MyLabs Group MyPsychLab PsychLab_Prompt10 Prompt Code Provide a unique identifier Prompt Type Check appropriate type Expository X Descriptive Narrative Persuasive Prompt You are reading your textbook and studying for an upcoming exam in psychology. Identify and describe each step in the process required for remembering information from your textbook in order to do well on the exam. Discuss a strategy for improving memory and provide an example of how it could help you on the exam. Length of Response Minimum Maximum Expected (Avg.) 100 1000 300 Holistic Trait Only Holistic + Trait List any traits X Ideas (content); Organization; Conventions (Mechanics); Voice; Focus and Coherence Comments (in words) Type of Scoring Holistic, Trait, or Holistic + Trait Anticipated Scoring (Preliminary) Trait 1 Trait Type Holistic Score Points Trait 2 Trait 3 Trait 4 Trait 5 Development of Ideas (Content) Organization Conventions (Mechanics) Voice Focus & Coherence 4 4 4 4 4 Trait 1 Rubric: Development of Ideas Specific Trait Response Priorities Complete for all multi-part prompts Top Priority Second Priority Score Point 4 Describing the information-processing theory and strategies in the context of the example. Getting the information accurate without context of example. Description of Student Response Response correctly describes the Information Processing Theory steps of encoding, storage, and retrieval within the context of studying for an exam. During encoding, the student must attend to the textbook information in order to move it into short-term/working memory. The student needs to rehearse or engage in some other strategy to store textbook information in long-term memory. During the exam, the student will retrieve information from longterm memory to answer questions correctly. Responses will vary but will include a strategy such as one of the following (note: a definition of the strategy is not required): 3 Elaboration: defined as extensive processing of information. A possible example of elaboration: psychology information for the test is not just memorized but the student comes up with examples, relates information to their own life, or associates a concept with existing knowledge; Imagery: defined as mental visualization of information. A possible example of imagery: create images of psychological concepts from textbook for the exam. Other mnemonics would also be acceptable. Chunking: defined as packing information into higher-order units that can be remembered as single units. A possible example of chunking: grouping textbook information into smaller chunks/pieces of information such as a long list of terms being grouped into themes. Organization: classifying information into a meaningful structure. A possible example of organization: create a hierarchy or outline of the chapter and using that organized structure to store the information into memory. Cues: any sign or stimulus associated with a concept. A possible example of clues: using either a trigger word that you create or remembering all aspects of a course concept in order to retrieve the correct information for the exam. Response correctly describes most of the Information Processing Theory steps of encoding, storage, and retrieval within the context of studying for an exam. During encoding, the student must attend to the textbook information in order to move it into short-term/working memory. The student needs to rehearse or engage in some other strategy to store textbook information in long-term memory. During the exam, the student will retrieve information from longterm memory to answer questions correctly. Responses will vary but will include a strategy such as one of the following (note: a definition of the strategy is not required): Elaboration: defined as extensive processing of information. A possible example of elaboration: psychology information for the test is not just memorized but the student comes up with 2 examples, relates information to their own life, or associates a concept with existing knowledge; Imagery: defined as mental visualization of information. A possible example of imagery: create images of psychological concepts from textbook for the exam. Other mnemonics would also be acceptable. Chunking: defined as packing information into higher-order units that can be remembered as single units. A possible example of chunking: grouping textbook information into smaller chunks/pieces of information such as a long list of terms being grouped into themes. Organization: classifying information into a meaningful structure. A possible example of organization: create a hierarchy or outline of the chapter and using that organized structure to store the information into memory. Cues: any sign or stimulus associated with a concept. A possible example of clues: using either a trigger word that you create or remembering all aspects of a course concept in order to retrieve the correct information for the exam. Response correctly describes some of the Information Processing Theory steps of encoding, storage, and retrieval but context of example may be missing. During encoding, the student must attend to the textbook information in order to move it into short-term/working memory. The student needs to rehearse or engage in some other strategy to store textbook information in long-term memory. During the exam, the student will retrieve information from longterm memory to answer questions correctly. Responses will vary but may include one of the following with a reliance on definitions instead of using the context of example: Elaboration: defined as extensive processing of information. A possible