ST. CLOUD STATE UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT OF NURSING SCIENCE
COMPREHENSIVE EVALUATION PLAN
September 2009 to September 2012
Evaluation Element Assessment Method Criteria/Benchmark
Time Frame
Responsible Party
I-A The mission, goals, A comparative analysis of Congruency will be
Curriculum Committee
Fall Semester:
and expected outcomes of respective documents (the demonstrated by identifying Comparison reviewed and
the program are written, program, university's,
unifying threads between adapted every 5 years at
congruent with
COSE & MnSCU mission, the mission, and expected the Fall Program Review
professional nursing
will be reviewed.
outcomes of MnSCU,
Day (PRD) 2010, 2015
standards and guidelines
SCSU, COSE and Nursing and with any U,COSE, or
for the preparation of
Science.
MnSCU changes
nursing professionals.
I-B The mission, goals, Process for selection and Faculty minutes document Fall Semester: Review at Curriculum Committee
and expected outcomes of utilization of standards to discussion and selection of the Fall PRD every 5
the program are reviewed the curriculum will be
nursing standards.
years 2010, 2015 and with
periodically and revised, reviewed.
any U,COSE, or MnSCU
as appropriate, to reflect
changes
professional standards and
guidelines.
I-C The mission, goals,
and expected outcomes of
the program are reviewed
periodically and revised,
as appropriate, to reflect
the needs and
expectations of the
community of interest.
Document1Created by Simones
An evaluation form will
be used to gather input
from the communities of
interest to determine need
to revise the mission or
goals/objectives.
Faculty minutes indicate
discussion and
recommendations regarding
feedback from communities
of interest.
Page 1
Fall Semester: Review
Curriculum Committee
will occur at Fall PRD
Assessment coordinator
every 5 years 2010, 2015
and with any
recommendation from
community of interest.
Recommended changes
will be adopted by the end
of respective semester.
7/12/2016
Documentation
A table demonstrating
congruency will be
included in the CCNE
Self-Study, Faculty
Handbook and Student
Handbook
Outcome
2010 Met
Strategic Plan
The process and rationale 2010 Met
for selecting specific
standards and subsequent
reviews of the standards
are documented in the
Curriculum Committee
minutes
Strategic Plan
Findings, analysis and
2010 Met
recommendations will be
minutes.
1
Evaluation Element Assessment Method Criteria/Benchmark
Exiting students and
alumni will complete the
AACN/EBI nursing
Student Survey.
Questions on learning
outcomes will have a mean
response rate of at least 5on
a 7-point Likert Scale.
Questions on this survey
related to learning
outcomes will be used as
indicators that curriculum
reflects mission, goals,
and expected outcomes.
I-D The roles of the
A list of faculty and
Each full-time nursing
faculty and students in
student membership and faculty member will serve
program governance are participation on SCSU,
on at least one Nursing
clearly defined and enable Nursing Science and
Science Faculty
meaningful participation. related committees will be Organization committee
developed and reviewed to
assure representation and Nursing faculty on SCSU
participation.
committees will be tracked.
Annual review of the Bylaws.
I-E Documents and
publications are accurate.
Any references in
promotional materials to
the program’s offerings,
outcomes,
accreditation/approval
status, academic calendar,
admission policies,
grading policies, degree
completion requirements,
tuition, and fees are
accurate.
Document1Created by Simones
An analysis of the SCSU Information will be clear,
catalog, the Nursing
current, consistent and
Science Student
accurate.
Handbook, the Web site,
course syllabi and
materials in the Student
Application Packet will be
conducted.
Page 2
Time Frame
Responsible Party
Documentation
Outcome
Fall Semester: Results of Assessment Coordinator
the surveys will be
compiled and analyzed at
the Fall PRD.
AACN/EBI student survey 2012 Met
Executive committee
Fall Semester:
The faculty list will be
Committee Chairs
reviewed at the Fall PRD.
Bylaws detail policy &
2012 Met
procedures. A table notes
membership by AY & is
included in Faculty and
Student Handbooks.
