Arkansas’ Women in Agriculture: Changing Challenges and Growing Opportunities Jennie Popp Center for Agricultural and Rural Sustainability Division of Agriculture University of Arkansas National Women in Agriculture Conference April 1-2, 2008 Oklahoma City, OK Background Characteristics of Arkansas’ Women in Agriculture Women’s roles on the farm are increasing in numbers and in responsibilities Women are 28.6% of Arkansas farm operators 25% of these women are principal operators Their numbers are increasing every year Source: USDA 2002 Census of Agriculture Farm women are also increasingly working off of the farm Nationally, 30% of farm women worked off farm in 1969; by 2002, 47% of them nationally worked off farm By 2002 that number in Arkansas was 46% Sources: The Invisible Farmers: Women in Agricultural Production by Carolyn Sachs, USDA 2002 Census of Agriculture Women hold many roles in agriculture off farm Working in agricultural support industries Working in rural and community development organizations Sources: The Entrepreneurial Characteristics of Farm Women by B. Tanner, Women and Farming: Changing Roles, Changing Structures by W. Haney and J. Knowles Why the Changes? Similar to reasons why women all around the nation are becoming more involved in agriculture, by: Inheritance Divorce Illness CHOICE Nationally, agriculture-related degrees given to females - more than doubled from 1993 to 2000, Source: USDA REEIS Total FAEIS Degrees Awarded by Classification of Instructional Program and Gender Between 1997 and 2005, the agriculturally related degrees (ignoring HESC) earned by women increased 52% Sources University of Arkansas Institutional Research In Arkansas and elsewhere, agriculturally related education programs are acknowledging this fast growing clientele. Education Programs for Women in Agriculture Prerequisites to effective education programs – understandings of the knowledge the needs and the experience of the education program participants. In Arkansas, educational program development included taking assessments of participants of the 2005-2007 Arkansas Women in Agriculture conferences Surveys were used to identify recent changes in their roles on and off the farm, the challenges they face in their businesses and factors important to achieving success, as they define it This is the first such data set on agricultural women in Arkansas Objectives Provide selected summary results from these surveys Test for differences in survey responses between types of agricultural women and across years. Identify educational needs and opportunities for a growing clientele of agricultural women Methods Methods The 752 female participants of the 2005-2007 Arkansas Women in Agriculture Conferences were asked to complete a survey* The response rates were 55% (147 of 269) in 2005 36% (108 of 300) in 2006, and 49% (89 of 183) in 2007 Respondents placed into two groups Agriculture business owners (ABOs) – women who owned or jointly operated a farm, ranch or agriculturally-related business (ag banks, input suppliers, vet medicine, ag organizations, etc) Agriculture business employees (ABEs) – women who were employees of farms/ranch and agriculturally-related businesses *2008 conference participants recently surveyed but data not yet analyzed Methods Survey questions related to their type of business, their role in the business and how changes in that role impacted various aspects of their home and business how important certain factors are to their career success, the challenges they face Chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests were used to test for significant differences (p=0.10) in responses across years and between ABO and ABE groups Follow up focus groups used to explain responses (13 conducted over three year period, each group averaged 10 people, 6 of whom had completed surveys) Selected results follow Results Characteristics of Survey Respondents 2005-2007 Of the 344 survey respondents, 210 were ABOs. 16% considered themselves principal operators. 33% believed they had a greater role in the business today than they did three years ago. 72% would probably or definitely continue to run the business if something happen to their business or domestic partner. Characteristics of Survey Respondents 2005-2007 The remaining 134 women were ABEs working for: Lending institutions Input suppliers Farm organizations Educational institutions (and their work was agricultural – related) Which Factors are Important in Measuring Your Success? 11 Options I can talents and skills directly I feel secure in my employment I can make key decisions I can meet current financial needs I can try new ways of doing things I can participate in environmental conservation programs (ag and non-ag) I am excited about my work I have flexible work hours I can balance my work and free time I can be involved in my community I improve my standard of living I can pass on the business to a family member I can provide jobs for my community 2005 2006 2007 Factors ABO ABE Pr ABO ABE Pr ABO ABE Pr apply talents and skills 87.4 97.8 0.0451 87.7 94.1 0.2727 78.6 100. 