Part 1 (Open to the public) ITEM NO. 9 REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES To the: ENVIRONMENTAL SCRUTINY COMMITTEE On: Monday, 16 June, 2003 TITLE: BEST VALUE REVIEWS OF BUILDING CONTROL AND DEVELOPMENT CONTROL IMPLEMENTATION PROGRESS REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS: That Members note the progress being made in implementing the Best Value Reviews EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The reviews of Building Control and Development Control were completed in September, 2002 when the final report and improvement plans were approved by Cabinet. Members may recall that I provided a first progress report of implementation in February of this year. This report is the second progress report to which is attached schedules indicating targets and the positions achieved in meeting the targets against a range of performance indicators, together with progress in implementing improvements. A representative of the Directorate will be present at the meeting. BACKGROUND DOCUMENTS: Building Control Final Report Building Control Improvement Plan Building Control First Implementation Report Development Control Final Report Development Control Improvement Plan Development Control First Implementation Report 1 ASSESSMENT OF RISK: Low THE SOURCE OF FUNDING IS: Directorate budget LEGAL ADVICE OBTAINED: Consulted Directorate Legal Officer and Head of Law and Administration FINANCIAL ADVICE OBTAINED: Consulted Directorate Finance Officer CONTACT OFFICER: Paul Mallinder 793-3606, Dave Jolley 793-3631 WARD(S) TO WHICH REPORT RELATES: ALL WARDS KEY COUNCIL POLICIES: Best Value; DETAILS: 2 Report to Environmental Scrutiny Committee - Building Control Improvement Plan Progress Update June 2003 Improve response times to plan checking, whilst maintaining and improving a customer focused quality service Indicator 1. National PI. The percentage of plans checked within 3 weeks of receipt. This PI has not been measured in the past, the baseline is an estimate from a sample size of 9% of the 1000 full applications received April 2001-2002. 2. National PI. The percentage of plans given a decision within 5 or 8 weeks. 2001/02 Baseline 2002/03 Target Original Sample estimate 40% Actual approx. 25% 70% 76% Based on original base line estimate of 40% 80% (top quartile AGMA) 2002/3 actual to (31.01.03) 28% Nov 02Jan 03 >67% Plans received in Jan 2003 were checked in <3weeks 62% 2002/3 1/9/0231/3/03 47% 76 % Plans received in March 2003 were checked in <3weeks 76% 3. National PI Percentage of inspections undertaken on the same day as requested (when requested before 10:00am.) 100% (top quartile) 100% 100% 100% 4. Local PI. The % of sites re-inspected within 3 months of last visit. N/A 95% 21% 30% 53.5 Complianc e level 55 No comparative data for benchmark 55 55 0 0 0 88% 88% 5. Local PI. Analyse compliance with the Code of Practice: DETR, Building Control Performance Standards 1999 (Green Guide) Implement appropriate systems and procedures, monitor level of compliance and customer satisfaction levels. National Indicator. Quality Performance Matrix- QPM Index (May 2002) 6. Number of formal complaints (upheld) 7. Local PI- Customer Satisfaction- % customers considering overall service to be “good” or “excellent” Comments Systems to monitor this PI have only recently been introduced - Sept 02. The original baseline estimate was optimistic. Staff reductions have impacted upon proposals, but the recent employment of agency staff / plan checker has made a significant impact on this figure. Rates are very high in relation to other metropolitan areas. Staff reductions have impacted on performance, emphasis has been placed on plan checking, the granting of decisions is dependent on the applicant amending their applications. Decision rates have improved in recent months This is a key aspect of our service. Due to the success in achieving this target it was considered that a more efficient monitoring method would be the recording of inspections that were not undertaken within this time frame. Monitoring the exceptions, due to the time involved in monitoring all inspection requests. There is however a need to develop an inspection policy in order to rationalise demands on this service. I.e prioritise the need for inspections in order to avoid unnecessary visits and unreasonable demands on surveyor’s time – statutory inspections only? Recent improvements have focused on reducing planchecking backlog. This PI is the next area to be addressed. Inspection numbers have been dramatically reduced due to reduction in staff numbers and addressing plan-checking rate. Recent staff losses have severely hindered progress in this area. Recruitment is in progress. This figure is unlikely to have changed. However, work has been undertaken on key issues impacting on this rating, such as: plan checking inspection regimes enforcement policy Enforcement policy has now been approved by Lead Member for Development Services. 0 N/A No formal complaints have been upheld. This years annual customer survey has yet to be undertaken. Consideration is now being given to the inclusion of questionnaires with all completion certificates. 3 Action Points Action Required Timetable Actual Progress Comments Short Term R1. Address existing backlog of applications, in order to ease the introduction of new working methods and focus attention on achieving new targets. 1. Reduce existing inspection levels to statutory requirements. 2. Combine working areas and implement team working principles to free up any spare capacity. Time scale to be adjusted in response to unexpected reduction in staff numbers. 1. Achieved: Inspections have been reduced to minimum statutory requirements. 2. Substantially achieved: Team working has been improved by increasing operational flexibility. Individual staff boundaries have been “blurred”. Surveyors assist with inspections for all team members freeing up office time for plan checking. 3. Collate and fast track all minor applications 3. Substantially achieved – use 4. Introduce overtime working as necessary. 4. Achieved The recent employment of an agency staff member (January 03) has produced a significant impact on plan checking rates and the number of outstanding applications. Increasing plan checking rates have “levelled off” following this short-term solution to this improvement area. Further improvements are currently under development to provide a more long-term solution. Improvements have been delayed due to the loss of another member of staff and difficulties in recruitment - this is a profession wide. Agency staff continue to provide a short term solution. In order to assist in the assessment of more complex schemes a specific room has been allocated for this purpose. of agency staff 5. In progress – further work 5. Discuss and address backlog of Fire Service consultations. 