Reinspection Progress Record This form should be used, where appropriate, to record the progress the provider has made against the original inspection weaknesses for leadership and management and each area of learning. Complete this form for each monitoring visit – it should also be used to inform the PDU and the local LSC or Jobcentre Plus of progress. Use the notebook and evidence form for all other reinspection activities. Ensure satisfactory aspects of provision have remained satisfactory or improved. Inspect any new provision within the area of learning which has been introduced since the previous inspection. Inspector’s name: Provider: Salford City Council Inspection No: 8776 Leadership and management or area of learning: Reinspection visit: (circle) 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Type of reinspection: (circle) Full or Partial Visit date: 13 July 2006 Inadequate management of performance IN29/6/2005 The new posts are now settled in with much clearer lines of accountability and good levels of communication and team work. Data is being regularly used as a basis for discussion in 1:1 sessions; the ‘big form’ for tutors and monthly reports for team leaders on retention, achievement, ethnicity, gender, disability etc Team leaders manage tutor completion of the ‘big form’ which leads to individual action plans and targets. This has helped to identify and address some long term running issue with courses. Management of subcontracted arrangements with the college is greatly improved. Regular monthly data reports on learner progress are now provided by the college. Monthly meetings have established SCC expectations which now include a range of information on learners and set targets for recruitment, retention and achievement, percentage of learners across wards in terms of age, gender, ethnicity etc Additional monitoring activities by SCC to include OTL, health and safety records, learner inductions, evaluations and portfolios is also requested. SCC has been effective in identifying college errors in data and the college has been responsive to the new requests. Programme targets for recruitment, retention and achievement are set up for September 2006 and the provider is sensibly managing the appropriateness of these recruitment targets with venues and availability of resources. significant good Progress so far some Action taken and impact none Weaknesses identified in the original report x Reinspection Progress Record © Adult Learning Inspectorate Page 1 of 4 This document may have changed since it was last printed. Please use the ‘Document Search Facility’ on the ALI Intranet (or the Associate Inspector Network if appropriate) to obtain the latest revision. Reinspection Progress Record Poor control and provision of management information Inadequate monitoring of Health and Safety Inadequate promotion of equality of opportunity IN29/6/2005 Further training for staff on the use of data and the TERMS system is to take place in June 2006. The training and development of the data manager is supporting a clearer focus on further improvement and developments needed. Staff are discussing data at team meetings and all team leaders can now generate their own monthly reports. SCC FACL is making good use of the North West Users group to identify and customise paperwork and procedures. Procedures for gathering data is improved, course registrations forms are more detailed, registers are returned weekly. Course amendment form and the MIS query form capture any changes to learner status. Team leaders also monitor changes and inaccuracies in learner information at tutor individual reviews by cross checking the big form SSC FACL is making good use of data to inform curriculum planning. Equality data has been analysed and used to inform the planning and targeting of curriculum provision for September. Targets are set in the 3 year plan for recruitment, achievement of qualifications and personal targets. SCC FACL has no targets for widening participation of minority groups. There is no business plan to support the implementation of the 3 year development plan x SCC FACL now has an identified person for health and safety and a new health and safety action group. Risk assessments on all venues are now complete; this includes monitoring of DDA compliance. One programme has closed down because the venue didn’t have liability insurance. The health and safety action group consists of FACL working with Salford Consortium. The group is currently doing accredited training - an EMTA NVQ in health and safety. The group focus will be on new legislation, training, relevant literature, accident books and sharing good practice. All staff are shortly to complete a one day training to achieve a CIEH foundation certificate on health and safety in the workplace. Staff recently completed the city council stress assessment survey. The lifelong learning manager fed back the results to the team and responded to issues raised. For example staff now have copy of the city council policies and procedures, dignity at work and the complaints procedure. Information on health and safety in the tutor handbook is comprehensive. x A number of new initiatives now in place but have yet to impact and become embedded. The staff survey carried out in May 2006 is currently being collated to inform the staff training plan in equality and diversity. A lifelong learning equality and diversity group is in place and carried out its first meeting on 30 June 2006. This is a potential forum for sharing good practice. A new equality action plan identifies key areas for development – staff training, impact measures, equality champions, accessible technology, and equality in the curriculum – differentiation, review of information for learners, and DDA audits and reviews. Equality targets have been set with the college. The tutor handbook equality of opportunity is well written with simplified information and links to the city council intranet and policies. Reinspection Progress Record © Adult Learning Inspectorate This document may have changed since it was last printed. Please refer to the ALInet (or the Associate Inspector Network if appropriate) to obtain the latest revision. x Page 2 of 4 Reinspection Progress Record Reinforcement of learner understanding of equality and diversity and monitoring of understanding is yet to be planned. Monitoring of learning resources and materials is not in place Learner have little access to information on available adaptive technology The team leader recognises the lack of targeting of hard to reach learners in the family learning class visited, and of the need to improve planning and targeting of provision in the future. Develop family learning provision to meet the needs of learners throughout the city Improve curriculum development and planning Establishment of new posts, regular team meetings, and and one to one reviews are a good basis for better planning and development. Curriculum team meetings have been welcomed by staff and are already leading to useful discussions and sharing of practice. An electronic folder for staff to store and share resources on the network is planned. Overall significant steps have been taken to towards improvement but they are too recent to have an impact on provision. Training in the observation of teaching with Salford College Quality and the support of an external consultant have moved forward the development of a teaching observation system. The format, guidance and reporting lines have been agreed in outline but have yet to be formally incorporated into the written quality procedures. The course review form has been improved to allow for more qualitative comments. There is still work to do to integrate the variety of reporting documents that are used, standardise the procedure, and produce a database for analysis. Arrangements for the collation and analysis of course review data is clear. The use of learner feedback to influence planning needs more development. The development of a database to collate and analyse this would be helpful, but little progress has been made of this to date. However, learner feedback forms have led to actions for improvement such as the introduction of a new course information leaflet for literacy and numeracy provision. The evaluation form for literacy and numeracy have been improved to make them more accessible to learners with literacy needs. Although the process for gathering learner feedback in one family learning group observed was thorough, the form used was inappropriate for the learners. Registers are now sent in to the office weekly. This has eased workflow and improved the accuracy of data held centrally. Data has now been used in curriculum meetings, but needs to be presented in a different way to aid the work of the team The ‘Big Form’ (learner progression monitoring matrix) is now in Incorporate quality improvement into the provision IN29/6/2005 Reinspection Progress Record © Adult Learning Inspectorate This document may have changed since it was last printed. Please refer to the ALInet (or the Associate Inspector Network if appropriate) to obtain the latest revision. X X X Page 3 of 4 Reinspection Progress Record use, providing a useful cumulative record of information shared at one to tone meetings between tutors and team leaders. Introduced for monitoring purposes primarily, it has also led to discussion about quality issues. Extra issues raised on reinspection visit Partnerships Some good use of networks and regional links to rationalise training and curriculum provision and gather feedback for the SAR. For example, the survey work with voluntary and community sector identifying requests for entry level programme and support for use of NLDC funds. The new termly meeting with partners and adult and learning skills group providing a strategic link and better local information to more effectively plan provision. Training in Elearning Interesting developments and staff training on use of E portfolios to support the embedding of RARPA for example, digital recorders and cameras for learners. To improve staff flexibility to work in a range of venues training is being provided on the use of mimeo board and personal digital assistants. IN29/6/2005 Reinspection Progress Record © Adult Learning Inspectorate This document may have changed since it was last printed. Please refer to the ALInet (or the Associate Inspector Network if appropriate) to obtain the latest revision. Page 4 of 4