Candidate Interview Evaluation Form (Optional)
Name of Candidate
Position
Did you attend this candidate’s seminar or presentation? NO
YES
Did you personally interview this candidate?
NO
YES
Do you think that this candidate fits the advertised requirements for the position? (Explain, if not.)
Please use the following scales to indicate how well each statement fits your observations of this candidate:
Mastery of a Body of Knowledge
Strongly
Disagree Disagree Neutral
Agree
Strongly
Agree
In your opinion did the candidate demonstrate
sufficient mastery of a body of knowledge in your
discipline?
Was the candidate’s area of professional emphasis
evident?
Was his or her level of knowledge in the area sufficient
be considered an expert?
Teaching Ability
Was the candidate’s teaching philosophy consistent
with the needs and expectation of our institution’s
students and faculty?
What elements of the candidate’s instructional
materials show evidence of a grassed of pedagogy?
How would you evaluate the candidate’s presentation?
Scholarship
Did the candidate have a well thought out and planned
research agenda?
To what degree are the candidate’s publications of the
caliber expected UT Arlington?
To what degree is the candidate’s professional
presentation evidence of a productive scholar?
Is his or her depth and breadth of scholarly activities
rich enough to be noteworthy?
Please return your completed evaluation marked CONFIDENTIAL to the Search Chairperson Rev 6/ 2015
Candidate Interview Evaluation Form (Optional)
Service related to the Profession
Strongly
Disagree Disagree Neutral
Agree
Strongly
Agree
What is the degree of engagement of the candidate in
his or her discipline?
What is the candidate’s record of college/university
service?
How is the candidate actively engaged in his or her
profession?
General Observations
Was the candidate professional in appearance,
demeanor, and interaction with everyone involved in
the interview process?
Did the candidate communicate clearly and effectively?
Did the candidate answer all questions to your
satisfaction? If not, which questions were left
unanswered?
The candidate will develop a strong funded research
program.
This candidate will integrate well into the Department.
Your response to the next two questions is critical to our selection process. Please use the back of this
form to answer these questions.
What are the strengths of the candidate, based upon your observations of the candidate, the application packet,
and any other information you have accessed? Please comment on the ways in which the candidate can contribute
to the Department.
What are the weaknesses of the candidate, based upon your observations of the candidate, the application packet,
and any other information you have accessed?
Additional remarks:
Please return your completed evaluation marked CONFIDENTIAL to the Search Chairperson Rev 6/ 2015
Candidate Interview Evaluation Form (Optional)
Overall, my rating of acceptability of this candidate is:
Acceptable
Unacceptable
Evaluator is: [ ] Faculty [ ] Staff [ ] Student [ ] Other
INSTRUCTIONS
1) Complete the Candidate Interview Evaluation Form.
2) DO NOT comment on applicant’s age, race, sex, disability, national origin, religion,
sexual orientation, and marital or family status.
3) Please submit all evaluation forms and resumes to the Search Committee Chair.
Please return your completed evaluation marked CONFIDENTIAL to the Search Chairperson Rev 6/ 2015