6. Develop staff awareness of the importance of the 3 week time scale required. Delays in the receipt of fire service consultations are significantly impacting decision times 6. Achieved: Performance management reports are now produced weekly and circulated to all staff. Staffs are becoming familiar with current performance and improvement targets. Performance reports are now produced for both teams and individuals. Performance figures have now been included on an office “White Board” recently introduced to record staff operations etc. Further “fine-tuning” of performance measures is required. 4 1. Further analysis of appropriate R2. Improving plan checking speed and quality in response to customer demands. The adoption of the DETR Building Control Performance Standards (BCPS) in relation to plan checking will provide a base line for speed and the quality of service. BCPS’s 2. Map existing process. 3. Identify and consult with key stakeholders 4. Consult with other service providers. 5. Consult with staff and customers to identify and develop key process issues. 6. Develop quality plan assessment systems 7. Formalise responses to all applications as appropriate. 8. Combine working areas and implement team working principles to free up any spare capacity. 9. Investigate fast track approach to smaller projects 10. Revisit existing QA procedures and adjust. October 2002-October 2003 To be reviewed in the light of agency contractual arrangement s 1. Substantially achieved 2. Achieved 3. Achieved 4. Substantially achieved 5. Achieved 6. Achieved 7. In progress 8. Substantially achieved 9. Substantially achieved – Long term solution under development 10. In progress Investigations have been undertaken to develop and review long term plan checking strategies. The office has now been radically restructured, originally 4 teams serviced the City. Teams have been amalgamated in order to improve efficiency and effectiveness. 2 teams have been formed, 1 team concentrating on Building Regulations and the other dealing with demolitions, security and licensing together with general Building Regs. This has also included the installation of additional computer systems and hardware. All staff have been supplied with PC’s. Computer systems are now in place to monitor processing speeds. Further work required Original estimates for plan checking speeds were optimistic, based on 10% of workload. This figure can now be accurately measured. Staff are now aware of the importance of inputting data on to the computer system. Plan checking Pro formas have now been developed to assist staff and improve quality. A part time agency worker has now been employed to address planchecking rates. Rates have improved dramatically, however they now appeared to have “levelled off”, improvement requires further development. May 2003 - 2 existing surveyors have been promoted to team leaders, to assist with the implementation of service improvements and performance management. Recruitment in progress Graduate Building Control Surveyor has recently gained professional status – MRICS. It is anticipated that she will now take on the role of District Building Control Surveyor. A further review of the office structure is currently in progress in order to provide a more long-term solution to plan checking improvements. In order to assist in the assessment of more complex schemes a specific room has been allocated for this purpose. 5 1. Analyse BCPS. Compare how R3. Revise inspection regimes, reducing numbers but improving quality, this will allow an increase in plan checking capacity. Develop and operate new inspection regimes in line with BCPS. This initiative should develop approximately 7-10 man hours / week. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. R4. Devolve staff recruitment to section manager in order to ensure staff resources are maintained and targets can be achieved. R5. Formalise working partnership arrangements with the Greater Manchester District Surveyors Association in order to improve plan checking capacity and speed up response times. we currently operate compared to the Green Guide on inspection levels Identify the issues important to customers Consult with other service providers Develop and revise inspection regime based on the Green Guide, rationalise inspection numbers, but improve quality. Develop risk assessment procedure in order to focus on key inspections. Rationalise individual inspection areas Improve flexibility and working arrangements 1. Resources need to be maintained in order to achieve targets. 1. Investigate procedures and costings for working partnership with GM Authorities July2002July2003 To be reviewed in light of recent staff losses 1. Substantially achieved 2. Achieved 3. Substantially achieved 4. In progress 5. – Inspections have been reduced to statutory requirements. This has not however freed up time due to reductions in staff numbers A formal inspection regime is currently being developed to be included with all application decision notices Further work is required improve efficiency of inspection process and allow time for plan assessment improvements. Improvements have been delayed due to the loss of another member of staff. 6. Substantially achieved 7. Substantially achieved October 2002 – October 2003 October December 2002 To be reviewed. In progress: An agency staff member has recently been employed. 1. In progress: We continue to liase closely with neighbouring authorities, regularly attending local DSA meetings. This is a key area in order to maintain and improve performance. i.e specialised areas such as the service given to the Health Authority (Pendlebury and Hope Hospital) have been compromised. No progress at Greater Manchester DSA level. All regional LABC services are suffering from staffing difficulties. The proposed Strategic Partnership may influence potential working arrangements. 6 R6. Create more staff flexibility within the service in order to address fluctuating workload demands. Workload should be considered an office problem, not an individuals. R7. Investigate effectiveness of national partnering schemes with major developers to ensure that this work can be undertaken successfully without adversely impacting on local services. 1. Removal of individual area boundaries and develop team working principles. 