Leadership Framework Professional Conversations Planning Form-Comprehensive Evidence from Direct Observations Criterion Professional Growth Criterion (Goal) # Possible Sources of Evidence/Artifacts Notes, reflections, evidence to share: Date: Monthly Emphasis 1. Creating a Culture Creating a school culture that promotes the ongoing improvement of learning and teaching for students and staff. Evidence from Direct Observations 1) 2) 3) 4) Positive interactions with students and staff Staff Conversations focused on student and staff learning Aligns school practices, messages, routines of the school with the school’s vision and mission Written values and beliefs reflect high student achievement goals School mission is clearly articulated and understood by all staff Mission and vision includes a focus on student academic excellence and healthy social/emotional development Learning (both academic and social/emotional) focused posters on school walls CIP developed collaboratively and based on student performance data Regular progress monitoring throughout the year of CIP benchmark goals and adjustment of strategies as needed Data is publicly shared with staff and community Encourages shared leadership by allowing staff to assume leadership and decision making roles Structures are in place for job-embedded collaborative learning (Collaboration process in place, protected time for grade level/content area) Protocols to guide collaboration for systematic examination of practice are in place Teacher teams have deep and frequent conversations about student learning and data Possible Sources of Evidence/Artifacts Vision/Mission Statements Survey Data (Staff, Parents, Students) Leadership Team Meeting Minutes/Agendas Staff Bulletins Newsletter Articles focused on Learning Staff development Feedback/Exit slips CIP Staff Development Plan Learning Walks Teacher Leadership Log/Spreadsheet Team/Department meeting minutes Processes for developing/reviewing mission/vision Staff Meeting Minutes/Agendas Data Analysis Student Leadership Opportunities In what ways do you communicate your schools’ mission and vision to all stakeholders? What systems do you have in place to communicate and sustain your expectations and standards for ongoing improvement in teaching and learning? How do you build capacity for meaningful collaboration (two-way) to take place across your community with students/staff/parents? (For both engaged stakeholders and less visible stakeholders) How do you provide opportunities for leadership and engagement for students, staff, and other stakeholders? Evidence from Direct Observations Criterion Professional Growth Criterion (Goal) # Possible Sources of Evidence/Artifacts Notes, reflections, evidence to share: Date: Monthly Emphasis 2. Ensuring School Safety Providing for school safety. Evidence from Direct Observations 1) 2) 3) Staff knows roles/plans for emergencies Emergency/Safety plans up-to-date Evidence of monitoring Works in collaboration with community (e.g. Fire, Police, City) to ensure safety systems are in place within school and greater community Creates a network of resources to support staff/students/families in a crisis Ensures that staff/student/ families are aware of school safety plan and able to competently and automatically implement the plan through training and drills Student interactions during lunch, passing periods, assemblies, classrooms, recess are respectful and safe Trains staff to teach habits of self-discipline and self-management on a daily basis Creates clear rewards and consequences for how well individual students meet conduct expectations and school values There are a very low number of classroom interruptions/disruptions and referrals to the office Teachers’ responses to incidents in their classrooms look and feel similar across classrooms Possible Sources of Evidence/Artifacts Building Emergency Preparedness Plan Safety Committee Notes/Agendas Accident reports Emergency planning Documents Safety Drill and practice documentation Crisis Action Plan Training Agendas/Sign-ins Safety Bulletin Board Survey Data Discipline plan and/or data Discipline/Behavior Management Committee Notes/Agendas BART Team Notes Incident review notes Communication with parents regarding school safety Discipline Data Student/Parent Handbook Healthy Youth Survey How have you communicated your school safety plan to staff, students, parents, and first responders? How are you monitoring and assessing the plans effectiveness? What systems do you have in place to monitor and support student and staff social/emotional needs as well as behavioral needs in your building? How are you monitoring the systems that are in place, and allocating resources, to ensure effectiveness in providing for social, emotional, and intellectual safety? Evidence from Direct Observations Criterion Professional Growth Criterion (Goal) # Possible Sources of Evidence/Artifacts Notes, reflections, evidence to share: Date: Monthly Emphasis Evidence from Direct Observations 3. Planning With Data Leading the development, implementation and evaluation of a datadriven plan for increasing student