APPENDIX 1 1. Name of Local Partnership Review and

advertisement
LPDG REVIEW - ACTION PLAN
RECOMMENDATION
ACTION
1. Name of Local Partnership
Delivery Group to remain
unchanged, consistent with
the citywide Partnership
Delivery Group
Review and
relaunch Terms
of Reference,
restate
membership,
promote at PACT
meetings
Circulate
guidelines /
Terms of
Reference and
membership to
senior partnership
reps
2. Relevant senior managers
from all directorates
partner agencies to be
reminded of requirements
to send a representative to
LPDG and to share
information in keeping with
responsibilities under Sec
17, Crime & Disorder Act.
In the absence of the
regular representative, an
appropriate deputy to be
sent.
3.
Magistrates to attend
LPDG at least every six
months, and more
frequently if they wish to
do so
LEAD
APPENDIX 1
SUPPORTING
PARTNERS
TIMESCALE
MEASURE OF
SUCCESS
Brian Wroe;
Dianne
Errington
Neighbourhood
Managers;
Neighbourhood
Inspectors
31 December
2009
Agreed Terms of
Reference;
circulation of
document;
agenda item at
PACT meetings
Green
Joint Chairs
of CDRP –
Kevin Brady
and Kevin
Mulligan
Strategic
Directors;
Senior reps of
partner
agencies
To be
complete
before CDRP
Executive
meeting
February
2010
Letter / Memo to
Strategic
Directors /
Partners; full
attendance or
deputies at each
LPDG
Amber
Magistrates’
Courts
31 December
2009
Letter to
Magistrates’
Court; attendance
by magistrates at
LPDG,
appropriate to
that
neighbourhood
Amber
Letter to
Brian Wroe
Magistrates’
Courts, outlining
findings and
inviting
attendance as per
recommendation.
Copy to Chairs of
LPDG.
1
PROGRESS
(RAG)
COMMENTS
Complete.
Name
remained
same. Terms
of Ref
reviewed and
updated.
LPDG Review
and Action
Plan went to
CMT on
16/02/10.
Commitment
from Strategic
Directors to
ensure
appropriate
attendance.
Letter sent to
Peter
Lawrence,
Salford
Magistrates’
Court.
RECOMMENDATION
ACTION
4. LPDG meetings to receive
feedback on sentencing
and work being undertaken
on Community Payback.
LPDG also to decide how
this information will be
disseminated to the
neighbourhood area.
LPDG to receive
feedback on
Community
Payback scheme;
suggestions of
Community
Payback to be
generated from
each CC; LPDGs
to be informed to
disseminate
Payback info
widely.
5. Each neighbourhood to
have a mechanism in
place to identify suitable
Community Payback
schemes to be provided to
Probation/YOS and fed
back to the LPDG
meetings.
6. LPDGs to be provided with
a bespoke analytical
LEAD
SUPPORTING
PARTNERS
TIMESCALE
Damian
Dallimore
Vincent
Greener (GMP);
Carole Johnson
(GM Probation)
31 December
2009
Formalised
Amber
feedback
mechanism;
community
payback schemes
generated by
each LPDG
LPDG to receive
feedback on
Community
Payback scheme;
suggestions of
community
payback to be
generated from
each CC; LPDGs
to be informed to
disseminate
Payback info
widely.
Damian
Dallimore
Ch Insp Vincent
Greener; Carole
Johnson (GM
Probation)
31 December
2009
Formalised
Amber
feedback
mechanism;
community
payback schemes
generated by
each LPDG
Lead Officers to
meet; identify
Supt Dave
Wilkinson;
Alan Tomlinson;
Dianne
To be
complete by
Agreement
reached between
2
MEASURE OF
SUCCESS
PROGRESS
(RAG)
Green
COMMENTS
Sentencing
outcomes are
now received
from courts by
Community
Safety Unit.
Judgements
then made re
publicity
locally and to
LPDG. Action
is on track but
yet to be
completed.
Probation
attending
LPDGs on
occasional
basis,
receiving
suggestions
of community
payback
schemes.
Feedback on
schemes
being
finalised by
Youth
Offending
Services
together with
Probation.
Complete.
Monthly
RECOMMENDATION
document that can be
shared with partners and
which contains information
from a range of
directorates / partners.
Capacity within the team of
analysts may need to be
considered.
ACTION
LEAD
SUPPORTING
PARTNERS
TIMESCALE
MEASURE OF
SUCCESS
relevant
information and
data to provide to
LPDG and
produce relevant
specification.