2. Create an overtime budget policy. 3. Formalise criteria for employing temporary agency staff. 1. Investigate Impact on other services ie. plan assessment times generally. 2. Develop time monitoring system. 3. Investigate need for: Overtime, Performance related pay Temp staffing October December 2002 To be reviewed 1. Substantially achieved 2. In progress Reducing the number of teams and changing our operational approach has improved flexibility and optimised efficiency with reduced staff numbers. 2 team leaders have been appointed in order to assist with workload distribution. 3. In progress 1. Achieved October December 2002 To be reviewed 2. In progress Overtime is used on an ad hoc basis, formalisation is required based on demand. 7 Medium term R8. Improve and monitor working practises and arrangements in conformity with DETR Building Control Performance Standards, ensuring that overall service quality is maintained and improved whilst addressing the plan checking issue. 1. Develop Building Control Policy 2. Develop enforcement policy 3. Develop resource monitoring systems 4. Enhance consultation process 5. Monitor level of conformity through the adoption and use of QPM Matrix. 6. Revisit QA Manuals and adjust 1. Substantially achieved January 2003December 2004 2. Substantially achieved 3. Performance management systems are now in placefurther development is in progress. Work has been undertaken on the development of: Plan Checking pro formas Inspection Regimes Enforcement Policy has been drafted and approved by the Lead Member 4. The need to improve both the fire service and structures consultation process has been identified as causing substantial time delays. The consultation process with United Utilities requires further development. 5. Substantially achieved – reassessment required. 6. Any changes to process will be reflected in the QA Manual. 8 R9. Expand the use of home working to improve efficiency and increase time available for plan checking and inspections. R10. Develop training structure to ensure staff are kept informed of changing technical issues and the business / organisational environment 1. Identify demand and analyse potential benefits. 2. Identify staff for pilot home working scheme 3. Investigate suitability of “home office” for working. 4. Move desk and computers, including IT and phone connections etc. 5. Commence home working 1. Improve effectiveness of appraisal system 2. Audit skills and competencies of staff. 3. Identify staff with expertise and interest in specific technical, marketing, IT issues etc 4. Monitor CPD 5. Develop technical training structure. 6. Readdress existing RICS training manual. 7. Investigate the benefits and feasibility of performance related pay. January 2003July2004 1. Substantially Achieved: Home working has been practised by a number of staff, improving plan-checking rates. Further development is necessary without compromising office efficiency. October 2002October 2003 In progress: This area is currently under consideration following recent staff appraisals. One member of staff has been appointed as CPD / training co-ordinator. Monthly staff meetings to include technical feed back session. Training is being considered in conjunction with members of the user panel. 9 R11. Develop a performance culture within the section to ensure a strong focus is maintained on improving plan checking speed without loosing other quality features. 1. Ensure PI’s are monitored accurately 2. Create team and productivity targets 3. Introduce staff training/team bonding eg. Lledr Hall 4. Link target setting to the staff appraisal process July2002July2004 1. Substantially achieved: The production of weekly performance reports has lead to more emphasis on team performance. Further development required 2. Substantially achieved: Weekly performance reports are now circulated to all staff. 3. Substantially achieved: 4. To be introduced into this years appraisal process (November/December 2003) Recent staff appraisals have emphasised improvements and objectives of the Service Improvement Plan together with linkages to Corporate Pledges. The installation of PC’s for all staff now allows the development of appropriate performance measures. The BV Service Improvement Plan was linked to last years staff apparaisal. Long Term 1. In progress 1. Implement Oce process R12. Enhance the effectiveness of IT usage within the section, in order to optimise capacity and assist in the improvement of performance management 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. review in order to move to a digitally based service. Optimise use of existing Uniform system Investigate further use of GIS Investigate e-consultations Document imaging Investigate use of on-site electronics/ palm tops etc Develop concept of electronic submissions Develop bespoke training to ensure all staff have fundamental IT expertise. October2002July 2005 2. Substantially achieved 3. In progress 4. In progress with Document Imaging system 5. In progress 6. Developing Additional computers are now in place. Each member of staff now has access to their own PC. Staff are therefore making more use of the UNIFORM system to monitor work. Staff are now more confident in using the system. However, further training is necessary. Standard templates are currently being developed i.e. fax letters, memos, standard letters, standardised legal notices. The upgrading of the Uniform System has now been commissioned with CAPS. Work has commenced on the implementation of a Data Management system. 7. Under review at regional DSA level. 8. In progress 10 Improve Building Control’s Contribution to a “Safer Salford” Indicator 8. Local PI Licensing- To inspect premise within 2 weeks of notification This indicator is under further development 9. Local PI Demolition- No of fatalities on demolition sites under the direct supervision of Building Control. 10. Local PI- % Dangers of dangerous buildings inspected: Working time- within 1 hour - 60 total Out of hours within 2 hours – 8 total 11. NEW: Local PI: The Average time from being notified a building is empty to demolition commencing on site. For a project which currently takes 18 weeks. 12. NEW: Local PI: The average time from receiving notification of existence of insecure property to commencement of legal proceedings – private dwelling Measured by undertaking regular monitoring exercises. 12 (2). NEW: Local PI: The average time from expiry of legal process to the securing of the property, in default – private dwelling Measured by undertaking regular monitoring exercises. 