Spring Semester:
Student participation on
program committees will
be solicited.
Spring YED: Review of
by-laws
Before printing new
application packets,
SCSU catalog and the
Nursing Science
Handbook.
Website will be reviewed
Fall and Spring and as
necessary.
7/12/2016
Minutes reflect reports &
recommendations.
Committee minutes
document faculty and
student participation in
governance.
Admissions, Progression A summary of findings
2012 Met
and Advising Committee and changes is
documented in committee
Student Service
meeting minutes.
Coordinator
Copies of catalogs
Faculty handbook
Student handbook
Website
Course syllabi
Copies of program
advertising directed at
prospective students
2
Evaluation Element Assessment Method Criteria/Benchmark
I-F. Policies of the parent An analysis of parent
institution and the nursing institution and nursing
program are congruent
program policies to
with and support the
identify assessment
mission, goals, and
policies. Policies may
expected outcomes of the differ from the University.
program: these policies Rationale is provided.
are fair, equitable, and
published and are
reviewed and revised as
necessary to reflect
ongoing improvement.
These policies include,
but are not limited to,
those relative to student
recruitment, admission,
and retention.
II-A The parent
Review the IFO contract
institution and the
language for policies that
program provide and
support teaching,
support an environment scholarship, service and
that encourages faculty practice.
teaching, scholarship,
service and practice in
Review Faculty
keeping with the mission, Accomplishment table
goals, and expected
regarding participation.
outcomes of the program.
Time Frame
Responsible Party
Documentation
Outcome
Congruency will be
reflected in faculty
discussion and minutes.
Comparison reviewed and Admissions, Progression, Official documentation
revised as needed at Fall and Advising Committee from accrediting and
PRD and with any
regulatory agencies.
changes of parent
Curriculum Committee
Copies of current
institution.
affiliation agreements.
NFO
Strategic documents.
Board of Nursing
standards.
Admission criteria
APA minutes
Curriculum minutes
NFO minutes
Marketing brochures
Websites
2012 Met
This year policies will be
reviewed at NFO meeting
Workload, sabbatical,
consultation and research
policies will support faculty
participation in scholarship,
service and practice.
Individual Nursing
Spring Semester:
During the annual Article Faculty
22 review process, faculty
as a whole will
recommend & plan
opportunities for
participation in
scholarship, service and
practice for the next
academic year.
2012 Met in PDRs
IFO contract
language: Article 22
Section D.
NFO minutes
Assessment committee
minutes for procedure.
Faculty Accomplishment
table from PDR
Faculty Handbook
Document1Created by Simones
Page 3
7/12/2016
3
Evaluation Element Assessment Method Criteria/Benchmark
Time Frame
Responsible Party
II-B Fiscal and physical Review of program budget The program will have
Spring YED: Analysis is Resource Committee
resources are sufficient to documents
fiscal resources equal to the conducted
enable the program to
medium level of resources
fulfill the mission, goals,
in other state funded nursing
and expected outcomes
programs.
and are reviewed, revised
and improved as needed.
Review and analyze
ancillary funds used
to support program (e.g.
grants)
NFO for discussion
regarding need for
increased resources.
Grant monies are targeted
toward program
development and
improvement not
operations.
Spring YED minutes
Outcome
2012 See minutes
NFO minutes of grant
reports
Requested resources are
addressed in the budget.
A Resource Manual will Available fiscal resources
identify :1) policies for are allocated according to
developing
program priorities related to
recommendations
mission and
re: allocation of learning goals/objectives.
resource dollars yes ; 2)
available resources
including books, journals
and videos at SCSU Miller
Center and NSL 3)
electronic journal access
nursing journal holdings at
Miller Center ; 4) an
inventory of the Nursing
Learning Lab lab
inventory is in separate
inventory binder and on Zdrive; 5) a
computer/eqip./software
inventory yes
Nursing program resources
will be sufficient
Feedback through
Resource Committee
student representative
Document1Created by Simones
Grant Coordinators
Documentation
Page 4
Resource Committee &
A current resource
Course Coordinators
inventory will be
presented at the Fall PRD NSL coordinator
The Nursing Science
Resource Manual
NSL evaluation
Requests will be solicited
from Course Coordinators
Course Coordinators
for consideration in the
budget cycle.
