Community impact assessment form
Page 1 of 42
Community impact assessment screening process
Person(s) responsible for the assessment
(Please note that it is advisable that you undertake your community impact assessment
in a group)
David Greenfield and Daniel Welsh (Physical Regeneration Team)
Directorate
Sustainable Regeneration
Name of function to be assessed (this can be a policy, procedure, strategy or service)
Consultation Draft Crescent Development Framework
Date of assessment July 2011
Is this a function that is new – Yes, this is a new
Strategy
1. Please provide a brief description of the function or the proposed change to the
function
The Draft Framework will be used as the basis for public consultation on proposals for the
Crescent area of Salford. A boundary of the area that will be covered by the Development
Framework is provided as Annex 1.
2. What are the aims of the service, strategy, policy or procedure?
The purpose of the Crescent Development Framework is to:







Provide a clear vision to steer the transformation of this area into a vibrant and modern
part of the Regional Centre;
Provide guidance on built form and design in the area;
Identify viable uses for sites currently or likely to become available for development over
the next decade and beyond;
Set out a programme for the implementation of the various development proposals
being taken forward in the area;
Set out the planning policy context for the area by providing more detailed guidance on
the application of UDP Policy MX1 (Development in Mixed Use Areas);
Co-ordinate the various projects being delivered by a range of different stakeholders in
the area to ensure integrated and co-ordinated regeneration; and
Form the basis for public consultation to ensure the final Development Framework
reflects the aspirations of residents, businesses, landowners and other key stakeholders
with an interest in the future of the area.
Consultation on the Draft Framework will be undertaken to ensure that the final Development
Framework reflects the aspirations of residents, business, landowners and other key
stakeholders with an interest in the future of the Crescent area.
Page 2 of 42
3. If you are considering a strategy or service, please list any related policies
The council’s existing planning policy framework. This includes the adopted Unitary
Development Plan 2004-16 and its supporting documents and the adopted and emerging
documents
which
make
up
Salford’s
Local
Development
Framework.
Specific planning policies contained in the City of Salford Unitary Development Plan 2004-16
which relate directly to the area covered by the Development Framework are as follows:





Policy CH2: Development Affecting the Setting of a Listed Building
Policy CH3/2: Works within Conservation Areas (The Crescent)
Policy E2: Innovation Park
Policy R4/5: Key Recreation Areas (Peel Park / The Meadows)
Policy MX 1 Chapel Street West
Further information on the range of planning policy documents that set the framework for
planning in the city and should therefore be read alongside the Development Framework can
be found on the council’s website using the following link:
http://www.salford.gov.uk/planning-policy.htm
4. Please list any group who has an interest in or who will benefit from the function (this
can include service users, stakeholders, beneficiaries).
The future regeneration of the Crescent area will be of interest and benefit to a wide range of
parties including:

Residents, businesses and landowners within the area

The University of Salford and its students

Registered social landlords

Developers (existing and potential)

The voluntary sector and local community groups

Decision makers (for example Urban Vision’s Development Management team)
5. Please list any aspects of your service or policy which are delivered externally or with
external partners.
It is to be expected that the vast majority of development in the area will be delivered by private
developers. In addition, Urban Vision (who provide the City Council’s Development
Management function) will deal with planning applications for development in the area.
Page 3 of 42
6. Is there any evidence of higher or lower participation or uptake by different groups?
Socio-economic
Yes
Race
Yes
Age
Yes
Religion and/ or belief
Yes
Disability
Yes
Sexual identity
No
Gender
Yes
7. Is there any evidence that different groups have different needs, experiences, issues
and priorities in relation to this function?
Socio-economic
Yes
Race
Yes
Age
Yes
Religion and/ or belief
Yes
Disability
Yes
Sexual identity
Don’t know
Gender
Yes
8. Is there an opportunity to better promote equality and diversity or better community
relations for the following groups, by working with others? e.g. partners, community and
voluntary groups?
Socio-economic
Yes
Race
Yes
Age
Yes
Religion and/ or belief
Yes
Disability
Yes
Sexual identity
Don't Know
Gender
Yes
9. Have consultations with relevant groups, organisations or individuals indicated that
this policy creates problems that are specific to them?
Socio-economic
N/A
Race
N/A
Age
N/A
Religion and/ or belief
N/A
Disability
N/A
Sexual identity
N/A
Gender
N/A
As stated previously, the Draft Framework will be subject to public consultation but this
consultation has not yet occurred.
If your have answered ‘yes’ to the last four sections you will need to complete the rest of
the form, If you have answered ‘no’ to them please complete the next box and return to
your directorate equality lead officer.
Page 4 of 42
Comments
Date sent to directorate equality lead officer
Screening received and reviewed by directorate equality lead officer
Name
Date
Signed
Full community impact assessment
Narrowing the gap – socio-economic inequality
Please consider the following areas… please click here
Page 5 of 42
1. How does the service ‘narrow the gap’ and reduce the extent to which outcomes are
dependent on income?
At this stage the document is in consultation draft form and will be subject to consultation with a
wide range of stakeholders. In its present form the document contains a number of proposals
which will assist in ‘narrowing the gap’, including:

Proposals for new residential development which will Increase the range of housing
available in area. It is anticipated that housing will be mixed, with some private market
and some affordable housing to be provided. The proposed mix of housing to be taken
forward in the final document will depend on the outcome of the consultation exercise
and responses to the Draft Development framework from a range of stakeholders with
an interest in future housing provision in the area;

Proposals to improve the quality of existing employment areas and provide new
employment uses. While the document will set out the types of employment uses that
may be appropriate in the area it cannot determine who should be employed in these
particular businesses. However, in general terms the proposals should increase
employment opportunities in the area; and