example of elaboration: psychology information for the test is not just memorized but the student comes up with examples, relates information to their own life, or associates a concept with existing knowledge; Imagery: defined as mental visualization of information. A possible example of imagery: create images of psychological concepts from textbook for the exam. Other mnemonics would also be acceptable. Chunking: defined as packing information into higher-order units that can be remembered as single units. A possible example of chunking: grouping textbook information into smaller chunks/pieces of information such as a long list of terms being 1 grouped into themes. Organization: classifying information into a meaningful structure. A possible example of organization: create a hierarchy or outline of the chapter and using that organized structure to store the information into memory. Cues: any sign or stimulus associated with a concept. A possible example of clues: using either a trigger word that you create or remembering all aspects of a course concept in order to retrieve the correct information for the exam. Response fails to describe the Information Processing Theory steps of encoding, storage, and retrieval and/or may omit the context of studying for an exam OR the Information Processing Theory steps described are vague and/or incorrect. No effective strategies are presented to help improve performance on the exam OR the strategies presented are vague and/or incorrect. Psychology Rubric Universal Writing Traits – preliminary revisions 11.10.11 Note: These revisions are an attempt to draw clearer lines between the score points. Addition revisions may be needed after viewing student essays. Trait 2 Rubric: Organization Score Point Description of Student Response 4 3 2 Organization is effective and demonstrates a logical flow of ideas within the response. Transitions effectively connect concepts. May contain an effective introduction and/or conclusion. Organization is clear and appropriate. Transitions appropriately connect concepts. May contain an appropriate introduction and/or conclusion. Organization is skeletal or otherwise limited, which may impede the reader’s ability to follow the response. Some simple or basic transitions are used but may be inappropriate or ineffective. May contain a minimal introduction and/or conclusion. 1 Response lacks a clear plan. Transitions are lacking or do not link ideas. Both the introduction and conclusion are minimal and/or absent. Trait 3 Rubric: Conventions Score Point Description of Student Response 4 3 2 1 Demonstrates sophistication and skill with a wide variety of conventions. May contain minor editing errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, or sentence construction. Errors do not interfere with the reader’s understanding. Demonstrates adequate control over a variety of conventions. Response may contain some errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, and/or sentence construction. Most errors do not interfere with the reader’s understanding. Although basic conventions may be mostly controlled, overall the response demonstrates inconsistent control over conventions. May not use a variety of conventions, OR may only use basic conventions. May contain a substantial number of errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, and/or sentence construction. Some errors interfere with the reader’s understanding. Demonstrates a lack of control over basic conventions. May contain a large number of errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, and/or sentence structure OR the errors are severe. Errors interfere with the reader’s understanding OR the response is minimal and has a density of errors. Trait 4 Rubric: Voice Score Point Description of Student Response 4 3 Voice is appropriate and clear. Words are appropriate to the subject matter. Sentences are appropriate and varied, making the response easy to read. Voice may be artificial or uneven. Word choice, overall, may be appropriate for the subject matter, but original writing may indicate a limited vocabulary range. Sentences may be choppy, rambling, or repetitive in a way that limits fluency. 2 1 Voice is appropriately authoritative, indicating a high level of comfort with the material. Words are precise and well-chosen. Sentences are varied and have a natural fluidity. Voice may be lacking or inappropriate. Original writing may be simplistic, vague, inappropriate, or incorrect. Sentences may be limited in variety or may comprise awkward fragments or run-ons that produce a halting voice. Trait 5 Rubric: Focus & Coherence Specific Trait Score Point Description of Student Response Response persuasively justifies its conclusions through logic, examples, and illustrative language. References to theories, concepts, etc. effectively demonstrate a strong command of psychology. 4 Response justifies its conclusions through some combination of logic, examples, and illustrative language. References to theories, concepts, etc. effectively demonstrate a good command of psychology. 3 2 1 Response provides some justification for its conclusions. Some combination of logic, examples, and illustrative language are present but are inconsistent or somewhat ineffective. References to theories, concepts, etc. effectively demonstrate only a partial understanding of psychology. Response provides no significant justification for its conclusions. Logic, examples, and illustrative language are absent, inconsistent, and/or ineffective. References to theories, concepts, etc. effectively demonstrate no more than a weak grasp of psychology.