13. NEW: Local PI: The average time from receiving notification to board up a dwelling to actual board up – local authority dwelling To be measured by undertaking regular monitoring exercises. 2002/03 Target 2002/3 period Sept 2002– Jan 2003 2002/2003 Sept 2002 – March 2003 100% 100% 100% 100% 0 0 0 0 98% 98% 99% 99% 77.7% 90% 83% 75% 18 17.5 16 16 24 hours 24 hours 24 hours 24 hours 24 hours 24 hours 24 hours 24 hours 24 hours 24 hours 24 hours 24 hours 2001/02 Baseline TO BE MONITORED ON AN ANNUAL BASIS 11 Action Points Short Term R13. Improve efficiency and effectiveness of the demolition process in order to minimise nuisance to Salford citizens and improve the local environment. Action Required Timetable Investigate a partnership with a demolition contractor to reduce tendering and evaluation time and therefore speed up the time scale. Better communicate the demolition process to the community and councillors October 2002 – March 2003 To be reviewed In progress Discussions with contractors, National Federation of Demolition Contractors and New Prospect Housing procurement section have taken place. October 2002 – March 2003 To be reviewed In progress Continued progress Investigate how a partnership with the utilities could speed up their response times October 2002 – March 2003 To be reviewed October 2002 – March 2003 To be reviewed October 2002 – March 2003 In progress Joint pamphlet with Housing produced with reference to work in Lower Broughton. Guidance notes for both residents and elected members have been produced. Letters to Utilities sent Sept 02. Response only from UU Erect signs on the demolition project making people aware that progress is taking place. Seek additional funding of £60,000 to establish a demolition, security, dangers team to ensure a more responsive and customer focussed service. Establish a budget of £20,000 for securing private sector properties, which may not recovered to ensure swift action can be taken by building control. Develop effective administration process, optimise use of Uniform system Actual Progress Comments (Norweb) Still no reply from TRANSCO or UU Water In progress SALI Group produce banners for display on high profile sites. Promotional signage for general use to be developed. Substantially achieved The Crime and Disorder Group have recently funded the employment of an additional member of staff to undertake building security work throughout the City. October 2002 – March 2003 Substantially achieved: A budget of £13,000 has been obtained to assist in improving the effectiveness of the security service. There is a more proactive approach to securing private sector properties. October 2002 – October 2003 In Progress: The administration process is currently under review. Including the review of requisition procedures. Development of bespoke database to record actions and contractual orders is under way. Consultation with New Prospect has identified areas for improvement. City Treasurers investigating how bespoke database can link into SAP system. 12 1. Review existing process and R14. Improve the efficiency and effectiveness of dangerous structures service in order to ensure “a safer Salford”. contribution to a “safer Salford” 2. Identify and consult with 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. stakeholders Consult with other providers Review out of hours service Improve administration process optimise use of Uniform system Review cost of the service Consider development of dedicated team Investigate alternative service provider, consider joint venture with adjacent authority Introduce new emergency callout system October 2002October2003 To be reviewed 1. Substantially achieved 2. Substantially achieved 3. Substantially achieved 4. Substantially achieved 5. In progress Administration is under review and formal notices have been standardised. Formal callout rotas have recently been established to respond to problems associated with the recent Fire Service Dispute Salford and Langworthy Initiative Callout Rota is still in operation – Permanent week day presence within this area. A more proactive approach is now being taken with security issues in this area. 6. In progess 7. Substantially achieved 8. To be progressed 9. In progress 13 R15. Improve efficiency of licensing service in order to ensure “a safer Salford”. 1. Review existing process 2. Identify and consult with stakeholders 3. Consult with other providers. 4. Extend expertise within the October 2002-October 2004 1. Achieved 2. Achieved 3. Achieved section. 5. Improve existing performance indicator. 6. Investigate appropriate funding, allocate cost to duty. 7. Develop concept of risk assessment based inspection regime. 8. Raise profile internally and externally: 9. Promotional material and attendance at licensing committee. 10. Rationalisation of enforcement procedures, including out of hours inspections to ensure compliance with licence conditions 4. In progress Proposed changes in legislation (2004) will have a major impact on responsibilities and demands on this service. Discussions are in progress with Corporate Services to investigate changes in service provision. 5. In progress 6. In progress 7. To be Progressed 8. To be Progressed 9. To be Progressed 10. To be Progressed 14 Maintain and Improve Market Share and the self-financing of the Building Regulations Service to minimise service costs to Salford Citizens Indicator 2001/2 Baseline 2002/03 Target 2002/3 actual to date Sept 2002 - Jan 2003 14. The percentage housing market share achieved by the service. Number of service providers is increasing all the time, market share will be extremely difficult to maintain. 84% (top quartile) 84% 78% Outstanding data from private sector 15. The percentage commercial and industrial market share achieved by the service. Number of service providers is increasing all the time, market share will be extremely difficult to maintain. 76% 76% 76% 100% (top quartile) 100% Annual measure 16. Building Regulation Self Financing Rate TO BE REVIEWED ON AN ANNUAL BASIS 15 Action Points Short Term R16. Focus service on local customer demands. Produce an outline marketing strategy for the service to target local customers, specific demands and potential partners, review on an annual basis. R17. Develop and promote the benefits of the web site beyond statutory guidance to further engage customers R18. Align fees with all other Greater Manchester Authorities, in order to provide a uniform local approach. Actions Required 1. Develop marketing team 2. Analyse and monitor local Timescale July 2002 – July 2003 Actual Progress 1. – 2. To be progressed business environment. 