Nursing Faculty
Organization minutes
Faculty Course
Evaluations will identify
additional resources
needed to support course
Resource Committee
objectives
Department Chair
Spring Semester:
Resource Committee will
present recommendation
& rationale for budget
requests & allocations to
the NFO.
7/12/2016
Committee minutes
Committee minutes
NFO and Resource
Committee minutes
4
Evaluation Element Assessment Method Criteria/Benchmark
II- C. Academic support EBI exit interview
services are sufficient to
ensure quality and are
evaluated on a regular
basis to meet program and
student needs.
Student Course
Evaluations will survey
student satisfaction with
support services.
Time Frame
-no less than 5 on resource Fall Semester:
satisfaction questions based Reported at Fall PRD
on a 7 point Likert scale
Student satisfaction with
academic support services
will receive a mean rating
of no less than a 2.5 on a 5
point Likert Scale.
Senior exit interview
Responsible Party
Assessment Coordinator Fall PRD minutes
Assessment binders
Faculty Course
Course and level
Evaluations will analyze coordinators
student responses for each
course.
Course & Level meeting
minutes.
A summary of the student Course coordinators
input from the previous
year will be given to the
NFO.
NFO minutes.
Recommendations will be Course coordinators
forwarded to respective
departments for review.
Course & Level meeting
minutes
Spring Semester:
Course Evaluations will Course Coordinators
analyze student responses.
II-D. The chief nursing A comparison for
The Chair is academically Before hiring for the
Search Committee
administrator is
congruence between the and experientially qualified position.
academically and
chief nursing
to lead the program and has
experientially qualified administrator's CV & the sufficient time within
During cycle evaluation Dean, College of Science
and is vested with the
position description &
her/his workload to
on PDP and PDR and as & Engineering
authority required to
mission &
efficiently manage the
needed.
accomplish the mission, goals/objectives is
developing programs.
Executive committee
goals and expected
completed.
outcomes. The chief nurse
Evaluate structure of chair
Chair
administrator provides
position within the structure
effective leadership to the
of department, college, and
nursing unit in achieving
university.
its mission, goals, and
expected outcomes.
Document1Created by Simones
Page 5
Documentation
7/12/2016
Outcome
2012 – Reviewed at NFO
and faculty meetings
End of course reports
Search committee
minutes.
Personnel file
2012 Update sent to
AACN and MN Board of
Nursing of the change of
Joyce Simones as Interim
Chair
5
Evaluation Element Assessment Method Criteria/Benchmark
Time Frame
II-E. Faculty members A Faculty
75% of faculty will be full- Spring Semester:
are academically and
Accomplishment Table
time tenured/probationary Faculty analyze and make
experientially qualified will be analyzed to assure faculty.
recommendations
and sufficient in number members are academically
regarding new faculty
to accomplish the mission, and experientially
Article 22 will reflect
member recruitment
goals, and expected
qualified for course
quality faculty.
outcomes of the program. assignments.
Faculty Resource
Table details numbers,
Questionnaire will identify
licensure, credentials,
needs.
rank, tenure status, clinical Faculty workload
requirements, and
assignments will be
continuing education.
assessed each semester.
II-F The faculty roles in Faculty Accomplishment Definitions and standards of Fall Semester:
teaching, scholarship,
Table shows
performance will be
service, and practice are Teaching scholarship,
developed by faculty for
Each faculty member will
identified clearly and are service, practice and
quality and excellence in
address the criteria within
congruent with the
continuing education.
service, practice and
the process detailed in the
mission, goals, and
This information will be scholarship. These will be IFO contract: Article 22.
expected outcomes of the compared to the mission, used by faculty and
program.
and goals/objectives
administrators as targets for
during the evaluation
annual performance review.
process.
Department review of each
faculty’s PDP.
Workload documents.