Don Brown.
Errington
CDRP
Executive
meeting
February
2010
Lead Officers and
LPDG leads on
information
required and how
it will be provided.
Production of
document for
LPDG.
7. The current work entitled
'Collaborate to Innovate'
concerning provision of
data and other information
to be used to standardise
provision of information to
LPDG and how
performance is monitored
at LPDG.
Lead Officers to
meet; identify
relevant
information and
data to provide to
LPDG and
produce relevant
specification.
Supt Dave
Wilkinson;
Don Brown;
Alan Tomlinson;
Dianne
Errington
To be
complete by
CDRP
Executive
meeting
February
2010
Agreement
reached between
Lead Officers and
LPDG leads on
information
required and how
it will be provided.
Production of
document for
LPDG.
8.
Legal Services to
discuss
information
sharing and Data
Protection with
relevant partners
and produce
protocol / Service
Level Agreement.
Ian Sheard
GMFRS;
Children’s
Services
Directorate;
Environment
Directorate
To be
complete by
CDRP
Executive
meeting
February
2010
Service Level
Agreement, or
similar, which
clarifies the
responsibilities
under Crime and
Disorder Act for
all partners
Legal Services to clarify
the issue of sharing
relevant information at
LPDG within the
boundaries of the Data
Protection Act and
Section 17 Crime and
Disorder Act
responsibilities.
3
PROGRESS
(RAG)
Green
COMMENTS
document
now available,
including
ward data
with year-onyear
comparisons
and analysis
from PDG.
Complete.
Monthly
document
now available,
including
ward data
with year-onyear
comparisons
and analysis
from PDG.
Meeting held
with GM NHS
Adult Mental
Health
Services to
agree a mini
protocol
which can be
used as a
template for
other relevant
bodies
Further
meeting with
Childrens
RECOMMENDATION
ACTION
LEAD
SUPPORTING
PARTNERS
TIMESCALE
MEASURE OF
SUCCESS
9. Chairs of LPDG’s to report
back to the PDG,
Neighbourhood
Partnership Board and
Community Committee on
biannual basis on
successes and areas for
improvement.
Joint Chairs of
Supt Dave
PDG to arrange
Wilkinson;
biannual reports
Don Brown;
from each Chair
of LPDG, on
rolling basis, to
PDG. Include on
agenda and
commission short
report on
successes / areas
for improvement
ahead of
meetings. Ensure
that effective
practice is shared
through PDG
process.
Neighbourhood
Managers;
Neighbourhood
Inspectors
To commence
at January
2010 PDG
meeting
Agenda at PDG,
NPB and CC;
documents and
minutes of
discussions
featuring reports
from each of the
eight LPDGs.
10. Develop a formal
feedback mechanism
between PDG and LPDG
Joint Chairs of
PDG to arrange
biannual reports
Neighbourhood
Managers;
Neighbourhood
To commence
at January
2010 PDG
Agenda;
documents and
minutes of
Supt Dave
Wilkinson;
Don Brown;
4
PROGRESS
(RAG)
Green
COMMENTS
Services
shortly
Action
complete
Feedback on
effective
practice over
Christmas
featured at
January 2010
PDG.
Effective
Practice now
a standing
item. Agenda
of PDG
amended.
From March
2010, each
LPDG will
formally
report back to
the PDG on;
challenges/thr
eats to the
CDRP, areas
for
improvement/
blockages
and effective
practice/succ
esses
Action
Complete
Feedback on
RECOMMENDATION
and to clarify how issues
may be elevated
effectively from LPDG to
PDG. Introduce a method
to share good practice
and learning at PDG.
ACTION
from each Chair
of LPDG to PDG.
Include on
agenda and
commission short
report on
successes / areas
for improvement
ahead of
meetings. Ensure
that effective
practice is shared
through PDG
process.
LEAD
SUPPORTING
PARTNERS
TIMESCALE
Inspectors
meeting
5
MEASURE OF
SUCCESS
discussions
featuring reports
from each of the
eight LPDGs.
PROGRESS
(RAG)
COMMENTS
effective
practice over
Christmas
featured at
Action
complete
January 2010
PDG.
Effective
Practice now
a standing
item. Agenda
of PDG
amended
accordingly –
From March
2010, each
LPDG will
formally
report back to
the PDG on;
challenges/thr
eats to the
CDRP, areas
for
improvement/
blockages
and effective
practice/succ
esses. As of
Jan 2010,
agenda items
for
forthcoming
meetings can
RECOMMENDATION
ACTION
LEAD
SUPPORTING
PARTNERS
TIMESCALE
MEASURE OF
SUCCESS
PROGRESS
(RAG)
COMMENTS
be formally
requested.
