Anvil Clouds of Mesoscale Convective Systems Robert A. Houze, Jr. University of Washington

advertisement

Anvil Clouds of Mesoscale

Convective Systems

Robert A. Houze, Jr.

University of Washington

ASR Science Team Meetings, Bethesda, 20 November 2014

From space

Mesoscale Convective Systems

2

3

1

Frequency of MCS anvils over tropics

Yuan and Houze 2010

Width & thickness of MCS anvils seen by

CloudSat

Africa Indian Ocean

Yuan and Houze 2010

Internal structure of MCS anvils seen by

CloudSat

Africa Indian Ocean

Yuan, Houze, and Heymsfield 2011

CloudSat CFADs of Large, separated MCSs over the

Maritime Continent

Is there a framework for quantifying bulk anvil structures?

MCS anvil is the result of a life cycle process

Houze 1982

The time-integrated MCS anvil process

Mesoscale Convective

System

Need to understand how anvil is related to the raining region

Extensively studied

Dimensions and hydrometeor content of anvils are determined by the same cloud dynamics that produce the precipitation

Z

AC

A c

Breakdown of the water budget

A s

X

AC

After Houze et al. (1980)

Z

AC A c

X

AC

Convective region water budget

C cu

=

R c

+

E cd

+

A c

+

C

T

R c

E c

A c

C

T

=

=

=

= e

C c a

C c b

C c h

C c with the constraint e + a + b + h

(each height cat.)

=

1

Z

AC A c

X

AC

Stratiform water budget equation

C su

+

C

T

=

R s

+

E sd

+

A s

Rain not simply related to condensation

R s

= e s

(

(

C su

+

C

T

E sd

A s

=

= a C su

( su

+

C

T

+

C

T

)

)

)

where e s

+ a

+ b

=

1

Z

AC A c

X

AC

Total anvil water content

Z

AC A c

X

AC

Dimensions and hydrometeor content of anvils are determined by the same cloud dynamics that produce the precipitation—need to determine them to close the MCS water budget

What do we know about the bulk internal structure of MCS anvils from observations?

Anvil clouds observed by WACR at Niamey

Powell et al. 2012

Anvil clouds observed by WACR at Niamey

Powell et al. 2012

Aerosol effect on anvils

Fan et al. 2013

Take-home points:

1.

Larger MCSs are primary producers of anvils over the tropics

2.

Anvils are a product of lifecycle of the MCS  lifecycle studies are critical

3.

Anvil characteristics determined by environment: land, ocean, day, night, …

4.

Anvils not dynamically separate from the precipitating part of the MCS

5.

Anvils and precipitating sectors need to be physically consistent

6.

Anvils and precipitating sectors are linked via the MCS water budget

7.

Latent heating and radiative heating are linked  should not be separated

8.

Anvils are likely affected by the aerosol environment, but…

End

This research was supported by DOE grant DE-SC0008452 / ER-65460 and

NASA grant NNX13AQ37G

Extra Slides

Time-integrated Water Budget

1.17R

0

.37R

.41R

.16R

.60R

.29R

.40R

.13R

GATE —oceanic

(Gamache & Houze 1983)

COPT81 —continental

(Chong & Hauser 1989)

Z

AC A c

Sum over all cloud height categories i

X

AC

R

= å i

R ci

C cu

= å i

C cui

E cd

C

T

A c

= å i

E cdi

= å i

C

Ti

= å i

A ci

For each height category i

R ci

E cdi

=

= e i

C ci a i

C ci

A ci

C

Ti

=

= b i

C ci h i

C ci with the constraint e i

+ a i

+ b i

+ h

(each height cat.) i

=

1

Anvil clouds observed by WACR at Niamey

Powell et al. 2012

Download