IR Spectroscopy of Trans-Acrolein: The n11 Fundamental n11 and n16 + n18 n18 Hot Band n16 * n18 ** Hongyu Shi, Li-Hong Xu, R.M. Lees, D.W. Tokaryk Centre for Laser, Atomic and Molecular Sciences (CLAMS) Department of Physics, University of New Brunswick A.R.W. McKellar Steacie Institute for Molecular Sciences, NRC D.R.T. Appadoo Canadian Light Source, University of Saskatchewan (Australian Synchrotron Company, Australia) 1 A' n1 n2 n3 n4 n5 n6 n7 n8 n9 n10 n11 n12 n13 Description nobs / cm-1 CH2 asym-stretch 3103 CH* stretch 3069 CH2 sym-stretch 2998 CH** stretch 2800 C=O stretch 1742 C=C stretch 1625 CH2 scissors 1420 CH** bend 1360 CH* bend 1275 C-C stretch 1158 CH2 in-plane rock 912 CCO bend 564 CCC bend 324 Vibrational Modes of Trans-Acrolein * ** A" n14 n15 n16 n17 n18 Description nobs / cm-1 CH2 twist 993 CH** o-o-p bend 972 CH2 o-o-p wag 959 CH* o-o-p bend 593 C-C torsion 158 Ref. Y. Hamada, Y. Nishimura, M. Tsuboi, Chem. Phys. 100 (1985) 365-375. 2 Energy Diagram: Fundamentals, Overtones, Density of States Harmonic Approximation 2000 1800 1600 -1 * Energy (cm ) 1400 1200 1000 …. n 14 A" CH2 twist 800 ** n 15 A" CH** o/p n 16 A" CH2 o/p n 11 A' CH2 i/p 600 n 17 n 12 n 13 n 18 400 H2C=C(H*)-C(H**)=O 200 0 n18 n13 n12 n17 n11 n 16 n15 n 14 A" A' A' A" A" A" A' A" A" CH* o/p A' CCO bend A' CCC bend A" C-C torsion All 3 McKellar et al, 1, 2, 3, 5-state treatments below 700 cm-1 700 In the 10 mm region 2n12 1120 4n18 600 2n13 n132n18 2 states 2 states 1100 n17 3 states 1080 7n18 500 3n18 n13n18 2 states n16+n18 combination n13n17n18 n11n18 n173n18 n12 5 states 2n133n18 n16n18 n135n18 1060 n12n13n18 n123n18 1040 1020 n15 to be found (weak, close to 3n13) 400 1000 300 2n18 n13 2 states 980 n14 n14 fundamental 3n13, n15 960 6n18 2n132n18 n16 n134n18 n16 fundamental n13n17 n11 n172n18 n11 fundamental 940 200 n18 1 state 920 900 100 4 n16, n14 band analysis NRC II: 180K, 4 x 2m path CLS III: room T, 4.8 m path (High-freq. filter) n11 band analysis n16 + n18 n18 hot band analysis 920 930 940 950 960 CLS IV: room T, 7.2 m path 970 980 990 1000 5 The n11 CH2 In-Plane Rocking Band (A’ a/b-Type) a-type Q branches K 908.0 10 9 908.5 8 909.0 7 6 909.5 910.0 K=6 910.0 910.1 5 4 910.5 K=5 910.1 910.2 910.2 910.3 910.3 910.4 910.4 a-type Q-branch initial lines have so far been identified up to K = 15 R and P series followed to high J (> 40) assignments confirmed with ground state combination differences 6 Intensity Ratio (est.) from a- and b-Type Subbands b-type assignments have been found based on prediction From assignments, we learnt a-type transitions are much stronger than b-type transitions. - qualitatively We wish to know approximately what intensity ratio (- quantitatively) would be between the two types: (transition dipole moment)a /(transition dipole moment)b. Partition func. Vibrational transition dipole moment and temp. dependence Line intensity hcnij hcEi m T0 Sij nij 1 e kT e kT TZv Zr Q 2 J ' K '| J " K" 2 Related to population difference Rotational transition