AACN’s Position Statement
on Scholarship.
Document1Created by Simones
Page 6
7/12/2016
Responsible Party
Documentation
Outcome
2012 – Not Met. One new
probationary faculty hired
Also hired were fixed term
Dean, College of Science Committee minutes
and emergency hires. The
and Engineering
% of Probationary is less
Nursing Faculty
than 75%. This concern is
Individual Faculty
Handbook.
discussed frequently with
Office manager’s Faculty the Dean and Provost
Data Table
Department Chair
Nursing Faculty
Organization minutes
2012 – Met . SeePDRs
Assessment coordinator
Individual faculty
member
Individual faculty
member's professional
development plan.
Dean, College of Science
and Engineering
Personnel files
Nursing Faculty
Organization
6
Evaluation Element Assessment Method Criteria/Benchmark
Time Frame
III -A The curriculum is Review and analyze
developed, implemented, statements of outcome.
and revised to reflect clear Compare them to student
statements of expected
outcome data from
student learning outcomes the Capstone course and
that are consistent with
graduate, alumni and
professional nursing
employer survey results.
standards and guidelines 1-7 Likert scale >5
and congruent with the
1-5 Likert scale >3
program’s mission, goals,
and expected outcomes.
Student outcome data will
Fall Semester:
demonstrate congruence with At the annual Fall PRD,
stated mission, goals and
the mission and
expected outcomes.
goals/objectives will be
reviewed following the
report on the analysis of
the previous summers
alumni, employer
graduate survey results.
III-B. The curriculum is
developed, implemented,
and revised to reflect
professional nursing
standards and guidelines.
These standards and
guidelines are clearly
evident within the
curriculum structure and
expected learning
outcomes.
Course/unit/level
outcomes are consistent
with the roles for which
the program is preparing
its graduates.
1. The baccalaureate
curriculum incorporates
knowledge and skills
identified in The
Essentials of
Baccalaureate Education
for Professional Nursing
Practice (AACN,1998)
The standards and guidelines
within the curriculum will
match the knowledge and
skills in the The Essentials.
Document1Created by Simones
Compare the standards
and guidelines within the
curriculum with The
Essentials.
Page 7
Responsible Party
Curriculum Committee
Faculty Organization
meeting minutes
Outcome
2012 – Met. See minutes
Capstone Course
Assessment Binders
Assessment Coordinator
Capstone summaries
Department chair
Fall PRD every 5 years. Curriculum
2010, 2015 and when
Essentials updated.
The curriculum and
Essentials are compared.
7/12/2016
Documentation
Meeting minutes
2010 - Met
Table of comparison of
Essentials with curriculum
7
Evaluation Element Assessment Method Criteria/Benchmark
Time Frame
III-C The curriculum is
logically structured to
meet expected program
outcomes.
1. The baccalaureate
curriculum builds
upon a foundation
of the arts,
sciences, and
humanities.
Foundational concepts
Foundational courses to the Fall PRD
tracked through the
nursing curriculum will meet As needed
university core courses University core requirements,
that serve as prerequisites will enhance nursing courses
for the nursing curriculum without duplication and will
support the mission and
Meetings with support
goals/objectives of the
course faculty.
University and nursing.
III-D Curriculum and
teaching- learning
practices are evaluated at
regularly scheduled
intervals to foster ongoing
improvement.
Confidential student
course evaluation at the
end of a course will
evaluate theory and
clinical and faculty
teaching-learning
practices.
Document1Created by Simones
Annual course, curriculum
and instructional
refinements are based on
evidence from program
outcome and benchmark
assessment and feedback
from the internal and
external community of
interest. Changes to
strengthen the program are
documented in minutes and
reports.
End of course reports and
PDR to reflect teaching
learning practices – (content
mapping, discussion boards,
debate, role play, computer
assisted, seminar,
simulation, case studies,
problem based learning,
journal clubs)
Page 8
Responsible Party
Curriculum Committee
Course Coordinators
Fall Semester:
Courses are evaluated
following written policies
and procedures.
