Results of the Continuing Education
Programs and Services Survey
November 2003
Prepared by the Office of Planning, Budget, and Analysis
Institutional Analysis Area
University of Colorado at Boulder
L:\IR\consult\CE\programs_services\prog_srvcs_report.doc
7/12/2016
Table of Contents
Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 3
Highlights ....................................................................................................................................... 3
Counts and Weighted Percentages of Responses ....................................................................... 6
Results by Program ..................................................................................................................... 6
How Often Use Following CU Computer/IT Services: .......................................................... 6
How Learn About CE Programs at CU: ................................................................................. 7
Used CE web site for: ............................................................................................................. 8
Quality of CE Services and Courses ....................................................................................... 9
Reasons for Taking ACCESS Class: .................................................................................... 11
Reasons for Taking Independent Learning Class: ................................................................ 12
Reasons for Taking CAETE Class:....................................................................................... 13
Results by Program and Student Status .................................................................................... 14
How Often Use Following CU Computer/IT Services: ........................................................ 14
How Learn About CE Programs at CU: ............................................................................... 16
Used CE web site for: ........................................................................................................... 17
Quality of CE Services and Courses ..................................................................................... 18
Reasons for Taking ACCESS Class: .................................................................................... 20
Reasons for Taking Independent Learning Class: ................................................................ 21
Reasons for Taking CAETE Class:....................................................................................... 23
Results for Total Group ............................................................................................................ 24
How Often Use Following CU Computer/IT Services: ........................................................ 24
How Learn About CE Programs at CU: ............................................................................... 25
Used CE web site for: ........................................................................................................... 26
Quality of CE Services and Courses ..................................................................................... 27
Reasons for Taking ACCESS Class: .................................................................................... 27
Reasons for Taking Independent Learning Class: ................................................................ 29
Reasons for Taking CAETE Class:....................................................................................... 30
Weighted Means and Standard Deviations .............................................................................. 31
Results by Program ................................................................................................................... 31
Results by Program and Student Status .................................................................................... 35
Results for Total Group ............................................................................................................ 40
Appendix ...................................................................................................................................... 44
L:\IR\consult\CE\programs_services\prog_srvcs_report.doc
7/12/2016
2
Introduction
The Programs and Services Survey was designed to collect information that can be used for
planning purposes by the Division of Continuing Education. A web-based questionnaire
consisting of multiple-choice and extended-response items was administered to a stratified
random sample of 902 CU-Boulder students in October 2003. Strata included program
(ACCESS, Boulder Evening, CAETE, Independent Learning) and student status (degree seeking,
non degree seeking). Students were selected for the sample from the population of students who
participated in one or more Continuing Education (CE) programs during the 2002-03 academic
year and were still enrolled in fall 2003 (n = 2,937). Students who requested a privacy flag on
their records were not included in the population.
To encourage students to respond, an opportunity to win one of two $500 scholarships was
offered to those who submitted a completed questionnaire by October 27, 2003. A total of 326
students responded, for an overall response rate of 36%. Response rates over programs varied
considerably, ranging from 27% (Boulder Evening) to 52% (CAETE). Response rates are shown
in Table 1 for each program.
Table 1
Response Rates by CE Program
Program
Group
ACCESS
Sample
Respondents
Sample
Respondents
Sample
Respondents
Sample
Respondents
Boulder Evening
CAETE
Independent Learning
Total sample
Total respondents
Total
175
63
250
67
227
117
250
79
902
326
Response rate
36%
27%
52%
32%
36%
The response rate for degree-seeking students was similar to that of non degree-seeking students
(37% and 35%, respectively). Information on the survey population, sample, and respondents, by
program and student status, is provided in the appendix.
Results are provided in this report by program, and by program and student status. In addition,
results are provided for the total group. Percentages, means, and standard deviations are
weighted to adjust statistically for both differential sampling fractions and non-response across
combinations of program and student status.
Highlights
Computer Usage. With the exception of CAETE participants, many students reported that they
use campus computer labs daily or weekly (63% ACCESS and Boulder Evening, 68%
Independent Learning, 25% CAETE). Seventy-one percent or more of ACCESS, Boulder
Evening, and Independent Learning participants reported using their CU e-mail accounts daily or
L:\IR\consult\CE\programs_services\prog_srvcs_report.doc
7/12/2016
3
weekly for personal correspondence. The percentage of CAETE participants reporting such
usage was much smaller (37%).
Nearly half of Boulder Evening participants reported daily or weekly usage of CU as their
internet provider. Somewhat fewer ACCESS and Independent Learning participants reported this
level of usage (45% and 44%, respectively). Once again, CAETE participants reported the
smallest amount of daily or weekly usage (30%).
Daily or weekly usage of computer kiosks on campus was similar for ACCESS, Boulder
Evening, and Independent Learning participants (between 51% and 52%), but was noticeably
lower for CAETE participants (17%).
Source of Learning About CE Programs. Principal sources of learning about CE programs
included the CE Catalog and other students. Comparable percentages of Boulder Evening and
Independent Learning participants reported learning about CE programs via the catalog (53%
and 51%). Fewer ACCESS and CAETE participants learned about CE programs this way (41%
and 24%). Across programs, the percentages of students who reported that they learned about CE
programs via another student varied from 22% (ACCESS) to 46% (Independent Learning).
Using the CE Website. Popular uses of the CE website included obtaining course, registration,
and general program information. Obtaining course information was a website use reported by
50% or more of Boulder Evening, CAETE, and Independent Learning participants. Over half of
ACCESS and CAETE participants reported obtaining registration information. Obtaining
scholarship information was reported as the least popular use of the website for all program
participants.
Quality of CE Services and Courses. Most students in CAETE, ACCESS, and Boulder Evening
programs rated the quality of the overall CE experience as very good or excellent (90%, 82%,
and 80%, respectively). Fewer Independent Learning students (55%) provided such ratings of
overall quality. Many students rated the quality of CE registration as very good or excellent, with
percentages ranging from 62% (Independent Learning) to 83% (Boulder Evening) across
programs.
CE instructors and course content received generally high ratings. CE instructors were rated very
good or excellent by 85% of CAETE participants, and by 58% or more of participants in other
programs. Most CAETE participants (86%) reported that the quality of course content was very
good or excellent. For the other programs, 66% or more of the participants reported very good or
excellent quality of course content.
Reasons for Taking an ACCESS Class. Preparing to apply to CU was reported to be an
extremely important reason for taking an ACCESS class by 66% of ACCESS participants1.
1
Note that in order to be considered an ACCESS participant in the context of Question 5 (reasons for taking an
ACCESS class), a student must not only have been enrolled in an ACCESS class during 2002-03, based on SIS
records, but must also have responded to Question 5. Similarly, only those students who were enrolled in
Independent Learning or CAETE classes and responded to the survey questions pertaining to these programs are
considered Independent Learning or CAETE participants for Questions 7 and 9.
L:\IR\consult\CE\programs_services\prog_srvcs_report.doc
7/12/2016
4
Wanting to enhance one’s career was another important reason reported by ACCESS
participants, with 36% of them indicating that this was an extremely important reason. This was
followed by pursuit of a personal interest (24% rated this extremely important) and taking a class
with a specific instructor (10%).
Reasons for Taking an Independent Learning Class. Being the best way to take a class and still
manage other responsibilities was rated as an extremely important reason for taking an
Independent Learning class by 48% of Independent Learning participants. Other extremely
important reasons included completing a graduation requirement (44%) and flexible schedule
(40%).
Reasons for Taking a CAETE Class. Convenience, the opportunity to earn a graduate degree,
and distance education are the three most important reasons for taking a CAETE class,
respectively rated as extremely important by 74%, 71%, and 60% of CAETE participants.
L:\IR\consult\CE\programs_services\prog_srvcs_report.doc
7/12/2016
5
Counts and Weighted Percentages of Responses
CU-Boulder 2003 CE Programs/Services Survey
Results by Program
How Often Use Following CU Computer/IT Services:
ACCESS
N
Pct
Total number of respondents
Q2a: I use campus computer labs:
- - Daily
- - Weekly
- - Monthly
- - Never
- - No response
Q2b: I use my CU e-mail account for personal correspondence:
- - Daily
- - Weekly
- - Monthly
- - Never
- - No response
Q2c: I use my CU e-mail account to reach CU faculty, students &
depts:
- - Daily
- - Weekly
- - Monthly
- - Never
- - No response
Q2d: I use my personal e-mail account to reach CU faculty, students
& depts:
- - Daily
- - Weekly
- - Monthly
- - Never
- - No response
Q2e: I use CU as my internet provider:
- - Daily
- - Weekly
- - Monthly
- - Never
- - No response
Q2f: I use a non-CU internet provider (e.g., AOL, Qwest):
- - Daily
- - Weekly
- - Monthly
- - Never
- - No response
Q2g: I use computer kiosks on campus:
- - Daily
- - Weekly
- - Monthly
- - Never
- - No response
Q2h: I use the PLUS system (to register, etc.):
- - Daily
- - Weekly
- - Monthly
- - Never
- - No response
L:\IR\consult\CE\programs_services\prog_srvcs_report.doc
CE Program
Boulder
Evening
CAETE
N
Pct
N
Pct
Independent
Learning
N
Pct
63
100%
67
100%
117
100%
79
100%
14
26
9
14
--
22%
41%
14%
22%
--
17
23
13
13
1
27%
36%
18%
17%
1%
17
11
14
75
--
15%
10%
12%
63%
--
17
33
17
12
--
24%
44%
21%
11%
--
29
16
4
14
--
46%
25%
6%
22%
--
42
6
6
12
1
67%
9%
9%
15%
1%
34
8
9
66
--
30%
7%
8%
56%
--
54
2
9
14
--
74%
3%
10%
13%
--
28
20
6
9
--
44%
32%
10%
14%
--
25
22
12
6
2
38%
34%
19%
7%
2%
36
21
11
49
--
32%
18%
9%
42%
--
33
30
6
10
--
47%
36%
8%
9%
--
13
16
16
17
1
21%
25%
25%
27%
2%
11
10
13
32
1
16%
14%
20%
49%
1%
34
49
8
26
--
29%
42%
6%
22%
--
23
11
8
37
--
29%
12%
9%
50%
--
20
8
2
32
1
32%
13%
3%
51%
2%
26
6
6
27
2
39%
10%
10%
39%
3%
24
10
7
76
--
21%
9%
6%
64%
--
24
8
7
38
2
34%
10%
8%
45%
3%
33
5
4
21
--
52%
8%
6%
33%
--
34
4
4
24
1
53%
6%
5%
35%
1%
78
11
2
23
3
66%
9%
2%
21%
3%
52
4
1
20
2
64%
5%
2%
27%
3%
10
22
12
19
--
16%
35%
19%
30%
--
9
25
13
19
1
14%
38%
21%
26%
1%
8
11
17
79
2
7%
10%
15%
67%
2%
12
28
14
24
1
13%
38%
19%
28%
2%
8
22
31
1
1
13%
35%
49%
2%
2%
9
24
33
-1
14%
36%
49%
-1%
7
19
71
20
--
6%
16%
61%
16%
--
17
23
35
4
--
24%
30%
44%
2%
--
7/12/2016
6
Note: Percentages, means, and standard deviations are weighted to adjust statistically for different sampling fractions and response rates over CE program by student status
combinations.
CU-Boulder 2003 CE Programs/Services Survey
Results by Program
How Learn About CE Programs at CU:
CE Program
Boulder
Evening
ACCESS
N
Total number of respondents
Q3a: I learned about Continuing
- - Yes
- - No
- - No response
Q3b: I learned about Continuing
- - Yes
- - No
- - No response
Q3c: I learned about Continuing
advisor
- - Yes
- - No
- - No response
Q3d: I learned about Continuing
- - Yes
- - No
- - No response
Q3e: I learned about Continuing
- - Yes
- - No
- - No response
Q3f: I learned about Continuing
Catalog
- - Yes
- - No
- - No response
Q3g: I learned about Continuing
website
- - Yes
- - No
- - No response
Q3h: I learned about Continuing
- - Yes
- - No
- - No response
Q3i: I learned about Continuing
- - Yes
- - No
- - No response
Pct
N
Pct
CAETE
N
Pct
Independent
Learning
N
Pct
63
100%
67
100%
117
100%
79
100%
5
58
--
8%
92%
--
10
57
--
14%
86%
--
4
113
--
3%
97%
--
19
60
--
24%
76%
--
1
62
--
2%
98%
--
2
65
--
4%
96%
--
1
116
--
1%
99%
--
-79
--
-100%
--
18
45
--
29%
71%
--
19
48
--
31%
69%
--
5
112
--
4%
96%
--
20
59
--
27%
73%
--
6
57
--
10%
90%
--
5
62
--
9%
91%
--
17
100
--
14%
86%
--
4
75
--
6%
94%
--
22
41
--
35%
65%
--
12
55
--
17%
83%
--
15
102
--
13%
87%
--
6
73
--
6%
94%
--
26
37
--
41%
59%
--
35
32
--
53%
47%
--
28
89
--
24%
76%
--
41
38
--
51%
49%
--
17
46
--
27%
73%
--
10
57
--
15%
85%
--
36
81
--
30%
70%
--
19
60
--
21%
79%
--
14
49
--
22%
78%
--
27
40
--
45%
55%
--
46
71
--
40%
60%
--
32
47
--
46%
54%
--
15
48
--
24%
76%
--
8
59
--
9%
91%
--
27
90
--
23%
77%
--
5
74
--
6%
94%
--
Ed. programs via an advertisement
Ed. programs via a bus sign
Ed. programs via a CU academic
Ed. programs via a CU academic dept.
Ed. programs via CU Admissions
Ed. programs via the Continuing Ed.
