝑐𝑝,𝑔
𝑙𝑛 1 + π΅π‘œ,π‘ž
• Transfer number π΅π‘œ,π‘ž =
• 𝑇𝑓 = 𝑇𝑠 +
•
π‘Ÿπ‘“
π‘Ÿπ‘ 
=
β„Žπ‘“π‘” +π‘žπ‘–→𝑙
β„Žπ‘“π‘” +π‘žπ‘–→𝑙 πœˆπ΅π‘œ,π‘ž −1
𝑐𝑝,𝑔
𝜈+1
𝑙𝑛 1+π΅π‘œ,π‘ž
𝑙𝑛
• π‘ŒπΉ,𝑠 =
• 𝑇𝑠 =
Δβ„Žπ‘ 𝜈−𝑐𝑝,𝑔 𝑇𝑠 −𝑇∞
𝜈+1
𝜈
π΅π‘œ,π‘ž −1 𝜈
1+π΅π‘œ,π‘ž
𝐡
𝑙𝑛
1
π‘ŒπΉ,𝑠
−1
π‘€π‘ŠπΉπ‘’
𝑃
+1
π‘€π‘Šπ‘ƒπ‘Ÿ
𝐴
(then iterate if necessary)
Droplet Diameter
• 𝐷2 𝑑 = 𝐷02 − 𝐾𝑑
• Confirmed by experiments after initial transient
• 𝐾=
8π‘˜π‘”
πœŒπ‘™ 𝑐𝑝,𝑔
𝑙𝑛 1 + π΅π‘œ,π‘ž
• Droplet Lifetime: 𝑑𝑑 =
𝐷02
𝐾
• Property Evaluations (for best π‘šπΉ estimate):
• ∞ = π‘“π‘Ÿπ‘’π‘’ π‘ π‘‘π‘Ÿπ‘’π‘Žπ‘š; 𝐹 = 𝐹𝑒𝑒𝑙
• 𝑇=
𝑇𝑠 +𝑇𝑓
2
;
• 𝑐𝑝𝑔 = 𝑐𝑝𝐹 𝑇 [use 𝑐𝑝𝑂π‘₯ 𝑇 for best
• π‘˜π‘” = 0.4π‘˜πΉ 𝑇 + 0.6π‘˜π‘‚π‘₯ 𝑇
• πœŒπ‘™ = πœŒπ‘™ 𝑇𝑠
π‘Ÿπ‘“
π‘Ÿπ‘ 
estimate?]
Thank you for your attention in this class!
• I learn more about combustion each time I teach it.
• I also learn more about how to teach combustion.
• I would appreciate your candid comments and suggestions on the
course evaluations.
Dropped in 2015
Ch 10 Simple Droplet Evaporation (no combustion)
𝑇𝑑 = π‘‡π΅π‘œπ‘–π‘™
𝑄
π‘šπΉ =
𝑄
𝑄
β„Žπ‘“π‘”
• In Chapter 3 we assumed liquid temperature is same as 𝑇∞ and known
• Now assume π‘‡π‘†π‘’π‘Ÿπ‘“π‘Žπ‘π‘’ < 𝑇∞ , so evaporation is controlled by Heat Transfer
• Assumption
• Find:
• π‘šπΉ 𝑑 → π‘Ÿπ‘  𝑑 → 𝑑𝑑 (droplet life)
• 𝑇 π‘Ÿ = 𝑓𝑛 π‘‡π΅π‘œπ‘–π‘™ , 𝑇∞ , π‘šπΉ , π‘˜π‘” , 𝑐𝑝,𝑔
• 𝑄=
𝑑𝑇
+π‘˜π‘” 𝐴𝑆
π‘‘π‘Ÿ
= π‘šπΉ β„Žπ‘“π‘”
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Quiescent infinite medium
Quasi-steady behavior
Single compound liquid fuel
𝑇𝑑 ≈ π‘‡π΅π‘œπ‘–π‘™ (constant and uniform), 𝑇∞ > π‘‡π΅π‘œπ‘–π‘™
Binary diffusion with π’Ÿ ≈ 𝛼 (𝐿𝑒 ≈ 1 )
• Shvab-Zeldovich energy equation
6. Constant average properties
• Must be chosen carefully
Evaporation Solution
• Temperature Profile: 𝑇 =
• Z=
𝑐𝑝,𝑔
4πœ‹π‘˜π‘”
Zπ‘šπΉ
Zπ‘šπΉ
−
−
𝑇∞ −π‘‡π΅π‘œπ‘–π‘™ 𝑒 π‘Ÿ −𝑇∞ 𝑒 π‘Ÿπ‘  +π‘‡π΅π‘œπ‘–π‘™
Zπ‘š
− π‘Ÿ 𝐹
𝑠
1−𝑒
= πΆπ‘œπ‘›π‘ π‘‘π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘
• Evaporation Rate: π‘šπΉ =
4πœ‹π‘˜π‘” π‘Ÿπ‘ 
𝑐𝑝,𝑔
𝑙𝑛 π΅π‘ž + 1
• Spalding or Transfer Number: π΅π‘ž =
• Droplet Lifetime: 𝑑𝑑 =
• 𝐾=
8π‘˜
𝑙𝑛
πœŒπ‘™ 𝑐𝑝,𝑔
𝑇∞ −π‘‡π΅π‘œπ‘–π‘™ 𝑐𝑝,𝑔
β„Žπ‘“π‘”
𝐷02
𝐾
π΅π‘ž + 1
• Property Evaluations: ∞ = π‘“π‘Ÿπ‘’π‘’ π‘ π‘‘π‘Ÿπ‘’π‘Žπ‘š; 𝐹 = 𝐹𝑒𝑒𝑙
• 𝑇=
π‘‡π‘π‘œπ‘–π‘™ +𝑇∞
;
2
𝑐𝑝𝑔 = 𝑐𝑝𝐹 𝑇 ; π‘˜π‘” = 0.4π‘˜πΉ 𝑇 + 0.6π‘˜∞ 𝑇
Download