Documentation
Meeting minutes
Outcome
2012 – New general ed
(LEP) courses tracked.
Curriculum changes to
meet 120 credit cap for
nursing. See minutes
2012 Met
Peer faculty evaluations
Assessment committee for
revisions of forms
Individual PDR
Individual faculty member
Course Coordinator
Faculty Organization
meeting minutes
Curriculum Committee
Curriculum Committee
Reports
7/12/2016
8
Evaluation Element Assessment Method Criteria/Benchmark
III-E The didactic and
clinical teaching-learning
practices and learning
environments support the
achievement of student
learning outcomes.
Remediation data
Review and analyze
student learning
outcomes.
All students will progress
through student learning
outcomes.
Time Frame
Responsible Party
Assessment committee
Spring YED
Documentation
Assessment committee
minutes for forms
Outcome
2012 met
Course coordinators
Capstone Coordinators
Portfolios and projects
Remediation coordinator Remediation report from
NSL coordinator
Plan for success
(remediation)
Graduate, alumni and
employer surveys
Course syllabi for student
learning outcomes
Student Handbook
Document1Created by Simones
Page 9
7/12/2016
9
Evaluation Element Assessment Method Criteria/Benchmark
III-F The curriculum and An evaluation form to
teaching-learning
gather input from internal
practices consider the
and external communities
needs and expectation of of interest to evaluate the
the identified community need to strengthen
of interest.
curriculum
Analysis of data from the
programs internal and
external communities of
interest will be reflected in
the curriculum and teaching
practices.
Time Frame
Department Chair
Fall Semester:
Data analysis and
recommendations will be Course Coordinators
offered at Fall PRD
Analysis of aggregated
results from evaluation
tools that evaluate
individual student
progress in achieving
expected results will be
conducted:
1. Clinical Evaluation
Tool address program
goals/objectives, nursing
standards and nursing
abilities.
2. (HESI) Standardized
exams including:
 HESI entrance
 HESI exit
 HESI Specialty
exams
Document1Created by Simones
Progression through the
curriculum is dependent
upon satisfactory
achievement (as defined by
each level) of required
objectives .
Students meet with
clinical instructor for
formative evaluations as
stated in course syllabi.
1. Student achievement as Curriculum committee
reviews course reports for
noted on the clinical
evaluation tool is a valid and fall and spring semester.
reliable indicator of
expected results will be
successfully demonstrated.
2. Analyzed results evaluate 2. Spring Semester:
HESI results are reviewed,
student achievement in
analyzed, summarized and
meeting expected results,
shared with faculty at
target remediation and
Spring YED
determine areas within
accompanied by
curriculum that need
recommendations related
review/change.
to curriculum.
Page 10
Documentation
Faculty Organization
minutes
Outcome
2012 – Plans to have
nursing advisory meeting
this year.
The Nursing Science
Advisory Committee will Assessment Coordinator Nursing Community
Committee minutes
provide written and verbal
input at meetings. These
will reflect employer
input.
Nursing Committees
IV -A Student
performance is evaluated
by the faculty and reflects
achievement of expected
outcomes. Evaluation
policies and procedures
are defined and
consistently applied.
Responsible Party
7/12/2016
Clinical Course
coordinators
Individual faculty
members
Course Coordinators
Curriculum Committee
Assessment Coordinator
NFO
End of course reports
Course meeting minutes
2012 Met
Curriculum Committee
meeting minutes
Assessment folder on Z:
drive
NFO meeting minutes
HESI folders
10
Evaluation Element Assessment Method Criteria/Benchmark
75% of students will score At completion of each
above the national average. content area.
IV- A
Continued
Document1Created by Simones
Time Frame
3. Benchmark
assignments are designed
using an evaluation rubric
to assess student
performance toward
multiple program
outcomes.
3. Progression through the
curriculum is dependent
upon satisfactory
achievement of required
outcomes as identified on
sequenced activities.
