SALFORD
FAMILY, ADULT AND
COMMUNITY LEARNING SERVICE
POST INSPECTION
ACTION PLAN 2005/6
SUMMARY OF THE POST ADULT LEARNING INSPECTION PLAN
This plan is has been generated in response to the inspection of Salford Family, Adult and Community Learning Service (FACL) in October 2005 by
the Adult Learning Inspectorate. This report will be submitted to the Learning and Skills Council and the Adult Learning Inspectorate (ALI) to show
how the Lifelong Learning Service is address the development areas highlighted.
There is a range of possible four grades attributed to organisations by the ALI: 1 outstanding, 2 good, 3 satisfactory and 4 inadequate. The service
was graded 4 for Leadership and Management and 3 for both areas of learning looked at: Preparation for Life and Work and Family Learning. ALI had
some confidence in the services self-assessment and regarded the service as having sufficient capacity to improve.
There were real strengths highlighted in the ALI report. These were the good teaching in both curriculum areas and the good relationships with
partners and stakeholders. The service must maintain these whilst addressing the development areas.
The structure of this plan and the terminology within it reflects that used in the ALI report.
Salford Family, Adult and Community Learning will be re-inspected by in 2006. This will look at all areas of provision.
Steve Garner
Head of Lifelong Learning
February 2006
Final version 27th March 2006
2
1 KEY CHALLENGES
This section details the key issues the local authority will have to address to successfully meet the demands of the future reinspection by
ALI. All of the elements listed here are further developed in the main body of the report, which lists the strengths and weaknesses in each
area of learning and in Leadership and Management.
Overall key challenges for Salford Family, Adult and Community Learning
1.1 Introduce systematic monitoring of performance
See 2.5
1.2 Incorporate quality improvement into the provision
See 2.8 and 3.4
1.3. Improve curriculum development and planning
See 3.4 and 4.2.1
1.3 Develop family learning provision to meet the needs of learners throughout the city
See 4.2.2
1.4 Raise awareness of equality and diversity and health and safety
See 2.6 and 2.7
Final version 27th March 2006
for staff
3
2 LEADERSHIP AND MANAGEMENT
This section sets out the strengths and weaknesses of the service noted by the Adult Learning Inspectorate and the actions, which will be taken
to consolidate strengths and develop upon the weaknesses.
Strengths
2.1 Good links with local agencies to plan provision
2.2 Good initiatives to widen the participation of learners from under-represented groups
2.3 Good progress in rectifying many weaknesses from the service review
Priority Action
Milestones
Timescale
Lead officer
Monitoring,
evaluation
and
completion
Cost
Success criteria
Forum established with terms of
reference
December
2005
HLLL
Completed
2 days
staff
time
Forum
established and
joint working
further improved
Website developed and
launched
December
2005
HLLL
Completed
2 days
staff
time
Website launched
and marketing
publicity
produced
2.1. Good links with local agencies to plan provision
M
2.1.1 Establish strategic adult
learning forum
M
2.1.2 Establish joint website with
other providers
Final version 27th March 2006
4
Priority Action
Milestones
Timescale
Lead officer
H
New Memorandum of
Understanding in place with all
partners
End of
February
2006
HLLL
2.1.3 Clarify and formalise
relationships with partners
Monitoring,
evaluation
and
completion
Report to
Termly
Quality Action
Group
Cost
Success criteria
5 days
staff
time
Increase in % of
partners surveyed
who express the
view that the
relationships has
improved
Beginning of HLLL/FACLM
each term:
January
2006, March
2006,
Report to
HLLL and AD
(Transition)
Main
ACL
budget
BME learners to
be at minimum of
12%
September
2006
MISO (report)
Report to
quality work
group
5 days
staff
time
Increase % of
learners against
benchmarks
Set targets for under
represented groups
Termly
TL
Increase % of learners from
major underrepresented groups
Termly and
annually
2.2. Good initiatives to widen the participation of learners from under-represented groups
H
2.2.1 Continue with delivery in
areas of social need
New courses delivered or older
ones repeated
H
2.2.2 Continue with courses to