Proposals to improve the quality of existing public realm and greenspace and the
development of a number of new spaces. Such works will be beneficial to the health and
well being of the local community (and other users of the spaces) and access/use of
such space is free, meaning that they can be accessed and enjoyed by everyone,
regardless of their income.
It is anticipated that any further ideas regarding how the framework can offer assistance in
terms of narrowing the gap arising from feedback during the consultation process will be fed
into the final framework prior to its adoption by the council.
2. Please list any barriers which may prevent people from low income backgrounds from
achieving positive outcomes from the function
While this will be dependent on the mix and price of new housing to be provided in the area,
people on low incomes may not be able to afford new housing which may be built in the area.
People from low income backgrounds may not own a personal computer, which could present
difficulties in terms of accessing the draft Development Framework on-line (for example if they
also face other barriers that prevent them from using free internet access which is available in
local libraries).
Page 6 of 42
3. Please detail how these barriers may be overcome.
By making provision for affordable housing as part of new residential schemes and by setting
out clearly the level of affordable housing required.
The council’s overall approach to
affordable housing provision is set out in a range of documents including the adopted Unitary
Development Plan and associated guidance documents (including the Housing Planning
Guidance 2006) and the Affordable Housing Strategy 2006 and Affordable Housing Strategy
Update 2007/8.
The provision of affordable housing will be discussed with developers as proposals for new
housing schemes come forward in the area covered by the framework. Officers will also
consider the appropriateness of providing social housing as part of the overall housing mix in
the area, taking on board the outcomes of discussions with relevant stakeholders as part of the
consultation process.
‘Drop-in’ events will be held at Salford Museum and Art Gallery (which is located within the
area covered by the Development Framework) as part of the consultation process to enable
people without access to a computer/internet to view hard copies of the draft Development
Framework at a convenient location and discuss proposals face-to-face with officers involved in
preparing the framework.
To ensure that people who may have an interest in the future of the area but do not live/work
within the area covered by the Development Framework are able to get involved in the
consultation exercise, copies of the draft document will be available to view in all local libraries
across the city. The document will also be available online via the council’s website and all
persons/groups who have requested to be informed when new planning documents are
available for consultation will be contacted to inform them of the consultation.
Page 7 of 42
4. Please list any baseline income data and analysis which indicate that deprivation
issues are relevant to your function
The Draft Development Framework area falls into two of the basic statistical units used for
recording census and other data, which are known as Lower Super Output Areas (LSOAs).
The physical boundaries of the Development Framework area do not coincide exactly with the
boundaries of the LSOAs and the boundaries of the LSOAs also extend outside of the area
covered by the Development framework. However, the data still provides a general picture of
the trends that exist and a useful view of the wider context of the area.
Plan 1 below shows the boundaries of the 2 LSOAs which cover the Development Framework
area and the boundary of the Development Framework itself.
Plan 1: Boundary of LSOAs Salford 022C and 022D
Page 8 of 42
Income data for the area covered by the Development Framework was obtained from the
English Indices of Deprivation 2010 (the Indices) which contains seven ‘Domains’ of
information, including income deprivation. A paper providing information on the Indices in
relation to the Crescent area has been produced to support this assessment and is attached to
this paper as Annex 2 for information.
Information on the LSOAs which cover the study area with regard to income deprivation can be
seen in Table 1 below. In overall terms, the data shows that the area covered by the framework
is among the most deprived in the country in terms of income deprivation.
Table 1: Income Deprivation Ranking of LSOA’s covering the Development Framework area
LSOA Ref: E01005608
LSOA Ref: E01005610
With regards to income deprivation, this With regards to income deprivation, this
LSOA is:
LSOA is:





The 8368th most deprived in England (out
of 32,482 LSOA’s)
The 1534th most deprived in the North
West (out of 4459 LSOA’s)
The 143rd most deprived in Salford (out of
144 LSOA’s)
A score of 0.20 indicates that 20% of the
population within this LSOA are income
deprived
Within the 10% most deprived LSOA’s in
the country in terms of IMD





The 55th most deprived in England (out of
32,482 LSOA’s)
The 30th most deprived in the North West
(out of 4459 LSOA’s)
The 2nd most deprived in Salford (out of
144 LSOA’s)
A score of 0.56 indicates that 56% of the
population within this LSOA are income
deprived
Within the 10% most deprived LSOA’s in
England in terms of income deprivation
Page 9 of 42
5. Please provide evidence of how services are targeted or designed based on our
knowledge of need and deprivation
The draft Development Framework is concerned with the overall regeneration of the Crescent
area and as such is not designed to focus on addressing issues of income deprivation
specifically. However, regeneration activity will seek to bring about positive change in the area
through a range of measures which will help to address issues of deprivation, including
provision of a mix of new housing and improvement of existing / provision of new employment
uses resulting in job creation.
In addition, consultation on the draft Development Framework will be a wholly inclusive
exercise:

All residents, businesses and landowners within the area covered by the Development
Framework will be informed of the consultation process by letter

All persons/groups who have expressed an interest in being involved in consultation on
emerging planning documents produced by the council will be contacted

The wider East Salford community will be informed of the consultation process via
Community Committee

Any person with an interest in the future of the area will be able to view and comment on
the document via the council’s website
The consultation process will ensure that any person or organisation with an interest in the
future of the area will be provided with the opportunity to make their views know and influence
the Development Framework (including a wide variety of teams within the council who may
help to strengthen the document in terms of how it seeks to address issues of deprivation).
If your policy is relevant to narrowing the gap, please continue to complete this section.
Page 10 of 42
6. Please list any data or evidence you have which demonstrates access of service and
benefits
The benefits of producing Development Frameworks to help steer the future transformation of
particular geographic areas can be seen across the country as a whole. In terms of local
examples, the Salford Central Development Framework has been used to indicate how
development proposals for individual sites could form part of a series of mixed use
developments across Salford Central. Such guidance was used to inform discussions with a
range of developers including English Cities Fund which resulted in the council receiving its
largest ever planning application for the comprehensive redevelopment of 17.7 hectares of land
to the east of the Crescent Development Framework area.
As the consultation on the Draft Crescent Development Framework has not yet been
undertaken, there is no evidence available regarding participation in the consultation process
(or in the context of this particular question, “access to the service”) on this particular
document.
However, a consultation statement will be produced following the consultation
exercise which will provide information on levels of participation.
A consultation review of public consultation on the Draft Central Salford Vision and
Regeneration Framework was produced in February 2006 following extensive consultation with
a wide range of stakeholders over the period July to October 2005. As the Crescent area falls
within the wider Central Salford area covered by the Vision and Regeneration Framework, its
results are of some use in identifying levels of participation by different groups. However, the
consultation review does not provide any detailed information on participation by stakeholders
from the area covered by the Crescent Development Framework.
7. Does this data show that any groups access the service more/less?
Not applicable as data is not yet available.
Page 11 of 42
8. Does this data show any better or worse outcomes are achieved from the service for
different income groups?
As previously discussed, no data regarding participation in the consultation exercise by any
particular groups is currently available.
However, in terms of the outcomes arising from regeneration activity as a result of the
Development Framework, it is anticipated that the proposals will result in positive change to the
area across a range of different measures and as a result will be of benefit to Salford as a
whole.
The key impact on lower income groups is likely to be the provision of affordable and social
housing as part of residential development schemes that may come forward in the area in the
future and the improvement of existing and provision of new employment sites. However, until
these schemes are approved and the mix of housing and nature of employment uses are
known, it is not possible to assess their impact on any particular group.
9. Can any unfavourable impacts be justified?
We are unclear of what (if any) unfavourable impacts may be at present with regard to
consultation on the Development Framework.
With regard to the provision of housing, any unfavourable impacts arising from development
proposals will be considered through the Development Management process as individual
schemes come forward.
Age
Please consider the following areas… please click here
Page 12 of 42
1. Please list any barriers that service users may encounter when accessing services as
a result of their age
At this stage, no specific barriers are known to exist.
However, experience of officers undertaking the consultation indicate that older people are
more likely to experience problems in getting involved in the consultation process than other
groups and could potentially face the following barriers:


Potential difficulty in accessing consultation venues due to mobility barriers
May lack personal computer or may not be computer literate and therefore unable to
view consultation materials / submit comments online
Experience of officers also indicates that younger people are potentially less likely to get
actively involved in the consultation process for reasons such as:



Lack of interest in the planning process
Lack of awareness of the opportunities they have to get involved in the planning process
Lack of understanding about how the proposals put forward in planning documents such
as the Development framework will have an impact on them
It should however be noted that these issues could also be faced by other age groups.
2. Please list any barriers which may prevent people from achieving positive outcomes
from the service as a result of their age
As stated previously, the draft Development Framework is concerned with the overall
regeneration of the Crescent area and seeks to bring about positive change through a wide
range of measures. As such the proposals contained within it will be of benefit to all people,
regardless of age.
Page 13 of 42
3. Please detail how these barriers may be overcome.
As stated previously, officers are not aware of any specific barriers that may be faced at this
time.
However, in terms of the consultation process itself, the following actions are likely to help
ensure that elderly people, who are more likely to face barriers to getting involved with the
consultation process than other age groups, are able to get involved in the consultation
process:


When sending out letters publicising the consultation process, make it clear that officers
can come to residents to discuss the proposals should they have problems accessing
the venues to be used to display the consultation materials
Ensure that the Development Framework is not only available to view online but also in
local libraries and community venues
With regard to young people, the following measures will be undertake to help increase
awareness of the consultation process and the opportunities for young people to get involved in
the planning process:

The local school, St Phillips, will be informed of the consultation process and officers will
be available to attend meetings with pupils to explain the proposals should the school
feel this would be useful

The consultation will be publicised through the council’s social media sites

Salford’s Integrated Youth Support Services Manager will be contacted with a view to
making contact with relevant youth groups to make them aware of the consultation
process and opportunities to submit their views on the proposals
In order to ensure that all persons, regardless of age, are able to get involved in the
consultation process, the draft Development Framework will be available to view in a number of
different locations throughout the consultation period to ensure that all interested persons have
the opportunity to view the document without any inconvenience.
Page 14 of 42
4. Please list any baseline data or evidence you have e.g. census data
Data on age for the 2 LSOA’s which cover the Crescent Development Framework area has
been obtained from the Office for National Statistics and is provided below.
Figure 1: % of People in each Age Band (Mid 2008) in LSOA EO1005608 / SALFORD 022C
As can be seen in Figure 1 above, the majority of people within this part of the study area are
between 25-49 years old, with the second largest group of residents being between 16-24
years old.
Page 15 of 42
Figure 2: % of People in each Age Band (Mid 2008) in LSOA EO1005610 / SALFORD 022D
As can be seen in Figure 2 above, the majority of people within this part of the study area are
between 25-49 years old, with the second largest group of residents being between 0-15 years
old.
5. Please list any data or evidence you have which demonstrates service users
accessing the service
As consultation on the draft Development Framework has not yet taken place, no information
regarding levels of participation is available at this time.
6. Does this data show that any groups access the service more/less?
Not applicable as data is not yet available.
7. Does this data show any better or worse outcomes are achieved from the service for
this group?
Not applicable as data is not yet available.
Page 16 of 42
8. Can any unfavourable impact be justified?
Any unfavourable impacts arising from development proposals will be considered through the
Development Management process as individual schemes come forward.
Disability
Please consider the following areas… please click here
1. Please list any barriers that service users may encounter when accessing services as
a result of their disability

Disabled persons may face barriers in terms of travelling to/from the venues at which
copies of the consultation documents will be located and the venues which will be used
to display plans of the proposals contained in the Development Framework

Visually impaired/blind persons may face difficulties accessing the consultation materials
online and at the venues where display materials and copies of the consultation
documents will be located

Persons with learning difficulties may barriers in terms of their ability to understand the
proposals being put forward in the Development Framework
2. Please list any barriers which may prevent people with disabilities from achieving
positive outcomes from the service as a result of their disability.
As stated previously, the draft Development Framework is concerned with the overall
regeneration of the Crescent area and seeks to bring about positive change through a wide
range of measures. As such the proposals contained within it are considered to be of benefit to
all.
Page 17 of 42
3. Please detail how these barriers may be overcome.
In terms of the consultation process itself, the following actions will help to ensure that persons
facing barriers in terms of disability are able to be fully involved in the consultation process:

Use a range of fully accessible venues to display consultation materials, in particular
ensuring that all venues have disabled access

Ensure that consultation documents are available to view online

Ensure that consultation documents can be provided in audio and Braille formats upon
request
In terms of the proposals contained in the Development Framework itself:

Ensure that all Design and Access statements accompanying planning applications for
new development in the area clearly show how the new development is accessible to all
users

Ensure that existing and proposed new public realm and public open space (particularly
Peel Park) is fully accessible to all users
Page 18 of 42
4. Please list any baseline data or evidence you have e.g. census data
Data on the percentage of people with the 2 LSOA’s which cover the Crescent Development
Framework area claiming Disability Living Allowance (as of August 2009) has been obtained
from the Office for National Statistics and is provided below.
Figure 3: Disability Living Allowance Claimants in LSOA EO1005608 / SALFORD 022C
LSOA Salford North West England
Total Population of Area
2,619 216,103 6,729,764
49,138,831
Number of Claimants
150
17,940
470,470
2,537,590
Claimants as % of Total Population
5.7%
8.3%
7%
5.2%
As can be seen in Figure 3 above, this LSOA (which covers the lower part of the Development
Framework area) contains a much lower proportion of claimants than is the case for Salford
and the North West as a whole and only slightly higher than that for England as a whole. Data
from the Indices of Deprivation (see Annex 2) also shows that with regard to Health and
Disability Deprivation, this area falls within the 10% most deprived LSOA’s in the country.
Figure 4: Disability Living Allowance Claimants in LSOA EO1005610 / SALFORD 022D
LSOA Salford North West England
Total Population of Area
1,109 216,103 6,729,764
49,138,831
Number of Claimants
170
17,940
470,470
2,537,590
Claimants as % of Total Population
15.3% 8.3%
7%
5.2%
As can be seen in Figure 4 above, the LSOA which covers the upper part of the Development
Framework area has a much higher proportion of claimants than is the case for Salford, the
North West and England as a whole (almost three times that of the national figure). Data from
the Indices of Deprivation (see Annex 2) also shows that with regard to Health and Disability
Deprivation, this area falls within the 5% most deprived LSOA’s in the country.
5. Please list any data or evidence you have which demonstrates service users
accessing the service
As consultation on the draft Development Framework has not yet taken place, no information
regarding levels of participation is available at this time.
6. Does this data show that any groups access the service more/less?
Not applicable as data is not yet available.
7. Does this data show any better or worse outcomes are achieved from the service for
this group?
Not applicable as data is not yet available.
8. Can any unfavourable impact be justified?
Any unfavourable impacts arising from development proposals will be considered through the
Development Management process as individual schemes come forward.
Gender
Please consider the following areas… please click here
Page 19 of 42
1. Please list any barriers that service users may encounter when accessing services as
a result of their gender