11. Produce induction and
familiarisation material for
officers, elected members
and community
representatives involved in
LPDG, case conference
style meetings and CDRP
Exec so that roles and
responsibilities are
understood. Chairs of
LPDG to check times of
meetings to try to ensure
availability of elected
members to attend.
Devise an
Don Brown
induction and
familiarisation
package for
community reps,
officers and
elected members
engaged in any or
all of the LPDG
process.
Neighbourhood
Managers;
Neighbourhood
Inspectors.
To be
complete by
CDRP
Executive
meeting
February
2010
Induction and
familiarisation
package
produced and
implemented.
12. Agree a mechanism to
recruit local residents to sit
on LPDG and one resident
to sit on CDRP Executive;
agree role description and
responsibilities and how to
fulfil national and local
community justice
requirements and feed
back to local communities.
Local residents to be
appointed by Community
Committee.
Convene steering
group to agree
role description
for community
reps, officers and
elected members
attending LPDG /
CDRP Exec and
agreeing process
for recruiting
community reps
to LPDG and
CDRP Exec.
Neighbourhood
Managers;
Neighbourhood
Inspectors;
Julie Mackenzie
/ Dawn
Atkinson; other
identified
people for
steering group
To be
complete by
CDRP
Executive
meeting
February
2010
Role Description
produced for
community,
officer, elected
member.
Production of
suggested
recruitment
process for
community rep.
Brian Wroe
6
Amber
Local
residents now
sit on majority
of LPDG
meetings (no
involvement
at East
Salford to
date).
RECOMMENDATION
ACTION
LEAD
SUPPORTING
PARTNERS
TIMESCALE
MEASURE OF
SUCCESS
PROGRESS
(RAG)
13. Referral procedures are recirculated to all partners
and that Neighbourhood
Managers and Inspectors
encourage referrals in their
neighbourhood areas from
all agencies.
Review and recirculate referral
procedures to
each LPDG
Chair. N/H
Managers &
Inspectors to
reinforce
guidance with all
local LPDG
partners.
Dianne
Errington
Neighbourhood
Managers;
Neighbourhood
Inspectors
To be
complete by
CDRP
Executive
meeting
February
2010
Reviewed
procedure;
circulated
document;
increased
referrals from
partners agencies
including parties
other than N/H
Manager, Police
and Housing.
Green
14. Neighbourhood Managers
and Inspectors to organise
partnership development
sessions to improve local
partnership team working
and understanding of roles
and responsibilities.
Neighbourhood
Managers to each
organise
partnership
development
sessions locally,
covering roles
and
responsibilities.
Neighbourhoo
d Managers;
Neighbourhoo
d Inspectors
Community
Safety Unit
For
completion
during 2010.
Partnership
Development
Sessions held in
each
neighbourhood,
learning recorded
and shared with
other
neighbourhoods.
Amber
15. Assistant Director
(Transition), Children’s
Services to outline how
Teams Around the Schools
and other youth provision
Document the
role of Teams
Around Schools
and wider role of
Children’s
Jon
Stonehouse
Brian Wroe
To be
complete by
CDRP
Executive
meeting
Document
explaining Teams
Around Schools
and Locality
arrangements
7
COMMENTS
Action
complete.
Referral
process
reviewed and
circulated to
N’hood
Managers,
Inspectors
and other
relevant
parties,
including
Elected
Members.
Issue taken to
N’hood
Managers’
regular
meeting.
Some
n’hoods to
organise
bespoke
development
sessions,
others
considering
combining
sessions.
RECOMMENDATION
fits in with the LPDG
process and to incorporate
Youth Inclusion Support
Panel into case
management meetings.
ACTION
LEAD
SUPPORTING
PARTNERS
Services within
LPDG process.
Incorporate Youth
Inclusion Support
Panel in that
process and
circulate to LPDG
Chairs.
TIMESCALE
February
2010
R:\Secretariat\Joanne Colley\1. BW\LPDG\LPDG REVIEW ACTION PLAN UPDATE290110.doc
8
MEASURE OF
SUCCESS
within Children’s
Services and
links to LPDG.
Agreed method to
include YISP in
the LPDG
process
effectively.
PROGRESS
(RAG)
COMMENTS
Download