Ed. programs via the Continuing Ed.
Ed. programs via another student
Ed. programs via another source
L:\IR\consult\CE\programs_services\prog_srvcs_report.doc
7/12/2016
7
Note: Percentages, means, and standard deviations are weighted to adjust statistically for different sampling fractions and response rates over CE program by student status
combinations.
CU-Boulder 2003 CE Programs/Services Survey
Results by Program
Used CE web site for:
CE Program
Boulder
Evening
ACCESS
N
Total number of respondents
Q4a: I requested general program information from the CE website
- - Yes
- - No
- - No response
Q4b: I requested course information from the CE website
- - Yes
- - No
- - No response
Q4c: I requested registration information from the CE website
- - Yes
- - No
- - No response
Q4d: I requested scholarship information from the CE website
- - Yes
- - No
- - No response
Q4e: I requested a catalog from the CE website
- - Yes
- - No
- - No response
Q4f: I requested other information from the CE website
- - Yes
- - No
- - No response
L:\IR\consult\CE\programs_services\prog_srvcs_report.doc
Pct
N
Pct
CAETE
N
Pct
Independent
Learning
N
Pct
63
100%
67
100%
117
100%
79
100%
28
35
--
44%
56%
--
29
38
--
43%
57%
--
50
67
--
43%
57%
--
30
49
--
38%
62%
--
29
34
--
46%
54%
--
34
33
--
50%
50%
--
72
45
--
61%
39%
--
39
40
--
50%
50%
--
35
28
--
56%
44%
--
30
37
--
45%
55%
--
65
52
--
55%
45%
--
33
46
--
41%
59%
--
9
54
--
14%
86%
--
8
59
--
12%
88%
--
10
107
--
8%
92%
--
6
73
--
8%
92%
--
15
48
--
24%
76%
--
12
55
--
19%
81%
--
20
97
--
17%
83%
--
20
59
--
25%
75%
--
1
62
--
2%
98%
--
-67
--
-100%
--
2
115
--
2%
98%
--
-79
--
-100%
--
7/12/2016
8
Note: Percentages, means, and standard deviations are weighted to adjust statistically for different sampling fractions and response rates over CE program by student status
combinations.
CU-Boulder 2003 CE Programs/Services Survey
Results by Program
Quality of CE Services and Courses
CE Program
Boulder
Evening
ACCESS
N
Total number of respondents
Q11a: The quality of CE advising is:
- - Excellent
- - Very good
- - Good
- - Poor
- - N/A
- - No response
Q11b: The quality of CE registration is:
- - Excellent
- - Very good
- - Good
- - Poor
- - N/A
- - No response
Q11c: The quality of CE billing is:
- - Excellent
- - Very good
- - Good
- - Poor
- - N/A
- - No response
Q11d: The quality of the CE web site is:
- - Excellent
- - Very good
- - Good
- - Poor
- - N/A
- - No response
Q11e: The quality of CE printed material is:
- - Excellent
- - Very good
- - Good
- - Poor
- - N/A
- - No response
Q11f: The quality of CE course content is:
- - Excellent
- - Very good
- - Good
- - Poor
- - N/A
- - No response
Q11g: The quality of CE instructors are:
- - Excellent
- - Very good
- - Good
- - Poor
- - N/A
- - No response
(Continued)
L:\IR\consult\CE\programs_services\prog_srvcs_report.doc
Pct
N
Pct
CAETE
N
Pct
Independent
Learning
N
Pct
63
100%
67
100%
117
100%
79
100%
9
16
15
3
19
1
14%
25%
24%
5%
30%
2%
12
10
17
4
23
1
15%
14%
27%
6%
37%
1%
14
29
35
8
28
3
12%
25%
30%
7%
23%
3%
8
17
16
5
31
2
8%
19%
21%
8%
41%
2%
20
29
8
5
-1
32%
46%
13%
8%
-2%
30
24
10
2
-1
48%
35%
14%
3%
-1%
54
41
16
3
1
2
45%
36%
13%
3%
1%
2%
28
24
23
2
1
1
33%
29%
32%
3%
2%
2%
21
24
13
4
-1
33%
38%
21%
6%
-2%
20
22
16
7
1
1
30%
33%
25%
11%
1%
1%
52
44
16
2
1
2
44%
38%
13%
2%
1%
2%
25
26
20
7
-1
30%
32%
26%
11%
-2%
13
18
19
-12
1
21%
29%
30%
-19%
2%
16
19
16
3
12
1
23%
28%
24%
5%
19%
1%
27
52
31
-5
2
23%
45%
27%
-4%
2%
14
19
25
2
18
1
17%
21%
35%
2%
23%
2%
15
25
18
-4
1
24%
40%
29%
-6%
2%
27
21
13
2
3
1
43%
32%
19%
2%
3%
1%
31
48
22
-13
3
26%
42%
19%
-11%
3%
23
26
21
2
5
2
28%
30%
29%
3%
7%
3%
25
25
9
-3
1
40%
40%
14%
-5%
2%
28
21
16
1
-1
44%
31%
23%
2%
-1%
51
51
11
1
1
2
42%
44%
10%
1%
1%
2%
25
29
18
6
-1
31%
35%
23%
9%
-2%
28
17
10
2
5
1
44%
27%
16%
3%
8%
2%
32
16
14
3
-2
50%
22%
21%
4%
-3%
53
47
11
2
2
2
45%
40%
9%
2%
2%
2%
26
22
20
9
1
1
33%
25%
28%
13%
1%
2%
7/12/2016
9
Note: Percentages, means, and standard deviations are weighted to adjust statistically for different sampling fractions and response rates over CE program by student status
combinations.
CU-Boulder 2003 CE Programs/Services Survey
Results by Program
Quality of CE Services and Courses
CE Program
Boulder
Evening
ACCESS
N
Q11h: The quality of the overall CE experience is:
- - Excellent
- - Very good
- - Good
- - Poor
- - N/A
- - No response
L:\IR\consult\CE\programs_services\prog_srvcs_report.doc
28
24
8
2
-1
7/12/2016
Pct
44%
38%
13%
3%
-2%
N
31
22
11
2
-1
Pct
49%
31%
17%
3%
-1%
CAETE
N
45
61
7
2
-2
Pct
38%
52%
6%
2%
-2%
Independent
Learning
N
20
27
27
4
-1
Pct
25%
30%
38%
6%
-2%
10
Note: Percentages, means, and standard deviations are weighted to adjust statistically for different sampling fractions and response rates over CE program by student status
combinations.
CU-Boulder 2003 CE Programs/Services Survey
Results by Program
Reasons for Taking ACCESS Class:
CE Program
Boulder
Evening
ACCESS
N
Total number of respondents
Q5a: Reason for taking ACCESS class:
a specific instructor
- - Extremely important
- - Very important
- - Somewhat important
- - Not important or not applicable
- - No response
Q5b: Reason for taking ACCESS class:
CU
- - Extremely important
- - Very important
- - Somewhat important
- - Not important or not applicable
- - No response
Q5c: Reason for taking ACCESS class:
another school
- - Extremely important
- - Very important
- - Somewhat important
- - Not important or not applicable
- - No response
Q5d: Reason for taking ACCESS class:
personal interest
- - Extremely important
- - Very important
- - Somewhat important
- - Not important or not applicable
- - No response
Q5e: Reason for taking ACCESS class:
career
- - Extremely important
- - Very important
- - Somewhat important
- - Not important or not applicable
- - No response
Pct
N
Pct
CAETE
N
Pct
Independent
Learning
N
Pct
58
100%
20
100%
8
100%
14
100%
6
4
13
35
--
10%
7%
22%
60%
--
--6
14
--
--31%
69%
--
1
2
-5
--
13%
26%
-61%
--
--1
13
--
--5%
95%
--
38
7
5
8
--
66%
12%
9%
14%
--
8
5
5
2
--
38%
27%
27%
7%
--
1
1
-6
--
13%
10%
-77%
--
5
2
-7
--
24%
18%
-58%
--
4
4
7
43
--
7%
7%
12%
74%
--
2
1
1
16
--
7%
4%
4%
85%
--
--1
7
--
--10%
90%
--
2
-1
11
--
18%
-5%
77%
--
14
16
17
11
--
24%
28%
29%
19%
--
6
5
3
6
--
27%
23%
15%
35%
--
2
2
1
3
--
26%
23%
13%
39%
--
1
3
3
7
--
13%
14%
14%
58%
--
21
16
8
13
--
36%
28%
14%
22%
--
5
5
5
5
--
23%
23%
31%
23%
--
3
1
1
3
--
39%
10%
13%
39%
--
2
3
2
7
--
18%
14%
10%
58%
--
I wanted to take a class w/
I was preparing to apply to
I was preparing to apply to
I wanted to pursue a
I wanted to enhance my
L:\IR\consult\CE\programs_services\prog_srvcs_report.doc
7/12/2016
11
Note: Percentages, means, and standard deviations are weighted to adjust statistically for different sampling fractions and response rates over CE program by student status
combinations.
CU-Boulder 2003 CE Programs/Services Survey
Results by Program
Reasons for Taking Independent Learning Class:
CE Program
Boulder
Evening
ACCESS
N
Total number of respondents
Q7a: Reason for taking Indep. Lrng.
campus class I wanted
- - Extremely important
- - Very important
- - Somewhat important
- - Not important or not applicable
- - No response
Q7b: Reason for taking Indep. Lrng.
come to campus
- - Extremely important
- - Very important
- - Somewhat important
- - Not important or not applicable
- - No response
Q7c: Reason for taking Indep. Lrng.
flexible schedule
- - Extremely important
- - Very important
- - Somewhat important
- - Not important or not applicable
- - No response
Q7d: Reason for taking Indep. Lrng.
classroom environment
- - Extremely important
- - Very important
- - Somewhat important
- - Not important or not applicable
- - No response
Q7e: Reason for taking Indep. Lrng.
graduation requirement
- - Extremely important
- - Very important
- - Somewhat important
- - Not important or not applicable
- - No response
Q7f: Reason for taking Indep. Lrng.
crse & manage other resps.
- - Extremely important
- - Very important
- - Somewhat important
- - Not important or not applicable
- - No response
Q7g: Reason for taking Indep. Lrng.
transfer to another inst.
- - Extremely important
- - Very important
- - Somewhat important
- - Not important or not applicable
- - No response
Pct
N
Pct
CAETE
N
Pct
Independent
Learning
N
Pct
7
100%
26
100%
17
100%
75
100%
2
-1
4
--
29%
-14%
57%
--
5
3
7
11
--
21%
9%
27%
43%
--
4
1
1
11
--
23%
6%
6%
64%
--
19
11
7
38
--
29%
16%
9%
46%
--
-1
-6
--
-14%
-86%
--
5
3
3
15
--
21%
9%
11%
59%
--
9
3
3
2
--
53%
19%
17%
11%
--
14
15
12
34
--
20%
18%
17%
45%
--
3
1
1
2
--
43%
14%
14%
29%
--
11
7
6
2
--
46%
25%
23%
7%
--
10
6
-1
--
59%
36%
-5%
--
31
19
12
13
--
40%
26%
16%
18%
--
--1
6
--
--14%
86%
--
2
-9
15
--
9%
-34%
57%
--
-1
2
14
--
-5%
12%
83%
--
1
3
18
53
--
2%
4%
24%
71%
--
1
1
1
4
--
14%
14%
14%
57%
--
15
4
4
3
--
62%
16%
13%
9%
--
2
2
4
9
--
12%
11%
23%
53%
--
29
18
12
16
--
44%
23%
16%
17%
--
2
-5
---
29%
-71%
---
16
9
-1
--
61%
34%
-5%
--
10
5
1
1
--
58%
31%
6%
5%
--
36
19
14
6
--
48%
24%
19%
10%
--
-1
1
5
--
-14%
14%
71%
--
-1
-25
--
-2%
-98%
--
-1
2
14
--
-5%
12%
83%
--
5
1
4
65
--
4%
2%
4%
90%
--
class: Couldn't get into on-
class: Didn't want to have to
class: Wanted to have a
class: Prefer online to
class: Needed to complete a
class: Was best way to take
class: Needed the course to
L:\IR\consult\CE\programs_services\prog_srvcs_report.doc
7/12/2016
12
Note: Percentages, means, and standard deviations are weighted to adjust statistically for different sampling fractions and response rates over CE program by student status
combinations.
CU-Boulder 2003 CE Programs/Services Survey
Results by Program
Reasons for Taking CAETE Class:
CE Program
Boulder
Evening
ACCESS
N
Total number of respondents
Q9a: Reason for taking CAETE class:
- - Extremely important
- - Very important
- - Somewhat important
- - Not important or not applicable
- - No response
Q9b: Reason for taking CAETE class:
- - Extremely important
- - Very important
- - Somewhat important
- - Not important or not applicable
- - No response
Q9c: Reason for taking CAETE class:
- - Extremely important
- - Very important
- - Somewhat important
- - Not important or not applicable
- - No response
Q9d: Reason for taking CAETE class:
- - Extremely important
- - Very important
- - Somewhat important
- - Not important or not applicable
- - No response
Q9e: Reason for taking CAETE class:
- - Extremely important
- - Very important
- - Somewhat important
- - Not important or not applicable
- - No response
Q9f: Reason for taking CAETE class:
- - Extremely important
- - Very important
- - Somewhat important
- - Not important or not applicable
- - No response
Pct
N
Pct
Independent
Learning
CAETE
N
Pct
N
Pct
--
--
2
100%
109
100%
--
--
------
------
--1
1
--
--50%
50%
--
65
28
9
7
--
60%
26%
8%
7%
--
------
------
------
------
-1
1
---
-50%
50%
---
81
21
2
5
--
74%
20%
2%
5%
--
------
------
------
------
-1
1
---
-50%
50%
---
24
32
31
22
--
22%
29%
29%
21%
--
------
------
------
------
-1
1
---
-50%
50%
---
52
35
12
10
--
48%
32%
11%
9%
--
------
------
------
------
--1
1
--
--50%
50%
--
77
21
7
4
--
71%
19%
6%
4%
--
------
------
------
------
-1
1
---
-50%
50%
---
32
31
28
18
--
30%
28%
25%
16%
--
------
------
Distance education
Convenience
Customer service
University's reputation
Degree
Price
L:\IR\consult\CE\programs_services\prog_srvcs_report.doc
7/12/2016
13
Note: Percentages, means, and standard deviations are weighted to adjust statistically for different sampling fractions and response rates over CE program by student status
combinations.
