The Iowa Electronic Markets Macroeconomic Conditions: Measurement and Political Implications Economics Curriculum Using the IEM Presidential and Congressional Control Markets Assignment 1 Economic Indicators and Measuring Economic Activity Assignment Overview and Objectives: Statistics on the unemployment rate, inflation rate, and real GDP provide information on economic conditions in the nation. These statistics are often called “economic indicators” because of their ability to “indicate” the overall health of the economy. In this assignment, you will learn how to obtain data on various measures of economic activity and calculate additional economic indicators based on this data. Assignment: Use tables A and B on the following pages to complete this exercise. 1. Obtain quarterly nominal GDP data (NGDP) (billions of $) from the first quarter of 1996 (1996:Q1) through the fourth quarter of 2000 (2000:Q4) from the St. Louis Federal Reserve Bank’s Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED) Web site (http://www.stls.frb.org/fred/). Enter this data in the second column of Table A below. 2. Obtain quarterly real GDP data (RGDP) (billions of chained 1996 $) from the first quarter of 1996 (1996:Q1) through the fourth quarter of 2000 (2000:Q4) from the St. Louis Federal Reserve Bank’s Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED) Web site. Enter this data in the third column of Table A and the second column of Table B below. 3. Calculate quarterly values for the GDP Deflator (DEF) by dividing nominal GDP by real GDP for each quarter and multiplying the resulting value by 100. Enter these values in the fourth column of Table A below. Example: to calculate the GDP deflator for the first quarter of 1996: DEF1996:Q1 Nominal GDP1996:Q1 Real GDP1996:Q1 100 4. Calculate the growth rate of the GDP deflator (the inflation rate) as the percentage change in the value of the GDP deflator from one quarter to the next and enter this data in the fifth column of Table A below. Example: to calculate the percentage change in the value of the GDP deflator for the second quarter of 1996: Growth Rate of GDP Deflator1996:Q 2 [ DEF1996:Q 2 DEF1996:Q1 ] DEF1996:Q1 100 5. Obtain monthly U.S. population data (POP) from January, 1996 (1996:1) through December, 2000 (2000:12) from the St. Louis Federal Reserve Bank’s Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED) Web site . Convert this monthly data to quarterly data by computing the quarterly average of the monthly data and fill in the third column of Table B. The quarterly average is calculated as the simple average of the three months included in a particular quarter of the year. Example: to calculate the quarterly average of the population for the first quarter of 1996: POP1996,Quarter1 [Population Jan.,1996 Population Feb.,1996 Population Mar.,1996 ] 3 6. Calculate quarterly per capita real GDP (PCRGDP) by dividing real GDP by the population for each quarter. Enter this data in the fourth column of Table B on the following pages. Example: to calculate the quarterly average of per capita real GDP for the first quarter of 1996 (note: to obtain a value in dollars per person, the result is multiplied by 10,000 because real GDP is measured in billions of dollars and population is measured in hundreds of thousands) PCRGDP1996:Q1 Real GDP1996:Q1 Population1996:Q1 10,000 7. Calculate the growth rate of per capita real GDP as the percentage change in the value of per capita real GDP from one quarter to the next and enter this data in the fifth column of Table B on the following pages. Example: to calculate the percentage change in the value of per capita real GDP for the second quarter of 1996: Growth Rate of Per Capita Real GDP1996:Q 2 [ PCRGDP1996:Q 2 PCRGDP1996:Q1 ] PCRGDP1996:Q1 100 TABLE A Year and Quarter Real GDP Growth Rate Nominal GDP (RGDP) of GDP GDP Deflator (NGDP) (billions of Deflator (%) (DEF) (billions of $) chained 1996 $) Inflation Rate 1996 Q1 Not Applicable 1996 Q2 1996 Q3 1996 Q4 1997 Q1 1997 Q2 1997 Q3 1997 Q4 1998 Q1 1998 Q2 1998 Q3 1998 Q4 1999 Q1 1999 Q2 1999 Q3 1999 Q4 2000 Q1 2000 Q2 2000 Q3 2000 Q4 TABLE B Real GDP Year and Quarter 1996 Q1 1996 Q2 1996 Q3 1996 Q4 1997 Q1 1997 Q2 1997 Q3 1997 Q4 1998 Q1 1998 Q2 1998 Q3 1998 Q4 1999 Q1 1999 Q2 1999 Q3 1999 Q4 2000 Q1 2000 Q2 2000 Q3 2000 Q4 Population (RGDP) (POP) (billions of (hundreds of chained 1996 thousands of $) people) Per Capita Real GDP (PCRGDP) Growth Rate of Per Capita Real GDP (%) Not Applicable Sources of Economic Data Nominal GDP Gross Domestic Product Billions of Dollars, Seasonally Adjusted Annual Rate Source: U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis Source: http://www.stls.frb.org/fred/data/gdp/gdp Real GDP Real Gross Domestic Product Billions of Chained 1996 Dollars, Seasonally Adjusted Annual Rate Source: U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis Source: http://www.stls.frb.org/fred/data/gdp/gdpc1 Population: Total Population: All Ages Including Armed Forces Overseas Thousands Source: U.S. Department of Commerce, Census Bureau Source: http://www.stls.frb.org/fred/data/employ/pop 2000 Poll Results: http://www.pollingreport.com/wh2gen.htm http://abcnews.go.com/sections/politics/PollVault/PollVault.html http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2000/resources/polls.html Gallup Presidential Job Approval Rating: Source: http://www.gallup.com/poll/trends/ptjobapp.asp Analysis of polling data including House and Senate control: Source: http://www.cookpolitical.com/ Assignment 2 Economic Indicators and National Election Predictions Assignment Overview and Objectives: In this assignment, you will learn how economic indicators can be used to predict national election results using an economic model. Using the data calculated in Assignment 1, you will generate election forecasts for the 2000 presidential election using an economic model developed by Ray Fair at Yale University. In addition, you will compare your predictions to those from public opinion polls and the Iowa Electronic Markets Presidential Vote-Share market. Assignment: 1. Ray Fair, an economist at Yale University, has developed an economic model to predict the Democratic share of the two-party (Republican, Democrat) presidential vote. His model for the 2000 election is: Dem. Vote Share = .423 + (.0070growth3) – (.0072inflation15) + (.0091highgrowth) where growth3 = growth rate of capita real GDP in the first three quarters of the election year inflation15 = absolute value of the growth rate of the GDP deflator in the first 15 quarters of the administration that is in power in the year of the election highgrowth = number of quarters in the first 15 quarters of the administration in which the growth rate of real per capita is greater than 3.2% a. For the 2000 election, determine the numerical values of the variables: growth3, inflation15, and highgrowth and calculate the value of Vote Share using the model above. b. Compare the value of the prediction from the Fair model to the actual 2000 election outcome. Calculate the absolute percent error of the two-party voteshare prediction as follows: Absolute Percent Error Actual Democratic Vote Share Predicted Democratic Vote Share Actual Democratic Vote Share Note: Be sure to calculate the actual democratic vote share as a percentage of the two-party presidential vote; i.e. (dem. presidential votes/(dem. presidential votes + rep. presidential votes) c. Calculate the absolute percent error of the presidential two-party vote-share predictions from the IEM Presidential Vote-Share market using prices from (1) October 1, 2000, and (2) November 6, 2000 (the day before the election). Note: Because the IEM Presidential Vote-Share market for the 2000 presidential election contained three contracts representing the share of the three-party presidential vote, you need to calculate the value of the IEM two-party vote share using the following formula: Dem. (IEM) Vote Share Dem IEM Contract Price Dem. IEM Contract Price Rep. IEM Contract Price d. Calculate the absolute percent error of the presidential vote-share predictions from one of the major national opinion polls on (1) October 1, 2000, and (2) November 6, 2000 (the day before the election) Note: Depending on the poll, you may need to convert the vote-share predictions from the polls to a two-party vote share. e. Which method (economic model, IEM markets, polls) provided the most accurate vote-share predictions (1) a month before the election (October 1, 2000), and (2) one day before the election (November 6, 2000)? Why do you think that was? Why did the other methods predict less accurately, in your view? f. Based on your analysis and results, do you think that national economic conditions played a dominant role in the 2000 presidential election? Explain.