Administrator Performance Evaluation: University Relations
Employee Name & Oracle ID#:
Position Title:
Department:
Supervisor Name:
Evaluation Period:
Date of Review:
(From_____ to _____)
Summary of Performance Ratings and Definitions
Performance Rating:
Definition:
E
Exceeds Expectations
Performance exceeds normal job requirements
M
Meets Expectations
Performance meets position requirements, objectives and expectations
N
Needs Improvement
Performance meets some of the position requirements, objectives and expectations
Section 1: Division Responsibilities
Responsibility
Demonstrates commitment to
the USD Way: A Culture of
Care by treating everyone with
courtesy and compassion so
that they feel valued, cared for
and respected.
Performance Measurements
 Consistently demonstrates commitment to respecting the value and human dignity of
each and every person. Measured by feedback from relevant internal and external
constituents.
Self
Rating
Final
Rating
Employee Comments:
Supervisor Comments:
Responsibility/Competency
Supports the university’s
mission and core values listed
as: Academic Excellence,
Knowledge, Community,
Ethical Conduct and
Compassionate Service.
Performance Measurements
 Demonstrably supports and/or collaborates with faculty, staff, and students to support
USD’s academic mission.
 Acknowledges and applies strategies for continuous improvement to implement best
practices.
 Values inclusiveness, shows deliberation in planning and problem-solving, and
promotes an environment of respect among coworkers and campus constituents.
Employee Results/Comments:
Self
Rating
Supervisor Results/Comments:
Final
Rating
Responsibility
Operating within the dictates of
each department; supports the
division’s current year goals.
Performance Measurements
 Raises the profile of USD, regionally, nationally, and internationally.
 Increases the breadth and depth of engagement with the university by its various
constituencies (students, faculty/staff, parents, alumni, donors, and other friends)
 Helps strengthen and secure the financial vitality of the institution.
Employee Results/Comments:
Self
Rating
Supervisor Results/Comments:
Final
Rating
Responsibility
Performance Measurements
University Relations Administrator Performance Evaluation
1
Leadership and management
skills




Appropriately and responsibly executes supervisory responsibilities and promotes
personal and professional development of employees.
Successfully evaluates and prioritizes work and meets deadlines.
Sets and consistently achieves ambitious, realistic goals and objectives.
Exercises judgment, integrity and discretion on matters concerning budget, operations,
personnel, correspondence, reporting, and decisions pertaining to USD constituents in
compliance with university policies and procedures.
Employee Results/Comments:
Self
Rating
Supervisor Results/Comments:
Final
Rating
Responsibility
Teamwork and problem solving
Performance Measurements
 Takes appropriate initiative, demonstrates creativity, and collaborates with team
members.
 Welcomes and respects divergent opinions, understandings, and approaches to affect
successful outcomes.
 Identifies area of concern, provides relevant information, and shares with tact
appropriate strategies to resolve problems.
Employee Results/Comments:
Self
Rating
Supervisor Results/Comments:
Final
Rating
Section 2: Evaluate Results on 2015-16 Goals
In the spaces provided below, list the goals set for the employee for the previous year.
Goal
Performance Expectation and Measures
Employee Results/Comments:
Self
Rating
Supervisor Results/Comments:
Final
Rating
Goal
Performance Expectation and Measures
Employee Results/Comments:
Self
Rating
Supervisor Results/Comments:
Final
Rating
Goal
Performance Expectation and Measures
Employee Results/Comments:
University Relations Administrator Performance Evaluation
Self
Rating
2
Final
Rating
Supervisor Results/Comments:
Goal
Performance Expectation and Measures
Employee Results/Comments:
Self
Rating
Supervisor Results/Comments:
Final
Rating
Goal
Performance Expectation and Measures
Employee Results/Comments:
Self
Rating
Supervisor Results/Comments:
Final
Rating
University Relations Administrator Performance Evaluation
3
Section 3: Summary of Overall Performance and Employee Comments
Supervisor’s Summary of Overall Performance
Does the job description need to be updated?
Overall Rating:
(Mark one with an X)
___
___ Yes
Exceeds Expectations
___ No
___
Meets Expectations
___
Needs Improvement
Supervisor’s Name (Please Print): _______________________________________________________________
Supervisor’s Signature:___________________________________________ Date________________________
Next Level Manager’s Name (Please Print): _______________________________________________________
Next Level Management Signature:__________________________________ Date________________________
Employee’s Comments
Employee’s Acknowledgement Signature:_____________________________ Date________________________
(Employee’s signature indicates these evaluation documents have been reviewed and discussed with the employee.
It does not indicate agreement or disagreement.)
University Relations Administrator Performance Evaluation
4
Section 4: Set 2016-17 Goals
List in priority three to five major goals/objectives for the next year. One goal should be related to the USD Way.
Goal #
Goal
Performance Expectations and Measures
(How this goal will be measured and assessed)
Goal
Performance Expectations and Measures
(How this goal will be measured and assessed)
Goal
Performance Expectations and Measures
(How this goal will be measured and assessed)
Goal
Performance Expectations and Measures
(How this goal will be measured and assessed)
Goal
Performance Expectations and Measures
(How this goal will be measured and assessed)
1
Goal #
2
Goal #
3
Goal #
4
Goal #
5
Professional Development Plans
List one to three development initiatives to be accomplished throughout the next year. Each should enhance the
skills or competencies of the individual and/or help them accomplish the goals established above.
1
2
3
University Relations Administrator Performance Evaluation
5