Water and Food Security Comments on V0 Draft Douglas R. Brown, Christopher Shore, Angeline Munzara, Kirsty Nowlan and Pamela Ebanyat World Vision International General Comments We have reviewed this report and find it, on the whole, to be a very useful and comprehensive survey of thinking about the current situation, a thorough analysis of the data and a clear statement of issues that need to be considered for the future, especially in relation to food security, including the impact of inadequate access to water on children. In terms of water management, we really appreciated the focus on: o soil and water conservation and soil management o supplemental irrigation o water harvesting and storage o integrated water resources management o attention to the gender dimensions of water and food security o links between healthy ecosystems (including water) and dietary diversity o the importance of an agroecological approach At the same time, we feel that there could be greater emphasis on: o community-based watershed management o landscapes and water o the important role that climate smart agricultural practices play in management and recharge of groundwater as well as their linkage to food security and resilience o a more explicit mention of the role of management of soil carbon in water management In addition to this, we really appreciated the very strong and comprehensive focus on the various governance issues related to water: o Access to water o Local level as well as national level institutions, both formal and non-formal We are largely in agreement with the conclusions of the report. With respect to some of the specific recommendations we would note: o Recommendation 1: Water and sanitation deserve a central position in food security and nutrition strategies and there needs to be more joined up thinking and action around water / sanitation and food security and nutrition: It seems to us that there is a disconnect between the analysis of the report, which acknowledges the particular impact of inadequate access to water on children, with the recommendations, where children are entirely absent. This could be corrected by specifically naming children as a cohort alongside vulnerable women and men in Recommendation 2. For example, the introduction on page 76, line 21 could be reworded as: “Problems and solutions around water for FSN are often conceptualized and framed in ways that neglect the needs and interests of poor, food insecure and marginalized women and men, including and especially children. Thus, poor women’s and men’s capabilities and entitlements to water and food are neglected, together with their ability to ensure the needs of their children for water and food are met.” The report rightly states that the current The Voluntary guidelines on the ‘Responsible Governance of Tenure of Land, Fisheries and Forests in the Context of National Food Security adopted by CFS do not address the link with water. Given that access to land and water are interlinked, it would seem appropriate to consider how the CFS might amend or revise the Voluntary Guidelines to include water – or consider whether one might develop separate guidelines for sustainable water management. In most African states, just as land is vested in the State, so is water. Land and water are the most critical resources for agricultural production. o Recommendation 4: Ensuring sustainable use of ground water: States should recognize the key role that ecosystems play in maintaining water quantity and quality and support actions within respective national boundaries to protect and sustainably manage these ecosystems. o Recommendation 6: Fostering sustainable investment, innovation and technologies to improve agricultural water management productivity: National governments, international finance organisations, NGOs and international cooperating partners should accelerate the provision of technical and financial assistance to countries in preparing nationally owned integrated water resources management and water-efficiency plans tailored to countryspecific needs, paying particular attention to economic development, social and environmental needs as well as to the development of innovative and locally adapted institutional arrangements to enable their effective management. o Recommendation 7: Locally appropriate solutions: States should also involve all stakeholders, including women and men, youth and local communities, in integrated planning and management of land and water resources; developing preventive and preparedness measures, as well as risk mitigation and disaster reduction, including early warning systems and facilitate information exchange and knowledge-sharing, including indigenous and local knowledge. Finally, it me be worthwhile discussing the sort of programming options that might help assure that the linkages between water and the various dimensions of food security are optimized: Food security dimension Availability Water Water for increased crop & animal production Activities Irrigation, dams, rain water harvest Indicators Households with year round access to sustainable sources of water Food security dimension Access Water Water for Increased incomes Utilisation Water for better nutrition Stability Environmental Water control, preservation and maintenance (Management) Activities Water for sale, water for value addition, Advocacy with the government Water for food preparation, safe drinking water, Water for WASH, water for health Drought & flood management, adoption of water preservation Agriculture approaches like Conservation agriculture, solar pumped water, rain water harvest irrigation Indicators Households with improved standards of living as a result of water sale as a source of income Households accessing safe water, households with improved standards of sanitation and hygiene Increase in household resilience to climatic effects