3. Develop links with national 3. To be progressed marketing team. Ensure all staff of familiar with national strategy and associated service initiatives. LANTAC, Partnering, Warranties. 4. Forge links with local business community 5. Develop focus groups inc developers and designers. 6. Form marketing relationship with other LA’s 7. Customer database 8. Guidance information 9. Monitor market share 10. Investigate additional partnering, resource implications. 11. Internal promotion 12. Promotional literature. 4. To be progressed Adjust marketing budget as necessary. The Web Site is still proving useful. Promotional material has been drafted to include with all decision notices Draft promotional material is now with the Graphics Section Interactive promotional CD is currently under development. 5. Substantially achieved 6. Achieved 7. Achieved 8. Achieved 9. Achieved 10. To be Progressed 11. To be progressed 12. To be progressed 1. Achieved 1. Promote web site via all correspondence Comments May 2002May 2007 1. Achieved 1. Review trading account annually. Fees are now aligned with Greater Manchester DSA May 2002 16 R19. Produce a promotional brochure to encourage new business. 1. Develop material and publish by January 2003 July 2002July2003 Promotional document has been drafted. Now with Graphics Section. Interactive promotional CD is currently under development. 1. Substantially achieved Improve the Provision of Customer Information Relating to Service Procedures, Benefits and Associated Building Issues, together with Improved Service Accessibility Indicator 17. Information on service standards published and made available to users 2001/02 Baseline 2002/3 Target 2002/3 actual to date No Info Under development Language line adopted 10% 18. Publish information in alternative languages. in various languages 0 Full Info Full 19. %Services available on line 0 10% Action Point Short Term Action Required Timetable Actual Progress 1. In progress R20. Produce brochures and other forms of media to publicise service standards. 1. Refine existing drafts and consult with graphics October 2002July2003 Comments A draft service guide has been produced. Service standards are promoted on the web site and within the reception area. Interactive promotional CD is currently under development. 17 1. In progress R21. Introduce Development Team Approach. (DTA) 1. Develop DTA 2. Expand team: Environmental Health, Geological unit, Fire and Police Service? 3. Selection criteria, more flexibility? 4. Promote benefits of service, internally and externally. 5. Guidance literature R22. Produce leaflets in other languages promoting the service. R23. Improve planning counter by working to action plan. R26. Publish standards and PI’s on web site and promotional poster within reception. New DTA brochure published “Language Line” has now been formally adopted. All staff have attended training video 1. Consult With Personnel 2. Adopt Corporate strategy 3. Respond to customer demands October 2002July2003 1. Highlight columns in Foyer with November 2002 – October 2003 Achieved: Improvements have been made to the reception area. Improvements have been undertaken, including availability of guidance information, decoration, alterations to reception desk, access to offices, signage etc 1. Develop user friendly forms July 2002 – January 2003 Achieved: New clearer application forms have been produced (Plain English) Now in use 1. Monitor customer demands 2. Monitor competition July 2002 – 2003 In progress Continued progress, additional guidance notes have been added 1. Liase with IT Communications 2. Develop promotional material January 2003 In progress No further progress a band of contrasting colours. 2. Revise Reception furniture layout . Change signage . Put leaflets in suitable display stands. R24. Produce clearer application forms and reduce the number required. R25. Extend services and information available on the Web Site. November 2002 – October 2003 18 Long Term R27. Bid for a Charter mark for the service. This will demonstrate a customer focussed service and lead to further improvements 1. Produce draft 2. Submit bid Awaiting final guidance from new assessment criteria. 2003 2004 Improving and Monitoring the Service Through the Development of Performance and Information Management Indicator 20. Adoption and monitoring of AGMA Performance Indicators 2001/02 Baseline 2002/3 Target 2002/3 actual to date 0% Adopted 80% 80% NO PROGRESS 19 Action Point Short Term Action Required 1. AGMA PI,s and develop R28. Develop an improved performance monitoring system in order to ensure a cost effective service and maximise efficiency. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. monitoring systems Develop productivity PI’s Closer working links with GM DSA Investigate National benchmarking Develop time monitoring system Project unit costing. Monitor individual team productivity, fee / time relationships BC BR split analyse CIPFA , Investigate service overheads. Investigate level of performance in relation to non-fee income building control work directly impacting on organisational objectives. Optimise use of Uniform system in order to generate regular performance reports. Timetable Actual Progress 1. Substantially achieved: Recent 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. computer installations now allow the introduction of more effective performance management systems. Achieved: Monitoring systems are now in place. Achieved In progress In progress: Weekly performance reports are now produced. In progress: Productivity measures are inplace. In progress Substantially achieved: UNIFORM system is now being used more effectively. Comments Further work is required on the refinement of performance measures. A new time sheet has been produced, further work is required to develop effective unit cost measures and BC/BR split. Further work required to develop and collate effective benchmarking data.. Performance is also reported on the new office “White Board” No further progress 20 CITY OF SALFORD BUILDING CONTROL SERVICES Service Improvement Summary - June 2003 Building Control’s Service Improvement Plan was initially implemented in September 2003, numerous improvements have been undertaken and initiated within this relatively short period, including: 2 team leaders have been created (internal promotion) in order to assist with the development of service improvements and improve effectiveness of performance management systems. The office has been radically restructured. 