CU-Boulder 2003 CE Programs/Services Survey
Results by Program and Student Status
How Often Use Following CU Computer/IT Services:
CE Program
ACCESS
Boulder Evening
CAETE
Independent Learning
Status
Status
Status
Status
Degree
seeking
N
Total number of respondents
Q2a: I use campus computer labs:
- - Daily
- - Weekly
- - Monthly
- - Never
- - No response
Q2b: I use my CU e-mail account for personal correspondence:
- - Daily
- - Weekly
- - Monthly
- - Never
- - No response
Q2c: I use my CU e-mail account to reach CU faculty, students &
depts:
- - Daily
- - Weekly
- - Monthly
- - Never
- - No response
Q2d: I use my personal e-mail account to reach CU faculty, students
& depts:
- - Daily
- - Weekly
- - Monthly
- - Never
- - No response
Q2e: I use CU as my internet provider:
- - Daily
- - Weekly
- - Monthly
- - Never
- - No response
Q2f: I use a non-CU internet provider (e.g., AOL, Qwest):
- - Daily
- - Weekly
- - Monthly
- - Never
- - No response
Q2g: I use computer kiosks on campus:
- - Daily
- - Weekly
- - Monthly
- - Never
- - No response
Q2h: I use the PLUS system (to register, etc.):
- - Daily
Not degree
seeking
Pct
N
Pct
Degree
seeking
N
Pct
Not degree
seeking
N
Pct
Degree
seeking
N
Pct
Not degree
seeking
N
Pct
Degree
seeking
N
Pct
Not degree
seeking
N
Pct
--
--
63
100%
47
100%
20
100%
89
100%
28
100%
58
100%
21
100%
------
------
14
26
9
14
--
22%
41%
14%
22%
0%
14
18
8
7
--
30%
38%
17%
15%
0%
3
5
5
6
1
15%
25%
25%
30%
5%
16
9
10
54
--
18%
10%
11%
61%
0%
1
2
4
21
--
4%
7%
14%
75%
0%
15
27
12
4
--
26%
47%
21%
7%
0%
2
6
5
8
--
10%
29%
24%
38%
0%
------
------
29
16
4
14
--
46%
25%
6%
22%
0%
34
4
4
5
--
72%
9%
9%
11%
0%
8
2
2
7
1
40%
10%
10%
35%
5%
32
5
6
46
--
36%
6%
7%
52%
0%
2
3
3
20
--
7%
11%
11%
71%
0%
46
2
5
5
--
79%
3%
9%
9%
0%
8
-4
9
--
38%
0%
19%
43%
0%
------
------
28
20
6
9
--
44%
32%
10%
14%
0%
18
17
10
2
--
38%
36%
21%
4%
0%
7
5
2
4
2
35%
25%
10%
20%
10%
31
15
7
36
--
35%
17%
8%
40%
0%
5
6
4
13
--
18%
21%
14%
46%
0%
30
20
5
3
--
52%
34%
9%
5%
0%
3
10
1
7
--
14%
48%
5%
33%
0%
------
------
13
16
16
17
1
21%
25%
25%
27%
2%
7
6
10
24
--
15%
13%
21%
51%
0%
4
4
3
8
1
20%
20%
15%
40%
5%
25
39
4
21
--
28%
44%
4%
24%
0%
9
10
4
5
--
32%
36%
14%
18%
0%
17
6
5
30
--
29%
10%
9%
52%
0%
6
5
3
7
--
29%
24%
14%
33%
0%
------
------
20
8
2
32
1
32%
13%
3%
51%
2%
18
5
5
18
1
38%
11%
11%
38%
2%
8
1
1
9
1
40%
5%
5%
45%
5%
21
9
6
53
--
24%
10%
7%
60%
0%
3
1
1
23
--
11%
4%
4%
82%
0%
21
6
4
25
2
36%
10%
7%
43%
3%
3
2
3
13
--
14%
10%
14%
62%
0%
------
------
33
5
4
21
--
52%
8%
6%
33%
0%
26
3
2
16
--
55%
6%
4%
34%
0%
8
1
2
8
1
40%
5%
10%
40%
5%
56
6
2
22
3
63%
7%
2%
25%
3%
22
5
-1
--
79%
18%
0%
4%
0%
36
3
1
16
2
62%
5%
2%
28%
3%
16
1
-4
--
76%
5%
0%
19%
0%
------
------
10
22
12
19
--
16%
35%
19%
30%
0%
7
18
11
11
--
15%
38%
23%
23%
0%
2
7
2
8
1
10%
35%
10%
40%
5%
8
9
14
56
2
9%
10%
16%
63%
2%
-2
3
23
--
0%
7%
11%
82%
0%
7
23
12
15
1
12%
40%
21%
26%
2%
5
5
2
9
--
24%
24%
10%
43%
0%
--
--
8
13%
7
15%
2
10%
6
7%
1
4%
15
26%
2
10%
(Continued)
L:\IR\consult\CE\programs_services\prog_srvcs_report.doc
7/12/2016
14
Note: Percentages, means, and standard deviations are weighted to adjust statistically for different sampling fractions and response rates over CE program by student status combinations.
CU-Boulder 2003 CE Programs/Services Survey
Results by Program and Student Status
How Often Use Following CU Computer/IT Services:
CE Program
ACCESS
Boulder Evening
Status
Degree
seeking
N
Q2h: I use the PLUS system (to register, etc.):
- - Weekly
- - Monthly
- - Never
- - No response
L:\IR\consult\CE\programs_services\prog_srvcs_report.doc
-----
Status
Not degree
seeking
Pct
N
-----
22
31
1
1
CAETE
Pct
35%
49%
2%
2%
Degree
seeking
N
17
23
---
7/12/2016
Pct
36%
49%
0%
0%
Status
Not degree
seeking
N
7
10
-1
Independent Learning
Pct
35%
50%
0%
5%
Degree
seeking
N
Pct
15
57
11
--
17%
64%
12%
0%
Status
Not degree
seeking
N
Pct
4
14
9
--
14%
50%
32%
0%
Degree
seeking
N
Pct
18
25
---
31%
43%
0%
0%
Not degree
seeking
N
5
10
4
--
Pct
24%
48%
19%
0%
15
Note: Percentages, means, and standard deviations are weighted to adjust statistically for different sampling fractions and response rates over CE program by student status combinations.
CU-Boulder 2003 CE Programs/Services Survey
Results by Program and Student Status
How Learn About CE Programs at CU:
CE Program
ACCESS
Boulder Evening
Status
Degree
seeking
N
Total number of respondents
Q3a: I learned about Continuing
- - Yes
- - No
- - No response
Q3b: I learned about Continuing
- - Yes
- - No
- - No response
Q3c: I learned about Continuing
advisor
- - Yes
- - No
- - No response
Q3d: I learned about Continuing
- - Yes
- - No
- - No response
Q3e: I learned about Continuing
- - Yes
- - No
- - No response
Q3f: I learned about Continuing
Catalog
- - Yes
- - No
- - No response
Q3g: I learned about Continuing
website
- - Yes
- - No
- - No response
Q3h: I learned about Continuing
- - Yes
- - No
- - No response
Q3i: I learned about Continuing
- - Yes
- - No
- - No response
Status
Not degree
seeking
Pct
N
CAETE
Pct
Degree
seeking
N
Pct
Independent Learning
Status
Not degree
seeking
N
Pct
Degree
seeking
N
Pct
Status
Not degree
seeking
N
Pct
Degree
seeking
N
Pct
Not degree
seeking
N
Pct
--
--
63
100%
47
100%
20
100%
89
100%
28
100%
58
100%
21
100%
----
----
5
58
--
8%
92%
0%
6
41
--
13%
87%
0%
4
16
--
20%
80%
0%
3
86
--
3%
97%
0%
1
27
--
4%
96%
0%
14
44
--
24%
76%
0%
5
16
--
24%
76%
0%
----
----
1
62
--
2%
98%
0%
2
45
--
4%
96%
0%
-20
--
0%
100%
0%
1
88
--
1%
99%
0%
-28
--
0%
100%
0%
-58
--
0%
100%
0%
-21
--
0%
100%
0%
----
----
18
45
--
29%
71%
0%
16
31
--
34%
66%
0%
3
17
--
15%
85%
0%
2
87
--
2%
98%
0%
3
25
--
11%
89%
0%
16
42
--
28%
72%
0%
4
17
--
19%
81%
0%
----
----
6
57
--
10%
90%
0%
5
42
--
11%
89%
0%
-20
--
0%
100%
0%
11
78
--
12%
88%
0%
6
22
--
21%
79%
0%
4
54
--
7%
93%
0%
-21
--
0%
100%
0%
----
----
22
41
--
35%
65%
0%
7
40
--
15%
85%
0%
5
15
--
25%
75%
0%
12
77
--
13%
87%
0%
3
25
--
11%
89%
0%
3
55
--
5%
95%
0%
3
18
--
14%
86%
0%
----
----
26
37
--
41%
59%
0%
25
22
--
53%
47%
0%
10
10
--
50%
50%
0%
20
69
--
22%
78%
0%
8
20
--
29%
71%
0%
29
29
--
50%
50%
0%
12
9
--
57%
43%
0%
----
----
17
46
--
27%
73%
0%
7
40
--
15%
85%
0%
3
17
--
15%
85%
0%
23
66
--
26%
74%
0%
13
15
--
46%
54%
0%
11
47
--
19%
81%
0%
8
13
--
38%
62%
0%
----
----
14
49
--
22%
78%
0%
24
23
--
51%
49%
0%
3
17
--
15%
85%
0%
37
52
--
42%
58%
0%
9
19
--
32%
68%
0%
29
29
--
50%
50%
0%
3
18
--
14%
86%
0%
----
----
15
48
--
24%
76%
0%
3
44
--
6%
94%
0%
5
15
--
25%
75%
0%
22
67
--
25%
75%
0%
5
23
--
18%
82%
0%
3
55
--
5%
95%
0%
2
19
--
10%
90%
0%
Ed. programs via an advertisement
Ed. programs via a bus sign
Ed. programs via a CU academic
Ed. programs via a CU academic dept.
Ed. programs via CU Admissions
Ed. programs via the Continuing Ed.
Ed. programs via the Continuing Ed.
Ed. programs via another student
Ed. programs via another source
L:\IR\consult\CE\programs_services\prog_srvcs_report.doc
7/12/2016
16
Note: Percentages, means, and standard deviations are weighted to adjust statistically for different sampling fractions and response rates over CE program by student status combinations.
CU-Boulder 2003 CE Programs/Services Survey
Results by Program and Student Status
Used CE web site for:
CE Program
ACCESS
Boulder Evening
Status
Degree
seeking
N
Total number of respondents
Q4a: I requested general program information from the CE website
- - Yes
- - No
- - No response
Q4b: I requested course information from the CE website
- - Yes
- - No
- - No response
Q4c: I requested registration information from the CE website
- - Yes
- - No
- - No response
Q4d: I requested scholarship information from the CE website
- - Yes
- - No
- - No response
Q4e: I requested a catalog from the CE website
- - Yes
- - No
- - No response
Q4f: I requested other information from the CE website
- - Yes
- - No
- - No response
L:\IR\consult\CE\programs_services\prog_srvcs_report.doc
Status
Not degree
seeking
Pct
N
CAETE
Pct
Degree
seeking
N
Pct
Independent Learning
Status
Not degree
seeking
N
Pct
Degree
seeking
N
Pct
Status
Not degree
seeking
N
Pct
Degree
seeking
N
Pct
Not degree
seeking
N
Pct
--
--
63
100%
47
100%
20
100%
89
100%
28
100%
58
100%
21
100%
----
----
28
35
--
44%
56%
0%
20
27
--
43%
57%
0%
9
11
--
45%
55%
0%
39
50
--
44%
56%
0%
11
17
--
39%
61%
0%
22
36
--
38%
62%
0%
8
13
--
38%
62%
0%
----
----
29
34
--
46%
54%
0%
23
24
--
49%
51%
0%
11
9
--
55%
45%
0%
54
35
--
61%
39%
0%
18
10
--
64%
36%
0%
29
29
--
50%
50%
0%
10
11
--
48%
52%
0%
----
----
35
28
--
56%
44%
0%
21
26
--
45%
55%
0%
9
11
--
45%
55%
0%
46
43
--
52%
48%
0%
19
9
--
68%
32%
0%
23
35
--
40%
60%
0%
10
11
--
48%
52%
0%
----
----
9
54
--
14%
86%
0%
6
41
--
13%
87%
0%
2
18
--
10%
90%
0%
5
84
--
6%
94%
0%
5
23
--
18%
82%
0%
5
53
--
9%
91%
0%
1
20
--
5%
95%
0%
----
----
15
48
--
24%
76%
0%
10
37
--
21%
79%
0%
2
18
--
10%
90%
0%
13
76
--
15%
85%
0%
7
21
--
25%
75%
0%
14
44
--
24%
76%
0%
6
15
--
29%
71%
0%
----
----
1
62
--
2%
98%
0%
-47
--
0%
100%
0%
-20
--
0%
100%
0%
2
87
--
2%
98%
0%
-28
--
0%
100%
0%
-58
--
0%
100%
0%
-21
--
0%
100%
0%
7/12/2016
17
Note: Percentages, means, and standard deviations are weighted to adjust statistically for different sampling fractions and response rates over CE program by student status combinations.