target BME, disabled, men and
other underrepresented groups
Analyse MIS for equal
opportunities categories
“
TL
“
2.3 Good progress in rectifying many weaknesses from the service review
2.3.1 Continue delivering
Improvements as listed in this
report:
Final version 27th March 2006
5
Priority Action
Milestones
Timescale
Lead officer
H
Regular reports to quality
meetings
Crystal reports generated for
improved data usage
From
February
2006
February
2006
Maintain monthly data returns
from subcontracted provider
November
2005
Q&CM
G
Training for new and sessional
staff in ILP
Updates for existing staff
through 1-1s, when noted to be
necessary following OTL
January and
ongoing
TLs
New staff not
fully inducted,
updates not
yet carried out
for existing
staff
H
M
Further improve presentation of
data
Ensure all staff are aware of the
use of ILPs
Improve progression of learners
Pathways drawn up
Exit interviews for learners
carried out with data showing
progression
H
Improve register information
controls
All new staff trained on data
needs of service
All existing staff updated on data
needs
Final version 27th March 2006
February
2006 and
ongoing
September
2006
“
Cost
Success criteria
VLM
5 days
staff time
MISO
2 days
staff time
Minutes of
meetings show
data used to
direct service
improvements
All managers
surveyed feel
data is more
accessible
Subcontracted
provision directed
through use of
data
TLs
MISO
Monitoring,
evaluation
and
completion
Reports to
quality
meetings
Reports to
quality
meetings
6 days
staff time
4 days
staff time
5 days
staff time
3 days
staff time
% of staff
reporting better
awareness in use
of ILPs increases
% of learners
moving to higher
level course/work
improves
increases
All tutors
completing
course
documentations
accurately and
punctually
6
Priority Action
H
H
Continue monitoring contract with
subcontractor
Develop formal agreements with
partners
Milestones
September
2005
Meetings held monthly
From
September
2005
Q&CM
Meetings drafted and signed by
partners
By February
2006
HLLL
Service plan for Lifelong Learning
revised
Service plan written and
submitted to Children’s Services
M
Revise SAR
H
Improve curriculum planning
SAR revised and submitted to
LSC portal
See 3.3 and 4.2.1
Improve internal communications
Lead officer
Schedule of meeting set up
Meetings held monthly with
minutes
H
H
Timescale
By end of
December
2005
February
2006
Relaunch all meetings with
specific quality ones with set
agendas
February
2006
Issue newsletter for all staff
February
2006
HLLL
Ensure new staff and staff with
new responsibilities are fully
inducted to new roles
Final version 27th March 2006
Induction checklist drawn up
All new staff follow checklist
Report to
quality
meetings
Report to
quality
meeting
HLLL
G
HLLL
Report to LSC
HLLL
G
G
February
2006
Cost
1 day
staff time
6 days
staff time
2 days
staff time
4 days
staff time
A checklist
not drawn up
Success criteria
Improved
recruitment,
retention and
achievement in
subcontracted
courses % of
hard to reach
learners increase
% of partners
questioned feel
relationship with
service has
improved
4 days
staff time
6 days
staff time
£800
additional
payments
to staff
HLLL
TLs
H
Monitoring,
evaluation
and
completion
2 days
staff time
% of staff feeling
that
communication
has improved
increases
% of staff clear
about role
increases
7
Priority Action
M
Maintain visits by AD
H
Ensure quality loop is used in 1-1
meetings
Milestones
AD to visit staff meetings
quarterly
1-1s set up with staff
1-1s take place with personal
targets in place
Timescale
Lead officer
Monitoring,
evaluation
and
completion
From
January
2006
HLLL
Minutes of
meetings
Reports to
quality
meeting
TLs
G
HLLL
H
Continue to monitor finance
Regular meetings with finance to
take place
Risk assessments carried out on
all venues for the new academic
year
Officer trained to carry out risk
assessments
Risk assessments to take place
on all venues
H
Continue to embed and apply
quality framework
See 2.8
H
To embed equalities in all the
programmes
See 2.7
To ensure all learners are aware
of their right to complain
Reissue of learner handbook
To ensure all new venues have
DDA audits
Gather all existing DDA audits
Commission audits on those
locations still in need of them
Carry out immediate remedial
work to comply with the act
H
M
Final version 27th March 2006
A not all