4 teams have been merged into 2, with specific responsibilities for fundamental corporate pledges. Further improvements to team working arrangements are under development. New computer systems have been installed giving all staff access to their own PC. Staff are now making more use of the existing operating system, allowing productivity to be more effectively measured. An updated operating system has been commissioned, GIS based. Work has begun on developing a data management system, digitising all information. Work is in progress on developing standardised templates for all correspondence and legal notices, new and simpler application forms have been introduced. Performance management systems have been introduced, a weekly performance report is circulated to all staff and displayed on a new office “white board”. Further refinement is taking place to enhance productivity indicators. Team working has been improved, increasing operational flexibility and effectiveness. Inspections have been reduced to statutory requirements where possible, a result of staff cutbacks and the need to address plan checking rates. Formal inspection regimes are under development. A part time agency surveyor commenced employment in January, aimed specifically at assisting with the Building Regulation Service. This is still working well, plan-checking rates have stabilised, further work is required to introduce a long term solution, this has been hindered by the loss of another member of staff. An additional staff member has been funded by the Crime and Disorder Group to deal with building security throughout the City. This has enabled a very fast response to the need to secure private, unsecured property A demolition and security team has now been set up to develop a more proactive approach to this service. A security database is currently under development in conjunction with the Authorities SAP team. A number of promotional leaflets have been drafted and are currently with the Graphics Section. A formal enforcement policy has been approved by the Lead Member Further guidance note /links have been added to the Building Control Web site Numerous guidance documents are now available at the reception. Progress toward performance targets has been somewhat compromised by recent staff reductions, in the last 12 months 4.5 Building Control Surveyors have been lost, including 2 group leaders (2002). This situation has been further aggravated by the loss of another member of staff and associated problems with recruitment (March 2003). THE KEY AREA IDENTIFIED FOR SERVICE IMPROVEMENT – PLAN CHECKING RATES - HAS IMPROVED DRAMATICALLY. % of applications received in November 2002, and checked in less than 3 weeks % of applications received in March 2003, and checked in less than 3 weeks Approx 25% 76% Whilst original performance targets were somewhat challenging improvements are making a significant impact on the sections performance. 21 Report to Environmental Scrutiny Committee Development Control Improvement Plan Progress Update, June 2003 The Speed of Processing of Planning Applications Percentage of Planning Applications determined by Officers Indicator 1. Percentage of major planning applications given a decision within 13 weeks government target 60% - BVPI 109a) 2. Percentage of minor planning applications given a decision within 8 weeks (government target 65% - BVPI 109b) 3. Percentage of other planning applications given a decision within 8 weeks (government target 80% - BVPI 109c) 4. The time from initial receipt of a planning application to and arriving with the case officer. 5. The number of decisions delegated to officers as a percentage of all decisions, (government target of 90% to be achieved by all authorities every year – BVPI 188) 6. The number of Tree Preservation Order Applications determined within 6 weeks 2001/2 Baseline 33% 2002/3 target 2002/3 actual 60% 60.24% 60% 65% 68.08% 77% 80% 82% 11 days Within 3 days 65.7% 90% 7.75 days (1.04.03 to 31.05.03 is 4.83 days) 71.5% 36% 50% 54.2% 22 Action Point R1 Implement Oce process review to move to a digitally based service R2 Extend the use of GIS to speed processes up and improve quality including:- accuracy of data reliability and consistency of data comparison of multiple data seta Action Required Send out to tender Timetable August 2002 Actual Progress Achieved Appoint FM contractor October 2002 Achieved Implement action plan November 2002 Progressing - Pilot document management project being initiated Plot applications Input and correct constraint and historic data to speed up flow and improve accuracy Comments Annite commissioned to provide Eclipse software for document management project in common with other Council functions. Process review undertaken by Annite, hardware ordered and tested Achieved March 2004 In progress Constraints now plotted include: Coal Mining Areas Floodplain Wildlife corridors Sites of Special Biological Importance Removal of Permitted Development School Telecommunication zones Listed Buildings Conservation Areas Enforcement Pre-application enquiries Tree preservation Orders Telecommunications roll-out programmes Landfill sites Public Rights of Way District/key local centres 23 Upgrade computer system to integrate with GIS (Uniform version 7) June 2003 In progress Introduce use of postcodes 2003/2004 Included in computer system upgrade In progress Acquire and install higher spec computers Obtain authority for DC Manager to recruit establishment posts under delegated authority 2002/2003 Due to be installed September, 2003 (date adjusted to avoid document management system being installed at the same time Computers all installed R3 Ensure adequate staffing levels and flexible structure Flexibility of structure achieved through use of small applications team R4 Further develop the performance culture Focus staff on key improvements Respond to peaks of work and specific tasks by use of contract services Incorporate performance issues and target setting into appraisal system Staff training October 2002 Achieved Small applications team established. This team, led by a Principal Planning Officer supports the 2 area teams (north and south). Budget allocated Planning Consultants engaged for planning appeal (Public Inquiry) Achieved Achieved 24 R5 Modernise how the City Council consults with regular users to secure quicker and more efficient transactions Develop electronic consultation with consultees Commence consultation with regular customers via email E-consultation with all consultees April 2003 September 2003 Limited interest, however, this will follow the