Persons with responsibility for childcare may be unable to access consultation events
which take place at certain times of the day

Some people, if travelling alone by foot, may be discouraged from visiting consultation
events taking place in remote locations or locations which experience high rates of crime
2. Please list any barriers which may prevent people from achieving positive outcomes
from the service as a result of their gender

Some people may be less likely to make use of open space in the area due to fear of
crime

Some people may be less likely to feel comfortable travelling through the public realm at
night due to fear of crime

While data is available to show that the UK gender pay gap has narrowed in recent
years, income levels of women in overall terms are still less than that of men (see Figure
6 below). This could mean that women are less able to afford to purchase/rent new
housing which may be developed in the area

Depending on the nature of jobs created as a result of new employment development in
the area, males/females may find it more difficult to access the new jobs created
Page 20 of 42
3. Please detail how these barriers may be overcome.
In terms of the consultation process itself, the following actions will help to ensure that persons
facing barriers in terms of their gender are able to be fully involved in the consultation process:

Ensure that consultation events take place at a variety of different times to provide
everyone with the opportunity to attend an event (e.g. during the day, at night, on
weekdays and at weekends)

Ensure that consultation events take place in highly accessible and safe locations in
highly populated / animated areas

Ensure that consultation materials are available online for those persons who are unable
to travel to view the materials
In terms of the proposals contained in the Development Framework itself:

Ensure that the public realm and public open space is safe and benefits from sufficient
lighting and natural surveillance
Page 21 of 42
4. Please list any baseline data or evidence you have e.g. census data
Population estimates (as of mid 2008) for the 2 LSOA’s which cover the Crescent Development
Framework area have been obtained from the Office for National Statistics and are provided
below.
Figure 5: Mid 2008 Population Estimate for LSOA’s EO1005608 / and LSOA EO1005610
LSOA EO1005608
LSOA EO1005610
Total People
2,619
1,109
Total number of Males
1,444
521
Total number of Females
1,175
588
% Breakdown of male/female population Male: 55%
Male: 47%
Female: 45%
Female: 53%
Figure 6: Gender Pay Gap for Median Hourly Earnings (Excluding Overtime). Source: Office for
National Statistics
5. Please list any data or evidence you have which demonstrates service users
accessing the service
As consultation on the draft Development Framework has not yet taken place, no information
regarding levels of participation is available at this time.
6. Does this data show that any groups access the service more/less?
Not applicable as data is not yet available.
7. Does this data show any better or worse outcomes are achieved from the service for
this group?
Not applicable as data is not yet available.
8. Can any unfavourable impact be justified?
Any unfavourable impacts arising from development proposals will be considered through the
Development Management process as individual schemes come forward.
Race
Please consider the following areas… please click here
Page 22 of 42
1. Please list any barriers that service users may encounter when accessing services as
a result of their race
Potential language barriers.
2. Please list any barriers which may prevent people from achieving positive outcomes
from the service as a result of their race
At this stage, no barriers are known to exist. As stated previously, the draft Development
Framework is concerned with the overall regeneration of the Crescent area and seeks to bring
about positive change through a wide range of measures. As such the proposals contained
within it are considered to be of benefit to all, regardless of race.
3. Please detail how these barriers may be overcome.
In terms of the consultation process itself, the following actions will help to ensure that persons
facing barriers in terms of their race are able to be fully involved in the consultation process:

Ensure that the preface of the draft Development Framework contains a language panel
which provides information about how to contact the council if assistance in
understanding the document is required

Black and Minority Ethnic (BME) communities and their representatives will be
contacted through groups including the BME Forum
Page 23 of 42
4. Please list any baseline data or evidence you have e.g. census data
Data on population by ethnic group (which comes from the 2001 Census) for the 2 LSOA’s
which cover the Crescent Development Framework area have been obtained from the Office for
National Statistics and is shown in Figure 7 below.
Figure 7: Population by Ethnic Group. Source: 2001 Census
% of Population in each Ethnic Group
Ethnic Group
LSOA
LSOA
Salford North England
EO1005608 EO1005610
West
White: British
88.22
89.18
92.71
92.17 86.99
White: Irish
2.96
2.52
1.79
1.15
1.27
White: Other White
2.17
4.38
1.63
1.11
2.66
Mixed: White and Black
0.92
0.20
0.39
0.33
0.47
Mixed: White and Black
0.46
0.53
0.15
0.15
0.16
Mixed: White and Asian
0.00
0.27
0.23
0.26
0.37
Mixed: Other Mixed
0.66
0.20
0.23
0.20
0.31
Asian or Asian British: Indian
0.46
0.53
0.55
1.07
2.09
Asian or Asian British: Pakistani
0.72
0.00
0.45
1.74
1.44
Asian or Asian British: Bangladeshi
0.00
0.00
0.19
0.39
0.56
Asian or Asian British: Other Asian
0.20
0.40
0.20
0.22
0.48
Black or Black British: Caribbean
0.72
0.20
0.19
0.30
1.14
Black or Black British: African
0.59
0.40
0.33
0.24
0.97
Black or Black British: Other Black
0.20
0.00
0.06
0.08
0.19
Chinese or other ethnic group:
1.18
0.60
0.55
0.40
0.45
Chinese
Chinese or other ethnic group: Other 0.53
0.60
0.36
0.20
0.44
ethnic group
As can be seen, the population of the area is predominantly white British (88.22% and 89.18%
respectively), which is broadly in line with the trends for Salford (92.71%), the North West
(92.17%) and England as a whole (86.99%).
5. Please list any data or evidence you have which demonstrates service users
accessing the service
As consultation on the draft Development Framework has not yet taken place, no information
regarding levels of participation is available at this time.
6. Does this data show that any groups access the service more/less?
Not applicable as data is not yet available.
7. Does this data show any better or worse outcomes are achieved from the service for
this group?
Not applicable as data is not yet available.
8. Can any unfavourable impact be justified?
Any unfavourable impacts arising from development proposals will be considered through the
Development Management process as individual schemes come forward.
Page 24 of 42
Religion and/or belief
Please consider the following areas… please click here
1. Please list any barriers that service users may encounter when accessing services as
a result of their religion and or belief