CU-Boulder 2003 CE Programs/Services Survey
Results by Program and Student Status
Quality of CE Services and Courses
CE Program
ACCESS
Boulder Evening
Status
Degree
seeking
N
Total number of respondents
Q11a: The quality of CE advising is:
- - Excellent
- - Very good
- - Good
- - Poor
- - N/A
- - No response
Q11b: The quality of CE registration is:
- - Excellent
- - Very good
- - Good
- - Poor
- - N/A
- - No response
Q11c: The quality of CE billing is:
- - Excellent
- - Very good
- - Good
- - Poor
- - N/A
- - No response
Q11d: The quality of the CE web site is:
- - Excellent
- - Very good
- - Good
- - Poor
- - N/A
- - No response
Q11e: The quality of CE printed material is:
- - Excellent
- - Very good
- - Good
- - Poor
- - N/A
- - No response
Q11f: The quality of CE course content is:
- - Excellent
- - Very good
- - Good
- - Poor
- - N/A
- - No response
Q11g: The quality of CE instructors are:
- - Excellent
- - Very good
- - Good
Status
Not degree
seeking
Pct
N
CAETE
Pct
Degree
seeking
N
Pct
Independent Learning
Status
Not degree
seeking
N
Pct
Degree
seeking
N
Pct
Status
Not degree
seeking
N
Pct
Degree
seeking
N
Pct
Not degree
seeking
N
Pct
--
--
63
100%
47
100%
20
100%
89
100%
28
100%
58
100%
21
100%
-------
-------
9
16
15
3
19
1
14%
25%
24%
5%
30%
2%
5
6
14
3
19
--
11%
13%
30%
6%
40%
0%
7
4
3
1
4
1
35%
20%
15%
5%
20%
5%
11
22
28
6
19
3
12%
25%
31%
7%
21%
3%
3
7
7
2
9
--
11%
25%
25%
7%
32%
0%
4
10
13
5
25
1
7%
17%
22%
9%
43%
2%
4
7
3
-6
1
19%
33%
14%
0%
29%
5%
-------
-------
20
29
8
5
-1
32%
46%
13%
8%
0%
2%
24
16
6
1
---
51%
34%
13%
2%
0%
0%
6
8
4
1
-1
30%
40%
20%
5%
0%
5%
37
35
11
3
1
2
42%
39%
12%
3%
1%
2%
17
6
5
----
61%
21%
18%
0%
0%
0%
18
16
20
2
1
1
31%
28%
34%
3%
2%
2%
10
8
3
----
48%
38%
14%
0%
0%
0%
-------
-------
21
24
13
4
-1
33%
38%
21%
6%
0%
2%
14
16
12
5
---
30%
34%
26%
11%
0%
0%
6
6
4
2
1
1
30%
30%
20%
10%
5%
5%
38
36
10
2
1
2
43%
40%
11%
2%
1%
2%
14
8
6
----
50%
29%
21%
0%
0%
0%
17
18
15
7
-1
29%
31%
26%
12%
0%
2%
8
8
5
----
38%
38%
24%
0%
0%
0%
-------
-------
13
18
19
-12
1
21%
29%
30%
0%
19%
2%
10
13
11
3
10
--
21%
28%
23%
6%
21%
0%
6
6
5
-2
1
30%
30%
25%
0%
10%
5%
18
40
25
-4
2
20%
45%
28%
0%
4%
2%
9
12
6
-1
--
32%
43%
21%
0%
4%
0%
10
11
22
1
13
1
17%
19%
38%
2%
22%
2%
4
8
3
1
5
--
19%
38%
14%
5%
24%
0%
-------
-------
15
25
18
-4
1
24%
40%
29%
0%
6%
2%
22
15
9
-1
--
47%
32%
19%
0%
2%
0%
5
6
4
2
2
1
25%
30%
20%
10%
10%
5%
21
39
17
-10
2
24%
44%
19%
0%
11%
2%
10
9
5
-3
1
36%
32%
18%
0%
11%
4%
16
16
18
2
4
2
28%
28%
31%
3%
7%
3%
7
10
3
-1
--
33%
48%
14%
0%
5%
0%
-------
-------
25
25
9
-3
1
40%
40%
14%
0%
5%
2%
22
14
10
1
---
47%
30%
21%
2%
0%
0%
6
7
6
--1
30%
35%
30%
0%
0%
5%
33
42
10
1
1
2
37%
47%
11%
1%
1%
2%
18
9
1
----
64%
32%
4%
0%
0%
0%
18
20
13
6
-1
31%
34%
22%
10%
0%
2%
7
9
5
----
33%
43%
24%
0%
0%
0%
----
----
28
17
10
44%
27%
16%
25
9
10
53%
19%
21%
7
7
4
35%
35%
20%
39
37
8
44%
42%
9%
14
10
3
50%
36%
11%
19
13
17
33%
22%
29%
7
9
3
33%
43%
14%
(Continued)
L:\IR\consult\CE\programs_services\prog_srvcs_report.doc
7/12/2016
18
Note: Percentages, means, and standard deviations are weighted to adjust statistically for different sampling fractions and response rates over CE program by student status combinations.
CU-Boulder 2003 CE Programs/Services Survey
Results by Program and Student Status
Quality of CE Services and Courses
CE Program
ACCESS
Boulder Evening
Status
Degree
seeking
N
Q11g: The quality of CE instructors are:
- - Poor
- - N/A
- - No response
Q11h: The quality of the overall CE experience is:
- - Excellent
- - Very good
- - Good
- - Poor
- - N/A
- - No response
L:\IR\consult\CE\programs_services\prog_srvcs_report.doc
Status
Not degree
seeking
Pct
CAETE
N
Pct
Degree
seeking
N
Status
Not degree
seeking
Pct
Independent Learning
N
Pct
Degree
seeking
N
Pct
Status
Not degree
seeking
N
Pct
Degree
seeking
N
Pct
Not degree
seeking
N
Pct
----
----
2
5
1
3%
8%
2%
2
-1
4%
0%
2%
1
-1
5%
0%
5%
1
2
2
1%
2%
2%
1
---
4%
0%
0%
8
-1
14%
0%
2%
1
1
--
5%
5%
0%
-------
-------
28
24
8
2
-1
44%
38%
13%
3%
0%
2%
25
13
8
1
---
53%
28%
17%
2%
0%
0%
6
9
3
1
-1
30%
45%
15%
5%
0%
5%
33
46
7
1
-2
37%
52%
8%
1%
0%
2%
12
15
-1
---
43%
54%
0%
4%
0%
0%
14
15
24
4
-1
24%
26%
41%
7%
0%
2%
6
12
3
----
29%
57%
14%
0%
0%
0%
7/12/2016
19
Note: Percentages, means, and standard deviations are weighted to adjust statistically for different sampling fractions and response rates over CE program by student status combinations.
CU-Boulder 2003 CE Programs/Services Survey
Results by Program and Student Status
Reasons for Taking ACCESS Class:
CE Program
ACCESS
Boulder Evening
Status
Degree
seeking
N
Total number of respondents
Q5a: Reason for taking ACCESS class:
a specific instructor
- - Extremely important
- - Very important
- - Somewhat important
- - Not important or not applicable
- - No response
Q5b: Reason for taking ACCESS class:
CU
- - Extremely important
- - Very important
- - Somewhat important
- - Not important or not applicable
- - No response
Q5c: Reason for taking ACCESS class:
another school
- - Extremely important
- - Very important
- - Somewhat important
- - Not important or not applicable
- - No response
Q5d: Reason for taking ACCESS class:
personal interest
- - Extremely important
- - Very important
- - Somewhat important
- - Not important or not applicable
- - No response
Q5e: Reason for taking ACCESS class:
career
- - Extremely important
- - Very important
- - Somewhat important
- - Not important or not applicable
- - No response
Status
Not degree
seeking
Pct
N
CAETE
Pct
Degree
seeking
N
Pct
Independent Learning
Status
Not degree
seeking
N
Pct
Degree
seeking
N
Pct
Status
Not degree
seeking
N
Pct
Degree
seeking
N
Pct
Not degree
seeking
N
Pct
--
--
58
100%
6
100%
14
100%
7
100%
1
100%
4
100%
10
100%
------
------
6
4
13
35
--
10%
7%
22%
60%
0%
--2
4
--
0%
0%
33%
67%
0%
--4
10
--
0%
0%
29%
71%
0%
1
2
-4
--
14%
29%
0%
57%
0%
---1
--
0%
0%
0%
100%
0%
---4
--
0%
0%
0%
100%
0%
--1
9
--
0%
0%
10%
90%
0%
------
------
38
7
5
8
--
66%
12%
9%
14%
0%
2
2
2
---
33%
33%
33%
0%
0%
6
3
3
2
--
43%
21%
21%
14%
0%
1
--6
--
14%
0%
0%
86%
0%
-1
----
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
-1
-3
--
0%
25%
0%
75%
0%
5
1
-4
--
50%
10%
0%
40%
0%
------
------
4
4
7
43
--
7%
7%
12%
74%
0%
---6
--
0%
0%
0%
100%
0%
2
1
1
10
--
14%
7%
7%
71%
0%
---7
--
0%
0%
0%
100%
0%
--1
---
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
1
--3
--
25%
0%
0%
75%
0%
1
-1
8
--
10%
0%
10%
80%
0%
------
------
14
16
17
11
--
24%
28%
29%
19%
0%
1
1
1
3
--
17%
17%
17%
50%
0%
5
4
2
3
--
36%
29%
14%
21%
0%
2
1
1
3
--
29%
14%
14%
43%
0%
-1
----
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
1
--3
--
25%
0%
0%
75%
0%
-3
3
4
--
0%
30%
30%
40%
0%
------
------
21
16
8
13
--
36%
28%
14%
22%
0%
1
1
3
1
--
17%
17%
50%
17%
0%
4
4
2
4
--
29%
29%
14%
29%
0%
3
-1
3
--
43%
0%
14%
43%
0%
-1
----
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
1
--3
--
25%
0%
0%
75%
0%
1
3
2
4
--
10%
30%
20%
40%
0%
I wanted to take a class w/
I was preparing to apply to
I was preparing to apply to
I wanted to pursue a
I wanted to enhance my
L:\IR\consult\CE\programs_services\prog_srvcs_report.doc
7/12/2016
20
Note: Percentages, means, and standard deviations are weighted to adjust statistically for different sampling fractions and response rates over CE program by student status combinations.
CU-Boulder 2003 CE Programs/Services Survey
Results by Program and Student Status
Reasons for Taking Independent Learning Class:
CE Program
ACCESS
Boulder Evening
Status
Degree
seeking
N
Total number of respondents
Q7a: Reason for taking Indep. Lrng.
campus class I wanted
- - Extremely important
- - Very important
- - Somewhat important
- - Not important or not applicable
- - No response
Q7b: Reason for taking Indep. Lrng.
come to campus
- - Extremely important
- - Very important
- - Somewhat important
- - Not important or not applicable
- - No response
Q7c: Reason for taking Indep. Lrng.
flexible schedule
- - Extremely important
- - Very important
- - Somewhat important
- - Not important or not applicable
- - No response
Q7d: Reason for taking Indep. Lrng.
classroom environment
- - Extremely important
- - Very important
- - Somewhat important
- - Not important or not applicable
- - No response
Q7e: Reason for taking Indep. Lrng.
graduation requirement
- - Extremely important
- - Very important
- - Somewhat important
- - Not important or not applicable
- - No response
Q7f: Reason for taking Indep. Lrng.
crse & manage other resps.
- - Extremely important
- - Very important
- - Somewhat important
- - Not important or not applicable
- - No response
Q7g: Reason for taking Indep. Lrng.
transfer to another inst.