establishment of document management and upgrade of planning applications computer system. Both projects have been initiated. April 2004 R6 Increase the percentage Review scheme of of planning applications delegation determined by officers Report to Lead Member May 2002 Achieved June 2002 Achieved Report to Chair of Panel July 2002 Achieved July/August 2002 Achieved Consult Planning User Panel September 2002 Achieved Report to Cabinet and Council September 2002 Introduce and publicise new scheme October 2002 Community Committee consultation substantially achieved. Introduce April 2003 Consult all elected members This will be introduced with document imaging. For example, United Utilities and Environmental Health are prepared for this. Revise Scheme of Delegation due to be considered by Council on 18th June 2003 25 R7 Improve the speed of processing Tree Preservation Order applications Additional staff (planning assistant) Use of GIS – TPO data Achieved 2002/2003 Digitising of TPO data has commenced. Achieved 2003/2004 This will follow introduction of planning applications computer system upgrade. Arboricultural advice R8 Improve access to service Install public access package to Uniform version 7 The target for the speed of processing of applications relating to Tree Preservation Orders is being exceeded A Web based facility is included with the Eclipse Document Management system A Public Access package will be supplied by CAPS (part of the Uniform system) Engage with corporate GIS development to facilitate customer access to service data including location of TPOs, listed buildings, conservation areas. 2004 26 Customer Relations Indicator 1. Number of hours the office is open to visitors 2. Percentage of applications that can be submitted on line 3. Planning Information available to minority groups 4. Customer Satisfaction – The percentage of customers satisfied with the service they received (Top Quartile – 81%) Action Point R9 Extend opening hours on Thursdays from 8.00am to 7.00pm Action Required Produce protocol Consult staff Liaise with Building Managers re opening, security issues etc Publicise Staff rota Commence opening R10 Improve the web site Enable applications to be submitted via the web 2001/2 Baseline 37 hours per week NIL 2002/3 target 40 hours per week NIL Produce multilingual pamphlet 87% (2000/2001) No target for 2002/2003 Survey to be undertaken 2003/2004 2002/3 actual 40 hours per week NIL Pamphlets produced and available in reception _ Timetable Commence opening 26 September 2002 Actual Progress Achieved Opening commenced on 3rd October, 2002. Comments January 2004 Signed up to planning portal Planning applications can now be submitted electronically 27 Incorporate search facility Upgrade of planning application computer system confirmed – this includes public access module and search facility Public access to database R11 Improve access to the service by Black and ethnic minority groups Produce multi-lingual leaflet and poster promoting the service 2002/2003 Achieved Language-line adopted by City Council Promote service with talking news In progress R12 Improve reception by implementing reception action plan Highlight columns making them more visible Improve layout of reception furniture Provide better stands for documents November 2002 to April 2003 Achieved R13 Publish service standards and information on planning applications on web site and poster in reception R14 Introduce Duty Officer system Update website Produce poster Achieved and review annually Achieved and review regularly January 2003 Achieved Establish protocol Train staff Produce rota 28 Medium Term R15 Submit charter mark bid to maintain continual improvement on customers issues R16 Implement Peer Review Group 4 strategy Produce draft Submit bid 2003/2004 This will be progressed when the assessment/application criteria is finalised Monitor black and ethnic minorities Improve access to service 2003/2004 Monitoring commenced Impact assessment of Planning and Transportation Regulatory Panel and planning application process being undertaken. Monitoring commenced. Monitoring took place in 2000/2001 and will be repeated in 2003/2004 Initial Assessments of Planning and Transportation Regulatory Panel completed. Draft Initial Assessments of Supplementary Planning Guidance in respect of House Extensions and Designing Out Crime drafted. Enforcement Charter and Publicity for Planning Applications to be undertaken by 30th June 2003. Long Term R17 Develop strategy for access to services via Contact Centre and One Stop Shop Engage with corporate strategy 2004/2005 Implementing corporate document management system to link with Contact Centre and One Stop Shops Progressing with development of ICT and information systems to facilitate this 29 Quality of Outcomes/Added Value Indicator 1. The percentage of plans which have been amended prior to a decision being taken to improve quality of outcome 2001/2 Baseline No data 2. The number of maladministration findings 3. The percentage of appeals allowed 4. Percentage of enforcement cases resolved within 13 weeks 5. Number of formal complaints about the service (nonombudsman & upheld) 6. % of S.106 Agreements (planning gain) secured and required by policy 7. Applicants of 50% of major planning applications engaged with Development Team 1 35% Action Point Short Term R18 Publicise the Development Team Approach R19 Proactive compliance checking R20 Adopt SPG for Telecommunications Action Required Timetable Complete consultation Approval by Council 100% 100% 100% - 25% 13.4% 0 38% 78.9% 0 Actual Progress Comments Achieved and progressing Development Team Approach Leaflet produced 2003/2004 Commence April 2003 Draft report produced January 2003 March 2003 Not Achieved Some rewording of the document necessary to use plainer language. This Consultation in progress Publicised on the website and ongoing Establish framework Link with Building Control Train staff Publicise 2002/3 actual 206/1548 13.3% 0 2002/3 target 131/1326 9.9% (2002/3 actual to 31.12.02) 0 35% 70% 0 30 R21 Introduce members review of decisions Medium Term R22 Produce Planning Application checklist to improve quality of submission of planning applications R23 Review staff manual on consultation R24 Review existing SPG for Hot Food Uses followed community committee consultation. Expected completion June 2003 Achieved Inspection undertaken November 2002 Produce protocol Introduce members inspection 2002/2003 Adopt national planning application checklist 2003/2004 Prior to adoption of national planning checklist, Draft Check list