PART ONE ITEM NO. REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF CORPORATE SERVICES To the: Corporate Services Lead member Briefing On: Monday 17th May 2004 TITLE: INTERNAL AUDIT ACTIVITY SEPTEMBER TO MARCH 2004 RECOMMENDATIONS: The Lead Member is asked to note the contents of the report. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The purpose of the report is to inform the Lead Member of Internal Audit activity in the period September 2003 to March 2004. BACKGROUND DOCUMENTS: Various reports and supporting working papers ASSESSMENT OF RISK: Internal Audit projects are managed within the Unit’s risk based audit protocols aimed at giving assurance regarding the management of the City Council’s key business risks. THE SOURCE OF FUNDING IS: Existing revenue budget. LEGAL ADVICE OBTAINED: N/A FINANCIAL ADVICE OBTAINED: N/A CONTACT OFFICER: Andrew Waine - Audit Manager 0161 793 3357 WARD(S) TO WHICH REPORT RELATES: Various KEY COUNCIL POLICIES: N/A DETAILS: Report details are contained in the table below. COMMITTEE SUMMARY CORPORATE SERVICES SUBJECT ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 2002/3 REF 2327/CS/03 AIMS AND OBJECTIVES Internal Audit undertakes a review of the purchasing and accounts payable systems on an annual basis. The objective of the review is to provide management with an independent appraisal of the adequacy of controls in the key functional processes within the purchasing and accounts payable systems. The review was undertaken using payments and information obtained relating to the financial year 2002/3. The results of the review are not only subject to internal scrutiny but also subject to external scrutiny by the Audit Commission under the managed audit arrangements. The Audit Commission seeks to ensure that controls are in place to prevent: Incorrect payments being made Incorrect accounting/poor budgetary control System failure. Testing undertaken during this review sought to ensure that there were adequate controls in place to mitigate these risks and that the controls were operating effectively. AUDIT OPINION It is agreed that the introduction of the new financial systems in April 2000 has represented a significant change to working practices. The testing undertaken for this audit review has highlighted the issues that have already been raised and documented within the last audit report, for which discussions have been held with management and recommendations have now been agreed. The audit found that most of the key risks are adequately controlled. Only two key controls require attention, relating to the control of cheques and contingency plans in the event of an IT failure. MANAGEMENT RESPONSE All recommendations made were agreed. COMMITTEE SUMMARY CORPORATE SERVICES SUBJECT BACKUP AND RECOVERY REF 2461/CS/03 AIMS/OBJECTIVES The focus of our review concentrated on the backups taken by Desktop Services and Computer Services (both part of Corporate Services IT Net). Desktop Services are responsible mainly for the Microsoft platforms used to support shared file servers and Salford Intranet and Internet sites. Computer Services provide support for the mainly Unix based servers supporting major applications such as Council Tax, SAP and Carefirst. The objective of the audit was to determine the controls over the following risks: Completeness of the backup schedule Integrity of the backup process Efficiency and effectiveness of the recovery process We did not review the backup processes utilised by other units e.g. Education or Development Services. Neither did we review the backing up of Education’s application servers by Desktop Services. MAIN CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Provision of a backup function across Salford City Council (SCC) is well established and covers all the major servers and applications. Important files are taken off site at key points in the processing cycle to guard against major disasters. Key recommendations: The responsibility for backing up servers should be brought under the control of a single team Backup and recovery procedures should be brought together in a single document, which is reviewed at least annually Server commissioning and de-commissioning checklists should be created, completed and reviewed to ensure changes to asset records, backup schedules, and security arrangements are complete and timely A cost benefit analysis of the advantages of standardising on common backup technology should be undertaken An unobtrusive case capable of providing shock and weather protection should be purchased for the transport of tapes to and from Minerva House MANAGEMENT RESPONSE Management has agreed the 8 recommendations made, and have agreed to action between now and September 2004. COMMITTEE SUMMARY CORPORATE SERVICES SUBJECT CAPITAL BUDGET MONITORING REF 2503/CS/03 AIMS AND OBJECTIVES The purpose of this report was to review the process for the preparation and monitoring of the capital budget. This included a review of the various processes used to manage capital projects within each Directorate. The agreed terms of reference were to assess the risks and controls associated with: The processes used to produce the capital programme and budget. The processes used in individual departments for monitoring capital expenditure. The project monitoring processes within departments. And comment on the robustness of these processes and make recommendations for improvement where