4. Nursing course syllabi
are reviewed to assure
they contain the official
grading policy and the
means of achieving
required points or
behavioral objectives
4. All nursing course syllabi 4. Fall Semester:
include the official
Spring semester course
department's grading policy. syllabi are reviewed
Required assignments and before printing.
the means of achieving
Spring Semester:
required points or behavioral Fall semester course
objectives are published in syllabi are reviewed
each nursing course syllabi. before printing.
Grading policies are applied
consistently and fairly.
5. SCSU Upper division
Writing requirement.
5. All students will
5. Course report from
complete the upper division NURS 403
writing requirement at grade
C or better.
Page 11
Responsible Party
Documentation
Outcome
2012 Met
3. At completion of each
content area
A Report summarizing
results of sequenced
activities is prepared and
presented to Faculty
Organization during the
Spring YED
7/12/2016
11
Evaluation Element Assessment Method Criteria/Benchmark
Time Frame
Responsible Party
Documentation
IV-B Surveys and other 1. Alumni will be
data sources are used to surveyed one year & five
collect information about years post-graduation
student, alumni, and
utilizing the AACN/EBI
employer satisfaction and Nursing Alumni Survey to
demonstrated
assess program outcome.
achievements of
The survey will assess: graduates. Student
graduate' employment
outcome data include, but rates, performance and
are not limited to,
accomplishments.
graduation rates,
NCLEX-RN pass rates,
certification examination
pass rates, and job
placement rates, as
appropriate.
1. In the aggregate, graduates 1. Spring Semester:
1. Assessment
will rate the program at a
Alumni will be surveyed Coordinator
level of 5or greater (based on .
7 point Likert Scale) on
Fall PRD: results of
questions evaluating
NCLEX, the alumni and
satisfaction and attainment employer surveys will be
of program outcomes.
analyzed & reported to
90% of graduates will be
NFO
employed in nursing or
graduate education within
one year of graduation.
At the five year mark: 75%
of returned surveys will
demonstrate
leadership. Alumni will
pursue lifelong learning.
1. Assessment Binder
2. Exiting seniors will be
surveyed using the
AACN/EBI Nursing
Student Survey to assess
graduate nurse placement,
program satisfaction, and
attainment of program
goals/objectives.
2. Seniors will rate the
2. Seniors will surveyed
program at a level of 5 or
in Spring. Results will be 2. Assessment
greater based on a 7 point
analyzed & reported to
Coordinator
Likert Scale on questions
Faculty at the Fall PRD.
evaluating program
satisfaction and attainment of
program outcomes.
25% of graduates will have
graduate nurse positions.
2. Assessment Binder
3. Employers will be
surveyed to assess
graduate
performance. Questions
will address programs’
goals/objectives.
3. In the aggregate,
3. Employers will be
3. Assessment
employers will rate graduates surveyed in the spring and Coordinator
at a level of 2.5 or greater
analyzed results brought
(based on a 5 point Likert
to faculty at the Fall PRD
Scale) on questions
evaluating student outcomes.
3. Meeting minutes.
4. A Senior Portfolio will
be completed by students
to assess attainment of
Department
goals/objectives/student
accomplishments.
4. 100% of graduating
4. Course
seniors will have evidence of
attainment of all Department
goals/objectives.
4. Course Grades
Portfolio
Document1Created by Simones
Page 12
4.Leadership Course
Coordinator
7/12/2016
NFO minutes
Outcome
2012 Employer surveys
need to be discussed as th
participation is too low to
draw any data.
Meeting minutes
12
Evaluation Element Assessment Method Criteria/Benchmark
IV-B
Continued
5. Student
accomplishments will be
recorded to determine
effectiveness in meeting
goals/objectives
Time Frame
Responsible Party
Documentation
Outcome
5. 10% of students will be 5. Annual survey reported 5. Assessment coordinator 5. Assessment folder on Z:
involved in community
at Fall PRD
drive
service, political activity,
and/or professional service
6. Student course
6. Students will rate all
6. At completing of each 6. Course coordinators
evaluations will be used to criteria at a 2.5 or greater on course
assess student satisfaction a 5 point Likert scale.
with nursing courses
7. End of Course
Summary Reports will be
used by faculty to evaluate
how courses lead to
attainment of program
outcomes.