- - Extremely important
- - Very important
Status
Not degree
seeking
Pct
CAETE
N
Pct
Degree
seeking
N
Status
Not degree
seeking
Pct
Independent Learning
N
Pct
Degree
seeking
N
Status
Not degree
seeking
Pct
N
Pct
Degree
seeking
N
Not degree
seeking
Pct
N
Pct
--
--
7
100%
18
100%
8
100%
13
100%
4
100%
54
100%
21
100%
------
------
2
-1
4
--
29%
0%
14%
57%
0%
4
1
5
8
--
22%
6%
28%
44%
0%
1
2
2
3
--
13%
25%
25%
38%
0%
3
1
1
8
--
23%
8%
8%
62%
0%
1
--3
--
25%
0%
0%
75%
0%
17
9
5
23
--
31%
17%
9%
43%
0%
2
2
2
15
--
10%
10%
10%
71%
0%
------
------
-1
-6
--
0%
14%
0%
86%
0%
4
1
2
11
--
22%
6%
11%
61%
0%
1
2
1
4
--
13%
25%
13%
50%
0%
7
3
2
1
--
54%
23%
15%
8%
0%
2
-1
1
--
50%
0%
25%
25%
0%
11
9
10
24
--
20%
17%
19%
44%
0%
3
6
2
10
--
14%
29%
10%
48%
0%
------
------
3
1
1
2
--
43%
14%
14%
29%
0%
9
4
4
1
--
50%
22%
22%
6%
0%
2
3
2
1
--
25%
38%
25%
13%
0%
8
5
----
62%
38%
0%
0%
0%
2
1
-1
--
50%
25%
0%
25%
0%
21
14
9
10
--
39%
26%
17%
19%
0%
10
5
3
3
--
48%
24%
14%
14%
0%
------
------
--1
6
--
0%
0%
14%
86%
0%
2
-6
10
--
11%
0%
33%
56%
0%
--3
5
--
0%
0%
38%
63%
0%
--2
11
--
0%
0%
15%
85%
0%
-1
-3
--
0%
25%
0%
75%
0%
1
2
13
38
--
2%
4%
24%
70%
0%
-1
5
15
--
0%
5%
24%
71%
0%
------
------
1
1
1
4
--
14%
14%
14%
57%
0%
12
3
2
1
--
67%
17%
11%
6%
0%
3
1
2
2
--
38%
13%
25%
25%
0%
2
1
3
7
--
15%
8%
23%
54%
0%
-1
1
2
--
0%
25%
25%
50%
0%
26
12
9
7
--
48%
22%
17%
13%
0%
3
6
3
9
--
14%
29%
14%
43%
0%
------
------
2
-5
---
29%
0%
71%
0%
0%
11
6
-1
--
61%
33%
0%
6%
0%
5
3
----
63%
38%
0%
0%
0%
7
5
1
---
54%
38%
8%
0%
0%
3
--1
--
75%
0%
0%
25%
0%
26
12
10
6
--
48%
22%
19%
11%
0%
10
7
4
---
48%
33%
19%
0%
0%
---
---
-1
0%
14%
---
0%
0%
-1
0%
13%
---
0%
0%
-1
0%
25%
1
1
2%
2%
4
--
19%
0%
class: Couldn't get into on-
class: Didn't want to have to
class: Wanted to have a
class: Prefer online to
class: Needed to complete a
class: Was best way to take
class: Needed the course to
(Continued)
L:\IR\consult\CE\programs_services\prog_srvcs_report.doc
7/12/2016
21
Note: Percentages, means, and standard deviations are weighted to adjust statistically for different sampling fractions and response rates over CE program by student status combinations.
CU-Boulder 2003 CE Programs/Services Survey
Results by Program and Student Status
Reasons for Taking Independent Learning Class:
CE Program
ACCESS
Boulder Evening
Status
Degree
seeking
N
Q7g: Reason for taking Indep. Lrng. class: Needed the course to
transfer to another inst.
- - Somewhat important
- - Not important or not applicable
- - No response
L:\IR\consult\CE\programs_services\prog_srvcs_report.doc
----
Status
Not degree
seeking
Pct
N
----
1
5
--
CAETE
Pct
14%
71%
0%
Degree
seeking
N
-18
--
7/12/2016
Pct
0%
100%
0%
Independent Learning
Status
Not degree
seeking
N
Pct
-7
--
0%
88%
0%
Degree
seeking
N
Pct
2
11
--
15%
85%
0%
Status
Not degree
seeking
N
Pct
-3
--
0%
75%
0%
Degree
seeking
N
2
50
--
Pct
4%
93%
0%
Not degree
seeking
N
2
15
--
Pct
10%
71%
0%
22
Note: Percentages, means, and standard deviations are weighted to adjust statistically for different sampling fractions and response rates over CE program by student status combinations.
CU-Boulder 2003 CE Programs/Services Survey
Results by Program and Student Status
Reasons for Taking CAETE Class:
CE Program
ACCESS
Boulder Evening
Status
Degree
seeking
N
Total number of respondents
Q9a: Reason for taking CAETE class:
- - Extremely important
- - Very important
- - Somewhat important
- - Not important or not applicable
- - No response
Q9b: Reason for taking CAETE class:
- - Extremely important
- - Very important
- - Somewhat important
- - Not important or not applicable
- - No response
Q9c: Reason for taking CAETE class:
- - Extremely important
- - Very important
- - Somewhat important
- - Not important or not applicable
- - No response
Q9d: Reason for taking CAETE class:
- - Extremely important
- - Very important
- - Somewhat important
- - Not important or not applicable
- - No response
Q9e: Reason for taking CAETE class:
- - Extremely important
- - Very important
- - Somewhat important
- - Not important or not applicable
- - No response
Q9f: Reason for taking CAETE class:
- - Extremely important
- - Very important
- - Somewhat important
- - Not important or not applicable
- - No response
Status
Not degree
seeking
Pct
N
CAETE
Pct
Degree
seeking
N
Pct
Independent Learning
Status
Not degree
seeking
N
Pct
Degree
seeking
N
Pct
Status
Not degree
seeking
N
Pct
Degree
seeking
N
Not degree
seeking
Pct
N
Pct
--
--
--
--
2
100%
--
--
83
100%
26
100%
--
--
--
--
------
------
------
------
--1
1
--
0%
0%
50%
50%
0%
------
------
50
22
5
6
--
60%
27%
6%
7%
0%
15
6
4
1
--
58%
23%
15%
4%
0%
------
------
------
------
------
------
------
------
-1
1
---
0%
50%
50%
0%
0%
------
------
59
18
2
4
--
71%
22%
2%
5%
0%
22
3
-1
--
85%
12%
0%
4%
0%
------
------
------
------
------
------
------
------
-1
1
---
0%
50%
50%
0%
0%
------
------
18
22
24
19
--
22%
27%
29%
23%
0%
6
10
7
3
--
23%
38%
27%
12%
0%
------
------
------
------
------
------
------
------
-1
1
---
0%
50%
50%
0%
0%
------
------
42
24
9
8
--
51%
29%
11%
10%
0%
10
11
3
2
--
38%
42%
12%
8%
0%
------
------
------
------
------
------
------
------
--1
1
--
0%
0%
50%
50%
0%
------
------
59
17
4
3
--
71%
20%
5%
4%
0%
18
4
3
1
--
69%
15%
12%
4%
0%
------
------
------
------
------
------
------
------
-1
1
---
0%
50%
50%
0%
0%
------
------
29
23
19
12
--
35%
28%
23%
14%
0%
3
8
9
6
--
12%
31%
35%
23%
0%
------
------
------
------
Distance education
Convenience
Customer service
University's reputation
Degree
Price
L:\IR\consult\CE\programs_services\prog_srvcs_report.doc
7/12/2016
23
Note: Percentages, means, and standard deviations are weighted to adjust statistically for different sampling fractions and response rates over CE program by student status combinations.
CU-Boulder 2003 CE Programs/Services Survey
Results for Total Group
How Often Use Following CU Computer/IT Services:
N
Total number of respondents
Q2a: I use campus computer labs:
- - Daily
- - Weekly
- - Monthly
- - Never
- - No response
Q2b: I use my CU e-mail account for personal correspondence:
- - Daily
- - Weekly
- - Monthly
- - Never
- - No response
Q2c: I use my CU e-mail account to reach CU faculty, students &
depts:
- - Daily
- - Weekly
- - Monthly
- - Never
- - No response
Q2d: I use my personal e-mail account to reach CU faculty, students
& depts:
- - Daily
- - Weekly
- - Monthly
- - Never
- - No response
Q2e: I use CU as my internet provider:
- - Daily
- - Weekly
- - Monthly
- - Never
- - No response
Q2f: I use a non-CU internet provider (e.g., AOL, Qwest):
- - Daily
- - Weekly
- - Monthly
- - Never
- - No response
Q2g: I use computer kiosks on campus:
- - Daily
- - Weekly
- - Monthly
- - Never
- - No response
Q2h: I use the PLUS system (to register, etc.):
- - Daily
- - Weekly
- - Monthly
- - Never
- - No response
L:\IR\consult\CE\programs_services\prog_srvcs_report.doc
Pct
326
100%
65
93
53
114
1
25%
37%
18%
20%
0%
159
32
28
106
1
62%
10%
9%
19%
0%
122
93
35
74
2
41%
33%
14%
12%
1%
81
86
45
112
2
21%
18%
17%
43%
1%
94
32
22
173
5
35%
10%
8%
45%
2%
197
24
11
88
6
57%
6%
4%
31%
1%
39
86
56
141
4
14%
35%
20%
31%
1%
41
88
170
25
2
16%
32%
49%
2%
1%
7/12/2016
24
Note: Percentages, means, and standard deviations are weighted to adjust statistically for different sampling fractions and response rates over CE program by student status
combinations.
CU-Boulder 2003 CE Programs/Services Survey
Results for Total Group
How Learn About CE Programs at CU:
N
Total number of respondents
Q3a: I learned about Continuing
- - Yes
- - No
- - No response
Q3b: I learned about Continuing
- - Yes
- - No
- - No response
Q3c: I learned about Continuing
advisor
- - Yes
- - No
- - No response
Q3d: I learned about Continuing
- - Yes
- - No
- - No response
Q3e: I learned about Continuing
- - Yes
- - No
- - No response
Q3f: I learned about Continuing
Catalog
- - Yes
- - No
- - No response
Q3g: I learned about Continuing
website
- - Yes
- - No
- - No response
Q3h: I learned about Continuing
- - Yes
- - No
- - No response
Q3i: I learned about Continuing
- - Yes
- - No
- - No response
Pct
326
100%
38
288
--
15%
85%
--
4
322
--
2%
98%
--
62
264
--
27%
73%
--
32
294
--
9%
91%
--
55
271
--
16%
84%
--
130
196
--
48%
52%
--
82
244
--
20%
80%
--
119
207
--
41%
59%
--
55
271
--
12%
88%
--
Ed. programs via an advertisement
Ed. programs via a bus sign
Ed. programs via a CU academic
Ed. programs via a CU academic dept.
Ed. programs via CU Admissions
Ed. programs via the Continuing Ed.
Ed. programs via the Continuing Ed.
Ed. programs via another student
Ed. programs via another source
L:\IR\consult\CE\programs_services\prog_srvcs_report.doc
7/12/2016
25
Note: Percentages, means, and standard deviations are weighted to adjust statistically for different sampling fractions and response rates over CE program by student status
combinations.
CU-Boulder 2003 CE Programs/Services Survey
Results for Total Group
Used CE web site for:
N
Total number of respondents
Q4a: I requested general program information from the CE website
- - Yes
- - No
- - No response
Q4b: I requested course information from the CE website
- - Yes
- - No
- - No response
Q4c: I requested registration information from the CE website
- - Yes
- - No
- - No response
Q4d: I requested scholarship information from the CE website
- - Yes
- - No
- - No response
Q4e: I requested a catalog from the CE website
- - Yes
- - No
- - No response
Q4f: I requested other information from the CE website
- - Yes
- - No
- - No response
L:\IR\consult\CE\programs_services\prog_srvcs_report.doc
Pct
326
100%
137
189
--
42%
58%
--
174
152
--
50%
50%
--
163
163
--
46%
54%
--
33
293
--
11%
89%
--
67
259
--
21%
79%
--
3
323
--
0%
100%
--
7/12/2016
26
Note: Percentages, means, and standard deviations are weighted to adjust statistically for different sampling fractions and response rates over CE program by student status
combinations.
CU-Boulder 2003 CE Programs/Services Survey
Results for Total Group
Quality of CE Services and Courses
Total number of respondents
Q11a: The quality of CE advising is:
- - Excellent
- - Very good
- - Good
- - Poor
- - N/A
- - No response
Q11b: The quality of CE registration is:
- - Excellent
- - Very good
- - Good
- - Poor
- - N/A
- - No response
Q11c: The quality of CE billing is:
- - Excellent
- - Very good
- - Good
- - Poor
- - N/A
- - No response
Q11d: The quality of the CE web site is:
- - Excellent
- - Very good
- - Good
- - Poor
- - N/A
- - No response
Q11e: The quality of CE printed material is:
- - Excellent
- - Very good
- - Good
- - Poor
- - N/A
- - No response
Q11f: The quality of CE course content is:
- - Excellent
- - Very good
- - Good
- - Poor
- - N/A
- - No response
Q11g: The quality of CE instructors are:
- - Excellent
- - Very good
- - Good
- - Poor
- - N/A
- - No response
Q11h: The quality of the overall CE experience is:
- - Excellent
- - Very good
- - Good
- - Poor
- - N/A
- - No response
CU-Boulder 2003 CE Programs/Services Survey
Results for Total Group
Reasons for Taking ACCESS Class:
N
326
Pct
100%
43
72
83
20
101
7
13%
18%
25%
6%
36%
1%
132
118
57
12
2
5
41%
35%
19%
4%
0%
1%
118
116
65
20
2
5
32%
34%
23%
9%
0%
1%
70
108
91
5
47
5
21%
28%
28%
3%
19%
1%
96
120
74
4
25
7
35%
33%
23%
2%
5%
2%
129
126
54
8
4
5
40%
35%
20%
3%
1%
1%
139
102
55
16
8
6
44%
25%
21%
6%
2%
2%
124
134
53
10
-5
41%
33%
21%
4%
-1%
N
Total number of respondents
Q5a: Reason for taking ACCESS class: I wanted to take a class w/
a specific instructor
- - Extremely important
- - Very important
- - Somewhat important
L:\IR\consult\CE\programs_services\prog_srvcs_report.doc
Pct
100
100%
7
6
20
5%
4%
23%
7/12/2016
27
Note: Percentages, means, and standard deviations are weighted to adjust statistically for different sampling fractions and response rates over CE program by student status
combinations.