appropriate. AUDIT OPINION Good practice is followed in that: CIPFA advice is followed in preparing and monitoring capital budgets, with the following exceptions: Life-cycle costs are not considered, There is no requirement that a timetable be prepared for completion of the various elements of a scheme, There is no formal system for a post implementation review of a sample of individual projects. Expenditure is well controlled against budgets, but the officers dealing with it rely on their own records rather than using the information available from the core financial management information system (SAP). MANAGEMENT RESPONSE The audit recommendations have been accepted and agreement has been reached that the following action will be taken: Life cycle costs will be estimated for all proposed schemes where it is appropriate and feasible. The timetables for completion of schemes will be more comprehensive as from the 2004/05 programme and a full range of key dates will be recorded for the 2005/06 capital programme. A sample of non-grant-aided schemes will be reviewed after completion to confirm that the system continues to operate as intended. COMMITTEE SUMMARY CORPORATE SERVICES SUBJECT CITIZEN COMPUTER SYSTEM REF 2462/CS/03 AIMS/OBJECTIVES The aim of the audit was to determine the degree of control over the following risk areas: System Management System Development There are plans to further develop Citizen and link other Council Computer systems, with the aim of enhancing the services provided to the public. MAIN CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The audit has concluded that the risks relating to System Management and System Development are reasonably well controlled. Recommendations have been made to improve the degree of control over the current system and ensure that future developments are equally well controlled. The current resource levels for the Citizen system are adequate to maintain the system and develop it at a slow pace. However, if it is the intention to expand the use of Citizen to enable it to become a key element of the Council’s ‘Think Customer’ strategy, then the resources are inadequate. The procedures for backing up the Citizen development server are inadequate. This server is backed up locally and not via the standard procedures, as used by Desktop Services e.g. Veritas. The backup tapes are stored next to the server in a plastic box and not in a secure remote off site location. The procedures controlling changes to the Citizen software were found to be inadequate. This could result in changes being made that are not agreed with the users. The current procedures do not formally document change requests, prioritise them in terms of importance, and agree in detail the work required, or allow the client to sign off the work when completed . Main recommendations: The staffing and resources available for development of the Citizen application should be reviewed A system administrator should be appointed and trained The training program should be properly resourced A formal system of recording requests for change to Citizen should be implemented MANAGEMENT RESPONSE Management in Salford Direct and ITNet have agreed all the recommendations and they will be actioned between now and 31 March 2004. COMMITTEE SUMMARY CORPORATE SERVICES SUBJECT DESKTOP SERVICES STRATEGY AND SERVICE REF 2409/CS/03 AIMS/OBJECTIVES The objective of the audit was to determine the controls over the following risks: IT strategy and vision Service delivery Customer focus and support The audit assignment commenced in August 2003 and was conducted through discussions with the Director of Corporate Services, Assistant Director Operations & Support, Desktop Services Manager and selected managers and staff in the following Directorates: Community & Social Services Education & Leisure Corporate Services MAIN CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Desktop Services has a lack of any clear communication plan to ensure that vision, strategies and proposals are properly communicated at the right time to the right people across the Authority. Whilst the relationship with some Directorates is good, with others it is weaker and will require significant effort to improve. There are a number of significant issues that require action: Revisit the IT strategy to bring up to date and align with the key pledges and Directorate priorities Implement a succession policy to minimise the risk of service interruption through loss of key staff Carry out a GAP analysis of skills amongst Desktop staff to identify areas for development Develop and implement change management controls for Desktop staff to follow for internal projects Consider making Desktop Services the sole provider of IT equipment for the whole of the Authority Define and communicate a communications strategy between Desktop and its customers, which should also include regular meetings between IT staff at all levels and Directorate staff Develop and introduce a new process for recording and measuring customer satisfaction to ensure that representative feedback is received MANAGEMENT RESPONSE Management agreed to implement all 10 audit recommendations without reservations, though not all will be actioned within the Desktop Services unit. COMMITTEE SUMMARY CORPORATE SERVICES SUBJECT E-GOVERNMENT PROGRAMME REF 2455/CS/03 AIMS/OBJECTIVES The audit assessed the degree of control over the following categories of