Dossier Section G: External Evaluations THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTON [College/School of ______] External Evaluations [Month Day, Year] [Candidate Name] This page is to be completed by the Chair of the department/school P/T Committee. Summary of the External Review Process In box (A), type in the total number of individuals who were invited to serve as external reviewers of the candidate’s materials. For each of dispositions indicated in (B) through (E), type in the corresponding number of invitees. The sum of numbers in categories (B) through (E) must equal that of the total in (A). A: Total number invited to serve as external reviewers B: No response = In boxes (F) and (G), indicate how many of the letters in the dossier were written by individuals: D: Accepted but did not submit a letter C: Declined + + F: … suggested by the candidate: G: …suggested by the P/T Committee: E: Accepted and submitted a letter + The sum of these two numbers should equal the number in box E (above). For all letters received (i.e., the number listed in box D), list the reviewers alphabetically by last name. Do not indicate whether a reviewer was suggested by the candidate or by the P/T Committee. Note: All letters received must be included. Reviewer’s Name (Last, First) Title or Position Institution / Employer Behind this page, include the following materials in this order: A sample of the letter that was sent to external reviewers requesting a review of the candidate’s materials; A list of the materials (using your discipline’s bibliographic standards) that were sent out to external reviewers; and All external review letters received, ordered alphabetically by reviewer last name. (No letters received may be excluded.) Per section 6-306 of UT Arlington’s Handbook of Operating Procedures, “the P/T Committee chair shall also provide relevant information about each reviewer’s professional/academic qualifications for evaluating the candidate for tenure and/or promotion, such as a copy of the reviewer’s curriculum vitae (full or abbreviated), documentation appearing on the reviewer’s professional website, or a justification statement written by the P/T Committee chair.” Electronic files (ideally PDFs) with reviewers’ qualifications should be gathered into a separate folder labeled G-ReviewerCVs; this folder should then be placed into the electronic dossier’s section G, i.e., the folder labeled G-ExternalEvals. 1