Consortium Meeting Feb 07, 2012 Our Audience, Hits: January 2013 Audience, Data Transfer stopped yandex yesterday Inquiry from Canadians for Expansion • Eric Meyer, Superintendent, Fire Weather, BC Wildfire Management Branch, Ministry of Forests and Range, PO Box 9502, Stn Prov Govt, Victoria, BC V8W 9C1 • Want us to expand our 12km domain about 50% to reach the northern boundary of BC at 60 N latitude, and they would like us to expand the 4km domain about 50% to reach 55 N latitude. • Need to double number of nodes, plus more disks for storage. Plus, backup costs • Would give us more computer power for expansion of 1.3 km and a major computer refresh. Upgrade Since Last Meeting • 10/10/2012 Beginning with the 2012101100 case we have switched to the new configuration using WRF version 3.4.1 with an unmodified YSU PBL scheme – using the newer implicit gravity-wave damping layer (damp_opt=3) – expanding the depth of the damping layer from 5 km to 7 km * – changing the vertical levels to more gradually increase in depth from the surface to a more nearly constant 1-km depth in the upper troposphere – raising our model top from 100 hPa to 50 hPa For the PBL scheme change has these features: – the newer YSU scheme gives similar wind speed and direction scores to our u-star modifications for the 3.1.1 YSU scheme in our summer and winter 2-month tests December Modification • Beginning with the 2012122100 forecast, we are now using the simplified ArakawaSchubert cumulus scheme instead of the old Kain-Fritsch. Our studies show this to be a superior scheme that eliminates the nonphysical precipitation bands of Kain-Fritsch. It was getting pretty silly…strange lines, generally in post-frontal, low stability situations The origin? The Kain-Fritsch convective parameterization • Comprehensive experimentation by Dave Ovens of all available convective schemes. • Best choice: the same scheme used by NCEP for GFS model: SAS (Simplified Arakawa Schubert) scheme. • Also improves our substantial underforecasting of summer convection over the mountains. Old Kain-Fritsch SAS Old New Two Major Proposed Improvements • Better radiation scheme-RRTMG • Adding Land Surface model-RUC LSM Radiation • Dudhia simplified solar versus more sophisticated RRTMG: • Air Force evaluation was the RRTMG is better: RRTMG much more sophisticated Some Results (all stations) Green (with RRTMG) Land Surface Model (LSM) • Land Surface Models provide much more sophisticated descriptions of surface properties and how they evolve. • Generally provides much better dew point forecasts • Snow pack can change in time. • We had been using the NOAH LSM but found unacceptable cold biases over the interior. • But things (and the model) have changed. Testing LSM’s • Old NOAH LSM (had cold bias) • New NOAH MP (had stability issue) • RUC LSM (tested comprehensively) RUC LSM with RRTMG Radiation • As expected dew point is much improved in summer. Summer Winter: Mixed, but RUC overall better Winter Temp: Improvement Winter Temp, Improvement Summer Mixed Story 00z 00z 12z 12z New Developments • Yesterday, Dave figured out how to get around the snow problems with the old NOAH LSM. • Yesterday, NCAR sent us a potential fix for the new NOAH LSM MP. • Want to test these out. • Recommend we go with the best of the bunch with new radiation and LSM. Way Ahead • After we have an optimized basic system, we should go back and add a modified version of our surface drag mods, which can help low wind speed situations (lessen mix out problem a bit). • Then we revisit the shallow cold stable layer problem again. The End