achievement, including the use of multiple student data elements 1) 2) 3) 4) Systems are in place to collect and review data on attendance, behavior, interim assessments Encourages teacher teams to work together to analyze multiple data sources to set measureable learning goals School teams regularly review disaggregated data to track and monitor the progress of all students Continuous data review process in place to ensure students learned material (e.g. aligning assessments, analyzing interim and formative assessment and taking action on results) Utilizes disaggregated state assessment data; Homeroom, OSPI Data, SBE Instructional decisions throughout the year, including student grouping/differentiation and targeting for interventions are based on interim and formative assessments Student data is examined using multiple lenses (e.g. overall grade level/subject area, performance on individual standards, classroom level performance, individual student performance) CIP and priorities are in place and aligned to the analysis of data (addressing areas with highest needs for the building and district) All staff are familiar with priorities for improvement and details of the CIP Leadership Team meets regularly and creates short and medium term action plans to address areas of concern and recognize areas of success Has systems to assess programs and adjusts strategies as needed (including specific targets for sub-groups as well as grade cohorts) Possible Sources of Evidence/Artifacts CIP Plan Portfolio of evidence of progress toward goals and activities in CIP Master schedule and other evidence of differentiation for high performing and struggling students Course/Program Offerings Interventions with enrollment/participation numbers and results Data Reports Compilation of Classroom data Homeroom Smart Group Reports SMART Goal Examples Observations CIP/Leadership Team Agendas/Minutes CIP Review Professional Development Calendar Individual Student Learning Plans/Goals Department/Grade Level Team meeting agendas/notes Newsletters/Web site Staff Development Agendas/Minutes Please share a recent conversation you’ve had with your staff that focused on the use of data/information to guide, modify, and improve instructional practice. Share a recent conversation with an individual teacher that resulted in the teacher seeing the relationship between their own actions and the impact on their students’ achievement. What types of data/information do you use to inform a variety of decisions at the building level, grade level, and classroom level? How have you worked to build staff involvement, commitment, and engagement in the work of supporting and monitoring the CIP? Evidence from Direct Observations Criterion Professional Growth Criterion (Goal) # Possible Sources of Evidence/Artifacts Notes, reflections, evidence to share Date: Monthly Emphasis 4. Aligning Curriculum Assisting instructional staff with alignment of curriculum, instruction and assessment with state and local district learning goals. Evidence from Direct Observations 1) 2) 3) 4) Formal and informal observations Expectations regarding adopted curriculum can be articulated by instructional staff Every teacher uses data that drives instruction – data linked to a bigger department/grade level/building data plan Principal supports all teachers in creating data resources for their classrooms Curriculum is clearly aligned to the grade level expectations Engages key staff in curriculum planning and implementation Teaches and supports staff to align to CCSS and district initiatives Effectively builds capacity of teachers to analyze and align standards, curricula, instructional strategies and assessments Evidence of district initiatives seen in classrooms-anchor charts, posters, student work on display Routines, instructional practices, and learning environment are consistent across classrooms Teachers receive feedback around progress with non-negotiables and instructional practice Teachers are taught how to use a variety of instructional strategies and are familiar with the strategies outlined in the instructional framework Staff are using formative/summative assessments for differentiated instruction Data is frequently reviewed in team and/or subject area meetings Possible Sources of Evidence/Artifacts Master schedules reflect student needs Professional Development Calendar Feedback contained in Comprehensive Evaluations Post conferences notes, and plans to coach and assist teachers Leadership Team Agendas/Notes Department/Grade Level Team Meetings Department/Grade Level developed assessments Learning Walks Staff Development Trainings around TPEP, CCSS, curriculum adoptions-Minutes, Agendas, PPTs Teacher work samples Feedback/Exit slips Staff reflection journals Clearly articulated expectations to staff via memos/staff bulletins Examples of classroom implementation of district assessments Examples of building/grade level/department created classroom assessments Grade level/Department student data What systemic do you have in place to ensure alignment of curriculum, instruction and assessment? How are you providing assistance to staff in