Competition issues in agriculture sector in 7up4 countries

advertisement
Competition issues
in agriculture sector in 7up4
countries
Cornelius Dube & Rijit Sengupta
Final Project Conference
7Up4 project
6-7 August 2010 Dakar, Senegal
Outline of Presentation








Why the agriculture sector?
Brief Methodology
Nature of Market in production
Competition concerns in inputs market (Seed)
Competition issues in marketing
Other areas of concern
Conclusions
A few recommendations
2
Why the Agriculture sector?

Backbone of economic activity in all countries
Largest employer of labour
Significant foreign currency earner

Significant contribution to GDP


3
Brief Methodology

A major crop selected for each country, in terms of
importance to economy

Assessment done at all three levels of value chain; for
Mali and Togo restricted to the input segment

Inputs collated from country reports + analysis of
secondary data/information + analysis of primary data

Elements of Competition Assessment Framework (CAF)
utilised in overall assessment of competition concerns

Involves identification of major players, calculation of
market shares and estimation of concentration
4
Nature of market in production

Competition concerns arise if production is controlled by few
large farmers, who can influence prices

Production is dominated by small-scale farmers,
uncoordinated across households

Producers have no control over prices in input or output
markets

Existing associations do not provide farmers any bargaining
power

With so many producers and uncoordinated activity, no
competition concerns were noted
5
Competition concerns in inputs market (Seed)

Seed market analysed from perspective of the selected crop

Informal market dominates the supply of seeds for farmers

Formal seed market (govt deptt/research institutions) –
weak ‘extension services’

Seeds easily available from ‘informal sources’

Private sector participation is minimal (little incentives)

Governments supply certified seeds through some
programmes – weak reach-out
6
Competition concerns in inputs market (Seed)
(Contd.)

Seed market is generally not concentrated in Gambia and
Senegal, moderately concentrated in Nigeria

A dominant private firm present in Burkina Faso

Two SoEs together control 78% of seed supply in Togo

Rice and maize seed supply are each dominated by one
player in Mali - supplying 98% and 76% respectively

Allegations of excessive pricing and shortages common in
highly concentrated markets
7
Competition issues in marketing




A stage where several competition concerns are witnessed
Characterised by monopolies in Gambia, Ghana and
Burkina Faso
 GCC has exclusive marketing rights, after licensed buying
cos. (LBCs) buy from farmers
 COCOBOD has exclusive marketing rights for cocoa beans
after LBCs buy from farmers
 SOFITEX is involved throughout the cotton value chain in
Burkina Faso
Dominant private firm emerged from privatisation in
Senegal
Fair competition is noted in the Nigerian rice (processing)
8
Competition issues in marketing (Contd.)

Strategic, natural and policy-induced barriers to entry
influence the market structure

In Gambia and Ghana, scope for introducing competition
exist at LBC agents level

In Senegal, the dominant company is a direct beneficiary
of the privatisation process

Allegations of abuse of dominance in Senegal and UTPs in
Ghana

Farmers have remained with no bargaining power
9
Other areas of concern

Structure of market greatly determined by government
policies

Subsidies and support for SoEs

Absence of competitive neutrality (exclusive rights)

Dominant firms cast high level of influence over entire
value chain

Non-transparent licensing regime

High investment and low incentives for private players to
compete with SoE
10
Conclusions

Considerable competition noticed in production

Farmers (and associations) have no bargaining power

High concentration in inputs markets have implications for
low productivity

Concentration among buyer’s at farm gate impact farmers

Lack of incentives for monopolies to be efficient – no threat
of competition

Various policy-induced factors act as ‘entry barriers’ –
need to be reviewed

Little private sector participation

Improper process of setting ‘prices’ of products
11
A few recommendations

Focus on reducing concentration in input markets for
improving productivity

Promote competition among LBCs through appropriate
measures

Explore ways to attract private participation in marketing
of quality seeds (public-private-partnership)

Review composition and modus operandi of price setting
committees

Competition authorities to closely monitor behaviour of
dominant players (& monopolies)
12
THANK YOU!
13
Download