Temple College
GOVT 2301
Elena Thomason
248-47-9005
NAME:_______________
Spring 2001
MAKE-UP EXAM #3
PART I. SHORT ANSWER 1. Answer one (1) of the following in a
paragraph. Integrate your responses into a well-organized, well-constructed
paragraph. Write complete sentences and pay attention to spelling, grammar,
and word choice. Do NOT assume that “the instructor will know what you mean.”
WRITE LEGIBLY IN INK! 20 points
1. Contrast the three systems of government: unitary, confederal, and federal.
2. Trace the evolution of federalism in the United States.
PART II. SHORT ANSWER 2. Answer one (1) of the following in a
paragraph. Do NOT answer specific parts as separate items. Integrate your
responses into a well-organized, well-constructed paragraph. Write complete
sentences and pay attention to spelling, grammar, and word choice. Do NOT
assume that “the instructor will know what you mean.” WRITE LEGIBLY IN INK!
20 points
1. Compare and contrast the judicial philosophies of John Marshall and Roger Taney as
they relate to the constitutional principle of federalism. Specifically, you should
explain the position of both on:
To be more precise, answer the following:
[A] What is the doctrine of implied powers?
What is Marshall’s position on the doctrine of implied powers?
What is Taney’s position?
Why does each man hold his particular opinion?
[B] What is the supremacy clause?
What is Marshall’s position on the supremacy clause?
What is Taney’s position?
Why does each man hold his particular opinion?
[C] Identify the position of each man on how the Constitution should be interpreted
or applied.
Why does each man hold his particular opinion?
2. Explain the significance of the Supreme Court’s decision in MCCULLOCH V MARYLAND
on the evolution of federalism.
PART III. SHORT ANSWER 3. Answer one (1) of the following in a
paragraph. Integrate your responses into a well-organized, well-constructed
paragraph. Write complete sentences and pay attention to spelling, grammar,
and word choice. Do NOT assume that “the instructor will know what you mean.”
WRITE LEGIBLY IN INK! 20 points
1. The author of you textbook uses a “cake” analogy to describe the features of
American federalism. Briefly explain dual federalism, cooperative federalism,
and centralized federalism using the “cake” metaphor.
2. Describe the pros and cons of federal grant-in-aid programs, explaining the
differences among categorical grants, block grants, and general revenue
sharing. Why were grants-in-aid such a dominant feature of federalism during
the 20th century?
PART IV. SHORT ANSWER 4. Answer one (1) of the following in a
paragraph. Integrate your responses into a well-organized, well-constructed
paragraph. Write complete sentences and pay attention to spelling, grammar,
and word choice. Do NOT assume that “the instructor will know what you mean.”
WRITE LEGIBLY IN INK! 20 points
1. Discuss Daniel Elazar’s typology of political culture. What are the three main
types in his scheme? What are the distinguishing characteristics of each
type? Discuss the geographical patterns to his culture types. How does he
explain these patterns?
2. List and briefly explain three reasons why federalism might make government
more responsible to the people. List and briefly discuss at least three
problems with federalism.
PART V. IDENTIFICATION. Define and identify the importance of ten (10)
of the following items in two or three sentences for each. 20 points/2 pts. each.

necessary and proper clause

devolution

nullification

unfunded mandates

expressly delegated powers

10th Amendment

MISSOURI V HOLLAND

preemption

14th Amendment

the Supremacy Clause

strict constructionist

Anti-Federalists

dual federalism