- - Not important or not applicable
- - No response
Q5b: Reason for taking ACCESS class:
CU
- - Extremely important
- - Very important
- - Somewhat important
- - Not important or not applicable
- - No response
Q5c: Reason for taking ACCESS class:
another school
- - Extremely important
- - Very important
- - Somewhat important
- - Not important or not applicable
- - No response
Q5d: Reason for taking ACCESS class:
personal interest
- - Extremely important
- - Very important
- - Somewhat important
- - Not important or not applicable
- - No response
Q5e: Reason for taking ACCESS class:
career
- - Extremely important
- - Very important
- - Somewhat important
- - Not important or not applicable
- - No response
67
--
67%
--
52
15
10
23
--
50%
18%
14%
18%
--
8
5
10
77
--
8%
5%
8%
79%
--
23
26
24
27
--
24%
24%
22%
30%
--
31
25
16
28
--
29%
24%
20%
27%
--
I was preparing to apply to
I was preparing to apply to
I wanted to pursue a
I wanted to enhance my
L:\IR\consult\CE\programs_services\prog_srvcs_report.doc
7/12/2016
28
Note: Percentages, means, and standard deviations are weighted to adjust statistically for different sampling fractions and response rates over CE program by student status
combinations.
CU-Boulder 2003 CE Programs/Services Survey
Results for Total Group
Reasons for Taking Independent Learning Class:
N
Total number of respondents
Q7a: Reason for taking Indep. Lrng.
campus class I wanted
- - Extremely important
- - Very important
- - Somewhat important
- - Not important or not applicable
- - No response
Q7b: Reason for taking Indep. Lrng.
come to campus
- - Extremely important
- - Very important
- - Somewhat important
- - Not important or not applicable
- - No response
Q7c: Reason for taking Indep. Lrng.
flexible schedule
- - Extremely important
- - Very important
- - Somewhat important
- - Not important or not applicable
- - No response
Q7d: Reason for taking Indep. Lrng.
classroom environment
- - Extremely important
- - Very important
- - Somewhat important
- - Not important or not applicable
- - No response
Q7e: Reason for taking Indep. Lrng.
graduation requirement
- - Extremely important
- - Very important
- - Somewhat important
- - Not important or not applicable
- - No response
Q7f: Reason for taking Indep. Lrng.
crse & manage other resps.
- - Extremely important
- - Very important
- - Somewhat important
- - Not important or not applicable
- - No response
Q7g: Reason for taking Indep. Lrng.
transfer to another inst.
- - Extremely important
- - Very important
- - Somewhat important
- - Not important or not applicable
- - No response
Pct
125
100%
30
15
16
64
--
25%
12%
16%
46%
--
28
22
18
57
--
20%
14%
14%
51%
--
55
33
19
18
--
43%
25%
18%
14%
--
3
4
30
88
--
4%
2%
27%
66%
--
47
25
21
32
--
49%
20%
15%
16%
--
64
33
20
8
--
53%
27%
13%
7%
--
5
4
7
109
--
2%
2%
3%
92%
--
class: Couldn't get into on-
class: Didn't want to have to
class: Wanted to have a
class: Prefer online to
class: Needed to complete a
class: Was best way to take
class: Needed the course to
L:\IR\consult\CE\programs_services\prog_srvcs_report.doc
7/12/2016
29
Note: Percentages, means, and standard deviations are weighted to adjust statistically for different sampling fractions and response rates over CE program by student status
combinations.
CU-Boulder 2003 CE Programs/Services Survey
Results for Total Group
Reasons for Taking CAETE Class:
N
Total number of respondents
Q9a: Reason for taking CAETE class:
- - Extremely important
- - Very important
- - Somewhat important
- - Not important or not applicable
- - No response
Q9b: Reason for taking CAETE class:
- - Extremely important
- - Very important
- - Somewhat important
- - Not important or not applicable
- - No response
Q9c: Reason for taking CAETE class:
- - Extremely important
- - Very important
- - Somewhat important
- - Not important or not applicable
- - No response
Q9d: Reason for taking CAETE class:
- - Extremely important
- - Very important
- - Somewhat important
- - Not important or not applicable
- - No response
Q9e: Reason for taking CAETE class:
- - Extremely important
- - Very important
- - Somewhat important
- - Not important or not applicable
- - No response
Q9f: Reason for taking CAETE class:
- - Extremely important
- - Very important
- - Somewhat important
- - Not important or not applicable
- - No response
Pct
111
100%
65
28
10
8
--
50%
21%
15%
14%
--
81
22
3
5
--
61%
25%
10%
4%
--
24
33
32
22
--
18%
32%
32%
17%
--
52
36
13
10
--
40%
35%
18%
8%
--
77
21
8
5
--
59%
16%
14%
11%
--
32
32
29
18
--
25%
32%
29%
13%
--
Distance education
Convenience
Customer service
University's reputation
Degree
Price
L:\IR\consult\CE\programs_services\prog_srvcs_report.doc
7/12/2016
30
Note: Percentages, means, and standard deviations are weighted to adjust statistically for different sampling fractions and response rates over CE program by student status
combinations.
Weighted Means and Standard Deviations
CU-Boulder 2003 CE Programs/Services Survey
Descriptive Statistics for Questions 5, 7, 9, and 11
Results by Program
N
Std
CE Program
Obs
Variable
Label
N
Mean
Dev
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ACCESS
63
q11a
Q11a: The quality of CE advising is:
43
2.7
0.8
q11b
Q11b: The quality of CE registration is:
62
3.0
0.8
q11c
Q11c: The quality of CE billing is:
62
3.0
0.8
q11d
Q11d: The quality of the CE web site is:
50
2.9
0.7
q11e
Q11e: The quality of CE printed material is:
58
2.9
0.7
q11f
Q11f: The quality of CE course content is:
59
3.3
0.6
q11g
Q11g: The quality of CE instructors are:
57
3.2
0.8
q11h
Q11h: The quality of the overall CE experience is:
62
3.3
0.7
Boulder Evening
CAETE
Independent Learning
67
q11a
q11b
q11c
q11d
q11e
q11f
q11g
q11h
Q11a:
Q11b:
Q11c:
Q11d:
Q11e:
Q11f:
Q11g:
Q11h:
The
The
The
The
The
The
The
The
quality
quality
quality
quality
quality
quality
quality
quality
of
of
of
of
of
of
of
of
CE advising is:
CE registration is:
CE billing is:
the CE web site is:
CE printed material is:
CE course content is:
CE instructors are:
the overall CE experience is:
43
66
65
54
63
66
65
66
2.6
3.3
2.8
2.9
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.3
1.4
1.2
1.5
1.4
1.3
1.3
1.4
1.3
117
q11a
q11b
q11c
q11d
q11e
q11f
q11g
q11h
Q11a:
Q11b:
Q11c:
Q11d:
Q11e:
Q11f:
Q11g:
Q11h:
The
The
The
The
The
The
The
The
quality
quality
quality
quality
quality
quality
quality
quality
of
of
of
of
of
of
of
of
CE advising is:
CE registration is:
CE billing is:
the CE web site is:
CE printed material is:
CE course content is:
CE instructors are:
the overall CE experience is:
86
114
114
110
101
114
113
115
2.6
3.3
3.3
3.0
3.1
3.3
3.3
3.3
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.3
0.4
0.3
79
q11a
Q11a: The quality of CE advising is:
46
2.5
1.0
q11b
Q11b: The quality of CE registration is:
77
2.9
0.9
q11c
Q11c: The quality of CE billing is:
78
2.8
1.1
q11d
Q11d: The quality of the CE web site is:
60
2.7
0.9
q11e
Q11e: The quality of CE printed material is:
72
2.9
0.9
q11f
Q11f: The quality of CE course content is:
78
2.9
1.0
q11g
Q11g: The quality of CE instructors are:
77
2.8
1.1
q11h
Q11h: The quality of the overall CE experience is:
78
2.7
1.0
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
L:\IR\consult\CE\programs_services\prog_srvcs_report.doc
7/12/2016
31
Note: Percentages, means, and standard deviations are weighted to adjust statistically for different sampling fractions and response rates over CE program by student status combinations.
CU-Boulder 2003 CE Programs/Services Survey
Descriptive Statistics for Questions 5, 7, 9, and 11
Results by Program
N
Std
CE Program
Obs
Variable
Label
N
Mean
D ev
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ACCESS
58
q5a
Q5a: Reason for taking ACCESS class: I wanted to take a class w/ a specific instructor
58
1.7
0.9
q5b
Q5b: Reason for taking ACCESS class: I was preparing to apply to CU
58
3.3
1.0
q5c
Q5c: Reason for taking ACCESS class: I was preparing to apply to another school
58
1.5
0.8
q5d
Q5d: Reason for taking ACCESS class: I wanted to pursue a personal interest
58
2.6
1.0
q5e
Q5e: Reason for taking ACCESS class: I wanted to enhance my career
58
2.8
1.1
Boulder Evening
CAETE
Independent Learning
20
q5a
q5b
q5c
q5d
q5e
Q5a:
Q5b:
Q5c:
Q5d:
Q5e:
Reason
Reason
Reason
Reason
Reason
for
for
for
for
for
taking
taking
taking
taking
taking
ACCESS
ACCESS
ACCESS
ACCESS
ACCESS
class:
class:
class:
class:
class:
I
I
I
I
I
wanted to take a class w/ a specific instructor
was preparing to apply to CU
was preparing to apply to another school
wanted to pursue a personal interest
wanted to enhance my career
20
20
20
20
20
1.3
3.0
1.3
2.4
2.5
0.6
1.3
1.2
1.6
1.5
8
q5a
q5b
q5c
q5d
q5e
Q5a:
Q5b:
Q5c:
Q5d:
Q5e:
Reason
Reason
Reason
Reason
Reason
for
for
for
for
for
taking
taking
taking
taking
taking
ACCESS
ACCESS
ACCESS
ACCESS
ACCESS
class:
class:
class:
class:
class:
I
I
I
I
I
wanted to take a class w/ a specific instructor
was preparing to apply to CU
was preparing to apply to another school
wanted to pursue a personal interest
wanted to enhance my career
8
8
8
8
8
1.9
1.6
1.1
2.4
2.5
0.6
0.6
0.2
0.7
0.7
14
q5a
Q5a: Reason for taking ACCESS class: I wanted to take a class w/ a specific instructor
14
1.0
0.2
q5b
Q5b: Reason for taking ACCESS class: I was preparing to apply to CU
14
2.1
1.2
q5c
Q5c: Reason for taking ACCESS class: I was preparing to apply to another school
14
1.6
1.0
q5d
Q5d: Reason for taking ACCESS class: I wanted to pursue a personal interest
14
1.8
1.0
q5e
Q5e: Reason for taking ACCESS class: I wanted to enhance my career
14
1.9
1.1
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
L:\IR\consult\CE\programs_services\prog_srvcs_report.doc
7/12/2016
32
Note: Percentages, means, and standard deviations are weighted to adjust statistically for different sampling fractions and response rates over CE program by student status combinations.
CU-Boulder 2003 CE Programs/Services Survey
Descriptive Statistics for Questions 5, 7, 9, and 11
Results by Program
N
Std
CE Program
Obs
Variable
Label
N
Mean
Dev
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ACCESS
7
q7a
Q7a: Reason for taking Indep. Lrng. class: Couldn't get into on-campus class I wanted
7
2.0
1.3
q7b
Q7b: Reason for taking Indep. Lrng. class: Didn't want to have to come to campus
7
1.3
0.7
q7c
Q7c: Reason for taking Indep. Lrng. class: Wanted to have a flexible schedule
7
2.7
1.2
q7d
Q7d: Reason for taking Indep. Lrng. class: Prefer online to classroom environment
7
1.1
0.3
q7e
Q7e: Reason for taking Indep. Lrng. class: Needed to complete a graduation requirement
7
1.9
1.1
q7f
Q7f: Reason for taking Indep. Lrng. class: Was best way to take crse & manage other resps.
7
2.6
0.9
q7g
Q7g: Reason for taking Indep. Lrng. class: Needed the course to transfer to another inst.
7
1.4
0.7
Boulder Evening
26
q7a
q7b
q7c
q7d
q7e
q7f
q7g
Q7a:
Q7b:
Q7c:
Q7d:
Q7e:
Q7f:
Q7g:
Reason
Reason
Reason
Reason
Reason
Reason
Reason
for
for
for
for
for
for
for
taking
taking
taking
taking
taking
taking
taking
Indep.
Indep.
Indep.
Indep.
Indep.
Indep.
Indep.
Lrng.
Lrng.
Lrng.
Lrng.
Lrng.
Lrng.
Lrng.
class:
class:
class:
class:
class:
class:
class:
Couldn't get into on-campus class I wanted
Didn't want to have to come to campus
Wanted to have a flexible schedule
Prefer online to classroom environment
Needed to complete a graduation requirement
Was best way to take crse & manage other resps.
Needed the course to transfer to another inst.
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
2.1
1.9
3.1
1.6
3.3
3.5
1.0
1.8
1.9
1.5
1.4
1.6
1.1
0.4
CAETE
17
q7a
q7b
q7c
q7d
q7e
q7f
q7g
Q7a:
Q7b:
Q7c:
Q7d:
Q7e:
Q7f:
Q7g:
Reason
Reason
Reason
Reason
Reason
Reason
Reason
for
for
for
for
for
for
for
taking
taking
taking
taking
taking
taking
taking
Indep.
Indep.
Indep.
Indep.
Indep.
Indep.
Indep.
Lrng.
Lrng.
Lrng.
Lrng.
Lrng.
Lrng.
Lrng.
class:
class:
class:
class:
class:
class:
class:
Couldn't get into on-campus class I wanted
Didn't want to have to come to campus
Wanted to have a flexible schedule
Prefer online to classroom environment
Needed to complete a graduation requirement
Was best way to take crse & manage other resps.
Needed the course to transfer to another inst.