0.0376 secure in my employment 67.9 88.6 0.1318 72.3 94.1 0.0452 78.6 91.3 0.1565 try new ways 81.2 91.1 0.3663 81.0 97.0 0.1324 65.9 90.9 0.0348 excited about work 86.2 89.1 0.0376 84.1 87.9 0.8525 80.5 82.6 0.9800 flexible work hours 82.8 80.9 0.4794 69.8 56.3 0.0694 68.3 56.5 0.6481 improve standard of living 77.4 91.3 0.3766 73.0 78.8 0.8190 65.9 95.5 0.0022 pass on the business 79.3 18.6 <0.000 1 65.6 16.1 <0.0001 63.4 25.0 0.0233 provide jobs 58.8 27.9 0.0094 50.0 42.4 0.5489 42.5 27.3 0.5484 Higher percentage of ABEs measure success by black factors Higher percentage of ABOs measure success by red factors Opnions of ABOs and ABEs are different for results in blue Which areas represent challenges for you in your business? 13 options Networking with others Finding good information about BMPs for my business Finding information about government programs related to my work Qualifying for government programs related to my business Knowing where/how to market my products Keeping up with environmental regulations regarding my business Keeping financial records Finding/affording a good lawyer Keeping good employees Handling my cash flow Gaining access to credit Completing loan forms and other important paperwork Being respected as a female business person 2005 2006 2007 Factors ABO ABE Pr ABO ABE Pr ABO ABE Pr Info about govt programs 37.4 17.2 0.0452 32.2 22.7 0.7821 30.0 22.7 0.4313 qualifying for govt program 33.7 17.9 0.0039 40.7 23.8 0.0423 41.0 21.1 0.3361 marketing products 30.6 14.3 0.2945 28.8 13.6 0.0691 25.6 20.0 0.9570 environmental regulations 40.0 25.0 0.3976 33.9 14.3 0.1778 25.0 30.0 0.7504 keeping financial records 41.4 14.8 0.1614 33.9 17.4 0.0558 25.0 40.0 0.4705 finding/keeping a lawyer 42.4 29.6 0.1940 34.5 22.7 0.3942 35.0 15.8 0.2637 keeping good employees 48.8 25.0 0.0374 51.7 13.6 0.0184 43.6 35.0 0.0708 being respected 41.2 37.9 0.4902 39.0 36.4 0.2428 32.5 47.6 0.7546 Higher percentage of ABOs have problems all factors above Opinions of ABOs and ABEs are different for results in blue Relatively small percentage of women overall have problems in these areas Being respected as a female business person is one of the most often reported problems Differences Across Time Results were tested for significant differences across time Few significant differences emerged The percentage of ABOs that had problems keeping financial records and being respected both fell between 2005 and 2007 The percentage of ABEs that agreed meeting current financial needs was important increased over time Across all respondents, the importance of having flexible work hours decreased over time Percentage of women that agreed or strongly agreed 100.0 90.0 80.0 70.0 60.0 2005 2006 2007 50.0 40.0 30.0 20.0 10.0 0.0 Keeping financial records (ABOs problems) Being respected as a female business person (ABOs problems) Meeting current financial needs (ABEs important factors) Factors different across years Having flexible work hours (All women- important factors) Explaining the Results Explaining the Results Arkansas’ Agricultural Women are Motivated ABOs have confidence through education and experience to lead agricultural operations on and off the farm Many ABEs expect to become leaders in their respective farm and non-farm agricultural operations in the future Explaining the Results Arkansas’ Agricultural Women are Community Minded Many ABOs put community before profit; business driven by desire to provide community jobs and agricultural experiences for youth Nearly 70% of respondents were members of at least one community organization and provided their ag-related expertise to community on a volunteer basis Explaining the Results Arkansas’ Agricultural Women Can Work in Traditional Man’s World Business culture is changing Agribusinesses (particularly lenders and equipment dealers) more comfortable working with ABOs In part this is because more women are the agribusiness personnel dealers Networks for ABOs and ABEs emerging However, not all areas of agriculture are transforming at the same rate Explaining the Results Arkansas’ Agricultural Women Want Agricultural- Related Business Assistance Demand Annie’s Project in State First three classes will complete the course by May 2008 Demand Active Educational Program Efforts led by Arkansas Women in Agriculture, Inc. and assisted by University of Arkansas Cooperative Extension Service Conclusions Women’s Roles include more responsibilities including leadership and decision-making Data suggests that needs vary from different groups of women at different points in time ABOs and ABEs share some problems in business, as well as factors important to them, but also differ because of backgrounds Further research on women in agriculture is needed, especially at different times, to explore, more in depth, their needs and roles What’s Next We’ve only just begun! Expanded efforts on Arkansas’ Women in Agriculture research Comprehensive cataloging of research on women in agriculture around the nation Identification of womens’ needs, challenges and opportunities nationwide that will drive research and education programs into the future Acknowledgements A special thank you goes to Ms. Carmen Albright, 2007 University of Arkansas graduate who conducted much of the analysis as her undergraduate thesis research. Thank You For more information, contact: Jennie Popp University of Arkansas 217 Agriculture Building Fayetteville, AR 72701 (479)575-2279 jhpopp@uark.edu