carried out
By January
2006
By January
2006
Success criteria
4 days
staff time
Staff feel greater
involvement by
Senior Mgmt
Improved
retention and
achievement
Reduce
over/under
spends
All venues risk
assessed
G
1 day
staff time
G
HLLL
H
Cost
Q&CM
A handbook
still not issued
A existing
audits
gathered but
no new ones
carried out
Reports to
quality
meetings
Reports to
quality
meeting
Reports to
quality
meetings
4 days
staff time
2 days
staff time
4 days
staff time
Feedback form
learners shoe
100% of learners
surveyed are
aware of rights
Improvements
made in access
to 50% of
properties
8
Weaknesses
2.4 Poor control and provision of management information
2.5 Inadequate management of performance
2.6 Inadequate monitoring of health and safety
2.7 Inadequate promotion of equal opportunities and diversity
2.8 Insufficiently established quality improvement
Priority
Action
2.4 Poor
H
Timescales
Lead office
Monitoring and
evaluation
Cost
Success Criteria
Systems of checking all
paperwork in place and when
inaccurate sent back to tutors
In place
November
2005
MIS Officer
and Team
Leaders
Report to
fortnightly
quality meeting
4 days
staff
time
Systems reviewed for their
effectiveness
Quarterly
reviews
100% course
documentation
is accurate as
MIS Officer is
continually
reviewing
returns and
acting upon
discrepancies
8 days
staff
time
Subcontracted
data available
and targets for
recruitment,
retention and
achievement
area set and
achieved
Milestones
control and provision of management information
2.4 1 Systems in place to control
management information
“
HLLL
Any necessary amendment to
the system put in place
Monthly data returns from
Salford College for the
scheduled meeting
Final version 27th March 2006
Monthly
returns to
Lifelong
Learning
Q&CM
“
“
G Received
from November
2006
9
Priority
H
Milestones
Timescales
Lead office
2.4.2 Improve course reviews to
reflect learners experience
Format of IV course reviews
revised
Additional training provided on
course reviews
By end of
February
2006
C&CM
Report to
quality meeting
December
2006
C&Q
Review at Quality
meeting
December
2006
January 2006
TL
“
TL
“
January 2006
HLLL
January 2006
HLLL
2.5 Inadequate
Cost
Success Criteria
All course
reviews reflect
learning
management of performance
H
2.5.1 Review performance
management procedures utilised
by other parts of Lifelong
Learning and apply to FACL
Procedures adapted with any
necessary amendments
H
2.5.2 Monthly 1-1 meetings with
tutors to review recruitment,
retention and achievement with
notes, action plans and
outcomes
1-1s timetabled with all staff
H
Monitoring and
evaluation
Action
2.5.3 Performance management
information chain is set up to
enable performance
management to move up to AD
level
1-1s to start and feedback to
quality meeting
Reports to HLLL and AD on
performance (inc data, OTL
Revise staff newsletter to
include performance
Staff (inc. agency) packs set up
showing what is expected of
them
Final version 27th March 2006
TL
1 days
staff
time
10
days
staff
time
Report HLLL to
AD
Copy sent to AD
From
February
2006
2days
staff
time
Reports to mgmt
meeting
2 days
staff
time
Procedures are
available and in
use
All staff are
aware of
performance of
service and
sections
% of staff who
feel that they
are better
informed
increases
3 days
staff
time
10
Priority
H
Action
Milestones
Timescales
2.5.4 Monthly finance meetings
to take place between Head of
LLL and accountant from
finance team
Need to set profile for spend and
match expenditure to plan
From
September
2005
Lead office
Monitoring and
evaluation
Cost
6 days
staff
time
Success Criteria
Fewer
under/over
spends
2.6 Inadequate monitoring of health and safety
H
2.6.1 Compile H&S action plan
for LLL
Plan drafted and submitted to
the LSC
December
2005
TB
H
2.6.2 Set up H&S action group
Action group meets, terms of
reference agreed
January 2006
TB
Report to
quarterly
management
meeting
“
Review H&S procedures
including incomplete actions
All procedures reviewed and
adapted to be fit for purpose
H
January 2006
TB
January 2006
C&QM
“
2.6.2 Risk Assessments carried
out on all premises
H
2.6.3 Additional training on H&S
for staff
All staff to have had basic H&S
training
TB
June 2006
“
£1,500
consult
ancy
£100
caterin
g
£100
room
hire
20
days
staff
time
% of learners and
staff are aware
their rights and
responsibilities
under H&S.