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
1.9
3.1
3.5
1.2
1.8
3.4
1.2
0.7
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.5
0.4
0.3
Independent Learning
75
q7a
Q7a: Reason for taking Indep. Lrng. class: Couldn't get into on-campus class I wanted
75
2.3
1.4
q7b
Q7b: Reason for taking Indep. Lrng. class: Didn't want to have to come to campus
75
2.1
1.3
q7c
Q7c: Reason for taking Indep. Lrng. class: Wanted to have a flexible schedule
75
2.9
1.2
q7d
Q7d: Reason for taking Indep. Lrng. class: Prefer online to classroom environment
75
1.4
0.7
q7e
Q7e: Reason for taking Indep. Lrng. class: Needed to complete a graduation requirement
75
2.9
1.2
q7f
Q7f: Reason for taking Indep. Lrng. class: Was best way to take crse & manage other resps.
75
3.1
1.1
q7g
Q7g: Reason for taking Indep. Lrng. class: Needed the course to transfer to another inst.
75
1.2
0.7
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
L:\IR\consult\CE\programs_services\prog_srvcs_report.doc
7/12/2016
33
Note: Percentages, means, and standard deviations are weighted to adjust statistically for different sampling fractions and response rates over CE program by student status combinations.
CU-Boulder 2003 CE Programs/Services Survey
Descriptive Statistics for Questions 5, 7, 9, and 11
Results by Program
N
Std
CE Program
Obs
Variable
Label
N
Mean
Dev
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Boulder Evening
2
q9a
Q9a: Reason for taking CAETE class: Distance education
2
1.5
1.2
q9b
Q9b: Reason for taking CAETE class: Convenience
2
2.5
1.2
q9c
Q9c: Reason for taking CAETE class: Customer service
2
2.5
1.2
q9d
Q9d: Reason for taking CAETE class: University's reputation
2
2.5
1.2
q9e
Q9e: Reason for taking CAETE class: Degree
2
1.5
1.2
q9f
Q9f: Reason for taking CAETE class: Price
2
2.5
1.2
CAETE
109
q9a
Q9a: Reason for taking CAETE class: Distance education
109
3.4
0.4
q9b
Q9b: Reason for taking CAETE class: Convenience
109
3.6
0.4
q9c
Q9c: Reason for taking CAETE class: Customer service
109
2.5
0.5
q9d
Q9d: Reason for taking CAETE class: University's reputation
109
3.2
0.5
q9e
Q9e: Reason for taking CAETE class: Degree
109
3.6
0.4
q9f
Q9f: Reason for taking CAETE class: Price
109
2.7
0.5
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
L:\IR\consult\CE\programs_services\prog_srvcs_report.doc
7/12/2016
34
Note: Percentages, means, and standard deviations are weighted to adjust statistically for different sampling fractions and response rates over CE program by student status combinations.
CU-Boulder 2003 CE Programs/Services Survey
Descriptive Statistics for Questions 5, 7, 9, and 11
Results by Program and Student Status
N
Std
CE Program
Status
Obs
Variable
Label
N
Mean
Dev
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ACCESS
Not degree seeking
63
q11a
Q11a: The quality of CE advising is:
43
2.7
0.9
q11b
Q11b: The quality of CE registration is:
62
3.0
0.9
q11c
Q11c: The quality of CE billing is:
62
3.0
0.9
q11d
Q11d: The quality of the CE web site is:
50
2.9
0.8
q11e
Q11e: The quality of CE printed material is:
58
2.9
0.8
q11f
Q11f: The quality of CE course content is:
59
3.3
0.7
q11g
Q11g: The quality of CE instructors are:
57
3.2
0.9
q11h
Q11h: The quality of the overall CE experience is:
62
3.3
0.8
Boulder Evening
CAETE
Independent Learning
Degree seeking
47
q11a
q11b
q11c
q11d
q11e
q11f
q11g
q11h
Q11a:
Q11b:
Q11c:
Q11d:
Q11e:
Q11f:
Q11g:
Q11h:
The
The
The
The
The
The
The
The
quality
quality
quality
quality
quality
quality
quality
quality
of
of
of
of
of
of
of
of
CE advising is:
CE registration is:
CE billing is:
the CE web site is:
CE printed material is:
CE course content is:
CE instructors are:
the overall CE experience is:
28
47
47
37
46
47
46
47
2.5
3.3
2.8
2.8
3.3
3.2
3.2
3.3
0.9
0.8
1.0
0.9
0.8
0.9
0.9
0.8
Not degree seeking
20
q11a
q11b
q11c
q11d
q11e
q11f
q11g
q11h
Q11a:
Q11b:
Q11c:
Q11d:
Q11e:
Q11f:
Q11g:
Q11h:
The
The
The
The
The
The
The
The
quality
quality
quality
quality
quality
quality
quality
quality
of
of
of
of
of
of
of
of
CE advising is:
CE registration is:
CE billing is:
the CE web site is:
CE printed material is:
CE course content is:
CE instructors are:
the overall CE experience is:
15
19
18
17
17
19
19
19
3.1
3.0
2.9
3.1
2.8
3.0
3.1
3.1
1.0
0.9
1.0
0.8
1.0
0.8
0.9
0.8
Degree seeking
89
q11a
q11b
q11c
q11d
q11e
q11f
q11g
q11h
Q11a:
Q11b:
Q11c:
Q11d:
Q11e:
Q11f:
Q11g:
Q11h:
The
The
The
The
The
The
The
The
quality
quality
quality
quality
quality
quality
quality
quality
of
of
of
of
of
of
of
of
CE advising is:
CE registration is:
CE billing is:
the CE web site is:
CE printed material is:
CE course content is:
CE instructors are:
the overall CE experience is:
67
86
86
83
77
86
85
87
2.6
3.2
3.3
2.9
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.3
0.9
0.8
0.8
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
Not degree seeking
28
q11a
q11b
q11c
q11d
q11e
q11f
q11g
q11h
Q11a:
Q11b:
Q11c:
Q11d:
Q11e:
Q11f:
Q11g:
Q11h:
The
The
The
The
The
The
The
The
quality
quality
quality
quality
quality
quality
quality
quality
of
of
of
of
of
of
of
of
CE advising is:
CE registration is:
CE billing is:
the CE web site is:
CE printed material is:
CE course content is:
CE instructors are:
the overall CE experience is:
19
28
28
27
24
28
28
28
2.6
3.4
3.3
3.1
3.2
3.6
3.3
3.4
0.9
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.6
0.8
0.7
Degree seeking
58
q11a
q11b
q11c
q11d
q11e
q11f
q11g
q11h
Q11a:
Q11b:
Q11c:
Q11d:
Q11e:
Q11f:
Q11g:
Q11h:
The
The
The
The
The
The
The
The
quality
quality
quality
quality
quality
quality
quality
quality
of
of
of
of
of
of
of
of
CE advising is:
CE registration is:
CE billing is:
the CE web site is:
CE printed material is:
CE course content is:
CE instructors are:
the overall CE experience is:
32
56
57
44
52
57
57
57
2.4
2.9
2.8
2.7
2.9
2.9
2.8
2.7
0.9
0.9
1.0
0.9
0.9
1.0
1.1
0.9
Not degree seeking
21
q11a
Q11a: The quality of CE advising is:
14
3.1
0.7
q11b
Q11b: The quality of CE registration is:
21
3.3
0.7
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
L:\IR\consult\CE\programs_services\prog_srvcs_report.doc
7/12/2016
35
Note: Percentages, means, and standard deviations are weighted to adjust statistically for different sampling fractions and response rates over CE program by student status combinations.
CU-Boulder 2003 CE Programs/Services Survey
Descriptive Statistics for Questions 5, 7, 9, and 11
Results by Program and Student Status
N
Std
CE Program
Status
Obs
Variable
Label
N
Mean
Dev
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Independent Learning
Not degree seeking
21
q11c
Q11c: The quality of CE billing is:
21
3.1
0.8
q11d
Q11d: The quality of the CE web site is:
16
2.9
0.9
q11e
Q11e: The quality of CE printed material is:
20
3.2
0.7
q11f
Q11f: The quality of CE course content is:
21
3.1
0.8
q11g
Q11g: The quality of CE instructors are:
20
3.1
0.9
q11h
Q11h: The quality of the overall CE experience is:
21
3.1
0.7
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
L:\IR\consult\CE\programs_services\prog_srvcs_report.doc
7/12/2016
36
Note: Percentages, means, and standard deviations are weighted to adjust statistically for different sampling fractions and response rates over CE program by student status combinations.
CU-Boulder 2003 CE Programs/Services Survey
Descriptive Statistics for Questions 5, 7, 9, and 11
Results by Program and Student Status
N
Std
CE Program
Status
Obs
Variable
Label
N
Mean
Dev
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ACCESS
Not degree seeking
58
q5a
Q5a: Reason for taking ACCESS class: I wanted to take a class w/ a specific instructor
58
1.7
1.0
q5b
Q5b: Reason for taking ACCESS class: I was preparing to apply to CU
58
3.3
1.1
q5c
Q5c: Reason for taking ACCESS class: I was preparing to apply to another school
58
1.5
0.9
q5d
Q5d: Reason for taking ACCESS class: I wanted to pursue a personal interest
58
2.6
1.1
q5e
Q5e: Reason for taking ACCESS class: I wanted to enhance my career
58
2.8
1.2
Boulder Evening
Degree seeking
6
q5a
q5b
q5c
q5d
q5e
Q5a:
Q5b:
Q5c:
Q5d:
Q5e:
Reason
Reason
Reason
Reason
Reason
for
for
for
for
for
taking
taking
taking
taking
taking
ACCESS
ACCESS
ACCESS
ACCESS
ACCESS
class:
class:
class:
class:
class:
I
I
I
I
I
wanted to take a class w/ a specific instructor
was preparing to apply to CU
was preparing to apply to another school
wanted to pursue a personal interest
wanted to enhance my career
6
6
6
6
6
1.3
3.0
1.0
2.0
2.3
0.5
0.9
0.0
1.3
1.0
14
q5a
q5b
q5c
q5d
q5e
Q5a:
Q5b:
Q5c:
Q5d:
Q5e:
Reason
Reason
Reason
Reason
Reason
for
for
for
for
for
taking
taking
taking
taking
taking
ACCESS
ACCESS
ACCESS
ACCESS
ACCESS
class:
class:
class:
class:
class:
I
I
I
I
I
wanted to take a class w/ a specific instructor
was preparing to apply to CU
was preparing to apply to another school
wanted to pursue a personal interest
wanted to enhance my career
14
14
14
14
14
1.3
2.9
1.6
2.8
2.6
0.5
1.1
1.2
1.2
1.2
Degree seeking
7
q5a
q5b
q5c
q5d
q5e
Q5a:
Q5b:
Q5c:
Q5d:
Q5e:
Reason
Reason
Reason
Reason
Reason
for
for
for
for
for
taking
taking
taking
taking
taking
ACCESS
ACCESS
ACCESS
ACCESS
ACCESS
class:
class:
class:
class:
class:
I
I
I
I
I
wanted to take a class w/ a specific instructor
was preparing to apply to CU
was preparing to apply to another school
wanted to pursue a personal interest
wanted to enhance my career
7
7
7
7
7
2.0
1.4
1.0
2.3
2.4
1.3
1.1
0.0
1.4
1.5
Not degree seeking
1
q5a
q5b
q5c
q5d
q5e
Q5a:
Q5b:
Q5c:
Q5d:
Q5e:
Reason
Reason
Reason
Reason
Reason
for
for
for
for
for
taking
taking
taking
taking
taking
ACCESS
ACCESS
ACCESS
ACCESS
ACCESS
class:
class:
class:
class:
class:
I
I
I
I
I
wanted to take a class w/ a specific instructor
was preparing to apply to CU
was preparing to apply to another school
wanted to pursue a personal interest
wanted to enhance my career
1
1
1
1
1
1.0
3.0
2.0
3.0
3.0
.
.
.
.
.
Degree seeking
4
q5a
q5b
q5c
q5d
q5e
Q5a:
Q5b:
Q5c:
Q5d:
Q5e:
Reason
Reason
Reason
Reason
Reason
for
for
for
for
for
taking
taking
taking
taking
taking
ACCESS
ACCESS
ACCESS
ACCESS
ACCESS
class:
class:
class:
class:
class:
I
I
I
I
I
wanted to take a class w/ a specific instructor
was preparing to apply to CU
was preparing to apply to another school
wanted to pursue a personal interest
wanted to enhance my career
4
4
4
4
4
1.0
1.5
1.8
1.8
1.8
0.0
1.0
1.5
1.5
1.5
Not degree seeking
CAETE
Independent Learning
Not degree seeking
10
q5a
Q5a: Reason for taking ACCESS class: I wanted to take a class w/ a specific instructor
10
1.1
0.3
q5b
Q5b: Reason for taking ACCESS class: I was preparing to apply to CU
10
2.7
1.5
q5c
Q5c: Reason for taking ACCESS class: I was preparing to apply to another school
10
1.4
1.0
q5d
Q5d: Reason for taking ACCESS class: I wanted to pursue a personal interest
10
1.9
0.9
q5e
Q5e: Reason for taking ACCESS class: I wanted to enhance my career
10
2.1
1.1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
L:\IR\consult\CE\programs_services\prog_srvcs_report.doc
7/12/2016
37
Note: Percentages, means, and standard deviations are weighted to adjust statistically for different sampling fractions and response rates over CE program by student status combinations.
CU-Boulder 2003 CE Programs/Services Survey
Descriptive Statistics for Questions 5, 7, 9, and 11
Results by Program and Student Status
N
Std
CE Program
Status
Obs Variable Label
N Mean Dev
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ACCESS
Not degree seeking
7 q7a
Q7a: Reason for taking Indep. Lrng. class: Couldn't get into on-campus class I wanted
7
2.0 1.4
q7b
Q7b: Reason for taking Indep. Lrng. class: Didn't want to have to come to campus
7
1.3 0.8
q7c
Q7c: Reason for taking Indep. Lrng. class: Wanted to have a flexible schedule
7
2.7 1.4
q7d
Q7d: Reason for taking Indep. Lrng. class: Prefer online to classroom environment
7
1.1 0.4
q7e
Q7e: Reason for taking Indep. Lrng. class: Needed to complete a graduation requirement
7
1.9 1.2
q7f
Q7f: Reason for taking Indep. Lrng. class: Was best way to take crse & manage other resps.