Potential language barriers

Persons of a particular religion/belief may not be able to attend consultation events due
to clashes with faith holidays or scheduled events such as Sabbaths.
2. Please list any barriers which may prevent people from achieving positive outcomes
from the service as a result of their religion and or belief
At this stage, no barriers are known to exist. As stated previously, the draft Development
Framework is concerned with the overall regeneration of the Crescent area and seeks to bring
about positive change through a wide range of measures. As such the proposals contained
within it are considered to be of benefit to all, regardless of religion and/or belief.
3. Please detail how these barriers may be overcome.
In terms of the consultation process itself, the following actions will help to ensure that persons
facing barriers in terms of their race are able to be fully involved in the consultation process:

Ensure that the preface of the draft Development Framework contains a language panel
which provides details of how to contact the council if assistance in understanding the
document is required

Do not schedule consultation events on days which would clash with faith holidays or
scheduled events

Provide opportunities for the document to be viewed online for those persons who are
unable to attend consultation events

Provide a translation service for persons who wish to view the document in a language
other than English
Page 25 of 42
4. Please list any baseline data or evidence you have e.g. census data
Data on religion (which comes from the 2001 Census) for the 2 LSOA’s which cover the
Crescent Development Framework area have been obtained from the Office for National
Statistics and is shown in Figure 8 below.
Figure 8: Religious Belief
Religion
Christian
Buddhist
Hindu
Jewish
Muslim
Sikh
Other religions
No religion
Religion not
stated
LSOA
EO1005608
67.5
0.7
0.2
1.0
1.6
0.2
0.3
19.5
9.0
% of Population by Religious Belief
LSOA
Salford
EO1005610
76.0
76.5
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.3
0.4
2.4
0.7
1.2
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.2
13.2
11.0
9.2
8.1
England
71.7
0.3
1.1
0.5
3.1
0.7
0.3
14.6
7.7
As can be seen, the majority of residents in the study area (67.5% and 76% respectively) list
their religious belief as Christian, which is in line with the trends for Salford (76.5%) and
England as a whole (71.7%). Part of the study area also contains a higher proportion of
persons of Jewish faith (1%) than is the case nationally (0.5%) but less than the proportion for
Salford as a whole (2.4%). The same part of the study area also contains a higher proportion of
persons of Muslim faith (1.6%) than is the case for Salford as a whole (1.3%) but again, less
than is the case for England as a whole (3.1%).
5. Please list any data or evidence you have which demonstrates service users
accessing the service
As consultation on the draft Development Framework has not yet taken place, no information
regarding levels of participation is available at this time.
6. Does this data show that any groups access the service more/less?
Not applicable as data is not yet available.
7. Does this data show any better or worse outcomes are achieved from the service for
this group?
Not applicable as data is not yet available.
8. Can any unfavourable impact be justified?
Any unfavourable impacts arising from development proposals will be considered through the
Development Management process as individual schemes come forward.
Sexual identity
Please consider the following areas… please click here
Page 26 of 42
1. Please list any barriers that service users may encounter when accessing services as
a result of their sexual identity
At this stage, no barriers are known to exist.
2. Please list any barriers which may prevent people from achieving positive outcomes
from the service as a result of their sexual identity
At this stage, no barriers are known to exist.
3. Please detail how these barriers may be overcome.
If any barriers are identified during consultation on the draft Development Framework these will
be addressed in an appropriate manner as they arise.
4. Please list any baseline data or evidence you have e.g. census data
There is currently no Census information available on the size of the lesbian, gay, bisexual and
transgender community in the UK and no questions about this topic were included in the recent
Census. However, data on the proportion of Salford’s population as a whole who are living in a
same-sex couple (which comes from the 2001 Census) has been obtained from the Office for
National Statistics and is provided in Figure 9 below.
Figure 9: Persons Living in a Same-Sex Couple
Salford
North West
England
0.3%
0.2%
0.2%
5. Please list any data or evidence you have which demonstrates service users
accessing the service
As consultation on the draft Development Framework has not yet taken place, no information
regarding levels of participation is available at this time.
6. Does this data show that any groups access the service more/less?
Not applicable as data is not yet available.
7. Does this data show any better or worse outcomes are achieved from the service for
this group?
Not applicable as data is not yet available.
8. Can any unfavourable impact be justified?
Any unfavourable impacts arising from development proposals will be considered through the
Development Management process as individual schemes come forward.
Community cohesion
Please consider the following areas… please click here
1. Does the function promote/support community cohesion?
The consultation exercise should assist in helping to develop a sense of ownership about the
future of the Crescent area among the local community by providing genuine opportunities to
Page 27 of 42
help shape the future of this part of the City. The process will also provide an opportunity for
different groups from within the community to attend exhibitions on the Development
Framework, providing opportunities for interaction and discussion amongst members of the
local community, presenting opportunities to build new relationships within the community.
In addition, the proposals arising out of the Development Framework itself should help to
promote community cohesion through the overall regeneration of the area. This regeneration,
(particularly the development of new housing) will also help to increase the number of residents
in the area, helping to establish a larger and more mixed residential community.
2. If community cohesion is relevant to your function what steps will you take to promote
it?
In terms of the consultation process itself, this will be an inclusive exercise and consultation
events will provide an opportunity for everyone with an interest in the future of the Crescent
area to help shape its future regeneration. Attendance at consultation events will also act as a
mechanism for people living and working in the area to meet one another and discuss their
ideas for the future of the area. It is unlikely that such discussions between members of the
community would occur in the absence of events such as this.
The Development Framework itself is concerned with the overall regeneration of the Crescent
area and seeks to bring about positive change through a wide range of measures.
As such, officers involved in preparing the Development Framework consider that the
Development Framework and the proposals, in addition to the planned consultation process,
are an effective way of promoting community cohesion because community cohesion is about
building positive and respectful relations between and across different groups in a community.
Page 28 of 42
Consultation – planning
Who are the groups, organisations and individual most likely to be affected by the proposed policy, directly and
indirectly?
Residents, Businesses and Landowners in the area covered by the Development Framework
What methods of consultation are most likely to succeed in attracting the organisations and people you want to reach?
 Contact with residents, businesses and landowners by mail
 Contact with residents groups both directly and via the east Salford Community Committee and Chapel Street Forum
 1:1 meetings with concerned residents, businesses and landowners
 Drop in events at Salford Museum and Art Gallery
 Online publication of the draft Development Framework
 Publicise the consultation on the draft Development Framework on the council’s website
Has there been any recent research or consultation with the group/individuals you plan to consult? (please give details)
 Regular contact with residents of Fire Station Square via the Chapel Street Regeneration Forum
 Regular meetings with the university which is a major landowner
Consultation- results
When did you undertake the consultation?
The consultation process is due to be undertaken during the period 4th November to 16th December 2011
Did you reach all the groups/individuals you wanted to reach?
Not known at this stage
What did you find?
Not known at this stage
What will you change as a result of the consultation? Please ensure this is captured in the action plan
Not known at this stage
Page 29 of 42
Action plan (following consultation)
Please list issues identified from targeted consultation and actions required
Issue identified
Action required
Person responsible
Community cohesion
To
inform
the Daniel
consultation
Welsh
and
process, David Greenfield
contact will be made
with
relevant
(e.g.
the
teams
Community
and Cohesion team) to
highlight any potential
issues
related
to
community cohesion in
the area covered by the
Development
Framework.
Measures
will, where considered
to be appropriate, be
incorporated
into
the
Development framework
to address any issues
raised.
Page 30 of 42
Date required by Outcome
Please ensure you have provided as much evidence as possible to support the responses you have given
Additional comments
Following consultation on the draft Development Framework, responses will be collated into a Consultation Statement which will
provide details of all comments received during the consultation process and recommended changes to the Development
Framework in response to these comments. A revised Development Framework, along with the Consultation Statement, will then
be taken to Lead Member with a recommendation that the Development Framework be adopted.
Any issues identified during the consultation process will be developed into an action plan and any actions required will be
addressed as necessary.
Monitoring
How and when will the action plan be monitored?
Any issues identified through the targeted consultation and actions planned to resolve/address them will be recorded on the CIA
Action Plan, entered onto the corporate performance management framework and monitored and reported every six months.
Page 31 of 42
How and when will outcomes be recorded?
The results of the consultation exercise on the draft Development framework will be incorporated into a Consultation Statement.
This statement will list all comments received during the consultation process along with officer’s recommendations with regard to
any potential changes to the Development Framework resulting from these comments. The Consultation Statement will be
submitted to Lead Member for Planning, along with the revised Development Framework and a recommendation that the
framework be adopted in due course.
Who will the results of the impact assessment be shared with?
The CIA will be accessible to stakeholders and the general public as it will be published on the council’s website
http://www.salford.gov.uk/impact-assess.htm
Have the actions been mainstreamed into the service plan?
Actions have not yet been identified. As actions are identified through the consultation process, they will be addressed through the
final Development Framework.
Quality assurance
When you have completed your impact assessment, it must be submitted to your directorate quality assurance panel for
approval.
Signed
Signed
Daniel Welsh
Dated 21 September 2011
David Greenfield
Dated 21 September 2011
Rob Pickering
Dated 7 October 2011
Page 32 of 42
(Completing officers)
(Lead officer)
Signed
Michelle Brown
Dated 21 September 2001
(Business
Reviewer)
Management
Team
Trisha Nunn
Dated 21 September 2011
(Business
Reviewer)
Management
Team
Russell Dennis
Dated 7 September 2011
(Peer Reviewer)
Michael Hemingway
Dated 7 September 2011
(Peer Reviewer)
This impact assessment must be reviewed every three years.
Review date: The assessment will be reviewed and updated following consultation on the Development Framework and a further
assessment prepared in support of the final Development Framework.
Please send your approved impact assessment and narrative to elaine.barber@salford.gov.uk, for publishing on the
council’s website.
Page 33 of 42
Annex 1: Area covered by the Development Framework
Page 34 of 42
Annex 2: INDICES OF DEPRIVATION
The English Indices of Deprivation 2010 (ID 2010) are the Government’s measure of deprivation at small area level. The Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) which forms part of the ID 2010 is based
on the small area geography known as Lower Super Output Area’s (LSOA’s). LSOA’s have between 1000-3000 people living within them, with an average population of 1500 people.
There are 32,482 LSOA’s in England. The LSOA ranked 1 by the IMD 2010 is the most deprived and that ranked 32,482 is the least deprived. The Indices are a measure of deprivation across an
area, but it is important to note that not every person living in a deprived area will necessarily be deprived.
The Crescent Development Framework covers two of the basic neighbourhood units used for recording census and other data (Lower Layer Super Output Areas’ (LSOA’s). The location and extent
and reference numbers of the 2 LSOA’s that cover the Development Framework area are shown in Figure 1 below. It is important to note that the physical boundaries of the study area do not
coincide with the boundaries of LSOA’s, meaning that the area covered by the 2 combined LSOA’s is actually larger than that covered by the Development Framework. However, the data can still
be used to provide a general picture of the trends that exist in the Crescent area.
Figure 1: Locations of the Lower Super Outputs Areas that cover the study area
Key
LSOA Ref: EO1005608
LSOA Ref: EO1005610
The IMD 2010 contains seven ‘Domains’ of deprivation:

Income deprivation

Employment
deprivation

Health deprivation and
disability

Education, skills and
training deprivation

Barriers to housing and
services

Living environment
deprivation

Crime
The remainder of the report provides an analysis of the performance of each LSOA within the study area in terms of the IMD before moving on to look at the performance of each LSOA against the
various Domains and Supplementary Indices that make up the IMD.
Page 35 of 42
Index of Multiple Deprivation Ranking
The Index of Multiple Deprivation brings together 37 different indicators which look at different aspects of deprivation such as income, employment, health and disability, education, skills and
training, barriers to housing and services, living environment and crime. These are weighted and combined to create the overall IMD 2010. In overall terms, Salford is amongst the 20 local
authorities in England with the highest proportion of deprived LSOA’s. The remainder of this paper provides information regarding the performance of each of the LSOA’s that cover the Crescent
area in terms of the Index of Multiple Deprivation.
LSOA Ref: EO1005608
LSOA Ref: E01005610
Figure 2: IMD Ranking
With an IMD score of 46.04, this LSOA is:
With an IMD score of 71.70, this LSOA is:







The 2988th most deprived in England (out of 32,482 LSOA’s)
The 846th most deprived in the North West (out of 4459 LSOA’s)
The 102nd most deprived in Salford (out of 143 LSOA’s)
Within the 10% most deprived LSOA’s in the country in terms of IMD
Page 36 of 42