Improve on
benchmark. All
tutors aware of
how to deal with
H&S issues
All premises have
risk assessments
All staff attending
to report they are
more competent
to deal with H&S
issues
One members of
staff
TB
Final version 27th March 2006
Staff members to complete
ENTO Unit D
July 2006
Training in hazard spotting,
manual handling, lone working
etc
By end of
February
2006
“
Q&CM
All staff report
they are better
able to deal with
H&S issues
11
Priority
Action
2.7 Inadequate
M
Milestones
H
Lead office
By end of
February
2006
HLLL
By end of
February
2006
HLLL
Monitoring and
evaluation
Cost
Success Criteria
Report to
quarterly
management
meeting
5 days
staff
time
Report to
quarterly mgmt
meeting
2 days
time
Plan in place and
all staff sign to
say seen. All data
used to set
benchmarks to
measure
improvement
promotion of equal opportunities and diversity
2.7.1 Compile diversity action
plan for LLL including learners
and staff
Plan drafted and agreed
Regular data reports to
management teams on
equalities
Benchmarks established and
targets for future improvements
made
M
Timescales
2.7.2 Set up EO action group
2.7.3 Additional training on EO
for staff
Action group established with
terms of reference and SMART
plan with representative of all of
LLL
By end of
February
2006
All processes and policies
assessed for impact on diversity
Diversity to be standard item on
all agendas
By end of
January 2006
HLLL
HLLL
HLLL
“
“
By end of
March 2006
HLLL
“
H
2.7.3 Revise learner handbook
and other marketing materials
Final version 27th March 2006
Learner handbook ‘SMOG’
analysed and translation details
included
By end of
December
2006
10
days
staff
time
“
“
All tutors to attend basic EO
training, managers to attend
separate training
Action group set
up with clear
remit
10
days
staff
time
£1,500
trainin
g
£200
TL (SFL)
“
Report on all
procedures
produced with
mitigating/
alleviating
response
% of tutors
reporting
confidence in
equalities
increases
“”
Increase %
learners
questioned report
better knowledge
12
Priority
M
Action
2.7.4 All properties to be DDA
assesses and action plans to be
reviewed
2.8 Insufficiently
H
Milestones
Timescales
Lead office
Learner handbook reprinted with
revised complaints policy
By end of
February
2006
HLLL
All locations to be DDA
assessed
Monitoring and
evaluation
Cost
Success Criteria
“
5 days
staff
time
of rights; 10%
increase in
comments/compl
aints
“
£1000
consul
tants
fees
10% of properties
used are more
accessible
By April 2006
HLLL
Set up quality Lifelong Learning
Group to review effectiveness of
quality system
From
February
2006
VLM
Report to Quality
Action Group
Implement quality calendar
From
September
2005
HLLL
Report to quality
meetings
Support improved lesson
observations (additional training for
staff and moderation meetings set
up)
From
January 2006
HLLL
“
Improve course reviews
From
February
2006
Q&CM
“
established quality improvement
2.8 1 All procedures listed in the QA
manual to be applied over the year
Final version 27th March 2006
12
days
staff
time
12
days
staff
time
5 days
staff
time
2 days
staff
time
25% of systems
reviewed
quarterly
All items in
quality calendar
addressed
monthly
% of OTL
regarded as
accurate
improves over
the year when
assessed in
moderation
Course reviews
analysed and
used for planning
13
Priority
Action
Final version 27th March 2006
Milestones
Timescales
Lead office
Utilise learners’ feedback from
surveys in planning
From
February
2006
TL FL, TL SFL,
Q&CM
Improved SAR- additional support
on SAR from LSC consultant
From March
2006
HLLL
Monitoring and
evaluation
“
Cost
Success Criteria
4 days
staff
time
Curriculum
developed
according to
learner
comments
“
All venues assessed by recruitment,
retention and achievement and
DDA/risk assessment
From March
2006
Q&CM
Data from learner satisfaction
surveys incorporated in planning
From March
2006
Q&CM
“
“
SAR in next
inspection
regards more
confidence in the
report
Improved
performance
indicators
“
14
Preparation for Life and work
This section sets out the strengths and weaknesses noted by the Adult Learning Inspectorate in this area of learning and the actions,
which will be taken to consolidate and build upon the strengths and improve weak areas.