risk, threatening the management of the E-Government Programme: Programme Management Communication and Information Management Meeting Business Needs Note: The audit focused on the work of the Programme Manager and E-Government Services Team, but also covered Directorate activities, where this was found to be practicable. MAIN CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS In Internal Audit's opinion, the E-Government Programme has successfully built on the achievements of the Information Society and Pathfinder Projects. The audit has identified that governance procedures, capacity building measures and change management products, such as BPR/Project Management methodologies, have become more embedded within the cultures of Salford Advance, Programme management and the Directorates. The audit has also identified that great strides have been made in implementing technical solutions, which enhance the Council's ability to meet Government targets and information requirements for service e-enablement, as measured again BVPI 157. They also help the Council to achieve its own vision for organisational transformation. However, testing of specific governance controls, e.g. elements within the Salford Method of PRINCE 2 project management methodology, has revealed concerns about their effectiveness, in terms of practical application. Concern must also be expressed about the effectiveness of controls related to the promotion of e-government solutions, in terms of covering the key risks related to meeting business needs, bringing about culture change and improving services to the public. In other words, controls are in place, but Programme Management has recognised that these will require enhancing and strengthening, if the levels of commitment to and take-up of e-government solutions are to be improved within the Directorates. Main recommendations: Lack of corporate commitment and support from senior manager and Councillors, both strategic and financial, should be addressed The Programme Manager should report to the Cabinet briefing meeting on a quarterly basis, on progress against the plan and BVPI 157, together with corporate working issues and risks. This group should act as the Programme Board Executive A review should be undertaken of the use of the Salford Method of Prince 2, at Programme level and within the individual projects E-government should become a strategic part of the Leaders’ Front Line Service Review MANAGEMENT RESPONSE Management has agreed all the recommendations and they will be actioned between now and April 2004. COMMITTEE SUMMARY CORPORATE SERVICES SUBJECT LOANS AND INVESTMENTS REF 2325/CS/03 AIMS AND OBJECTIVES The aim and objective of this audit was to identify the risks and associated controls in respect of the following processes: Determine Dealing Requirements Negotiating Deals Make and Receive Payments Maintain Diary Logotech Computer System. The audit was conducted through discussions with the Accountant and the Assistant Group Accountant who are responsible for the section, in addition to examining the documentation held by the section. The documentation reviewed related to the 2002/03 financial year. AUDIT OPINION The review found that the controls in place are operating efficiently and are well executed by the loans officers. There are only two areas where improvements to existing controls are required:Record of Checking Deal Tickets and Confirmations When confirmation notes are received, they are matched to the deal ticket and checked fro accuracy. Currently, the officer undertaking the check does not sign the forms to verify that this check has been undertaken. Logotech Passwords Although Logotech passwords are changed and had been changed prior to the audit commencing, they are not changed on a frequent basis. The recommendation was agreed in the previous audit report, issued February 2002, but has still not been implemented. Actioning this recommendation would reduce the risk of unauthorised access to the system. MANAGEMENT RESPONSE Both recommendations were accepted and implementation dates agreed by management. COMMITTEE SUMMARY CORPORATE SERVICES SUBJECT PROCUREMENT AND DISPOSAL OF IT EQUIPMENT REF 2382/CS/03 AIMS/OBJECTIVES The aim of the audit was to determine the degree of control over the following risk areas: Corporate Procurement of IT equipment Directorate Procurement of IT equipment Corporate Disposal of IT equipment Directorate Disposal of IT equipment The audit examined the situation regarding Community and Social Services, as an example of procurement using the Corporate procedures and Environmental Services as a variant from the standard. MAIN CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The audit has concluded that the risks relating to both Corporate and Directorate procurement are reasonably well controlled. However risks relating to the disposal of IT equipment are less well controlled, e.g. no formal guidelines relating to disposal were identified during the audit. There are a number of issues that require action: Asset / stock management controls in Desktop Services are unsatisfactory and are approximately 12 months out of date Consider giving Desktop Services the mandate to be the sole provider of IT equipment for the whole Authority A Corporate policy on disposal of equipment should be prepared and distributed to all Directorates Minutes of meetings between Directorate Client Liaison Officers (CLO) and IT