has been produced Produce staff manual Train Staff 2003/2004 Await issue of Government proposals in respect of revisions to Use Classes Order Report to Lead Member Consultation Address responses Lead Member Council 2003/2004 Progressing Draft manual has been produced Staff training on consultation has commenced Government proposals on changes to Use Classes Order not yet issued Draft checklist for house extensions has been produced 31 R25 Commission Greater Manchester Geological Unit to monitor major minerals and waste development and ensure compliance with conditions Long Term R26 Produce new Supplementary Planning Guidance and review existing following review of Unitary Development Plan Produce service agreement Implement 2003/2004 A range of topics will be 2003/2004/2005 identified by the reviewed UDP which will require the production of SPG Progressing GMGU commissioned on case basis The topics identified for SPG in the first deposit draft UDP have been identified Transparency, Probity, Fairness and Consistency in Decision-Making Indicator 2001/2 Baseline 2002/3 target Number of award of costs against City Council 0 0 2002/3 actual to date 0 Number of complaints received and upheld relating to local Code of Conduct 0 1 1 Number of complaints received and referred to National Standards Committee and upheld 0 0 0 32 Action Point Short Term R27 Revise Local Code of Conduct for Officers and Members dealing with planning matters in light of new publicised national and LGA guidance R28 Produce Quality Assurance procedure for Planning and Transportation Regulatory Panel Action Required Produce report Report to Lead Member Report to Council Implement and train staff and members Produce draft procedure Report to Lead Member and Chair of Regulatory Panel Consult members Train Members Implement Timetable Actual Progress Comments 2002/2003 Substantially Achieved Code of conduct has been revised. Reported to Lead Member 2nd December 2002 Reported to Standards Committee on 2nd December 2002 Reported to Planning and Transportation Regulatory Panel on 19th December 2002 Awaiting comments of District Audit – aim to report to Council March, 2003 Adopted by Council in May, 2003. Achieved Achieved April 2002 June 2002 Achieved Achieved Achieved Achieved September 2002 Reported to Lead Member with final draft December 2002 Reported to Regulatory Panel December 2002 Approved by Chairman of Regulatory Panel January 2003 Implemented January 2003 March 2003 2002/2003 33 Medium Term R29 Produce policy on achieving a responsive dialogue with local people rather than just consultation (see Camden and Wirral) R30 Improve reporting of planning applications to Planning and Transportation Regulatory Panel Undertake research Produce draft policy Report to Lead Member Undertake consultation Report to Lead Member Train staff/implement and publicise March 2003 September 2003 October 2003 November 2003 February 2003 March 2004 Improve layout of furniture in committee room Introduce more effective presentation techniques Improve access to committee rooms Improve customer care 2004 Commence project in March 2003 In progress Reported to Lead Member and Regulatory Panel in May, 2003. This item brought forward to take advantage of ICT improvements, improve customer and customer involvement and take account of increased levels of officer delegation in respect of planning applications providing members with more time to consider major and contentious matters at the Panel. 34 Overall Conclusions The critical Best Value Performance Indicators relate to the speed of processing of planning applications and the percentage of planning applications determined by Officers. The performance has improved in each of the categories and the targets have been exceeded for minor (BVPI 109b) and other (BVPI109c) planning applications and achieved for major planning applications (BVPI 109a). The Government has also specified that 90% of planning applications should be determined by officers (BVPI 188). Although performance has improved from 65.7% in 2001/2002 to 71.5% in 2002/2003, the target of 90% has not been achieved. To address this, Council will be considering a proposal to increase the level of officer delegation at the meeting of the 18th June, 2003. In terms of Customer Relations, the office has extended opening on Thursdays (R9) and access to the service has substantially improved through the introduction of the website (R10) and the adoption of languageline (R11). Leaflets have also been produced in a range of languages which explain the development control process. An Equalities Strategy has been produced in line with the recommendations of the Peer Group Review and initial assessments has been completed in respect of the Planning and Transportation Regulatory Panel. Draft assessments have been completed for Supplementary Planning Guidance for House Extensions and Designing Out Crime. Quality of Outcomes/Added Value is a critical area of the planning system and the results are very positive in this area. There have been no findings of maladministration. An improvement is in the area of planning appeals. Indicator 7 states that no more than 35% of appeals against planning decisions should be allowed. The figure of 42% reported to you in February, 2003 for the period 1st April, 2002 to 31st December, 2002 has improved to a figure of 38% for the full financial year. The principal reason for this is the importance Planning Inspectors are placing on the Supplementary Planning Guidance for House Extensions which they are generally accepting. Enforcement is exceeding the target whilst planning gain is being secured when required in all cases. More major planning applications are subject to the Development Team Approach (target is 25%) than was last reported (7.5%) – the figure has improved to 13.4% for the year. The Development Planning Best Value review Improvement Plan indicates the DTA will be reviewed in summer 2003. A significant improvement is the member review of planning decisions. This was a valuable exercise involving members and officers with an external perspective provided by Doctor Roy Darke of Oxford Brookes University Planning School. He also provided a very positive assessment of the event. The indicators for Transparency, Probity, Fairness and Consistency in Decision-making are positive. There were no awards of costs against the City Council on planning appeals, no upheld complaints to National Standards Committee and one upheld by the Standards Board. Overall, good progress is being made in achieving the aims of the best value review. 35