7
2.6 1.0
q7g
Q7g: Reason for taking Indep. Lrng. class: Needed the course to transfer to another inst.
7
1.4 0.8
Boulder Evening
Degree seeking
18
q7a
q7b
q7c
q7d
q7e
q7f
q7g
Q7a:
Q7b:
Q7c:
Q7d:
Q7e:
Q7f:
Q7g:
Reason
Reason
Reason
Reason
Reason
Reason
Reason
for
for
for
for
for
for
for
taking
taking
taking
taking
taking
taking
taking
Indep.
Indep.
Indep.
Indep.
Indep.
Indep.
Indep.
Lrng.
Lrng.
Lrng.
Lrng.
Lrng.
Lrng.
Lrng.
class:
class:
class:
class:
class:
class:
class:
Couldn't get into on-campus class I wanted
Didn't want to have to come to campus
Wanted to have a flexible schedule
Prefer online to classroom environment
Needed to complete a graduation requirement
Was best way to take crse & manage other resps.
Needed the course to transfer to another inst.
18
18
18
18
18
18
18
2.1
1.9
3.2
1.7
3.4
3.5
1.0
1.2
1.3
1.0
1.0
0.9
0.8
0.0
8
q7a
q7b
q7c
q7d
q7e
q7f
q7g
Q7a:
Q7b:
Q7c:
Q7d:
Q7e:
Q7f:
Q7g:
Reason
Reason
Reason
Reason
Reason
Reason
Reason
for
for
for
for
for
for
for
taking
taking
taking
taking
taking
taking
taking
Indep.
Indep.
Indep.
Indep.
Indep.
Indep.
Indep.
Lrng.
Lrng.
Lrng.
Lrng.
Lrng.
Lrng.
Lrng.
class:
class:
class:
class:
class:
class:
class:
Couldn't get into on-campus class I wanted
Didn't want to have to come to campus
Wanted to have a flexible schedule
Prefer online to classroom environment
Needed to complete a graduation requirement
Was best way to take crse & manage other resps.
Needed the course to transfer to another inst.
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
2.1
2.0
2.8
1.4
2.6
3.6
1.3
1.1
1.2
1.0
0.5
1.3
0.5
0.7
13
q7a
q7b
q7c
q7d
q7e
q7f
q7g
Q7a:
Q7b:
Q7c:
Q7d:
Q7e:
Q7f:
Q7g:
Reason
Reason
Reason
Reason
Reason
Reason
Reason
for
for
for
for
for
for
for
taking
taking
taking
taking
taking
taking
taking
Indep.
Indep.
Indep.
Indep.
Indep.
Indep.
Indep.
Lrng.
Lrng.
Lrng.
Lrng.
Lrng.
Lrng.
Lrng.
class:
class:
class:
class:
class:
class:
class:
Couldn't get into on-campus class I wanted
Didn't want to have to come to campus
Wanted to have a flexible schedule
Prefer online to classroom environment
Needed to complete a graduation requirement
Was best way to take crse & manage other resps.
Needed the course to transfer to another inst.
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
1.9
3.2
3.6
1.2
1.8
3.5
1.2
1.3
1.0
0.5
0.4
1.1
0.7
0.4
4
q7a
q7b
q7c
q7d
q7e
q7f
q7g
Q7a:
Q7b:
Q7c:
Q7d:
Q7e:
Q7f:
Q7g:
Reason
Reason
Reason
Reason
Reason
Reason
Reason
for
for
for
for
for
for
for
taking
taking
taking
taking
taking
taking
taking
Indep.
Indep.
Indep.
Indep.
Indep.
Indep.
Indep.
Lrng.
Lrng.
Lrng.
Lrng.
Lrng.
Lrng.
Lrng.
class:
class:
class:
class:
class:
class:
class:
Couldn't get into on-campus class I wanted
Didn't want to have to come to campus
Wanted to have a flexible schedule
Prefer online to classroom environment
Needed to complete a graduation requirement
Was best way to take crse & manage other resps.
Needed the course to transfer to another inst.
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
1.8
2.8
3.0
1.5
1.8
3.3
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.4
1.0
1.0
1.5
1.0
Degree seeking
54
q7a
q7b
q7c
q7d
q7e
q7f
q7g
Q7a:
Q7b:
Q7c:
Q7d:
Q7e:
Q7f:
Q7g:
Reason
Reason
Reason
Reason
Reason
Reason
Reason
for
for
for
for
for
for
for
taking
taking
taking
taking
taking
taking
taking
Indep.
Indep.
Indep.
Indep.
Indep.
Indep.
Indep.
Lrng.
Lrng.
Lrng.
Lrng.
Lrng.
Lrng.
Lrng.
class:
class:
class:
class:
class:
class:
class:
Couldn't get into on-campus class I wanted
Didn't want to have to come to campus
Wanted to have a flexible schedule
Prefer online to classroom environment
Needed to complete a graduation requirement
Was best way to take crse & manage other resps.
Needed the course to transfer to another inst.
54
54
54
54
54
54
54
2.4
2.1
2.9
1.4
3.1
3.1
1.1
1.3
1.2
1.1
0.7
1.1
1.1
0.5
Not degree seeking
21
Not degree seeking
CAETE
Degree seeking
Not degree seeking
Independent Learning
q7a
Q7a: Reason for taking Indep. Lrng. class: Couldn't get into on-campus class I wanted
21
1.6 1.0
q7b
Q7b: Reason for taking Indep. Lrng. class: Didn't want to have to come to campus
21
2.1 1.2
q7c
Q7c: Reason for taking Indep. Lrng. class: Wanted to have a flexible schedule
21
3.0 1.1
q7d
Q7d: Reason for taking Indep. Lrng. class: Prefer online to classroom environment
21
1.3 0.6
q7e
Q7e: Reason for taking Indep. Lrng. class: Needed to complete a graduation requirement
21
2.1 1.2
q7f
Q7f: Reason for taking Indep. Lrng. class: Was best way to take crse & manage other resps.
21
3.3 0.8
q7g
Q7g: Reason for taking Indep. Lrng. class: Needed the course to transfer to another inst.
21
1.7 1.2
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
L:\IR\consult\CE\programs_services\prog_srvcs_report.doc
7/12/2016
38
Note: Percentages, means, and standard deviations are weighted to adjust statistically for different sampling fractions and response rates over CE program by student status combinations.
CU-Boulder 2003 CE Programs/Services Survey
Descriptive Statistics for Questions 5, 7, 9, and 11
Results by Program and Student Status
N
Std
CE Program
Status
Obs
Variable
Label
N
Mean
Dev
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Boulder Evening
Degree seeking
2
q9a
Q9a: Reason for taking CAETE class: Distance education
2
1.5
0.7
q9b
Q9b: Reason for taking CAETE class: Convenience
2
2.5
0.7
q9c
Q9c: Reason for taking CAETE class: Customer service
2
2.5
0.7
q9d
Q9d: Reason for taking CAETE class: University's reputation
2
2.5
0.7
q9e
Q9e: Reason for taking CAETE class: Degree
2
1.5
0.7
q9f
Q9f: Reason for taking CAETE class: Price
2
2.5
0.7
CAETE
Degree seeking
83
Not degree seeking
26
q9a
q9b
q9c
q9d
q9e
q9f
Q9a:
Q9b:
Q9c:
Q9d:
Q9e:
Q9f:
Reason
Reason
Reason
Reason
Reason
Reason
for
for
for
for
for
for
taking
taking
taking
taking
taking
taking
CAETE
CAETE
CAETE
CAETE
CAETE
CAETE
class:
class:
class:
class:
class:
class:
Distance education
Convenience
Customer service
University's reputation
Degree
Price
83
83
83
83
83
83
3.4
3.6
2.5
3.2
3.6
2.8
0.9
0.8
1.1
1.0
0.7
1.1
q9a
Q9a: Reason for taking CAETE class: Distance education
26
3.3
0.9
q9b
Q9b: Reason for taking CAETE class: Convenience
26
3.8
0.7
q9c
Q9c: Reason for taking CAETE class: Customer service
26
2.7
1.0
q9d
Q9d: Reason for taking CAETE class: University's reputation
26
3.1
0.9
q9e
Q9e: Reason for taking CAETE class: Degree
26
3.5
0.9
q9f
Q9f: Reason for taking CAETE class: Price
26
2.3
1.0
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
L:\IR\consult\CE\programs_services\prog_srvcs_report.doc
7/12/2016
39
Note: Percentages, means, and standard deviations are weighted to adjust statistically for different sampling fractions and response rates over CE program by student status combinations.
CU-Boulder 2003 CE Programs/Services Survey
Descriptive Statistics for Questions 5, 7, 9, and 11
Results for Total Group
Std
Variable
Label
N
Mean
Dev
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------q11a
Q11a: The quality of CE advising is:
218
2.6
0.9
q11b
Q11b: The quality of CE registration is:
319
3.2
0.9
q11c
Q11c: The quality of CE billing is:
319
2.9
1.0
q11d
Q11d: The quality of the CE web site is:
274
2.8
0.8
q11e
Q11e: The quality of CE printed material is:
294
3.1
0.8
q11f
Q11f: The quality of CE course content is:
317
3.1
0.9
q11g
Q11g: The quality of CE instructors are:
312
3.1
1.0
q11h
Q11h: The quality of the overall CE experience is:
321
3.1
0.9
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
L:\IR\consult\CE\programs_services\prog_srvcs_report.doc
7/12/2016
40
Note: Percentages, means, and standard deviations are weighted to adjust statistically for different sampling fractions and response rates over CE program by student status combinations.
CU-Boulder 2003 CE Programs/Services Survey
Descriptive Statistics for Questions 5, 7, 9, and 11
Results for Total Group
Std
Variable
Label
N
Mean
Dev
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------q5a
Q5a: Reason for taking ACCESS class: I wanted to take a class w/ a specific instructor
100
1.5
0.8
q5b
Q5b: Reason for taking ACCESS class: I was preparing to apply to CU
100
3.0
1.1
q5c
Q5c: Reason for taking ACCESS class: I was preparing to apply to another school
100
1.4
0.9
q5d
Q5d: Reason for taking ACCESS class: I wanted to pursue a personal interest
100
2.4
1.1
q5e
Q5e: Reason for taking ACCESS class: I wanted to enhance my career
100
2.6
1.1
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
L:\IR\consult\CE\programs_services\prog_srvcs_report.doc
7/12/2016
41
Note: Percentages, means, and standard deviations are weighted to adjust statistically for different sampling fractions and response rates over CE program by student status combinations.
CU-Boulder 2003 CE Programs/Services Survey
Descriptive Statistics for Questions 5, 7, 9, and 11
Results for Total Group
Std
Variable
Label
N
Mean
Dev
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------q7a
Q7a: Reason for taking Indep. Lrng. class: Couldn't get into on-campus class I wanted
125
2.2
1.4
q7b
Q7b: Reason for taking Indep. Lrng. class: Didn't want to have to come to campus
125
2.0
1.3
q7c
Q7c: Reason for taking Indep. Lrng. class: Wanted to have a flexible schedule
125
3.0
1.2
q7d
Q7d: Reason for taking Indep. Lrng. class: Prefer online to classroom environment
125
1.5
0.8
q7e
Q7e: Reason for taking Indep. Lrng. class: Needed to complete a graduation requirement
125
3.0
1.3
q7f
Q7f: Reason for taking Indep. Lrng. class: Was best way to take crse & manage other resps.
125
3.3
1.0
q7g
Q7g: Reason for taking Indep. Lrng. class: Needed the course to transfer to another inst.
125
1.1
0.6
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
L:\IR\consult\CE\programs_services\prog_srvcs_report.doc
7/12/2016
42
Note: Percentages, means, and standard deviations are weighted to adjust statistically for different sampling fractions and response rates over CE program by student status combinations.
CU-Boulder 2003 CE Programs/Services Survey
Descriptive Statistics for Questions 5, 7, 9, and 11
Results for Total Group
Std
Variable
Label
N
Mean
Dev
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------q9a
Q9a: Reason for taking CAETE class: Distance education
111
3.1
0.6
q9b
Q9b: Reason for taking CAETE class: Convenience
111
3.4
0.5
q9c
Q9c: Reason for taking CAETE class: Customer service
111
2.5
0.5
q9d
Q9d: Reason for taking CAETE class: University's reputation
111
3.1
0.5
q9e
Q9e: Reason for taking CAETE class: Degree
111
3.2
0.6
q9f
Q9f: Reason for taking CAETE class: Price
111
2.7
0.5
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
L:\IR\consult\CE\programs_services\prog_srvcs_report.doc
7/12/2016
43
Note: Percentages, means, and standard deviations are weighted to adjust statistically for different sampling fractions and response rates over CE program by student status combinations.
Appendix
Population, Sample, and Respondents, by Program and Student Status
Population
with e-mail
addresses
Student status
ACCESS
Non degree seeking
464
175
63
36%
Boulder Evening
Non degree seeking
231
75
20
27%
Boulder Evening
Degree seeking
1176
175
47
27%
CAETE
Non degree seeking
52
52
28
54%
CAETE
Degree seeking
213
175
89
51%
Independent Learning
Non degree seeking
95
75
21
28%
Independent Learning
Degree seeking
706
175
58
33%
2937
902
326
36%
Total
L:\IR\consult\CE\programs_services\prog_srvcs_report.doc
Sample
Respondents
Response
rate
Program
7/12/2016
44