should be taken Directorates should prepare and issue guidance to their CLO to aid them discharging their duties MANAGEMENT RESPONSE Management in the 3 Directorates visited in the audit agreed to implement all 13 audit recommendations. The recommendation to make Desktop the sole provider of IT equipment is to be put to Directors. COMMITTEE SUMMARY CORPORATE SERVICES SUBJECT SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT REF 2358/CS/03 AIMS/OBJECTIVES The aim of the audit was to determine the degree of controls over the following risk areas: Personnel / succession Operational / procedural Technical Security / resilience Organisational The audit focused on the development work of the S.D. Team, but took into account the fact that other functions within IT Net and Salford Advance are involved in software development, e.g. the E-Government Team. MAIN CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Software development is delivered by 2 teams within IT – Salford Advance and IT Net Software development. This has created some differences in standards, development tools and methods of design and management. However, in both teams, substantial assurance can be given on the level of controls that exist. To conclude, the review has established that risks relating to the day-to-day operation of the IT Net software development function are reasonably well covered, and that progress is being made to iron out weaknesses. In terms of the higher-level risks currently threatening the S. D. Team, management has formally identified these and included them in the Business Plan, but there is much work to be done to move the Team forward, given the challenging environment in which it will have to operate. There are a number of recommendations to improve the existing arrangements: Implement handover procedures for work when staff leave Adoption and rollout of a formal system to manage development standards Software Development management should be fully involved in the feedback from and assessment of the pilot for the "mini" version of the Salford Method PSO and Software Development management need to establish a system for assessing the relative priorities of developments/projects being undertaken by the Team, at any given moment in time Within IT Net and Salford Advance, a number of teams are undertaking development work. It is suggested that steps be formally taken to establish whether this situation, or any proposed situation for the future, has or is likely to result in duplication of effort on systems or standards etc MANAGEMENT RESPONSE Management agreed to implement all 5 audit recommendations. All of these have action dates in September 2003 to start the dialogue, though it is accepted that the implementation of actual changes may take place after that. COMMITTEE SUMMARY CORPORATE SERVICES SUBJECT MANAGEMENT OF THE UNIX SERVER ENVIRONMENT REF 2420/CS/03 AIMS/OBJECTIVES The aim of the audit was to determine the degree of control over the following risk areas: Hardware - performance and resilience Software - integrity and security Information - data integrity and security People – succession and personnel issues The review focused on the risks related to the role of Computer Services, rather than those of Desktop Services or the Directorate application managers, e.g. it covered threats to data integrity arising from an insecure Unix environment, rather than from an insecure network or application environment. Assessment of control over security risks was aided by the use of an audit computer tool kit, originally provided by the Audit Commission. MAIN CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The completion of this audit appraisal has led us to the general opinion that the Unix server environment is well managed by the Computer Services Team. The Team contains a good balance of experienced staff and newer staff, who have been or are being trained up in relevant technical aspects of Unix. The audit review has established that the Team operate satisfactory controls to mitigate most of the key risks elated to the aspects covered in the audit. However, both IT Net and Computer Services management have recognised the need for a credible disaster recovery plan for the Computer Centre, which includes the Unix environment, and have started to formulate such plan. Furthermore, tests undertaken during the review using the audit tool kit, indicate that there could be possible security vulnerabilities in some or all of the Council's Unix configurations. However, the tool kit did report that a number of common security loopholes had been closed. It should also be noted that the audit has not covered controls built into user applications or the communications network, which could act as a form of "safety net" for potential Unix vulnerabilities. There are a number of significant issues that require action: Computer Services management should formalise an investigation into the performance monitoring tools available A schedule of disaster recovery "restore" tests should be drawn up to ensure that such tests are undertaken periodically in respect of each Unix installation Computer Services should critically examine the results reported by the audit tool kit, as summarised at Appendix 1 and discussed in detail with the Deputy Service Manager MANAGEMENT RESPONSE Management agreed to implement all 3 audit recommendations, over timeframes from end of Dec 2003 to end of October 2004.