Syllable Simplification Strategies: A Stylistic Perspective Presenter: Michelle Lu Presentation Date: 2012/4/19 Director: Professor Chung “Formal equals accurate” It is generally assumed that greater accuracy is obtained by second language (L2) learners as style becomes more formal. Choice 1. 2. 3. The universal preference for open syllables: the effect of adjacent sounds Native language transfer: preference for disyllabicity Recoverability of linguistic context Syllable Simplification Strategies 1. 2. 3. Vowel epenthesis Consonant deletion Replacement of one of the consonants Preferences Preference for Open Syllables Native Language Transfer: Chinese Preference for Disyllabicity Recoverability of Linguistic Context Sociolinguistic or Stylistic Studies on L2 Consonant Clusters Variables 1. 2. 3. Degree of structural markedness of final consonant clusters Task formality Linguistic context Hypothesis 1. 2. 3. The degree of overall syllable simplification will increase as the final consonant cluster increases. The degree of overall syllable simplification will increase as the task formality decreases. The proportion %epenthesis / %deletion should be greater in tasks without linguistic context than in tasks with linguistic context. Participants Subjects: 20 students (10 males & 10 females) Native Languages: Mandarin Chinese & Taiwanese Ages: 21~35 English learning beginning ages: 13 / 14 Michigan Listening Comprehension Test Scores: 42~66 (Average≒51.17) Procedure and Tasks Michigan Listening Comprehension Test Learning the pseudowords. The main task. 1. Reading minimal pairs with phonetic transcription 2. Reading word list 3. Sentence reading/grammaticality judgment test 4. Conversation The Production Tasks (I+II) The Production Tasks (III) The Production Tasks (IV) Data Gathering and Transcription 1. 2. Instrument A low-noise microphone A SONY 5000 recorder Data Gathering A total of 2,600 tokens = (minimal pair 40 + word list 34 + sentence 40 + conversation 16) × 20 participants Epenthesis Deletion Replacement Frequency Results (Error Rates) Error Rates The Prediction: Minimal Pairs < Word List < Sentences < Conversation Results of the study: Sentences < Word List < Conversation < Minimal Pairs Thanks for your listening!