Strengths
3.1 Good teaching and learning
3.2 Good monitoring of learners’ progress
Priority
Action
Milestones
Timescales
Lead officer
All new TL to attend LSC training on
OTL
Additional support for team leads on
managing equalities in class rooms
By February
2006
By May 2006
HLLL
Paperwork for OTL checked
Schedule of OTL set up
OTL to take place
Grades from OTL to feed into 1-1s
By end of
January 2006
By end of
March
Monitoring
and evaluation
Cost
Success
Criteria
3.1 Good teaching and learning
M
3.1.1 Training for new team
leads on OTL
H
3.1.2. Observation of
teaching and learning
Final version 27th March 2006
Q&CM
TL
TL
TL
TL
Report to
quality work
group
“
“
2days
All Team
Leaders report
confident in
robust OTL
5 days
Teaching and
learning to take
place; all
observations at
least
satisfactory
15
Priority
H
Action
Milestones
Timescales
Lead officer
3.1.3 Induction of new staff
Staff induction programme drafted (to
include S4L)
Throughout yea
TL
Monitoring
and evaluation
“
Cost
2 days
“
Success
Criteria
All staff to
report that they
are confident
they know
FACL systems
H
3.1.4 1-1 meetings with staff
H
M
3.1.5 Performance
management of staff with
date flowing through
management
3.1.5 Moderation of all OTL
Monthly 1-1s to take place and
targets set on Tutor Performance
Plan
By end of
January 2006
All staff to have a monthly meeting
when their outputs are measured by
recruitment, retention and
achievement and OTL
20 days
TL
“
For all new
staff starting in
January 2006
TL
“
Moderation meeting set up and
management of good and poor
performance taken up
From January
2006
VLM
“
5 days
‘Buddy’ observations to take place
with FACL and SC
From May 2006
VLM/C&QM
“
2days
End of
February 2006
TL
100% of staff
report clearer
targets
30 days
All OTL verified
All TL to
confirm
improved
confidence in
OTL
3.2 Good monitoring of learners’ progress
H
3.2.1 Ensure all new tutors
are supported in sow, ILPs
and lesson plans
Induction of new tutors to include
support on sow and lesson plans
Draft new tutor handbook
“
TL (S4L)
Report to
quality work
group
“
“
Final version 27th March 2006
2 days
staff time
and £200
additional
payment
to
sessional
staff
100% of tutors
reporting clarity
in paperwork
and procedures
increases
16
Priority
M
Action
Milestones
Timescales
3.2.2 Fully embed RARPA
Training for C&QM by LSC
Training for TL s and tutors on
RARPA and ILT
TL to address RARPA in 1-1s
March 2006
From April
2006
From May 2006
Lead officer
C&QM/MISO
Monitoring
and evaluation
Report to
quality work
group
Cost
10 days
staff time
TL
Success
Criteria
Tutors
awareness of
RARPA
increases by
100%
Weaknesses
3.4 Insufficient use of management information to help develop curriculum planning and insufficient focus on quality
improvement in the skills for life provision
Priority
3.4
H
H
Action
Milestones
Timescales
Lead officer
Monitoring and
evaluation
Cost
Success
Criteria
Insufficient use of management information to help develop curriculum planning and insufficient focus on quality improvement in
the skills for life provision
3.4.1 Appoint Skills for Life lead
3.4.2 Improve use of course
management information for
curriculum planning
Seconded post in place
Completed
HLLL
Report to AD
2 days
time
Permanent post appointed
By end of
March 2006
HLLL
Report to AD
£2k
advertisin
g
Set benchmarks with other
providers
By end of
January 2006
MISO
Report to ACL
quality meeting
2 days
staff time
Ensure all MIS is analysed to feed
into planning
By end of
February 2006
Q&CM
Report to quality
work group
10days
staff time
By end of
March 2006
HLLL
Report to quality
work group
4 days
staff time
Review learner and tutor
evaluations
Final version 27th March 2006
Improvement
s in planningincrease in
range of
courses
delivered
17
Priority
Action
Monitoring and
evaluation
Cost
TL (S4L)
Report to ACL
quality group
3 days
staff time
By end of May
2006
TL (S4L)
Report to ACL
quality group
£3,000
recruitme
nt costs
Subject learning coach training
for ESOL
By June 2006
TL (S4L)
Link to e guides action plan
By April 2006
TL (S4L) / MISO
Develop citizenship courses for
new academic year
By September
2006
TL (S4)
Milestones
Timescales
Lead officer
Recruit additional tutors with the
skills
By end of
March 2006
Additional training for existing
staff
Success
Criteria
Ensure all evaluations are
analysed to feed into planning
H
3.4.3 Improve ESOL
“
“
2 days
staff time
All ESOL
course to run
twice a week
All staff
delivering
ESOL have
additional
training
1 day staff
time
“
Final version 27th March 2006
10 days staff
time, £5,00
course costs
18
Family Learning
This section sets out the strengths and weaknesses noted by the Adult Learning Inspectorate in this area of learning and the actions,
which will be taken to consolidate and build upon the strengths and improve weak areas.
