GPS has not reference to the geometric function that I was able to see. There was
not definition that was linked directly to this distribution, where it could be loosely
connected to another topic I was not able to fully understand where geometric
distribution is. This is the same scenario as Frequentist versus Bayesian. Normal
distributions and z-score are connected and thus under the same section. Binomial and
discrete distributions are a hard topic to understand and are not outright defined in GPS.
Adding and subtracting is very vaguely discussed too. Confidence interval is in GPS but
again is not directly stated.
In CCSS The topics similar to GPs does not have a direct statement about
Frequentist versus Bayesian. The CCSS is also missing Add and subtraction two
independent means. I have found that the CCSS describes the other topics very nicely.
The only topic lightly touched on and hardly stated it geometric. Confidence interval is
describe nicely in the CCSS as well. I clearly noticed this topic.
Both CCSS need to state Frequentist versus Bayesian, adding and subtracting
means, and geometric distribution. Though all the distributions are stated in both CCSS
and GPS they are very hard to fully understand. I think that CCSS does a nicer job of
showing examples and better descriptions. The GPS needs to fix it’s statements about
distributions in which sections need to be taught. CCSS also does a better description of
confidence interval.