5th Biennial International Business, Banking and Finance Conference University of the West Indies, St. Augustine Campus. Presenter: Joseph Jason Cotton May 3rd, 2013 I. Background II. Methodology III. Results IV. Conclusions 2 Main Concepts What does it tell us? Overall Fiscal Provides an indication of the impact of fiscal policy on domestic demand and financial resources. Overall Fiscal Balance =TR-TE Provides an indication as to whether fiscal policy is becoming more or less expansionary over time. Measured as the change in the structural balance An increase in government expenditures and/or a decrease in taxes that causes the government's budget deficit to increase or its budget surplus to decrease. Measured as the change in the overall fiscal balance or primary balance. A decrease in government expenditures and/or an increase in taxes that causes the government's budget deficit to decrease or its budget surplus to increase. Measured as the change in the overall fiscal balance or primary balance. Balance Fiscal impulse Expansionary Fiscal Policy Contractionary Fiscal Policy 7/15/2016 3 How is it measured? Main Concepts What does it tell us? Cyclical Adjustment It removes the cyclical component of a time series and provides a sense of the underlying movements in a time series. The Hodrick-Prescott (HP) Filter Structural Adjustment Goes beyond the cyclical adjustment and corrects for changes in asset or commodity prices which do not affect the underlying fiscal position Structurally adjusted balance Countercyclical Adding to aggregate demand during downturns (through deficits) and withdrawing from aggregate demand during upturns (through surpluses) It is measured by the fiscal impulse Pro cyclical 7/15/2016 How is it measured? Adding to aggregate demand during upturns It is measured by the (through deficits) and withdrawing from fiscal impulse aggregate demand during downturns (through surpluses). 4 Austerity vs Stimulus: Measurement Indicators The overall fiscal balance The primary fiscal balance The cyclical fiscal balance The structural fiscal balance 5 The fiscal impulse was mostly positive during 2002-2008 and negative during 2009-2011. This suggests a countercyclical response to the economic cycle. This type of assessment can be misleading because it does not adjust for the impact of the business cycle and/or commodity price fluctuations on the budget. 15,000 10,000 5,000 TT$ Million 0 -5,000 -10,000 -15,000 -20,000 Change in the overall fiscal balance Change in the primary balance -25,000 6 Fiscal Indicator What does it tell us? Provides a measure of the The cyclical country’s fiscal underlying fiscal balance position. The structural fiscal balance 7/15/2016 Provides a measure of the country’s underlying fiscal position excluding commodity related revenue and expenditure. How is it measured? Strength Weaknesses CAB= OB -CB •Eliminates the impact of the business cycle on the budget. •May not detect the impact of a commodity price boom. SB= OB-SB •Eliminates the impact of the business cycle and changes in asset or commodity prices. •Some level of subjectivity required in adjustment of revenue and expenditure. 7 Usefulness of estimating the cyclical and structural fiscal balances: 1. They provide a more accurate indication of the budget impact on the economy. 2. Allows for improved formulation of medium-term fiscal frameworks. 3. Practical for international comparisons. 4. Changes in the structural balance can indicate the impact of discretionary fiscal policy on the economy. 8 The two main methods of calculating the cyclical and structural balances were put forward by: I. The International Monetary Fund (IMF) II. The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) 7/15/2016 9 IMF Methodology 7/15/2016 10 7/15/2016 11 7/15/2016 12 Revenue is adjusted for output and commodity price gaps. Where ∗ 𝐶 𝐸 𝑟,a adjusts revenue for the deviation of commodity prices from and average 𝐶 commodity price index. 𝐸 𝑟,c – once this is > 0. Deviations in commodity prices will affect the structural balance 7/15/2016 13 7/15/2016 14 The IMF methodology draws on arithmetic formulas to assess the budget’s impact on aggregate demand and involves three conceptual issues: I. The choice of the base year II. Deriving the Cyclical fiscal balance III. Deriving the Structural fiscal balance 7/15/2016 15 Deriving the Cyclical fiscal balance involves: Data gathering Identifying relevant one-off factors Remove one-off factors from data Adjust for cyclical factors Add back one-off factors 7/15/2016 16 Deriving the Structural fiscal balance involves: Data gathering Identifying relevant one-off factors Remove one-off factors from data Remove energy related revenue and expenditure Compute the asset price adjustment Adjust for cyclical factors 7/15/2016 17 Limitations: 1. The Output gap and elasticities’ of revenue and expenditure were estimated. 2. Subjectivity in determining one-off factors. 3. No adjustment was made for changes in property prices. 4. ECPI data only available from 2004. 7/15/2016 18 …the effect of the business cycle on revenue and expenditure did not appear to significantly distort the fiscal analysis during the review period. 10.00 8.00 6.00 per cent of GDP 4.00 2.00 0.00 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 -2.00 -4.00 -6.00 Overall balance (per cent of GDP) -8.00 Primary balance (per cent of GDP) -10.00 Cyclically adjusted balance (per cent of potential GDP) 19 …the graph shows that the CAB displayed more volatility than the SFB during the review period. 10.00 8.00 per cent of potential GDP 6.00 4.00 2.00 0.00 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 -2.00 -4.00 -6.00 Cyclically adjusted balance (per cent of potential GDP) -8.00 Structural Fiscal Balance (per cent of potential GDP) -10.00 20 …fiscal policy is predominantly pro cyclical in Trinidad and Tobago. 15.00 5.00 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 0.00 2002 per cent 10.00 -5.00 Output gap (as a per cent of potential GDP) Cyclical Fiscal impulse as per cent of potential GDP -10.00 21 …as the economy attempts to return to a path of sustainable economic growth, particularly in the non-energy sector, governments’ active participation will be critical. 15 10 8 6 4 5 2 Growth rates Per cent 10 0 0 2002 -5 -10 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 -2 Output gap (as a per cent of potential GDP) -4 Fiscal impulse as per cent of potential GDP -6 Non-Energy Real GDP growth -8 22 …during the pre-crisis years (2003-2008) the energy sector provided most of the impetus for changes in aggregate demand. However, there have also been signs of an improved fiscal impulse from the non-energy sector since the year 2009. per cent of potential GDP 15.00 10.00 5.00 0.00 2002 -5.00 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Output gap (as a per cent of potential GDP) Cyclical Fiscal impulse as per cent of potential GDP Structural Fiscal impulse as per cent of potential GDP -10.00 23 1. The fiscal impulse was much stronger in the pre-crisis period (2003-2008) than the post crisis period (20092011). 2. Fiscal policy is predominantly pro-cyclical in Trinidad and Tobago. 3. The effect of the business cycle on revenue and expenditure did not significantly distort the fiscal outturn during the review period. 24 4. In resource dependent economies like Trinidad and Tobago it may be useful to estimate the structural fiscal balance to get a clearer picture of the underlying fiscal position and the effect of fiscal policy on aggregate demand. 5. The energy sector provides most of the impetus for changes in aggregate demand. However, there have also been signs of an improved fiscal impulse from the non-energy sector since 2009. 6. As the economy attempts to return to a path of sustainable economic growth, particularly in the non-energy sector, governments’ active participation will be critical. 25 Thank you for your attention. Please feel free to e-mail your comments to . This paper can be accessed on the website of the Central Bank of Trinidad and Tobago. See WP12/2013 April 2013. 26