alignment of best instructional practices to state and district learning goals? How are you monitoring implementation? How do you provide feedback to teams or individuals when alignment in curriculum, instruction or assessment is not occurring? How do you go about having difficult conversations with less than proficient teachers How are you providing assistance to staff in alignment of assessment practices to best instructional practices? What practices have you seen that are highly effective? Evidence from Direct Observations Criterion Professional Growth Criterion (Goal) # Possible Sources of Evidence/Artifacts Notes, reflections, evidence to share: Date: Monthly Emphasis 5. Improving Instruction Monitoring, assisting, and evaluating effective instruction and practices. Evidence from Direct Observations 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) Clearly communicates effective instructional and assessment practices Each staff member has clear performance expectations aligned with school's goals and expectations for instruction Routines, instructional practices, and learning environments are consistent across classrooms Actively engages grade level and content areas teams in successful planning processes, and continuously monitors process PLCs/Dept./Grade levels are focusing discussions on the instructional framework, best practices, and evidence of student learning Building Leadership team discussions are focused on improved instruction and student learning Principals facilitate professional development on best practices, CCSS and the instructional framework Engages in difficult conversations with below-proficient teachers, helping them improve Monitor levels of performance data over time of both teachers and students Possible Sources of Evidence/Artifacts Professional Development Calendar Staff Development training Agendas/Minutes/PPTs Staff Bulletins, Monday Memos Staff Feedback/Exit slips Staff reflection journals Teacher evaluation documents include goals, evidence of use of the instructional model, specific feedback, teacher reflections Observation/Accountability System Observation Data Teacher work Samples Student achievement data BERC STAR Reports Teacher improvement plans Achievement Data What systems, and/or practices have you put in place to more effectively, monitor and evaluate instruction and assessment practices? How do you assist teachers in using data to inform the development of their student growth plans? When, and how often, do you meet with teachers to monitor progress and adjust plans? Give an example, or share specific effective feedback you have given a staff member that has led to improved instruction and assessment practices. How do you go about gaining knowledge regarding student diversity in your building? How do you use this knowledge to assist staff in using differentiation to improve instruction? Evidence from Direct Observations Criterion Professional Growth Criterion (Goal) # Possible Sources of Evidence/Artifacts Notes, reflections, evidence to share: Date: Monthly Emphasis 6. Managing Resources Managing both staff and fiscal resources to support student achievement and legal responsibilities. Evidence from Direct Observations 1) 2) 3) 4) Staffing focus is on matching staff to specific position expectations Continuously searches for staff with outstanding potential and provides the best placement of both new and existing staff to fully benefit from their strengths School has intensive selection, induction, and mentoring processes for any new staff Counsels out, places on plan of improvement or dismisses some ineffective teachers, following contractual requirements All new teachers and teachers with specific needs are mentored by highly skilled peers Is effective in bringing additional human resources into the school Taps all possible financial resources to support the school's goals and school CIP Budget-ensures the strategic allocation and equitable use of financial resources to maximize student achievement and staff growth Organizes workshops/trainings for both students and staff (e.g. bullying, CPS) to ensure staff and students are knowledgeable of and in full compliance with legal responsibilities Budgets are well-managed and reports are accurate Manages bureaucratic, contractual, and legal issues effectively Possible Sources of Evidence/Artifacts Staffing sheets reflecting reassignments Interview questions/process Evaluation Write-Ups and documents Plans of Improvement List of School Volunteer/tutoring groups VOICE Mentor assignments PTSA Gifts and grants ISF Grants Community Business Partnerships Budget priorities and expenditures Student assemblies-Anti-bullying Staff Training Agendas Master Schedule EA Schedule Resource Room/BEL Schedule Overview of budgeting process and expenditures What systems do you have in place to engage in dialogue with stakeholders to ensure prudent fiscal decisions? What data do you use to make decisions regarding allocation of resources-assignment and hiring, master schedule, and directing funds? What types of professional development opportunities are you providing your staff? How are they