7. 100% of summary reports 7. At completion of each 7. Course coordinators
will report progression to or course
attainment of program
outcomes.
6. Course meeting minutes
Curriculum Committee
Minutes
7. Course meeting minutes
Curriculum committee
minutes
8. Attrition rates will be 8. 80% of graduates will
8. Spring YED:
8. Student Services
identified and analyzed by complete the program within a report of student attrition Advisor Chair
tracking students from
5 consecutive semesters.
will be given to the NFO.
admission through
graduation.
Exit data will be collected
on all exiting students to
track reasons for
withdrawal.
9. Achievement of
9. Program passing rate will 9. Spring YED: NCLEX 9. Assessment coordinator 9. Meeting minutes.
programs goals/outcomes be at or above the National summary
will be analyzed by
Average
NCLEX Summary Binder
reviewing graduate results
on the NCLEX-RN as
NCLEX folder on Z:drive
reported in the NCLEXRN Summary Report
Document1Created by Simones
Page 13
7/12/2016
13
Evaluation Element Assessment Method Criteria/Benchmark
IV-C. Program outcome There is a feedback loop
data are analyzed to
where analysis of data is
provide evidence of
brought back to the
program effectiveness and appropriate committees
are used to foster ongoing and courses and used to
program improvement. improve program
effectiveness.
IV-D Faculty outcomes PDP and PDR that
demonstrate achievement address teaching
of the program’s mission, effectiveness, creative
goals, and expected
achievement or research,
outcomes and enhance
evidence of continuing
program quality and
preparation and study and
effectiveness
service to the university
and community are
reviewed by all faculty.
Time Frame
All changes based on data
Recommendations clearly
identified
Fall PRD
Spring YED
Assessment coordinator
Course Coordinators
Committees
All faculty
Faculty PDR will
demonstrate accomplishment
in teaching, scholarship,
practice and service.
Faculty will be evaluated Dean
according to appointment
type, tenure and the
evaluation schedule
published in Article 22 of Individual faculty
the IFO contract.
members
Aggregate data on faculty Faculty will provide the
Spring: At time of PDR
to identify outcomes
Assessment coordinator with
an annual listing of their
accomplishments, service
and awards through their
PDR.
The Student Evaluation of Faculty will address any
Instructor forms provide a element receiving less than a
confidential process for 2.5 on a 5-point Likert Scale
student feedback on
in their professional
teaching effectiveness in development plan.
the classroom and clinical
setting. Each faculty
member will survey a
minimum of two theory &
clinical courses/year.
Document1Created by Simones
Responsible Party
Page 14
Individual faculty
members
Outcome
Minutes
Year end reports
Assessment binders
2012 – See fall and spring
minutes
PDR
2012 Met
Assessment Committee
minutes for process
IFO Contract
PDR
PDR summary
Assessment Coordinator
to summarize data
Information included in
evaluation process occurs Dean
according to appointment
type, tenure and schedule
as published in Article 22
of IFO contract. Each
Individual faculty
faculty member chooses member
which courses to survey.
7/12/2016
Documentation
PDR
Faculty summary sheets
14
Evaluation Element Assessment Method Criteria/Benchmark
IV-E The program has An annual review of
Students will be afforded a
established policies and confidential input
process to provide
procedures by which it
including student
confidential input including
defines and reviews
complaints and how they complaints, concerns, or
formal complaints;
were addressed.
noted commendations that
analyses of aggregate data
will be used to improve
regarding formal
Summaries of student
program effectiveness.
complaints are used to
feedback included in
foster ongoing program student course evaluations
improvement.
Document1Created by Simones
Page 15
Time Frame
Responsible Party
Fall PRD: The chair will Department Chair
present a summary of
student feedback from the
last two semesters at the
first faculty meeting.
Documentation
Outcome
2012 – reports of formal
complaints reported at
Dept. Chair and year end meetings.
report.
Student Feedback File
Student Handbook
Faculty Organization
minutes
7/12/2016
15