Keck NGAO Proposal: Management Overview Presenter: P. Wizinowich SSC Meeting June 21, 2006 1 Presentation Sequence • Development Process • NGAO Project • Schedule, WBS, Budget • System Design Phase • Deliverables, Plan, Schedule, Budget • Management status & next steps 2 WMKO Development Process Design and Development Delivery and Commissioning Science Verification Facility Class Operation End of Life Decommissioning New Instrument Proposal System Design Science Need Preliminary Design Detailed Design Full-scale Development We are here Next step 3 NGAO Project: Milestones Year Month Milestone 06 July System design phase starts 07 June 1st major funding secured 07 08 10 12 Sept Dec Mar Mar System Design Review Preliminary Design Review Detailed Design Review AO & LGS facility pre-ship reviews 12 13 13 Dec Jun Dec NGS 1st light LGS 1st light Shared-risk science begins This is only a first-cut timeline 4 NGAO Project: Top-level WBS 5 PW NGAO Project: AO Budget AO Cost Estimate = $35M $10M • Estimation approach 1: Comparison to other systems • Gemini-S MCAO - $18M in 03 dollars. • • Gemini-S GPI - $19M + $6M reserve • • Add $15M for LGS & subtract $5M for instrument $35M TMT NFIRAOS - $25 for AO & $24M for LGS • • Add $7M for 2 additional lasers + 4% inflation $29M Subtract $10M for simpler system $39M Estimation approach 2: Bottoms-up cost estimate Procure WBS Subsystem ($k) 1 Design & Sys Eng 50 2 AO System 7207 3 Laser System 12233 4 Operations tools 0 6 Telescope I&T 50 7 Ops Transition 0 8 Management 600 Ops Spares (5%) 972 Contingency (25%) 5035 Total = 26147 Design Implement (FTE) (FTE) 11.9 2.5 19.0 3.2 6.7 5.0 1.0 1.2 3.7 3 16 10 51 FTE ($k) 1727 2280 388 800 600 120 592 0 1627 8134 Total ($k) 1777 9487 12621 800 650 120 1192 972 6662 34281 Estimation methods agree 6 NGAO Project: Instrument Budget • Cost Estimate = $20M $4M for 1st three instruments Instrument ROM Cost Anchor Near-IR Imager $3M G-S NIR imager ~ $3.5M + 1 vs 4 H2-RG Visible Imager $3M LRIS-R upgrade ~ $1.5M; camera/filters $1M; SW $0.5M Deployable NIR IFU $14M TMT IRMOS ~$42M for 10 IFU + AO; ~$1.6M/IFU for 6 Near-IR IFU $7M OSIRIS ~$5.5M + new detector Visible IFU $4.5M Thermal NIR Imager $3M OSIRIS without full cryo, 4x4K deep depletion CCD, slicer Similar to NIR, smaller but more expensive detector 7 System Design: Objectives • • Establish design approach that meets the scientific & user requirements Establish discipline integrated engineering plan for the proposed design • • Understand technical risks, trade-offs, performance estimates, cost to completion Key deliverables • • • • Systems Requirements Document System Design Manual Systems Engineering Management Plan Systems Design Report 8 System Design: Project Schedule Plan based on delivery of 4 key documents Plan includes schedule & person-hours 9 System Design: Project Schedule System requirements need science team effort • Budget includes 3 graduate students & 1 postdoc 10 System Design: Project Schedule System design will utilize expertise & resources at CIT, UC & WMKO 11 System Design: Project Schedule System Engineering Management Plan 12 SD: Risk Assessment & Management • Detailed risk assessment spreadsheet produced • • • • ~40 items identified during initial point design development Severity & probability of each item indicated along with risk mitigation plan During system design each risk area will be further addressed as either part of the planned trade studies &/or as part of risk assessment Risk management process includes balancing scientific & technical performance, cost & schedule 13 System Design: Budget Cost Estimate = $980k • Basis: • • • 12400 hrs or 6.4 FTE eng/scientist * $120k/yr = $770k 5500 hrs for 3 grad students + postdoc = $150k $40k for travel + $20k for procurements • Only 3% of total NGAO budget system design phase budget may be low • Believe we have properly identified path forward & have a clear idea of how to proceed A more detailed estimate will be prepared as individuals identified & next level of detail added to plan • 14 Management Status • • • Observatory Directors plan to define the NGAO management structure More detailed NGAO system design phase planning awaits management structure resolution NGAO ready to become a real project 15 NGAO Project: Next Steps NGAO is ready to become a real project: • Ready to begin system design phase • The project needs the following key personnel: • • • • • NGAO Project Scientist & science team lead development & iteration of science requirements • • • Principal Investigator Project Scientist + Science Team Project Manager Systems Engineer Volunteer model unsustainable Need to take advantage of expertise & resources at CIT, UC & WMKO in system design Form NGAO Science Advisory Committee to provide high level science guidance 16