linked to your building’s vision and PD plan? What systems do you have in place to ensure that staff are aware of, and upholding appropriate legal standards and expectation? Evidence from Direct Observations Criterion Professional Growth Criterion (Goal) # Possible Sources of Evidence/Artifacts Notes, reflections, evidence to share: Date: Monthly Emphasis 7. Engaging Communities Partnering with the school community to promote student learning. Evidence from Direct Observations Consistent communication between families and school are present Parents are included and invested in the school community Families are actively involved in key student learning demonstrations Structures are in place for family/community voice and participation in the school Makes families/community members feel welcome, listens to their concerns, and are included and invested in the school community (e.g. parent engagement and survey data) Implements processes that empower families/community stakeholders to participate in significant decisions Has consistent communication and ensures teachers have regular channels of communication of their own Possible Sources of Evidence/Artifacts 1) 2) 3) 4) Newsletters, eNews, School Messenger Web site information Parent 9 Characteristics Survey Student-parent conference data PTSA participation PTSA Principal Report Site Council Meeting Agendas/Minutes Parent Education Nights Watchdogs-Parent Volunteers VOICE Mentors Tutoring volunteers Parent Volunteer Logs Business Partnerships Press releases Parent/Principal emails Activity log of school events designed to engage community/parents Booster membership, meeting notes, activities Principal attendance/membership in community group(s) Staff Bulletins, Monday Memos, meeting minutes In reviewing the multi formats you use to communicate with stakeholders, which methods serve as two-way communication tools? Have you elicited feedback from stake holders on the effectiveness of communication conduits? What information can you share and what adjustments have you made based on feedback? What community resources and partnerships are you currently utilizing to support your vision for improving student learning? How are you partnering with families and your community to garner input/feedback, and be part of the vision of improving teaching and learning? Evidence from Direct Observations Criterion Professional Growth Criterion (Goal) # Possible Sources of Evidence/Artifacts Notes, reflections, evidence to share: Date: Monthly Emphasis 8. Closing the Gap Demonstrating commitment to closing the achievement gap. Evidence from Direct Observations 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) Principal leads data analysis training or sessions Teachers lead Professional Development sessions, instructional groups and intervention classes Principal and staff are consistently monitoring student progress The use of research-based instructional practices is evident throughout the school Staff promotes active parent involvement of low performing students Principal and staff create a building schedule and programs that reflect the academic needs of the students Motivates staff to follow up assessments with re-teaching, tutoring, and other interventions Uses data on grades, attendance, behavior and other variables to monitor and drive continuous improvement to reduce achievement gap Boosts morale and a sense of efficacy by getting colleagues to celebrate and own measurable student gains Planning meetings engage in a no-blame, highly productive search for root causes and hypothesis-testing Ensures a welcoming experience for parents, visitors and other stakeholders Is knowledgeable of and responsive to diversity issues in school and community Promotes and models an atmosphere of inclusiveness, equity and respect Possible Sources of Evidence/Artifacts CIP Plan Assessment data – Measure of Student Progress (MSP), High School Proficiency Exam (HSPE), Endo of Course exam (EOC), Benchmark assessments, etc. Surveys of students, parents, staff Documentation of the use of common assessments with reflections from collaborative discussions Data on low performing students Agendas and minutes of meetings where data is shared with instructional staff Progress monitoring of low performing students Schedules that reflect the lowest performing students are assigned to the highest performing teachers Data Reports Master Schedule Intervention placement process/criteria Student Monitoring Processes Individual and group learning plans Homeroom SMART groups Title 1 resources allocation and plans Staff Development Agendas/Minutes Guidance Team/Teachers Support Team Notes What barriers or challenges to closing the gap have you identified in your learning community? What is your plan to communicate/articulate the gaps to your staff in order for them to gain a deep understanding of why these gaps exist? What actions or interventions will you and your staff take to address these gaps? Who have you engaged to support your efforts in closing the gap(s)? What data will you collect, and how will you know, if interventions are effective in closing the gap(s)?