strength Transition freq. 7 Boltzmann factor Vibrational Transition Dipole Moment Ratio of a- and b-Type Transitions in the n11 Band (Sij_a / Sij_b)calc (Sij_a / Sij_b)obs 2 a ∂μ ∂Q Ka' = 7 n11 = 1 2 b 9 8 7 rR(7) pP(9) qR(7) 8 7 6 qP(9) 9 8 7 n11 = 0 Ka" = 6 ∂μ ∂Q 10 9 8 Ka" = 8 Ka" = 7 8 Ratio of a-/b- Type Transition Dipole Moment Squared ∂μ ∂Q 6 2 a ∂μ ∂Q 5 2 ≈2.4 b 4 3 2 1 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 Number of data points 9 n16 Fundament and Hot Bands – Low Resolution Plot n16 + n18 n18 hot band centered at ~ 957.6 cm-1 n16 fundamental band centered at ~ 958.8 cm-1 2 pQ Ka" 8 935 7 940 6 5 945 3 4 5 6 rQ Ka" 4 950 955 Transmission / Wavenumber (cm-1) File # 1 = ACROLEIN-001CM-1_COADDBGSUB Acrolein in 30cm MP cell with 16 passes 960 965 970 975 980 Paged X-Zoom CURSOR Res=0.001 10 Q Branches – Medium and High Resolution 973.22 973.24 rQ pQ branch of n16hot band Ka" = 5 Ka= 6-5 33 32 branch of n 16 fundamental band Ka" = 5 branch of n14 fundamental band Ka" = 7 rQ 31 30 973.26 29 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 20 18 16 14 12 … = J 973.28 973.3 973.32 973.34 973.36 973.38 11 Asymmetric Rotor Hamiltonian H n vib AP BP CP + higher order 2 a 2 b 2 c B C 2 n vib Bav P A Bav P Pb Pc2 2 + higher order 2 2 a E Evib Bav J J 1 A Bav K asym. 2 J 1 JK J J 1 K K K H J J J 1 2 2 2 4 6 H JK J J 1 K H KJ J J 1 K H K K ... J J 2 2 2 4 3 3 (Isolated band modeling using Maki’s program) 12 Molecular Parameters (cm-1) for Trans-Acrolein n11 n16 n16+n18 0 157.8839(1) 911.3419(1) 1.57954076 1.5271577(3) 1.552589(10) 0.155424164 0.15564911(3) 0.154799(3) 0.14152-893 0.14208587(3) 0.141265(3) 3.99773 3.947(7) 3.3(22) 0.19342 -0.028(2) 1.90(81) -0.073(115) 0.229(52) -0.057(4) 3.47417 3.6226(7) 3.92(21) -2.92953 -2.851(2) -4.17(41) 1.20053 -0.2192(3) -0.322(22) 0.63(14) -0.041 -61.9(30) -0.01586 0.0222(7) 1.46(26) -0.8252(1) -2.19(18) 3.17(1) 35.2(43) 0.00089 958.74077(11) 1.5967121(97) 0.15529617(78) 0.14152241(81) 4.59(29) 1.027(75) 957.6290(1) 1.543791(10) 0.155274(1) 0.142086(1) 6.68(78) 0.36(16) 0.091(34) 0.044(11) -0.084(2) 4.07(5) -1.71(14) 0.905(45) 0.258(30) -44.8(9) -2.39(16) -5.34(72) 216(36) 0.00073 Ground Statea ni A B C J K hJ hJK hK J JK K HJ HJK HKJ HK LK rms a x 109 x 106 x 1011 x 108 x 106 x 108 x 107 x 105 x 1011 x 1011 x 109 x 108 x 1012 n18b 3.543(12) -2.95(13) 2.514(25) -1.69(67) -5.757(97) -1.27(18) 0.0010 M. Winnewisser, G. Winnewisser, T. Honda, E. Hirota, Z. Naturforsch. 30a (1975) 1001-1014. McKellar, D.R.T. Appadoo, J. Mol. Spectrosc., in press. b A.R.W. 13 Summary Vibrational substates have been identified for the n11 mode of trans-acrolein from Ka = 0 to 15, and for n16 + n18 from Ka = 0 to 10, generally up to order J ~ 40 for most subbands. Asymmetry splitting has been observed for Ka up to 5. Assigned transitions have been modeled by a Watson asymmetric rotor Hamiltonian using the least squares program written by Art Maki. The two datasets are currently fitted with standard deviations of 0.00089 and 0.00073 cm-1. 14