The 178thh most deprived in England (out of 32,482 LSOA’s)
The 99th most deprived in the North West (out of 4459 LSOA’s)
The 34th most deprived in Salford (out of 144 LSOA’s) and most
deprived LSOA within the Crescent area in terms of IMD
Within the 10% most deprived LSOA’s in the country in terms of
IMD
Overall performance of LSOA’s within the area covered by the Development Framework
Figure 3: Comparative ranking between E01005608 and E01005610
LSOA Ref: E01005608
Index of Multiple Deprivation Rank (out of 32482 where 1 is the most deprived
and 32482 the least)
Key
2988
IMD Income Deprivation Domain (out of 32482) where 1 is the most deprived and
32482 the least
8368
IMD Employment Deprivation Domain(out of 32482) where 1 is the most deprived and
32482 the least
4535
IMD Health Deprivation and Disability Domain(out of 32482) where 1 is the most
deprived and 32482 the least
1017
IMD Education Skills and Training Deprivation Domain(out of 32482) where 1 is the
most deprived and 32482 the least
3556
IMD Barriers to Housing and Services Domain(out of 32482) where 1 is the most
deprived and 32482 the least
14970
IMD Crime Domain(out of 32482) where 1 is the most deprived and 32482 the least
217
IMD Living Environment Deprivation Domain(out of 32482) where 1 is the most
deprived and 32482 the least
7301
Index of Multiple Deprivation(out of 32482 where 1 is the most deprived and
32482 the least)
178
IMD Income Deprivation Domain(out of 32482) where 1 is the most deprived and
32482 the least
55
IMD Employment Deprivation Domain(out of 32482) where 1 is the most deprived and
32482 the least
207
IMD Health Deprivation and Disability Domain(out of 32482) where 1 is the most
deprived and 32482 the least
312
IMD Education Skills and Training Deprivation Domain(out of 32482) where 1 is the
most deprived and 32482 the least
1075
IMD Barriers to Housing and Services Domain(out of 32482) where 1 is the most
deprived and 32482 the least
11560
IMD Crime Domain(out of 32482) where 1 is the most deprived and 32482 the least
3797
IMD Living Environment Deprivation Domain(out of 32482) where 1 is the most
deprived and 32482 the least
16496
LSOA Ref: E01005610
Page 37 of 42
Worst performing LSOA
out of the 2 LSOA’s in the
study area
Best performing LSOA
out of the 2 LSOA’s in the
study area
Income Deprivation Domain
The purpose of this domain is to capture the proportion of the population experiencing income deprivation in an area. A number of indicators have been combined to create this domain including:






Adults and children in Income Support families (Source: Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) 2008)
Adults and children in Income-Based JSA families (Source: DWP 2008)
Adults and children in Pension Credit (Guarantee) families (Source: DWP 2008)
Adults and children in those Working Tax Credit families (Source: HMRC 2008)
Adults and children in Child Tax Credit Households (who are not eligible for IS, Income-Based JSA, Pension Credit or Working Tax Credit) whose equivalised income (excluding housing
benefits) is below 60 percent of the median before housing costs (Source: HMRC 2005)
Asylum seekers in England in receipt of subsistence support, accommodation support, or both (Source: NASS 2008)
Table 1: Income Deprivation Domain Ranking
LSOA Ref: E01005608
LSOA Ref: E01005610
With regards to income deprivation, this LSOA is:
With regards to income deprivation, this LSOA is:










The 8368th most deprived in England (out of 32,482 LSOA’s)
The 1534th most deprived in the North West (out of 4459 LSOA’s)
The 143rd most deprived in Salford (out of 144 LSOA’s)
A score of 0.20 indicates that 20% of the population within this LSOA are income deprived
Within the 10% most deprived LSOA’s in the country in terms of IMD
Page 38 of 42
The 55th most deprived in England (out of 32,482 LSOA’s)
The 30th most deprived in the North West (out of 4459 LSOA’s)
The 2nd most deprived in Salford (out of 144 LSOA’s)
A score of 0.56 indicates that 56% of the population within this LSOA are income deprived
Within the 10% most deprived LSOA’s in England in terms of income deprivation
Employment Deprivation Domain
This domain measures employment deprivation (involuntary exclusion of the working age population from the labour market). A number of indicators have been combined to create this domain
including:






Claimants of Jobseekers Allowance (both contribution-based and income based): men aged 18-64 and women aged 18-59 (Source: DWP 2005)
Claimants of Incapacity Benefit: men aged 18-64 and women aged 18-59 (Source: DWP 2005)
Claimants of Severe Disablement Allowance: men aged 18-64 and women aged 18-59 (Source: DWP 2005)
Claimants in the New Deal for the 18-24s who are not in receipt of JSA (Source: DWP 2005)
Claimants in the New Deal for 25+ who are not in receipt of JSA (Source: DWP 2005)
Claimants in the New Deal for Lone Parents (after initial interview) (Source: DWP 2005)
Table 2: Employment Deprivation Domain Ranking
LSOA Ref: E01005608
LSOA Ref: E01005610
With regards to employment deprivation, this LSOA is:
With regards to employment deprivation, this LSOA is:





The 4535th most deprived in England (out of 32,482 LSOA’s)
The 916th most deprived in the North West (out of 4459 LSOA’s)
The 57th most deprived in Salford (out of 144 LSOA’s)
A score of 0.17 indicates that 17% of the population within this LSOA are employment
deprived
Within the 20% most deprived LSOA’s in the country in terms of IMD





The 207th most deprived in England (out of 32,482 LSOA’s)
The 91st most deprived in the North West (out of 4459 LSOA’s)
The 7th most deprived in Salford (out of 144 LSOA’s)
A score of 0.34 indicates that 34% of the population within this LSOA are employment
deprived
Within the 10% most deprived LSOA’s in England in terms of employment deprivation
Health Deprivation and Disability Deprivation Domain
This domain measures rates of poor health, early mortality and disability in an area and covers the entire age range. A number of indicators have been combined to create this Domain including:




Years of Potential Life Lost (YPLL). An age and sex standardised measure of premature death (Source: ONS)
Comparative Illness and Disability Ratio. An age and sex standardised measure of morbity and disability (CIDR) (Source: DWP)
Measures of acute morbidity. An age and sex standardised rate of emergency admission to hospital (Source: Department of Health)
The proportion of adults under 60 suffering from mood or anxiety disorders based on prescribing (Source: Prescribing Pricing Authority), Hospital Episode Statistics (2004 to 2005, Source:
Department of Health) and Incapacity Benefit data (Source: DWP)
Table 3: Health Deprivation and Disability Deprivation Domain Ranking
LSOA Ref: E01005608
LSOA Ref: E01005610
With regards to health and disability deprivation, this LSOA is:
With regards to health and disability deprivation, this LSOA is:




The 1017th most deprived in England (out of 32,482 LSOA’s)
The 438th most deprived in the North West (out of 4459 LSOA’s)
The 39th most deprived in Salford (out of 144 LSOA’s)
Within the 10% most deprived LSOA’s in England
Page 39 of 42




The 312ndth most deprived in England (out of 32,482 LSOA’s)
The 312th most deprived in the North West (out of 4459 LSOA’s)
The 13th most deprived in Salford (out of 144 LSOA’s)
Within the 5% most deprived LSOA’s in England
Education Skills and Training Deprivation Domain
This domain captures the extent of deprivation in terms of education, skills and training in a local area. The indicators are structured into two sub domains: one relating to children/young people in
the area, and one relating to lack of skills and qualifications among a sub-set of the working age adult population. A number of indicators have been combined to create these sub domains including:
Children / Young People Sub Domain






Average points score of pupils taking English, Maths and Science at Key Stage 2 (Source: Department for Children, Schools and Families (DCSF)
Average test score of pupils taking English, Maths and Science at Key Stage 3 (Source: DCSF)
Average capped points score at Key Stage 4 (this includes results of GCSEs, GNVQ’s and other vocational equivalents) (Source: DCSF)
Proportion of young people not staying on in school or non-advanced education above the age of 16, Source: HMRC Child Benefit (CB) data
Secondary school absence rate (Source: DCSF)
Proportion of those aged under 21 not entering higher education (Source: Universities and Colleges Admission Service (UCAS), Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)
Skills Sub Domain

Proportions of working age adults (aged 25-54) in the area with no or low qualifications (Source: 2001 Census)
Table 4: Education, Skills and Training Deprivation Domain Ranking
LSOA Ref: E01005608
LSOA Ref: E01005610
With regards to education, skills and training deprivation, this LSOA is:
With regards to education, skills and training deprivation, this LSOA is:



The 3556th most deprived in England (out of 32,482 LSOA’s)
The 437h most deprived in the North West (out of 4459 LSOA’s)
The 30th most deprived in Salford (out of 144 LSOA’s)
Page 40 of 42




The 1075th most deprived in England (out of 32,482 LSOA’s)
The 144th most deprived in the North West (out of 4459 LSOA’s)
The 6th most deprived in Salford (out of 144 LSOA’s)
Within the 5% most deprived LSOA’s in England
Barriers to Housing and Services Deprivation Domain
The purpose of this domain is to measure physical and financial barriers to housing and key local services. The indicators are structured into two sub-domains: ‘geographical barriers’, and ‘wider
barriers’ which includes issues relating to access to housing, such as affordability. A number of indicators have been combined to create these two sub domains including:
Financial Barriers



Household overcrowding (Source: 2001 Census)
Local Authority level percentage of households for whom a decision on their application for assistance under the homeless provisions of housing legislation has been made, assigned to the
constituent Super Output Area’s (Source: Communities and Local Government,)
Difficulty of Access to owner-occupation (Source: modelled estimates produced by Heriot-Watt University, 2005)
Physical Barriers




Road distance to a GP surgery (Source: National Administrative Codes Service)
Road distance to a general stores or supermarket (Source: MapInfo Ltd)
Road distance to a primary school (Source: DCFS)
Road distance to a post office or sub post office (Source: Post Office Ltd)
Table 5: Barriers to Housing and Services Deprivation Domain Ranking
LSOA Ref: E01005608
LSOA Ref: E01005610
With regards to barriers to housing and skills deprivation, this LSOA is:
With regards to barriers to housing and skills deprivation, this LSOA is:



The 19993rd most deprived in England (out of 32,482 LSOA’s)
The 1715th most deprived in the North West (out of 4459 LSOA’s)
The 114th most deprived in Salford (out of 144 LSOA’s)
Page 41 of 42



The 10508th most deprived in England (out of 32,482 LSOA’s)
The 1511th most deprived in the North West (out of 4459 LSOA’s)
The 98th most deprived in Salford (out of 144 LSOA’s)
Crime Deprivation Domain
This domain measures the rate of recorded crime for four major crime types, representing the risk of personal and material victimisation at a small area level. A number of indicators have been
combined to create this domain including:




Burglary (4 recorded crime offence types); number of reported burglaries per 1000 of at risk population (Police Force data, constrained to Crime and Disorder Reduction Partnership (CDRP)
level)
Theft (5 recorded crime offence types); number of reported thefts per 1000 of at risk population ( Police Force data, constrained to CDRP level)
Criminal damage (10 recorded crime offence types); number of reported incidents per 1000 of at risk population (Police Force data, constrained to CDRP level)
Violence (14 recorded crime offence types including Robbery); number of reported crimes per 1000 of at risk population, Police Force data, constrained to CDRP level).
Table 6: Crime Deprivation Domain Ranking
LSOA Ref: E01005608
LSOA Ref: E01005610
With regards to crime deprivation, this LSOA is:
With regards to crime deprivation, this LSOA is:




The 217th most deprived in England (out of 32,482 LSOA’s)
The 72nd most deprived in the North West (out of 4459 LSOA’s)
The 10th most deprived in Salford (out of 144 LSOA’s)
Within the 10% most deprived LSOA’s in England



The 3797th most deprived in England (out of 32,482 LSOA’s)
The 528th most deprived in the North West (out of 4459 LSOA’s)
The 47th most deprived in Salford (out of 144 LSOA’s)
Living Environment Deprivation Domain
This domain measures the quality of individual's immediate surroundings; the ‘indoors’ living environment which measures the quality of housing, and the ‘outdoors’ living environment which
contains two measures about air quality and road traffic accidents. Four indicators have been combined to create these two Sub Domains:
Sub-Domain: The ‘indoors’ living environment


Social and private housing in poor condition (Source BRE and Communities and Local Government, modelled EHCS)
Houses without central heating (Source: 2001 Census)
Sub-Domain: The ‘outdoors’ living environment


Air quality (Source: Geography Department at Staffordshire University and NAEI modelled at LSOA level)
Road traffic accidents involving injury to pedestrians and cyclists (Source: DfT, STATS19 (Road Accident Data) smoothed to LSOA level)
Table 7: Living Environment Deprivation Domain Ranking
LSOA Ref: E01005608
LSOA Ref: E01005610
With regards to living environment deprivation, this LSOA is:
With regards to living environment deprivation, this LSOA is:



The 7301st most deprived in England (out of 32,482 LSOA’s)
The 1138th most deprived in the North West (out of 4459 LSOA’s)
The 22nd most deprived in Salford (out of 144 LSOA’s)
Page 42 of 42



The 16496th most deprived in England (out of 32,482 LSOA’s)
The 2543rd most deprived in the North West (out of 4459 LSOA’s)
The 86th most deprived in Salford (out of 144 LSOA’s)