The following criteria are applied to the 13 Quality Indicators of the
Counseling Standards. This rubric is found within the electronic portfolio
evaluation mode.
Level
Evidence
(0) Unacceptable (0 pts.)
Unacceptable – A meager writing effort. The student does not
appear to understand the concepts underlying in the quality
indicator. No artifacts or inappropriate artifacts. Extensive errors
in the use of standard written English (mechanics, usage,
grammar, spelling, and/or syntax.).
(1) Below Expectations (1 pts.)
Below Expectations – Demonstrates a limited understanding of
the quality indicator. Some key components of the reflective
statement are vague or missing. There are unacceptable errors
in the use of standard written English.
(2) Meets the Standard (2 pts.)
Meets the Standard – Demonstrates an acceptable understanding
of the quality indicator and supported by an appropriate artifact.
The reflection contains satisfactory descriptions, but may contain
a few errors in spelling or mechanics.
(3) Above Expectations (3 pts.)
Above Expectations – The student clearly demonstrates an
understanding of the concepts underlying in the quality indicator.
The discussion of the artifact provides clear evidence of the
artifact’s importance and relatedness to the quality indicator.
There is a detailed description and a thoughtful reflection with no
errors.
(4) Outstanding (4 pts.)
Outstanding – The student demonstrates a superior
understanding of the concepts underlying the quality indicator.
The artifact is an excellent selection with a discussion of the
artifact that provides clear evidence of the artifact’s importance
and relatedness to the quality indicator. The reflection is lengthy
and exhibits detailed descriptions.
Comments