Strengths
4.1 Good teaching and learning
4.2 Good working relationships with schools in the action zone
Priority
Action
4.1 Good
Milestones
Timescales
Lead officer
Monitoring and
evaluation
Cost
Report to quality
work group
2days
staff time
Success
Criteria
teaching and learning
H
4.1.1 Training for new team
leads of OTL
All new TL to attend LSC training
on OTL
By February
2006
HLLL
H
4.1.2 Schedule of OTL set up
By end of
January 2006
Q&CM
Schedule drafted
H
4.1.3 Sustain quality of teaching
Throughout
year
By end of
January 2006
TL
“
TL
“
For all new
staff starting in
January 2006
FACLM
OTL to take place according to
schedule
Staff induction programme drafted
Develop additional training on:
RARPA, e guides, subject
coaches, learners’ voice and data
use
Final version 27th March 2006
“
3 days
staff time
5 days
staff time
All Team
Leaders
report
confident in
robust OTL
Standard of
teaching is
maintained at
the service
benchmark
2 days
staff time
“
10 days
staff time
19
Priority
Action
Milestones
Timescales
Lead officer
H
4.1.4 Induction of new staff
All new staff inducted
From March
2006
TL
H
4.1.5 Monthly 1-1 meetings with
staff
All staff to have a monthly
meeting when their outputs are
measured by recruitment,
retention and achievement and
OTL
From April
2006
TL
Monitoring and
evaluation
“
Cost
3 days
staff time
30 days
staff time
“
10 days
Success
Criteria
100 % of new
staff to report
that they are
confident
they
understand
procedures
increases
and personal
targets
VLM
H
M
4.1.6 Performance management
of staff with date flowing through
management
4.1.5 Moderation of all OTL
To set up system to percolate
performance data through
management to AD
Set up quality meeting with
moderation function
Moderation to take place and
‘buddy’ observations
From March
2006
VLM
From February
2006
From February
2006
“
2days
“
3 days
100% of staff
reporting
overall
understandin
g of targets
improves
100 % of
grades of
OTL
moderated
are assessed
as accurate
All TL to
confirm
improved
confidence in
OTL
Final version 27th March 2006
20
Priority
Action
Milestones
Timescales
Lead officer
To start by end
of January
2006
TL FL
Monitoring and
evaluation
Cost
Report to ACL
quality meeting
10 days
staff time
Success
Criteria
4.2 Good working relationships with schools in the action zone
H
4.2.1 To build relations with any
schools through which family
learning is being delivered
Target schools with the greatest
need
Meetings with heads and new
and current schools
4 days
staff time
TL FL
M
Set up family learning working
group
Final version 27th March 2006
By end of April
2006
Report to ACL
quality meeting
Family
learning to
run in at least
6 schools at
least 50%
outside Little
Hulton
Group to
meet and to
agree future
development
s
21
Weaknesses
4.3 Insufficient curriculum development and inadequate provision to meet the needs of learners across the city
Action
Milestones
Timescales
Lead officer
Monitoring and
evaluation
Cost
Success
Criteria
4.3 Insufficient curriculum development and Inadequate provision to meet the needs of learners across the city
H
H
4.3.1 Develop programme of
FLLN
4.3.2 Increase the delivery or FL
and FLLN provision
Final version 27th March 2006
Recruit family learning team
leader
- Temporary
- Permanent
January 2006
February
2006
HLLL
G
Recruit additional family
learning tutors
January 2006
HLLL
G
Induct new tutors
January and
February
2006
TL FL
Report to HLLL
Targets schools in particular
need who would benefit from
this provision
From March
2006
TL FL
Partially
completed
Develop provision together
with schools in FL and FLLN
From
April 2006
TL FL
G
Report to ACL
quality meeting
£1500
recruitme
nt costs
Leader in
post
Tutors in post
£1000
recruitme
nt costs
100% of new
tutors report
clarity in
systems
At least 5
new schools
targeted
12 days
staff time
Provision
runs at least
5 new
schools
12 days
staff time
22
Action
Milestones
Timescales
Lead officer
4.4.3. Develop appropriate
progression routes
From March
2006
TL FL
All progression routes mapped
Monitoring and
evaluation
Cost
Report to ACL
quality meeting
6 days
staff time
Success
Criteria
At least 20%
of learners
progress to
alternative
courses
Responsible
AD
HLLL
FACLM
TL FL
TL SFL
MISO
VLM
Q&CM
Assistant Director (Transition)
Head of Lifelong Learning
Family, Adult and Community Learning Manager
Team Lead Family Learning
Team Leader Skills for Life
Management Information System Officer
Vocational Learning Manager
Quality and Contracts Manager
Final version 27th March 2006
23